英文摘要
|
This study tried to use "Document Analysis" and aggregate the regulations concerning teachers' supervisory occupational allowances, discussed the appropriateness of "The Table for Payment of Occupational Allowances, for Principals and Public School Teachers who Concurrently Serve in Supervisory Positions", approved by Executive Yuan, from the viewpoints of compensation theory and administrative law. There are three types of teachers given with occupational allowances, such as administrative teachers, homeroom-teachers and those served as a special educator. The former two allowances belong to "Job-Based Pay", which are not related to teacher's professional background and experience. Although the last one allowance belongs to "Job-Based Pay", which is given by means of depending on teacher's professional background. Supervisory occupational allowance of teachers who concurrently serve as administrative section chiefs belongs to "Treat-Pay" and "Job-Based Pay". But current regulations decided and cited "Service Year", which not only violated to the principle of "Equal Pay for Equal Work", but also were contrary to its theoretical basis. The allowances relationship between directors and section chiefs could violate "Equality Principle". In addition, in order to maintain the stability of the administrative structure in the primary and secondary schools, this paper proposed "Seniority Addition System" program to encourage the long term. Lastly, under the premises regarding the balance between treatment theory and the rule of law, seeking the regulative consistence of teachers’ supervisory occupation, this study suggested to abolish "Director-Agency System", supervisory occupational allowances of section chiefs should be fixed. For highlighting principle of "Different Pay for Different Work", compensation system mentioned above could be based on class size of schools and not the individual factor.
|