臺中市實驗教育實施現況、困難與建議之研究

The Experimental Education in Taichung City: Current Situation, Problems and Suggestions

10.3966/160683002017110112010

林彩岫(Tsai-Hsiu Lin)；游自達(Tzu-Ta Yiu)；陳延興(Yen-Hsin Chen)；賴志峰(Chih-Feng Lai)；曾榮華(Jung-Hua Tseng)；李彥儀(Yen-Yi Lee)；林妤蓁(Yu-Chen Lin)

實驗教育 ； 臺中市 ； 教育多元化 ； experimental education ； Taichung City ； pluralization of education

學校行政

112期（2017 / 11 / 16）

208 - 227

繁體中文

本研究之目的在於調查及彙整臺中市實驗教育實施現況及遭遇之問題，並提出解決建議。臺中市現有3所公辦公營實驗學校，1所民辦民營實驗學校，7所實驗教育機構，8個實驗教育團體，312人在家自學。臺中市實驗教育遭遇問題共包含升學就業、師資聘任、學生學籍、行政法規、經費補助、教學場地、教材教法、評鑑等八大類。本研究邀請學者專家、實驗教育實務工作者、主管教育行政機關，進行專家諮詢會議。最後，本研究提出以下的結論：1.實驗教育理念與做法呈現百家爭鳴，面臨各種問題和挑戰；2.各方持續溝通對話與協商，健全實驗教育永續發展；3.實驗教育相關法令有修正之需要；4.實驗教育資源的分配機制，需兼顧選擇教育、私有財、自主性和績效考核等面向；5.以量身訂做的方式，規劃實驗教育評鑑或訪視機制。

This study aims to review the current situation and collect the difficulties with the experimental education conducted in Taichung and offer suggestions for solving those difficulties. There are three experimental schools under public management, one public school under private management, seven experimental education institutions, eight experimental education groups and 312 persons who are taking home schooling. The difficulties with the experimental education in Taichung include the system for student to enter the next grade school, teacher recruitment, student recognized status, administrative regulations, financial support, teaching field, teaching materials and methods and evaluation. This study invites scholars, experts, practical workers in the area of experimental education and educational authorities concerned to attend expert consultations to discuss any relevant issues on conducting experimental education. The conclusion of this study is as follows: 1. there are competing ideas and methods in experimental education and thus comes with various problems; 2. it is significant that all the participants in experimental education keep communicating with one another for the sound and sustainable development of experimental education; 3. it is necessary to amend and revise experimental education regulations; 4. the distribution of the resources of experimental education should consider the dimensions of non-compulsory education, private good, autonomy and accountability; 5. tailoring alternative evaluation and review system to experimental education.

1. 李嘉年(2016)。實驗教育三法後台灣另類學校發展初探。學校行政，103，1-13。
   連結：
2. 臺中市政府新聞局（2016）。中市實驗教育研發中心揭牌成立 林市長：推動實驗教育快速前進。取自http://www.taichung.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=1768218&ctNode=1272&mp=112010
3. CERI(Ed.)(2008).Innovating to learn, learning to innovate.Paris:OECD.
4. Dunn, M. A.(1997).The evaluation of alternative schools in research and practice.Annual Meeting of the Virginia Educational Research Association
5. Nagata, Y.(2007).Alternative education: Global perspectives relevant to the Asia-Pacific region.Dordrecht, Netherlands:Springer.
6. 王如哲(2017)。從國際觀點剖析實驗教育的發展趨勢。臺灣教育雙月刊，704，12-18。
7. 秦夢群、温子欣、莊俊儒(2017)。實驗教育之特色及對現行教育之啟示。臺灣教育雙月刊，704，2-11。
8. 張淑芳(2017)。實驗教育理念實踐與辦學經營的另類思維。臺灣教育雙月刊，704，19-21。
9. 張淑芳(2005)。博士論文(博士論文)。國立台灣師範大學教育學系。
10. 陳麗珠(2014)。教育財政制度與改革。臺北市:心理。

1. 曾煥淦(Huan-Kan Tseng);謝傳崇(Chuan-Chung Hsieh)(2021)。實驗教育學校校長轉化型課程領導之研究。教育研究與發展期刊。17(4)。1-31。