题名

教師對國中學生應具備的數位公民看法之研究-以桃竹苗四縣市為例

并列篇名

A Study of Teacher's Expectations of Digital Citizenship among Junior High School Students: Examples from Taoyuan, Hsinchu, and Miaoli

DOI

10.6423/HHHC.201809_(117).0005

作者

夏菁穗(CHING-SUEY SHIA)

关键词

數位公民 ; 國中教育人員 ; digital citizenship ; secondary School educators

期刊名称

學校行政

卷期/出版年月

117期(2018 / 09 / 16)

页次

127 - 158

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究採調查研究法,旨在探討國中教育人員心目中學生所應具備之「數位公民素養」,並分析不同背景教師觀點的異同處。希望透過教學第一線教師們的意見,從實務角度審視數位公民教育的現狀。研究以桃竹苗四縣市公立國民中學為研究範圍,抽取40所國民中學及770位國中教育人員為研究對象進行問卷調查,有效樣本為706位教育人員,有效樣本回收率91.69%。本研究使用的工具為研究者自編之「國中生應具備之數位公民素養調查問卷」。資料處理採用的統計分析方法,包括探索性因素分析、信度分析、描述統計、t考驗、單因子變異數分析等進行分析。本研究獲得以下結論:一、國中教育人員認為學生應具備之數位公民素養,「數位素養」、「數位禮儀」與「數位健康與幸福感」層面相對較高,而認為「數位交易」、「數位溝通」與「數位權利與責任」層面的重要性相對較低。二、不同背景變項的國民中學教育人員對學生所應具備之數位公民素養,部分有所差異存在。三、課程安排建議以融入式為佳,又數位公民教育與目前國中公民科課程相關性大,同時兼具跨學科的特性。本研究依據上述研究結論提出具體建議,供學校、政府教育單位及後續研究者參考。

英文摘要

This study uses survey research to investigate teacher's expectations of digital citizen-ship literacy (DCL) among junior high school students. Furthermore, the purpose was to analyze the similarities and differences in the views about DCL held by teachers from different backgrounds. This report utilizes teachers' perspectives and took practical views to examine the status of digital citizenship education at the junior high school level in Taiwan. The measurement used was the "Digital citizenship literacy Questionnaire" developed for this study, the questionnaire survey was conducted, and a random sampling was conducted on a total of 770 educators of 40 junior high School in Hsinchu, Taoyuan, and, Miaoli. 706 questionnaires were totally collected and the response rate was 91.69%. The data was analyzed using explorative factor analysis, reliability analysis, t-test, and One-way ANOVA. According to the findings of the study, the research results of the study are as follows: 1) The importance of the digital citizenship that secondary School educators take for: the "Digital literacy", "Digital etiquette", "Digital health and wellness" are higher than "Digital commerce", "Digital communication", "Digital rights and responsibilites". 2) Secondary school educators with diverse backgrounds showed differences in their perceptions of the digital citizenship literacy of secondary school students. 3) In addition, it should be included in the current curriculum and can be taught across different subjects although it has the most relevance within the subject of Civil Ethics. Based on the study results, the specific proposal is put forward to school administrators, educational authorities as well as for future studies.

主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 白秀玲(2010)。國中資優生完美主義與負向情緒模式之建構研究。特殊教育研究學刊,35(2),103-133。
    連結:
  2. Alberta Education Foundation(2012).Digital Citizenship Policy Development Guide.
  3. Bandura, A.(2004).Health promotion by social cognitive means.Health Education & Behavior,31,143-164.
  4. Belanger, R. E.,Akre, C.,Berchtold, A.,Michaud, P.(2011).A U-Shaped association between intensity of internet use and adolescent health.Pediatrics,127,e330-e335.
  5. Beran, T.,Li, Q.(2007).The relationship between cyberbullying and school bullying.Journal of Student Wellbeing,1(2),15-33.
  6. Berkowitz, A. D. (2004). The social norms approach: Theory, research, and annotated bibliography. Retrieved from http://www.alanberkowitz.com/article's social-norms.pdf
  7. Choi, M.,Glassman, M.,Cristol, D.(2017).What it means to be a citizen in the internet age: Development of a reliable and valid digital citizenship scale.Computers & education,107,100-112.
  8. Collier, A.(2009).A better safety net: It's Time to Get Smart about Online Safety.School Library Journal,55(11),36-38.
  9. Dillinger, A.(2015).University of Central Missouri.
  10. Eastin, M. S.(2005).Teen Internet use: Relating social perceptions and cognitive models to behavior.Cyber Psychology & Behavior,8(1),62-75.
  11. Fertman, C. I.,Primack, C.,Primack, B. A.(2009).Elementary student self efficacy scale development and validation focused on student learning, peer relations, and resisting drug use.Journal of Drug Education,39(1),23-38.
  12. International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2016). ISTE Standards Students. Retrieved December 16, 2016, from http://www.iste.org/docs/pdfs/20-14ISTEPDF.pdf
  13. Isman, A.,Canan-Gungoren, O.C.(2014).Digital Citizenship.The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology,13(1),73-77.
  14. Jones, L. M.,Mitchell, K. J.(2016).Defining and measuring youth digital citizenship.New media & society,18(9),2063-2079.
  15. Koltay, T.(2011).The Media and the literacies: Media literacy, information literacy, digital literacy.Media, Culture & Society,33(2),211-221.
  16. Lamb, A.(2010).Everyone does it: Teaching ethical use of social technology.Knowledge Quest,39(1),62-67.
  17. Lindsey, L.(2015).Arizona State University.
  18. Lyons, R.(2012).Walden University.
  19. Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2015). The fourth Masterplan for ICT in Education (mp4). Retrieved September 1, 2016, from http://ictconnection.moe.edu.sg/ masterplan-4
  20. Mossberger, K.,Tolbert, C.J.,McNeal, R.S.(2011).Digital Citizenship: The internet, Society, and Participation.Cambridge, Massachusetts:The MIT Press.
  21. NetSafe's (2010). Digital citizenship in New Zealand schools overview. Retrieved September 13, 2016, from https://www.netsafe.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Digital_Citizenship_in_New_Zealand_Schools_Overview.pdf
  22. Nigam, H., & Collier, A. (2010). Youth safety on a living Internet: Report of the Online Safety and Technology Working Group. Retrieved from http://www.ntia.doc.gov/report2010/youth-safety-living-internet
  23. Ohler, J.(2011).Digital citizenship means character education for the digital age.Kappa Delta Pi Record,48(1),25-27.
  24. Oxley, C.(2011).Digital citizenship: Developing an ethical and responsible online culture.Access,25(3),5-9.
  25. Perkins, H. W.,Berkowitz, A. D.(1986).Perceiving the community norms of alcohol use among students: Some research implications for campus alcohol education programming.International Journal of the Addictions,21,961-976.
  26. Perkins, H.W.,Craig, D.W.,Perkins, J.M.(2011).Using social norms to reduce bullying: Aresearch intervention among adolescents in five middle schools.Group Processes & Intergroup Relations,14(5),703-722.
  27. Ribble, M.(2015).Digital Citizenship in Schools.Arlington, Virginia:ISTE.
  28. Ribble, M.,Bailey, G.(2007).Digital Citizenship in Schools.Washington, DC:ISTE.
  29. Searson, M.,Hancock, M.,Soheil, N.,Shepherd, G.(2015).Digital citizenship within global contexts.Education and Information Technologies,20(4),729-741.
  30. Siegle, D.(2010).Cyberbully and sexting: Technology abuses of the 21st century.Gifted Child Today,32(2),14-16.
  31. Suppo, C. A.(2013).Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
  32. Willard, N.E. (2006). A Briefing for Educators: Online Social Networking Communities and outh Risk. Center for Safe and Responsible Internet Use, Eugene, OR. Retrieved from http://csriu.org/documents/ docs/youthriskonlinealert.pdf
  33. 何振珮,朱正一(2012)。國中生網路成癮傾向與身心健康、學業成績之相關性研究。志為護理,11(5),58-68。
  34. 吳亞琪(2010)。台東市,國立臺東大學。
  35. 吳明隆(2007).SPSS操作與應用變異數分析實務.臺北:五南.
  36. 兒童福利聯盟文教基金會(2016)。2016年台灣兒少網路霸凌經驗調查報告。兒童福利聯盟文教基金會,未出版。
  37. 林宜隆,楊鴻正(2001)。網路交易犯罪之偵查要領—以網路詐欺犯罪為例。Journal of Information, Technology and Society,135-150。
  38. 香港教育局(2015)。第四個資訊教育科技策略報告《發揮IT 潛能釋放學習能量》。取自http://ite4.fwg.hk:8080/ite4/Chin/content/files/ITE4/report_CHI.pdf。
  39. 高熏芳(編)(2013).數位原生的學習與教學.台北:高等教育.
  40. 教育部(2016)。2016‒2020資訊教育總藍圖。民國105年6月19日,取自http://depart.moe.edu.tw/2016-2020資訊教育總藍圖(草案).pdf
  41. 教育部(2013)。教育部提升國民素養專案計畫報告書。民國104年3月15日,取自http://literacytw .naer edu.tw/教育部提升國民素養專案計畫報告書.pdf
  42. 陳佩珮(2011)。台北市,國立台灣師範大學。
  43. 陳怡君(2011)。台北市,國立台灣師範大學。
  44. 陳怡吟(2010)。台北市,國立台灣師範大學。
  45. 黃奕閔,歐陽誾(2009)。國小六年級學生網路禮儀態度與行為現況之調查研究。第十三屆全球華人計算機教育應用大會(GCCCE2009)
  46. 盧俊哲(2012)。臺北市,國立臺灣師範大學。
  47. 謝龍卿(2012)。彰化市,國立彰化師範大學。
  48. 蘇怡如(2005)。新竹市,國立交通大學。