校長領導的整合性觀點：多元架構取向分析

The Integrative Perspective of Principal Leadership Styles: An Multi-Frame Orientation Approach

10.6423/HHHC.201907_(122).0001

曾文鑑(Wun-Jian Tseng)

校長領導 ； 領導整合 ； 多元架構取向 ； principal leadership ； integrative leadership ； multi-frame orientation

學校行政

122期（2019 / 07 / 16）

3 - 19

繁體中文

校長領導的整合性觀點從多元架構取向分析論述見樹又見林的校長領導，以結構化領導架構、人資化領導架構、政治化領導架構、象徵化領導架構及教育化領導架構為其視角，希冀校長領導學校發展時，以一種更多元、更兼容並蓄的觀點，以不同領導型態的多元途徑來調整自身的領導角色，使校長更有能力面對越發複雜的教育生態，發揮領導效能，引領學校持續進步與成長。並且以重構及釋意的觀點，提出對五種架構的再詮釋，以引發校長領導的「創造性蛻變」。

This study adopted an integrative approach to explore principal leadership from the perspective of multi-frame orientation. Based on the proposed five dimensions of leadership styles, namely, structural leadership, human resource leadership, politicized leadership, symbolic leadership, and educational leadership, it is hoped that principals will lead the development of schools with a more diverse and inclusive vision, make use of the various leadership styles to establish their leadership roles, so that the principals become more capable of dealing with increasingly complex educational ecology, and to give full play to great leadership that leads to the continuous improvement and growth of schools. The study redefines the five dimensions of principal leadership effectiveness in order to initiate a ＂creative metamorphosis＂ in principals and their leadership styles.

1. 陳成宏(2014)。「亂流理論」與「多元架構領導」在學校領導與變革的整合運用。教育實踐與研究，27(2)，167-196。
   連結：
2. Ball, S. J.(1987).The micro-politics of the school: towards a theory of school organization.London:Methuen.
3. Bass, B. M.(1990).Bass & Stogdill’s handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications.New York:Free Press.
4. Bolman, L. G.,Deal, T. E.(1991).Leadership and management effectiveness: A multi-frame, multi sector analysis.Human Resource Management,30,509-534.
5. Bolman, L. G.,Deal, T. E.(2008).Reframing organizations.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
6. Bolman, L. G.,Deal, T. E.(1997).Reframing Organizations.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
7. Bolman, L. G.,Deal, T. E.(1992).Leading and managing: Effects of context, culture, and gender.Educational Administration Quarterly,28(3),314-329.
8. Bush, T.(2003).Educational leadership and management.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
9. Day, C.,Harris, A.,Hadfield, M.(2001).Challenging the orthodoxy of effective school leadership.International Journal of Leadership in Education,4(1),39-56.
10. Denis, J. L.,Langley, A.,Sergi, V.(2012).Leadership in the plural.Academy of Management Annals,6(1),211-283.
11. Drucker, P. F.(1995).Managing in a time of great change.Oxford:Butterworth Heinemann.
12. Foucault, M.(1978).The history of sexuality: An introduction.New York:Vintage Books.
13. Fullan, M.(2001).The new meaning of educational change.NY:Teachers College Press.
14. Gamson,W.A.,Croteau, D.,Hoynes, W.,Sasson, T.(1992).Media Images and the Social Construction of Reality.Annual Review of Sociology,18,373-393.
15. Goffman, E.(1974).Frame analysis: A essay on the organization of experience.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
16. Goleman, D.(2000).Leadership that gets results.Harvard Business Review,78-90.
17. Hallinger, P.(2011).Leadership for learning: lessons from 40 years of empirical research.Journal of Educational Administration,49(2),125-142.
18. Hoch, J. E.,Kozlowski, S. W. J.(2014).Leading virtual teams: Hierarchical leadership, structural supports, and shared team leadership.Journal of Applied Psychology,99(3),390-403.
19. Morgan, G.(1997).Images of organizations.Newbury Park, CA:Sage Publications.
20. Murphy, J.(Ed.),Louis, K. S.(Ed.)(1999).Handbook of research on educational administration.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass Publishers.
21. Murphy, J.(Ed.),Louis, K. Seashore(Ed.)(1999).Handbook of Research on Educational Administration.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
22. Orlikowski, W. J.,Gash, D. C.(1994).Technological frames: Making sense of information Technology in organizations.ACM Transactions on Information Systems,12(2),121-134.
23. Quinn, R. E.(1988).Beyond rational management: Mastering the paradoxes and Competing demands of high performance.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
24. Retallick, J.,Fink, D.(2002).Framing leadership: Contributions and impediments to educational change.International Journal of Leadership in Education,5(2),91-104.
25. Senge, P. M.(1990).The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization.New York:Doubleday.
26. Sergiovanni, T. J.(1984).Leadership and excellence in schooling.Educational Leadership,41(5),4-13.
27. Shriberg, A.,Shriberg, D.L.,Kumari, R.(2005).Practicing leadership. Principles and applications.New Jersey:John Wiley & Sons.
28. Sullivan, L. G.(2001).Four generations of community college leadership.Community College Journal Research and Practice,25,559-571.
29. Tichy, N. M.,Cohen, E. B.(1997).The Leadership Engine : How Winning Companies Build Leaders at Every Level.New York:Haper Collins.
30. Weick, K. E.(1996).Prepare your organization to fight fire.Harvard Business Review,74(3),143-148.
31. 吳明烈(1997)。邁向共同的願景：學習組織。成人教育，38，45-52。
32. 吳明清(2006)。學校領導的整合架構。臺灣教育，642，2-55。
33. 吳清山(1997)。學習型組織理論及其對教育革新的啟示。國教月刊教育行政，43，1-7。
34. 林天佑(1988)。教導型組織─創造教育永續成功的發動機。教育資料與研究，23，61-64。
35. 秦夢群(2006).教育行政.台北:五南.
36. 張君玫（譯）,Turner, Jonathan H.(1996).社會學─概念與應用.台北:巨流.
37. 張慶勳(2002)。台灣小學組織文化之型塑與領導策略研究─以台灣南部地區六所小學為例。香港教育研究學會二零零二年國際研討會─全球化：教育變革新領域，香港:
38. 陳明和,郭靜芳(2004)。符號互動論與學校組織文化。屏東師院學報，20，65-104。
39. 陳寶山(2005).學校行政理念與實踐.台北:冠學.
40. 曾文鑑(2009)。台北市，國立台北教育大學。
41. 臧國仁(1999).新聞媒體與消息來源─媒介架構與真實建構之論述.台北:三民.
42. 蔡進雄(2006)。從組織多元分析架構論學校組織再造。研習資訊，23(2)，83-88。
43. 鄭燕祥(2003).教育領導與改革：新範式.台北:高等教育.

1. 廖珮妏(2022)。從分散式領導角色探討大學社會責任形塑個案科大特色亮點之創新組織特性研究。修平學報，43，165-193。
2. (2020)。校長領導形塑素養導向校園文化：學校組織微觀政治觀點。教育研究月刊，313，47-63。
3. (2024)。特教學校校長多元架構領導與教師工作滿意度關係之研究。學校行政，149，73-98。