尋找校園學生主體性－人權教育與十二年國教之素養導向學習與教學

Seeking the Lost Subjectivity of Students in Taiwan's Schools-Human Rights Education and Competency-oriented Learning and Teaching of the 12-year Basic Education Curriculum Guidelines

10.6423/HHHC.201909_(123).0003

林佳範(Chia-Fan Lin)

人權教育 ； 學生主體性 ； 學習權 ； 終身學習者核心素養 ； Human Rights Education ； Subjectivity of Students ； The Right to Learn ； Essential Competencies of A Lifelong Learner

學校行政

123期（2019 / 09 / 16）

36 - 53

繁體中文

本文以尋找校園學生主體性為主題，先從人權保障之觀點，闡明學生主體性的意涵，釐清學生主體性的保障，不僅是法律面之學生權利主體而已，更在於校園中成為學習的主體，才是真正地從受教權到學習權保障的實踐；再者，十二年國教之素養導向學習與教學，正好服膺學習權之意涵，尊重學生作為學習的主體，以培養學生之學習素養為目標，而成為自發、互動、共好的終身學習者；此外，人權教育作為價值教育，無法以強制或灌輸之方式，而重視學生的主體性，使其心動而真心認同人權價值才可能行動；最後，人權教育的實施，在十二年國教之課綱下，在學校彈性課程中以專題或重視學生提問之人權議題融入領域之方式，且在教室中之教學，教師能引導以學習社群之模式，透過互為主體的公共審議方式，來實踐與發展學生的主體性，且較符合課綱學習素養導向之要求。

The subjectivity of students in campus is being lost in Taiwan's schools. In terms of the right to learn, the subjectivity of students is expected to be realized not only in legal terms but also in educational terms, to the effect that students are within educational relationship as the subjectivity of learning rather than the objectivity of teaching. In the 12-year Basic Education Curriculum Guidelines, the emphasis of the essential competencies as a lifelong learner is consistent with the idea of the right to learn, both of which regard the subjectivity of students as an important factor in teaching and learning. In addition, human rights education is not just teaching about human rights, but also exercising human rights. To enhance the subjectivity of students in terms of human rights education and the essential competencies of a lifelong learner, it is suggested that teachers in classrooms regarding students as partners in learning communities. To sum up, respecting the subjectivity of students is required in terms of education, in general, and of human rights education in particular.

1. 林佳範(2016)。價值衝突與價值教學─以人權教育為例。課程與教學季刊，19(4)，113-130。
   連結：
2. Adami, R.(2014).Re-thinking relations in human rights education: The politics of narratives.Journal of Philosophy of Education,48(2),293-307.
3. Cranston, J.,Janzen, M. D.(2017).A Critical approach to teaching about, through, and for human rights.The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning,8(3)
4. Curren, R.(Ed.)(2007).Philosophy of education: An anthology.Malden, MA:Blackwell Publishing Ltd..
5. Fischer, F.(2018).Learning communities and  scaffolding: Three different ways to  conceptualizing their relationship.Instructional Science,46,633-637.
6. Gordon, J.(2018).Learner agency: At the confluence between rights‐based approaches and well‐being.European Journal of Educaiton,53(3)
7. Hicks, D.(1997).Conflict resolution and human rights education: Broadening the agenda.Human rights education for twenty first century,Philadelphia, PA:
8. IGIE (2013). Review of the initial reports of the government of Taiwan on the implementation of the international human rights covenants concluding observations and recommendations adopted by the international group of independent experts. Retrieved from http://www.humanrights.moj.gov.tw/cp-468-31488-75b0f-200.html.
9. Magendzo, A. K.,Pavez, J. E.(2017).A perspective of controversy in human rights education: A curricular proposition.Prospects,47,17-29.
10. Meintjes, G.(1997).Human rights education as empowerment: reflections on pedagogy.Human rights education for twenty first century,Philadelphia, PA:
11. OHCHR,UNESCO(2017).World program for human rights education-third phaseplan of Action.New York, NY:United Nations.
12. OHCHR,UNESCO(2006).World program for human rights education-first phase plan of action.New York, NY:United Nations.
13. OHCHR,UNESCO(2012).Human rights education in primary and secondary school systems: A Self-assessment guide for governments.New York, NY:United Nations.
14. Rinaldi, S.(2017).Challenges for  human rights education in  Swiss secondary schools from  a  teacher perspective.Prospects,47,87-100.
15. Robinson, C.(2017).Translating human rights principles into classroom practices: Inequities in educating about human rights.The Curriculum Journal,28(1),123-136.
16. UNESCO(1985).Declaration on the recognition of the right to learn at the fourth international conference on adult education.Paris, France:UNESCO.
17. UNESCO(1972).Learning to be-the world of education today and tomorrow.Paris, France:UNESCO.
18. UNICEF,UNESCO(2007).A human rights-based approach to education for all: a framework for the realization of children’s right to education and rights within education.New York, NY:UN Children’s Fund.
19. Zembylas, M.,Charalambous, P.,Charalambous, C.,Lesta, S.(2017).Toward a critical hermeneutical approach of human rights education: universal ideals, contextual realities and teachers’ difficulties.Journal of Curriculum Studies,49(4),497-517.
20. 佐藤學,黃郁倫（譯）,鐘啟泉（譯）(2012).學習的革命.臺北市:天下.
21. 周志宏(2003).教育法與教育改革.臺北市:高等教育.
22. 國家教育研究院(2014)。國家教育研究院（2014）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱Q&A。臺北市：國家教育研究院。
23. 教育部（2014）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。臺北市：教育部。
24. 許育典(2002).法治國與教育行政.臺北市:高等教育.
25. 楊巧玲(2001)。教育基本法中有關受教權與學習權規定評析。教育政策論壇，4(2)，1-24。
26. 聯合國兒童權利委員會（2001）。兒童權利公約一般性意見第 1號「第29條第1款：教育目標」。取自https://crc.sfaa.gov.tw/crc_front/index.php?action=content&uuid=5344af55-d148-4dd6-946a-412af8f41afc。
27. 聯合國兒童權利委員會（2003）。兒童權利公約一般性意見第5號「執行《兒童權利公約》（第4、42和44條第6款）的一般措施」。取自https://crc.sfaa.gov.tw/crc_front/index.php?action=content&uuid=5344af55-d148-4dd6-946a412af8f41afc。
28. 聯合國兒童權利委員會（ 2009 ）。兒童權利公約一般性意見第12號「兒童表達意見的權利」。取自https://crc.sfaa.gov.tw/crc_front/index.php?action=content&uuid=5344af55-d148-4dd6-946a-412af8f41afc。

1. 林純雯(2021)。幼兒園家長資訊通信科技知能對其電子化校務參與動機之影響：以審議信念與領導支持為中介。課程與教學，24(4)，167-198。
2. (2021)。新課綱核心概念再探。教育研究月刊，324，4-17。