英文摘要
|
The purpose of this article was to investigate how the school administrative leadership supports marine education, and explore which may cause some educational problems. It also proposed the solutions from different aspects of problems, includes education administration authorities, schools, establish consensus, educational funds and resources, making good use of excellent leadership, principals authorize authority and duty, promoting administrators professional knowledge and conservation, the willing of teachers to participate in the further study, the solution to the problems of marine education, constant evaluation and exploration, and solving related problems. In order to solve the problems of marine education completely, flourish the marine education, enhance performance of marine education, and make students know, love and get close to the ocean more to make them have an adaptive development.
|
参考文献
|
-
黃富揚(2019)。臺中市,國立臺中教育大學教育研究所。
連結:
-
葉子超(2019)。澎湖縣國民中小學教育問題與解決之道。學校行政雙月刊,120,141-155。
連結:
-
Berg, J. H.,Carver, C. L.,Mangin, M. M.(2014).Teacher leader model standards: Implications for preparation, policy, and practice.Journal of Research on Leadership Education,9(2),195-217.
-
Glatthorn, A. A.(2000).The principal as curriculum leader: Shaping what is taught and tested.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin.
-
Gleick(1987).Chaos: Making A New Science.New York:Penguin.
-
Green, R. L.(2017).Practicing the art of leadership: A problem-based approach to implementing the professional standards for educational leaders.Boston, MA:Pearson.
-
Hawthorne, R. D.,McConnell, J. R.(1995).The principal and curriculum leadership.People and Education,3(1),111-122.
-
Henderson, J. G.,Hawthorne, E. D.(2000).Transformative curriculum leadership.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
-
Hoy, W. K.,Miskel C. G.(1996).Educational Administration: Theory, Research, and Practice.New York:McGraw-Hill.
-
Kiel, D. L.(1989).Nonequilibrium Theory and It’s Implication for Public Administration.Public Administrative Review,Nov-Dec
-
Seltzer, J.,Bass, B. M.(1990).Transformational Leadership: Beyond Initiation and Consideration.Journal of Management,16
-
Sergiovanni, T. J.(1992).Moral leadership:Getting to the heart of school improvement.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
-
Stogdill, R.(1963).Manual for the Leader Behavior Description Questionair-Form XII.Columbus, Ohio:Bureau of Business Research, College of commerce and Administration.
-
Stogdill, R.(ed.),Coons, A.(ed.)(1957).Leader Behavior: Its Description and Measurement.Columbus:Ohio State University.
-
Worchel, S.,Shebilske, W.(1995).Psychology: Principle and Application.Englewood Cliff, NJ:Prentice Hall.
-
Yukl, G. A.(1994).Leadership in Organization.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
-
王家通(編)(1995).教育導論.高雄:麗文文化公司.
-
吳定(編)(1994).行政學.台北:國立空中大學.
-
吳清基(1989).教育與行政.台北:師大書苑.
-
吳靖國,李秀卿(2005)。國民小學海洋教育之教科書版本比較—以藝術與人文領域為例。海洋文化學刊,1,201-236。
-
范雪凌(1999)。高雄市,國立中山大學教育研究所。
-
徐毓謙(2010)。屏東縣,國立屏東教育大學教育研究所。
-
秦夢群(2002)。校長培育制度的重新建構:典範的變遷與爭辯。中小學校長培育證照甄選評鑑與專業發展研討會論文集,台北:
-
秦夢群(1997).教育行政—理論實務部分.台北:五南圖書出版公司.
-
張文權,范熾文(2018)。凝聚學校共責的新力量:教師績效責任領導之實踐分析。教育政策論壇,21(3),143-180。
-
教育部(2007).海洋教育政策白皮書.台北:教育部.
-
陳國棟(2006)。海洋人文教育芻議。教育資料與研究,70,99-104。
-
陳銘賢(2009)。屏東縣,國立屏東教育大學教育研究所。
-
陳慧玲(2011)。台北市,國立台北教育大學教育研究所。
-
黃嘉郁(1999)。高雄市,國立中山大學教育研究所。
-
楊玉梅(2006)。基隆市,國立臺灣海洋大學教育研究所。
-
楊麗美(2008)。屏東縣,國立屏東教育大學教育研究所。
-
葉子超(1999)。國民教育領導問題及其解決之道探討。教育部人文及社會學科教育指導委員會—教學通訊雙月刊,9(5),121-128。
-
蔡因吉(2002)。臺中市,臺中師範學院教育研究所。
-
蔡錦玲(2006)。臺灣海洋教育藍圖。教育資料與研究,70,1-10。
-
聯合國教科文組織(1988)。聯合國教科文組織海洋科學報告第52號聯合國教科文組織海洋科學報告第52號,未出版
-
謝文全(2003).教育行政學.台北市:高等教育文化事業有限公司.
-
鍾國南,李展榮,方力行(2003).海洋教育的方向,海洋永續經營.台北:胡氏圖書.
-
羅虞村(1989).領導理論研究.台北:文景書局.
|