题名

校長科技領導的組織學習模式與學校效能關係之研究

并列篇名

The Relationship Between Organizational Learning Model of Principals' Technology Leadership and School Effectiveness

DOI

10.6423/HHHC.202005_(127).0002

作者

許晉榮(Ching-Jung Hsu);林朝清(Chao-Ching Lin)

关键词

校長科技領導 ; 組織學習模式 ; 系統思考 ; 學校願景 ; 學校效能 ; principals' technology leadership ; organizational learning model ; system thinking ; school vision ; school effectiveness

期刊名称

學校行政

卷期/出版年月

127期(2020 / 05 / 16)

页次

12 - 42

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

科技領導是重要的領導議題,因此本研究旨在探討「臺中市立國民中學校長科技領導的組織學習模式與學校效能關係之研究」,採問卷調查法,抽取臺中市18所市立國民中學435位國中教師為樣本,蒐集的資料以t考驗、單因子變異數分析、Pearson相關、多元迴歸分析等統計方法進行分析與處理。本研究的結果發現:1.臺中市立國民中學學校願景認同程度、系統思考、校長科技領導與學校效能彼此間具有顯著正相關。2.臺中市立國民中學校長科技領導對學校願景認同程度、系統思考與學校效能具有影響力。3.臺中市立國民中學系統思考對學校願景認同程度與學校效能具有影響力。

英文摘要

Technology leadership is an important leadership issue. The purpose of this research is to explore the impact of the current situations of the 3-in-1 Organizational Learning Model (3-in-1 OLM), including school vision, system thinking and principals' technology leadership, and its relation to school efficiency of the public junior high schools in Taichung City, and to analyze the differences between them according to their variables. This study tried to explore the relationships between the school vision, system thinking, principals' technology leadership, and school effectiveness. This research explores some issues about the relations between organizational learning model and school effectiveness; Questionnaire survey method was adopted. 435 teachers from 18 municipal junior high schools in Taichung City were surveyed. The collected data were analyzed by various statistical methods including t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson correlation and the multiple regression analysis. These conclusions were summarized below. 1. There were high positive correlations between school vision, system thinking, principals' technology leadership and school effectiveness of the public junior high schools in Taichung City. 2. principals' technology leadership had influence on system thinking, school vision and school effectiveness of the public junior high schools in Taichung City. 3. The system thinking had influence on school vision and school effectiveness of the public junior high schools in Taichung City.

主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 張奕華,張敏章(2010)。台北縣國民小學校長科技領導對學校效能影響之研究。學校行政,66,30-50。
    連結:
  2. 陳佑全,唐順明,陳美菁,黃國賢(2012)。虛擬組織資訊科技發展架構影響績效之研究。journal of e-business,14(2),353-382。
    連結:
  3. 蔡東鐘,黃曉筠(2011)。國小教師對校長科技領導表現觀點之調查研究──以臺東縣為例。教學科技與媒體,98,2-15。
    連結:
  4. Altinay, F.,Dagli, D.,Altinay, Z.(2016).The role of information technology in becominglearning organization.12th International Conference on Application of Fuzzy Systems and Soft Computing,Vienna, Austria:
  5. Argyris, C.,Schon, D. A.(1978).Organizational learning: a theory of action perspective.Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
  6. Averweg, U. R.(2010).Enabling role of an intranet to augment e-coaching.Industrial and Commercial Training,42(1),47-52.
  7. Barry, R.(1997).The Thinking Systems: How Can We Make It Easier to Master?.The System Thinker,8(2),1-5.
  8. Barth(1990).Improving Schools from Within: teachers, parents and principals can make the difference.San Francison, California:Jossey-Bass.
  9. Beare, T.(2001).Creating the future school.New York:John Wiley & Sons.
  10. Bierly, P. E.,Hamalainen, T.(1995).Organizational learning and strategy.Scandinavian Journal of Management,11(3),209-224.
  11. Brookover, W. B.,Lezotte, L. W.(1979).Changes in School Characteristics Coincident with Changes in Student Achievement.East Lansing:Michigan State University, College of Urban Development.
  12. Cameron, K.(1978).Measuring Organizational effectiveness in institutions of higher education.Administration Science Quartely,23,604-629.
  13. Chonko, L.B,Dubinsky, A.J,Jones, E.,Roberts, J.A.(2003).Organizational and individual learning in the sales force: an agenda for sales research.Journal of Business Research,56(12),935-946.
  14. Clampitt, P.G.,Downs, C.W.(1993).Employee Perceptions of the Relationship between Communication and Productivity: A Field Study.Journal of Bussiness Communication,30(1)
  15. Collinson, V.,Cook, T. F.,Conley, S.(2006).Organizational Learning in Schools and School Systems: Improving Learning, Teaching, and Leading.Theory Into Practice,45(2)
  16. Daft, R. L.(2001).Organization Theory and Design.Mason:South-Western College.
  17. Davis, G. A.,Thomas, M. A.(1989).Effective schools and effective teachers.Boston:
  18. Dawson, C.,Rakes, G.(2003).The influence of principals technology training on the integration of technology into schools.Journal of Research on Technology in Education,36(1),29-49.
  19. Dodgson, M.(1993).Organizational learning: A review of some literatures.Organizational Science,14(3),375-394.
  20. Driver, M.(2003).Improving group learning through electronically facilitated skillful discussions.The Learning Organization,10(5),283-293.
  21. Fiol, M. C.,Lyles, M. A.(1985).Organizational learning.Academy of Management Review,10,7-8.
  22. Flanagan, L.,Jacobsen, M.(2003).Technology leadership for the twenty-first century principal.Journal of Educational Administration,41(2)
  23. Forrester, Jay W.(1994).System dynamics, systems thinking, and soft OR.System Dynamics Review,10(2-3),245-256.
  24. Frederick, J. M.(1987).Measuring School Effectiveness: Guidelines from Educational Practitioners.N.J.:Educational Teseing Service.
  25. Gherardi, S.,Nicolini, D.(2000).The organizational learning of safely in communities of practice.Journal of management inquiry,9(3/4),7-18.
  26. Goh, S. C.(1998).Toward a learning organization: the strategic building blocks.S.A.M Advanced Management Journal,63(2),19.
  27. Greer, T.(1998).Understanding Intranets, A division of Microsoft Corporation.Redmond, Washington:Microsoft Press.
  28. Guns, B.(1998).The faster learning organization-Gain and sustain the competitive advantage.San Francisco:Jossey Bass Inc..
  29. Hanson, E. M.(2003).Educational Administration and Organizational Behavior.Boston:Pearson Education.
  30. Harvey, Michael,Palmer, Jonathan,Speier, Cheri(1998).Implementing intra-organizational learning: A phased-model approach supported by Intranet technology.European Management Journal,16(3),341-354.
  31. Hatch, N. W.,Dyer, J. H.(2004).Human capital and learning as a source of sustainable competitive advantage.Strategic Management Journal,25,1155-1178.
  32. Heijden, K. V.(2004).Can internally generated futures accelerate organizational learning.Futures,36(2),145-159.
  33. Hoy, W. K.,Miskel, C. G.(2000).Educational admini stration:theory, reseach, and practice.New York:Random House.
  34. Huang, Echo,Hsu, M-H.,Yen, Y.R.(2007).Resourceful virtual communities and revisit Intention.The 6th WSEAS International Conference on E-Activities,Spain:
  35. Hult, G. T. M.,Ferrell, O. C.,Hurley, R. F.(2002).Global organizational learning effects on cycle time performance.Journal of Business Research,55(5),377-387.
  36. ISTE (2002a). Nat ional Educa tional Technology Standards for Administrators 2002. Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/Libraries/PDFs/NETS _for_Administrators_2002_EN.sflb.ashx
  37. ISTE. (2009a). Nat ional Educa tional Technology Standards for Administrators 2009. Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/Libraries/PDFs/NETS _for_Administrators_2009_EN.sflb.ashx
  38. Keasley, G.,Lynch, W.(1994).Educational Technology Leadeship Perspectives.Englewoood Cliffs, NJ:Educational Technology Publications.
  39. Kim, D. H.(1993).The link between individual and organizational learning.Sloan Management Review,Fall,37-50.
  40. Kurland, H.,Peretz, H.,Hertz-Lazarowitz, R.(2010).Leadership style and organizational learning: the mediate effect of school vision.Journal of Educational Administration,48(1),7-30.
  41. Leithwood, K.,Louis, K. S.(1998).Organizational learning schools.Netherlands:Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers.
  42. M. Sammons, P.,Hillman, J.,Mortimore, P.(1995).Key Characteristics of Effective Schools: A review of school effectiveness research.Institute of Education for the Office for Standards in Education.
  43. Madaus, G. F.,Airasian, P.,Kellaghan, T.(1980).School effevtiveness – A reassessment of the evidence.New York:McGraw- Hill.
  44. Marquardt, M. J.(1996).Building the learning organization: A system approach to quantum improvement and global success.New York:Mcgraw- Hill.
  45. Marston, S.,Li, Z.,Bandyopadhyay, S.,Zhang, J,Ghalsasi, A.(2011).Cloud computing-the business perspective.decision support systems,51(1),176-189.
  46. Michael, A.,Armando, F.,Rean, G.,Joseph, A. D.,Randy, K.,Andy, K.,Gunho, L.,David, P.,Ariel, R.,Ion, S.,Matei, Z.(2009).,未出版
  47. Miller, M.,McDonald, S.(1997).Building the Corporate Intranet.Boston:
  48. Nanus, B.(1992).Visionary leadership.San Francisco, California:Jossey-Bass.
  49. Newell, R. J.,Van-Ryzin, M. J.(2007).Growing hope as a determinant of school effectiveness.Phi Delta Kappan,88(6),465-471.
  50. Perelman, K. J.(1984).The learning enterprise : Adult learning, human capotal, an deconomic development.Washington, D. C:Council of State Planing Agencies.
  51. Pincus, J. D.(1984).Univ of Maryland.
  52. Popper, M.,Lipshitz, R.(2000).Organizational learning: mechanicms, culture, and feasibility.Management Learning,31(2),181-196.
  53. Ragupathi, K.(2012).Teaching Computational Thinking using Cloud Computing.Technology in Pedagogy,8
  54. Redding, J. C.,Catalanello, R. F.(1994).Strategic readiness: the making of the Learning organization.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  55. Reid, K.,Hopkins, D.,Holly, P.(1987).Towards the Effective School: The Problems and Some Solutions.Oxford, UK:Basil Blackwell.
  56. Reynolds, D.,Teddlie, C.(2000).The international handbook of school effectiveness research.New York:Falmer Press.
  57. Robbins, S. P.(1996).Organizaitonal Behavior: Concepts, Controversies and Applications.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
  58. Ruiz-Mrcader, J.,Merono-Cerdan, L. A.,Sabater-Sanchez, R.(2006).Information technology and learning: Their relationship and impact on organizational performance in small businesses.International Journal of Information Management,26(1),16-29.
  59. Senge, P.(1990).The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization.New York:Doubleday.
  60. Senge, P. M.(1994).Learning to Alter Mental Models.Executive excellence,11(3),16-28.
  61. Shahin, A.,Zeinali, Z.(2010).Developing a Matrix Framework for the Relationship between Organizational Learning and Innovativeness.International Journal of Business and Management,5(7)
  62. Slater, S. F.,Narver, J. C.(1995).Market Orientation and the Learning Organization.Journal of Marketing,59(3),63-73.
  63. Slick, S.(2002).Teachers are enthusiastic participants in a learning community.Clearning Houe,75(4),198-203.
  64. Stata, R.(1989).Organizational Learning: The Key To Management Innovation.Sloan Management Review,Spring,63-74.
  65. Storck, J.,Hill, P. A.(2000).Knowledge diffusion through strategic communities.Sloan Management Review,41(2),63-74.
  66. Swerning, J.,Wierdsma, A.(1992).Becoming a learning organization-beyond the learning curve.Wesley Publishing Company Inc..
  67. Torres, R. T.,Preskill, H.(2001).Evaluation and organizational learning: Past, present, and future.American Journal of Evaluation,22(3),387-395.
  68. Valdez, G.(2004).Technology leadership: Enhancing positive educational change. Retrieved November 15, 2015, from http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/educatrs/ leadership /le700.htm
  69. Wallace, R. C. J.,Engel, D. E.,Mooney, J. E.(1997).The learning school: A guide to vision-based leadership.Thousands Oaks, CA:Corwin Press.
  70. Watkins, K. E,Marsick, V. J.(1993).Sculpting the learning organization.San Francisco:Jossey- Bass Publishers.
  71. Webster, M. D.(2017).Philosophy of technology assumptions in educational technology leadership.Educational Technology & Society,20(1),25-36.
  72. Zollo, M.,Winter, S. G.(2002).Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities.Organization Science,13(3),339-351.
  73. 中華民國成人教育學會(編)(1999).學習型組織.台北市:師大書苑.
  74. 江志正(2000)。高雄市,國立高雄師範大學教育學系。
  75. 吳育綺(2006)。高雄市,國立高雄師範大學人力與知識管理研究所。
  76. 吳明烈(2008)。組織學習的發展趨勢與變革策略之探究。教育政策論壇,11(4),90-123。
  77. 吳明烈(編)(2004).組織學習與學習型學校.台北市:高等教育.
  78. 吳明雄(2001)。台中市,國立中師範學院國民教育研究所。
  79. 吳清山(2007).教育行政新議題研究.台北:高等教育.
  80. 吳清山(1998).教育革新研究.台北市:師大書苑.
  81. 吳清山(2005).學校行政研究.台北:高等教育.
  82. 吳清山(1998).學校效能研究.台北:五南.
  83. 吳清山(1992).學校效能研究.台北市:五南圖書出版有限公司.
  84. 吳清山(1997)。學習型組織理論及其對教育革新的啟示。國教月刊,43(5/6),1-7。
  85. 巫柏青(1997)。台南市,國立成功大學企業管理研究所。
  86. 李元墩,藍俊偉(1999)。企業主管領導風格、員工溝通滿足水準及員工生產力關係之研究──台灣電子業之實證。陸軍軍官學校七十五週年校慶綜合學術研討會
  87. 李幸(2001)。高雄市,國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士班。
  88. 林保良(2003)。嘉義縣,國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所。
  89. 邱玉梅(2013)。台北市,國立台北教育大學。
  90. 邱昭良(譯),劉昕(譯),Sherwood, Dennis(2004).系統思考.北京:機械工業出版社.
  91. 施富薇(2004)。台中市,國立台中師院國民教育研究所。
  92. 紀文章(1997)。Intranet應用的組織面與管理面。網路通訊雜誌,75,112-117。
  93. 張宏毅(2002)。台北市,國立台北教育大學國民教育研究所。
  94. 張卓浩(1996)。企業Intranet建構實例──中國生產力中心。網路通訊雜誌,65,56-58。
  95. 張坤宏(2016)。屏東,國立屏東大學教育行政研究所。
  96. 張明輝(1999)。營造學習型學校。教育資料與研究,27,1-7。
  97. 張奕華(2010).校長科技領導─模式指標與應用.台北市:洪葉文化.
  98. 張奕華,吳怡佳(2011)。國民小學校長科技領導、知識管理與學校效能結構關係之驗證。教育行政與評鑑學刊,11,1-28。
  99. 張奕華,許正妹(2009)。校長科技領導對教師資訊科技素養影響路徑之研究:以都會型國民小學為例。初等教育學刊,33,1-32。
  100. 張奕華,蔡瑞倫(2007)。國民中學校長科技領導與學校效能關係之研究。學校行政,65,33-53。
  101. 張盈霏(2006)。台北市,國立政治大學。
  102. 張德銳(1995).台北縣教育改革經驗.高雄市:復文書局.
  103. 教育部(編)(2001).學校願景:發展、實踐、檢討與展望實例.台北市:教育部.
  104. 莊立民(1995)。高雄市,高雄工學院管理科學研究所。
  105. 郭進隆(譯),Senge, P.(2003).第五項修鍊:學習型組織的藝術與實務.台北:天下文化.
  106. 郭進隆(譯),齊若蘭(譯),Senge, P. M.(2010).第五項修練:學習型組織的藝術與實務.臺北市:天下文化.
  107. 陳玉娟(2000)。花蓮,國立東華大學國際企業理研究所。
  108. 陳春蓮(2007)。高雄市,高雄師範大學成人教育研究所。
  109. 湯昶洪(2003)。台北市,國立北師範學院國民教育研究所。
  110. 童宜慧,張基成(1998)。運用企業內網路(Intranet)促進組織學習之初探。遠距教育,9,30-35。
  111. 黃振球(1992).績優學校.台北:師大書苑.
  112. 葉連祺(2003)。科技領導。教育研究,112,151-152。
  113. 齊若蘭(譯),Senge, P.(2003).第五項修鍊II實踐篇──共創學習新經驗(上).台北:天下文化.
  114. 歐用生(1998).教師專業成長.台北:師大書苑.
  115. 潘慧玲(1999)。學校效能相關概念的釐析。教育研究資訊,7(5),138-153。
  116. 蔡淑敏(2001)。臺南縣,長榮管理學院經營管理研究所。
  117. 蔡進雄(2001).學校行政領導.台北市:師大書苑.
  118. 謝勝宇(2007)。高雄市,國立中山大學教育研究所。
  119. 謝寶煖(2003)。謝寶煖(2003)。量化研究與統計分析課程講義。台北市。
  120. 韓佩玉(2015)。屏東市,國立屏東大學。
  121. 簡惠閔,高家斌(2007)。提升學校效能之具體策略。教育資料與研究雙月刊,79,155-168。
  122. 魏惠娟(2002).學習型學校──從概念到實踐.台北:五南.
  123. 魏惠娟(1998)。學習型組織的基礎──系統思考及其應用。中華民國終生學習年─國際終生學習學術研討會論文集,臺北市:
  124. 羅聰欽(2016)。彰化,國立彰化師範大學工業教育與技術學系。