幼教師「空間與圖形」課程實施之探討

A Study of Kindergarten Teachers Implement Curriculum of ＂Space and Shape＂

10.6423/HHHC.202009_(129).0007

陳埩淑(Ching-Shu Chen)

幼教師 ； 空間與圖形 ； 課程實施 ； kindergarten teachers ； space and shape ； curriculum implementation

學校行政

129期（2020 / 09 / 16）

115 - 140

繁體中文

本研究探討幼教師是否忠實的實施全園訂定的「空間與圖形課程」？「空間與圖形課程」強調以遊戲及操作提供幼兒學習數學的機會。研究對象為一所附設幼兒園三個班級的六位幼教師，本研究以教師實施的「課」為單位，透過個案觀察和訪談蒐集資料，並分析幼教師空間與圖形教學與「課程」之間的一致性。經由資料分析發現教師實施課程時，偏向忠實的實施「課程」，傳遞數學內容因「課程」提供有系統的幼兒數學知識及教學方法。又因教師為因應情境及學習者需求，會調整課程活動，或創新教學改變課程。研究結果發現在實施課程「量」的方面，教師大部分遵照課程規定進行教學，但在質的方面，發現教師會超越幼兒認知發展，而加深數學知識教學。顯示，課程實施是一個複雜且多面向的過程，研究結果將進一步討論。

The purpose of research was to explore kindergarten teachers implemented curriculum of space and shape which was based on hand-on and play model for young children that provided learning opportunities. This analysis targeted the ways that teachers used the particulars of the curriculum to design instruction then taught. Applying case study was to understand implementation of curriculum of three classroom of kindergarten teachers. Data collection used observation and interview with each lesson as unit analysis to determine the consistency with curriculum of space and shape. Through data analysis, it was found that when teachers implement the curriculum, they tended to implement the ＂Curriculum＂ faithfully, and passed the mathematics content, because the ＂Curriculum＂ provided systematic children's mathematical knowledge and teaching methods. In addition, teachers would adjust curriculum activities or innovate teaching to change the curriculum in response to the situation and the needs of learners. The results indicated that in implementing the ＂quantity＂ of the curriculum, most of the teachers follow the curriculum regulations in teaching. But in qualitative terms, it is found that teachers would go beyond the cognitive development of children and deepened the teaching of mathematics. Obviously, teachers implemented the curriculum was a complex and multifaceted process, and the research results will be discussed further.

1. 徐偉民(2011)。數學課程實施─一位國小資深教師的個案研究。科學教育學刊，19(2)，101-122。
   連結：
2. 徐偉民(2013)。國小教師數學教科書使用之初探。科學教育學刊，21(1)，25-48。
   連結：
3. Ball. D. L.(1990).The mathematical understandings that prospective teachers vring to teacher education.The Elementary School Journal,90(4),449-467.
4. Ben-Peretz, M.(1990).The teacher-curriculum encounter: Freeing teachers from the tyranny of texts.Albany:State University New York Press.
5. Brown, M. W.(2002).Evanston, Illinois,Northwestern University.
6. Brown, S.,Pitvorec, K.,Ditto, C,Kelso, C.R.(2009).Reconceiving Fidelity of Implementation: An investigation of elementary whole-number lessons.Journal for Research in Mathematical Education,40(3),363-395.
7. Chin, C.(1995).England,University of Cambridge.
8. English, Lyn D.(Ed.)(2002).Handbook of international research in mathematics education.YJ:Lawrence Erlbaun Associates.
9. Freudenthal, H.(1973).Mathematics as an Educational Task.Dordrecht:Kluwer.
10. Fullan, M.,Pomfret, A.(1977).Research on curriculum and instruction implementation.Review of Educational Research,47(1),335-397.
11. Gravemeijer, K.(2004).Local instruction theories as a means of support for teachers in reform mathematics education.Mathematical Thinking and Learning,6(2),105-128.
12. Grouws, D. A.(Ed.)(1992).Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning.New York:Macmillan.
13. Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. V.,Buys, K.(2005).Young children learn measurement and geometry.Utrecht:Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University/SLO.
14. Huntley, M. A.(2009).A brief Report-Measure curriculum implementation.Journal for Research in Mathematical Education,40(3),355-362.
15. Lester, F. K., Jr.(Ed.)(2007).Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning.Charlotte, NC:Information Age Publishing.
16. Lester, Frank K., Jr.(Ed.)(2007).Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and learning.VA:National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
17. Lifter, K.,Foster-Sanda, S.,Arzamarski, C.,Briesch, J.,McClure, E.(2011).Overview of play: Its uses and importance in early intervention/early childhood special education.Infants and Young Children,24(3),225-245.
18. Lin, F. L.(Ed.),Cooney, T.(Ed.)(2001).Making sense of mathematics teacher education.London:Kluwer Academic.
19. Lloyd, G.M.(2008).Curriculum use while learning to teach: One student teacher’s appropriation of mathematics curriculum materials.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,39(1),63-94.
20. McLaughlin, M.,Mitra, D.(2001).Theory-based change and change-based theory: Going deeper, going broader.Journal of Educational Change,2,301-323.
21. Mullis, I. V. S.,Martin, M. O.,Gonzalez, E. J.,Chrostowski, S. J.(2004).TIMSS2003 International Mathematics Report: Findings from IEA’s Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the Fourth and Eighth Grades.Chestnut Hill, MA:Boston College.
22. Remillard, Herbel-Eisenmann,Lloyd, G. M.(2012).Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction.NY:Routledge.
23. Remillard, J. T.(2005).Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curriculum.Review of Educational Research,75,211-246.
24. Remillard, J. T.(1999).Curriculum materials in mathematics education reform: A framework for examining teachers’ curriculum development.Curriculum Inquiry,29(3),315-342.
25. Remillard, J. T.(Ed.),Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A.(Ed.),Lloyd, G. M.(Ed.)(2008).Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction.New York:Routledge.
26. Shawer, S. F.(2010).Classroom-level curriculum development: EFL teachers as curriculum-developers,curriculum-makers and curriculum-transmitters.Teaching and Teacher Education,26,173-184.
27. Sherin, M. G., & Drake, C. (2004). Identifying pattern in teachers’s use of a reform-based elementary mathematics curriculum. Retrieved May, 17, 2014, from http://www.gse.upenn.edu/~janiner/pdf/Sherin.drake.curricmodels.pdf
28. Simon, M.,Tzur, R.,Heinz, K.,Kinzel, M(2004).Explicating a mechanism for conceptual learning: Elaborating the construct of reflective abstraction.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,35,305-329.
29. Tarr, J. E.,Reys, R. E.,Reys, B. J.,Chavez, O.,Shih, J.,Osterlind, S. J.(2008).The impact of middle grades mathematics curricula and the classroom learning environment on student achievement.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,39,247-280.
30. Wittrock, M. C.(Ed.)(1986).Handbook of research on teaching.New York:Macmillan.
31. 張善政(1998)。課程實施程度的測量。教育學報，26(1)，149-170。
32. 教育部（2017）。幼兒園教保活動課程大綱。台北：教育部。
33. 梁淑坤(2011)。數學課程改革下綱要實施之相關研究。台灣數學教師電子期刊，28，1-20。
34. 盧美貴,江麗莉,陳伯璋(2003)。教育部國教司專案報告教育部國教司專案報告,未出版
35. 蕭蕙雯(2000)。台東市，國立台東幼兒教育研究所。