题名

21世紀能力發展之理念與規劃

并列篇名

The Ideas and Planning of 21st Century Competences Development

DOI

10.6423/HHHC.202203_(138).0007

作者

于承平(Cheng-Ping Yu)

关键词

21世紀能力 ； 技能 ； 芬蘭 ； 核心素養 ； 素養 ； 21st century competences ； skills ； Finland ； core competences ； literacy

期刊名称

學校行政

卷期/出版年月

138期（2022 / 03 / 16）

页次

150 - 178

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

面對由物聯網、數位化工廠、雲端服務、通訊等技術緊密結合所形成「智慧製造」之工業4.0趨勢，每個人都將花費更多時間在社交及情緒技能、創造力、高階認知等能力，因為具備這些21世紀能力，也才能不斷更新、升級及精深技能，進而達到國家終身學習目的，本文爰就該項政策予以探討。另為聚焦及明確凸顯問題分析重點，本研究藉由文獻分析及文件分析法進行探討，首先釐清素養之意涵，繼之探討不同國家及地區發展當代社會生活所需之21世紀能力政策發展脈絡及內涵，又因臺灣規劃實施基本教育課程綱要與芬蘭有若干相近之處，爰探討芬蘭核心課程之21世紀能力規劃；最後則是統整分析提出臺灣核心素養內涵探討及反思，作為臺灣推動相關政策參考。
英文摘要

In response to the industry 4.0 trend of ＂smart manufacturing＂, formed by the close integration of technologies such as the Internet of Things, digitalized factories, cloud services, and communications. Everyone will spend more time on social and emotional skills, creativity, higher-level cognitive skills, and so on. Because of these 21st century competences, everyone must constantly update, upgrade and deepen their skills to achieve the goal of national lifelong learning. This study discusses this policy. In addition, in order to focus and clearly highlight the key points of problem analysis, this study uses literature analysis and the method of document analysis to investigate. First of all, clarify the meaning of literacy, then explore the 21st century competences policy development context and connotation of the development of contemporary social life in different countries and regions, also because the directions for curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education is similar to Finland, that we explore its core curriculum of the 21st century competences. Finally, the integration analysis puts forward the discussion and reflection of Taiwan's core competences connotation, as Taiwan's promotion of relevant policy reference.
主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 林碧珍,鄭章華,陳姿靜(2016)。數學素養導向的任務設計與教學實踐－以發展學童的數學論證為例。教科書研究，9(1)，109-134。
    連結：
  2. 張建妤,華葳(2012)。數學成就表現與閱讀理解的關係：以 TIMSS 2003 數學試題與 PIRLS 2006 閱讀成就測驗為工具。教育心理學報，44(1)，95-116。
    連結：
  3. 陳素琴(2013)。創業精神與大學發展。教育研究與發展期刊，9(3)，87-114。
    連結：
  4. 單文經(2020)。在十二年國教課綱「總綱」中遇見杜威。當代教育研究季刊，28(2)，1-29。
    連結：
  5. 蘇意雯,陳政宏,王淑明,王美娟(2015)。幾何文本閱讀理解的實作研究。臺灣數學教育期刊，2(2)，25-51。
    連結：
  6. Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC). (2020, February, 12). APEC Education Strategy 2016-2030: Competences Innovation Employability. Retrieved from http://mddb.apec.org/Documents/2020/HRDWG/EDNET-PREP/20_hrdwg_ednet_prep_005.pdf.
  7. Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC). (2019). APEC 2018 Report on Education and Economic Development. Retrieved 2021.5.11 from https://www.apec.org/-/media/APEC/Publications/2019/11/APEC-2018-Report-on-Education-and-Economic-Development/219_HRD_APEC-2018-Report-on-Education-and-Economic-Development.pdf.
  8. Cedefop(2020).National qualifications frameworks developments in Europe 2019. Qualifications frameworks: transparency and added value for end users.Luxembourg:Publications Office.
  9. Cedefop (2019). Finland: European inventory on NQF 2019. Retrieved 2021.1.29 from https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/files/finland_-_european_inventory_on_nqf_2018.pdf
  10. Chu, S. K. W.,Reynolds, R. B.,Tavares, N. J.,Notari, M.,Lee, C. E. Y.(2017).21st Century Skills Development Through Inquiry-Based Learning: From Theory to Practice.Science+Business Media Singapore, Springer.
  11. Cyprus Pedagogical Institute. (2016). Transversal Skills—What are the transversal Skills? Retrieved 2021.1.29 from https://resources.ats2020.eu/transversal-skills.
  12. ELE Finland (2017). Road to 21st Century Competences. Retrieved 2021.1.25 from http://ele.fi/assets/evaluation_framework_microsoft_final.pdf.
  13. European Union. (EU). (2017).Developing Key Competences for all throughout life. Retrieved 2021.2.22 from https://ec.europa.eu/education/sites/default/files/docu-ment-library-docs/factsheet-key-competences-lifelong-learning_en.pdf.
  14. European Union. (EU). (2019). Key Competences for Lifelong Learning. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved 2021.2.22 from https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/297a33c8-a1f3-11e9-9d01-01aa75ed71a1/language-en.
  15. Eurydice (2020a). Finland: Teaching and Learning in General Upper Secondary Education. Retrieved 2021.1.29 from https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-policies/eurydice/content/teaching-and-learning-general-upper-secondary-education-15_en.
  16. Eurydice (2020b). Finland: Teaching and Learning in Vocational and Technical Upper Secondary Education. Retrieved 2021.1.29 from https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/nation-al-policies/eurydice/content/teaching-and-learning-vocational-and-technical-upper-secondary-education_en.
  17. Finnish National Agency for Education & Ministry of Education and Culture. (FNAE & MEC). (2018). Report on the referencing of the Finnish National Qualifications Framework to the European Qualifications Framework and the Framework for Qualifications of the European Higher Education Area . Retrieved 2021.2.22 from https://www.oph.fi/sites/default/files/documents/190482_report_on_the_referenc-ing_of_the_finnish_national_qualifications_framework.pdf.
  18. Global Entrepreneurship Research Association=GERA(2021).2020/2021 Global Report.London:London Business School, Global Entrepreneurship Research Association.
  19. Ito, Hiroshi(2013).Literacy for All: A Neglected “EFA” Goal?.Journal of International Education and Leadership,3(3),1-13.
  20. Karlsson, P. (2017). Teacher’s Perspectives on the National Core Curriculum of Basic Education 2016. Helsinki, Finland: Aalto University. Retrieved 2021.2.2 from https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/bitstream/handle/123456789/27182/master_Karlsson_Paula_2017.pdf.
  21. Keane, T. & Blicblau, A. S. (2012). (Trans)Formation through educational technologies. Retrieved 2021.2.22 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289721143_Trans_Formation_through_educational_technologies.
  22. Mawas, E.N.& Muntean, C.H. (2018). Support Lifelong Learning Through Development of 21ST Century Skills. Retrieved 2021.2.7 from http://www.newtonproject.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/EDULEARN_2018_NEM.pdf.
  23. McKinsey Global Institute (MGI). (2018). Skill Shift: Automation and The Future of The Workforce. Retrieved 2021.5.12 from https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/industries/public%20and%20social%20sector/our%20insights/skill%20shift%20automation%20and%20the%20future%20of%20the%20workforce/mgi-skill-shift-automation-and-future-of-the-workforce-may-2018.pdf.
  24. McKinsey Global Institute(MGI). (2017). Job Lost, Job Gained: Workforce Transitions in a Time of Automation. Retrieved 2021.5.12 from https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Industries/Public%20and%20Social%20Sector/Our%20Insights/What%20the%20future%20of%20work%20will%20mean%20for%20jobs%20skills%20and%20wages/MGI-Jobs-Lost-Jobs-Gained-Executive-summary-December-6-2017.pdf.
  25. OECD iLibrary. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume III) :Chapter 11. Students’ life sat-isfaction and meaning in life. Retrieved 2021.5.12 from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/c414e291-en/index.html?itemId=/content/component/c414e291-en.
  26. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2018.5.4). The Future of Education and Skills: Education 2030.Retrieved 2021.5.23 from https://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030%20Position%20Paper%20(05.04.2018).pdf.
  27. Pollari, P.,Salo, O.-P.,Koski, K.(2018).In Teachers We Trust – the Finnish Way to Teach and Learn.i.e.: inquiry in education,10(1)
  28. Roozenbeek J,Schneider CR,Dryhurst S,Kerr, J,Freeman, ALJ,Recchia, G,van der Bles, AM,van der Linden, S.(2020).Susceptibility to misinformation about COVID-19 around the world.Royal Society Open Science,7(10),1-15.
  29. Spradlin, D.（2012 年 9 月 1 日）. Are You Solving the Right Problem? 哈佛商業評論全球繁體中文版。查詢日期：2021 年 7 月 9 日，取自 https://www.hbrtaiwan.com/article_content_AR0002112.html。
  30. Tan, J. P. L.,Choo, S. S. L.,Kang, T.,Liem, G. A. D.(2017).Educating for twenty-first century competencies and future-ready learners: Research perspectives from Singapore.Asia Pacific Journal of Education,37(4),425-436.
  31. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2009). United Nations Literacy Decade: International Strategy Framework for Action. Retrieved 2021.5.23 from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000184023.
  32. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2021). Literacy. Retrieved 2021.5.23 from https://en.unesco.org/themes/literacy.
  33. World Economic Forum (WEF). (2015). New Vision for Education—Unlocking the Potential of Technology. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum. Retrieved 2021.5.23 from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEFUSA_NewVisionforEducation_Report2015.pdf.
  34. 田孟心(2019)。與臺灣一樣推「素養教改」─芬蘭怎麼做？。天下雜誌，685，86-88。
  35. 朱啟華,Tavares, Nicole,蕭勵中,周志堅,何洵怡,蔡國滔(2010).探究式學習教師手冊：小五常識科專題研習及英文科協同寫作.Hong Kong:Quality Education Fund.
  36. 柯華葳(2013)。閱讀是新世紀必要的學習管道。人文與社會科學簡訊，14(4)，4-11。
  37. 洪碧霞(2021).PISA2018 臺灣學生的表現.新北市:心理出版社.
  38. 教育部（2021）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。新北市：國家教育研究院。
  39. 郭重吉(2016)。中小學科學教育推展的挑戰與機會。科學研習月刊，55(11)，2-6。
  40. 陳海泓(2016)。社會領域教師和圖書教師高層次協作教學對國民小學六年級學生主題探究學習的影響以及學生的回應。圖書資訊學研究，10(2)，87-132。
  41. 陳珮英(2018)。跨領域素養導向課程設計工作坊之構思與實踐。課程研究，13(2)，21-42。
  42. 黃正筠(2016)。復原力教育的困境與展望。臺灣教育評論月刊，5(6)，233-235。
  43. 劉湘瑤,張俊彥(2018)。論自然科學課程綱要中的「素養」內涵。科學教育月刊，413，2-9。
print cancel