臺灣國中小、高中教師的班級經營狀況－基於TALIS 2018調查結果分析

Primary and Secondary School Teachers' Classroom Management in Taiwan: Based on TALIS2018 Survey

10.6423/HHHC.202207_(140).0003

甘火花(Huo-Hua Gan)

班級經營 ； 班級管理 ； 教與學國際調查 ； TALIS ； classroom management ； classroom management ； teaching and learning international survey ； TALIS

學校行政

140期（2022 / 07 / 16）

53 - 83

繁體中文

研究旨在透過TALIS2018教師問卷調查數據，採次級資料分析法從班級經營師培課程與在職培訓、班級經營樣態、自我效能探討臺灣國中小、高中教師的班級經營狀況。分析結果表明，臺灣各級教師的班級經營狀況呈現如下態勢：1.各級教師接受班級經營師培課程與在職培訓的比例高且差距小，班級經營的職前教師教育和在職進修具有很大優勢；2.國中教師知覺的班級經營師培課程準備度最高，高中教師知覺的準備度最低，國小教師知覺的需求度最高；3.各級教師班級經營行為頻率相似，由高到低為告訴遵守課堂規則－聽我講話－快點安靜－安撫學生，但高年級教師比低年級教師更注重安撫學生；4.在班級氣氛上，各級教師的認可度由高到低均為營造愉悅氣氛－因打斷浪費時間－有干擾噪聲和等學生安靜，但高中教師知覺的班級噪音、打斷、干擾比國中小教師多；5.各級教師維持班級秩序時間約佔總教學時間的15%。維持班級秩序的壓力有資歷與級任差異，高中資淺教師壓力最大，國小資深教師壓力最小，國小資深和資淺教師的壓力差距最小，國中資深和資淺教師的壓力差距最大；6.國小教師的班級經營自我效能略高於國中教師，國中教師略高於高中教師，高中教師的班級經營自我效能最低。整體而言，國中小教師知覺的班級經營各項調查有良好表現，高中教師有提升空間。基於此，提出四點研究啟示。

Based on the data of TALIS 2018 teacher questionnaire, this study aims to explore the situation of classroom management of primary and secondary school teachers in Taiwan from three aspects: Pre-service and in-service teachers' training for classroom management, classroom management behaviors, and self-efficacy by secondary data analysis. The situation of classroom management of primary and secondary school teachers in Taiwan presented as following: 1. Compared with the mean value of TALIS, the proportion of teachers receiving classroom management teacher training courses was very high and the gap was small, the pre-service teacher education and on-the-job training of classroom management had great advantages. 2. The classroom management teacher training courses perceived by middle school teachers had the highest readiness, high school teachers had the lowest readiness, and elementary school teachers had the highest demand. 3. The frequency of teachers' classroom management behaviors was similar, from high to low was: obey classroom rules - listen to me - be quiet - comfort students, but upper-class teachers paid more attention to appeasing disturbing students than lower-class teachers. 4. In the atmosphere of a specific class, the recognition of teachers at all levels from high to low was to create a pleasant atmosphere-wast time due to interruptions-there is interference noise and wait for students to be quiet, but high school teachers perceived more class noise, interference or interruption than the other two. 5. Teachers at all levels spent about 15% of the total teaching time in maintaining class order, and the pressure varied with teaching grades and experience. Senior high school teachers had the greatest pressure, senior elementary teachers had the least pressure, the pressure between senior and junior teachers in elementary schools was the smallest, and the pressure between senior and junior teachers in middle school was the largest. 6. As for the self-efficacy of classroom management, elementary school teachers were slightly higher than middle school teachers, middle school teachers were slightly higher than high school teachers, and high school teachers had the lowest self-efficacy. On the whole, all the surveys of primary and junior high school teachers' perceptions of classroom management had performed well, senior high school teachers had a room for improving. Based on this, four enlightenments were put forward.

1. 朱翊瑄, I-H,賴志峰, C-F.(2021)。國小教師實施多層次班級經營之研究。學校行政，136，164-187。
   連結：
2. 吳珍梅, J-M.,程小蘋, X.-P.(2011)。幼教師的專業發展：一個到園輔導的在職進修方案之探究。新竹教育大學教育學報，28(2)，1-28。
   連結：
3. 林易萱, Y.-H.,龔心怡, H.-Y.(2017)。教師信念，專業承諾與班級經營效能比較之研究──以國高中新手與資深教師為例。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，10(2)，111-138。
   連結：
4. 林碧珍, P.-J.,蔡文煥, W.-H.(2007)。小學數學領域輔導教師培訓課程及其實施成效。科學教育學刊，15(5)，521-542。
   連結：
5. 施怡僑, Y.-C.,賴志峰, C.-F.(2013)。國民小學級任教師時間管理與班級經營效能關係之研究。學校行政，87，73-97。
   連結：
6. 徐世瑜, S.-Y.(2001)。輔導國小教師從事行動研究之歷程探討。課程與教學，4(3)，89-102。
   連結：
7. 馬孟平, M.-P.(2014)。國民中小學師資培育教育專業標準之建構。教育經營與管理研究集刊，10，67-91。
   連結：
8. 陳易芬, Y.-F.(2009)。國小師資培育課程對職前教師關切事項的影響。教育理論與實踐學刊，19，63-93。
   連結：
9. 楊深坑, S.-K.,楊銀興, Y.-H.,周蓮清, L.-C.,黃淑玲, S.-L.,黃嘉莉, J.-L.(2002)。我國中小學教師在職進修制度規劃之研究。教育研究集刊，48(2)，113-156。
   連結：
10. 劉鎮寧, J.-N.(2013)。中小學教師進修及進階政策之分析。學校行政雙月刊，85，173-189。
    連結：
11. 潘慧玲, H.-L.,洪秋瑋, C.-W.(2020)。標準本位政策脈絡下師資培育改革成效之評估：應用「行動模式 / 改變模式圖式」分析師資培育學程。教育科學研究期刊，65(2)，73-104。
    連結：
12. 蔣姿儀, T.-Y.,林亞萱, Y.-H.(2013)。中部地區幼兒教師參與學士後在職進修與教師專業發展之調查研究。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，6(2)，141-168。
    連結：
13. 鍾昀珊, Y.-S.,戰寶華, P.-H.(2015)。屏東縣偏遠地區國小教師專業學習社群、組織承諾與教學效能之研究。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，8(2)，69-98。
    連結：
14. 簡梅瑩, M.-Y.(2015)。國小教師在職碩士學位進修之個案研究。臺北市立大學學報 ，46(1)，1-24。
    連結：
15. Abu-Tineh, A. M.,Khasawneh, S. A.,Khalaileh, H. A.(2011).Teacher self-effi-cacy and classroom management styles in Jordanian schools.Management in Education,25(4),175-181.
16. Ainley, J.,Carstens, R.(2019).OECD Education Working PapersOECD Education Working Papers,Paris:OECD Publishing.
17. Akın, S.,Yıldırım, A.,Goodwin, A. L.(2016).Classroom management through the eyes of elementary teachers in Turkey: A phenomenological study.Educational Sciences: Theory& Practice,16(3)
18. Bandura, A.(2000).Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy.Current directions in psychological science,9(3),75-78.
19. Barni, D.,Russo, C.,Danioni, F. V.(2018).Teachers’ Values as Predictors of Classroom Management Styles: A Relative Weight Analysis.frontiers in psychology,9,1-15.
20. Caner, H,Tertemiz. N.(2015).Beliefs, Attitudes and Classroom Management: A Study on Prospective Teachers.Procedia–Social and Behavioral Sciences,186,155-160.
21. Chamundeswari, S.(2013).Job satisfaction and performance of school teachers.International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences,3,420-445.
22. Demir, S.(2009).Teacher perceptions of classroom management and problematic behaviors in primary schools.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,1,584-589.
23. Djigic, G.,Stojiljkovic, S.(2011).Classroom management styles, classroom climate and school achievement.Procedia - Social and Behavioral Science,29,19-828.
24. Doyle, W.(1981).Research on Classroom Contexts.Journal of Teacher Education,6,3-6.
25. Emmer, E.D.,Stough, L.M.(2001).Classroom Management: A Critical Part of Educational. Psychology, With Implications for Teacher Education.Educational Psychologist,36(2),103-112.
26. Erdogan, M.,Kurt, A.(2015).A review of research on classroom management in Turkey.Procedia-Socialand Behavior Sciences,186,9-14.
27. Evrim, E. A.,Gökçe, K.,Enisa, M.(2009).Exploring the relationship between teacher beliefs and styles on classroom management in relation to actual teaching practices: a case study.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,1(1),612-617.
28. Flores, M. A.(2016).International handbook of teacher education.Singapore:Springer.
29. Gaastra, G. F.,Groen, Y.,Tucha, L.,Tucha, O.(2020).Unknown, unloved? Teachers’ reported use and effectiveness of classroom management strategies for students with symptoms of ADHD.Child & Youth Care Forum,49(1),1-22.
30. Gage, N. A.,Scott, T.,Hirn, R.,MacSuga-Gage, A. S.(2018).The relationship between teachers’implementation of classroom management practices and student behavior in elementary school.Behavioral disorders,43(2),302-315.
31. Garland, D.,Garland, K. V.,Vasquez, E.(2013).Management of classroom behaviors: Perceived readiness of education interns.Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning,133-147.
32. Holzberger, D.,Prestele, E.(2021).Teacher self-efficacy and self-reported cognitive activation and classroom management: A multilevel perspective on the role of school characteris- tics.Learning and Instruction,76,101-513.
33. Hoon, T. S.,Nasaruddin, N. F. B. M.,Singh, P.(2017).communication skills among different classroom management styles teachers.Asian Journal of University Educatin,3(1),68-78.
34. Kayıkçı, K.(2009).The effect of classroom management skills of elementary school teachers on undesirable discipline behaviour of students.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,1(1),1215-1225.
35. Klassen, R. M.,Chiu, M. M.(2010).Effects on teachers’ self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Teacher gender, years of experience, and job stress.Journal of educational Psychology,102(3),741.
36. Korthagen, F.(2007).The gap between research and practice revisited.Educational Research and Evaluation,3,303-310.
37. Koutrouba, K.,Markarian, D. A.,Sardianou, E.(2018).Classroom Management Style: Greek Teachers’ Perceptions.International Journal of Instruction,11(4),641-656.
38. Laut, J.(1999).Classroom Management: Beliefs of Preservice Teachers and Classroom Teachers.Concerning Classroom Management Styles. Teachers Education Conference
39. Lazarides, R.,Watt, H. M.,Richardson, P. W.(2020).Teachers’ classroom manage-ment. self-efficacy, perceived classroom management and teaching contexts from beginning until mid-career.Learning and Instruction,69,101346.
40. Mahvar, T.,Farahani, M. A.,Aryankhesal, A.(2018).Conflict management strategies in coping with students’ disruptive behaviors in the classroom: Systematized review.Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism,6(3),102.
41. Martin, N. K.,Baldwin, B.(1993).Validation of an Inventory of Classroom Management Style: Differences between Novice and Experienced Teachers.Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association
42. Martin, N. K.,Schafer, N.J,McClowry, S,Emmer, E.T,Brekelmans, M.,Mainhard, Tim,Wubbels, Theo(2016).Expanding the Definition of Classroom Management: Recurring Themes and New Conceptualizations.The Journal of Classroom Interaction,51(1),31-41.
43. Marzano, R. J.,Marzano, J. S.(2003).The key to classroom management.Educational leadership,61(1),6-13.
44. Neville, K. S.,Sherman, R. H.,Cohen, C. E.(2005).,未出版
45. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development(2019).TALIS 2018 Results (Volume I): Teachers and School Leaders as Lifelong Learners.Paris:OECD Publishing.
46. Owusu, M. K.,Dramanu, B. Y.,Amponsah, M. O.(2021).Classroom Management Strategies and Academic Performance of Junior High School Students.J. Education and Management Engineering,6,29-38.
47. Page, A.,Jones, M.(2018).Rethinking teacher education for classroom behaviour management: Investigation of an alternative model using an online professional experience in an Australian university.Australian Journal of Teacher Education,43(11),84-104.
48. Plöger, W.,Scholl, D.,Seifert, A.(2018).The quasi-experimental attitude of teachers: the development of a questionnaire.Journal of Education for Teaching,44(4),415-430.
49. Schneider, J.(2018).Marching forward, marching in circles: A history of problems and dilemmas in teacher preparation.Journal of Teacher Education,69(4),330-340.
50. Skaalvik, M.,Skaalvik, S.(2017).Dimensions of teacher burnout: relations with potential stressors at school.Social Psychology Education,20,775-790.
51. Uibu, K.,Kikas, E(2012).Authoritative and authoritarian-inconsistent teachers’ preferences for teaching methods and instructional goals.International Journal of Primary. Elementary and Early Years Education,13,3-13.
52. Zafer, Ü. N. A. L.,Aslihan, Ü. N. A. L.(2012).The impact of years of teaching experience on the classroom management approaches of elementary school teachers.International journal of Instruction,5(2),41-60.
53. 王素惠, S.-H.(2019)。淡江大學=Tamkang University。
54. 向延華, T-H.(2003)。論課堂教學管理。中國教育學刊，5，40-42。
55. 林育瑋, Y.-W.(2009)。一所私立幼稚園教師在職進修需求之研究。幼兒教育，293，58-80。
56. 林和春, H.-C.(2017)。臺灣中小學師資的職前教育與教育實習：變革年代的挑戰與因應。臺灣教育，707，8-16。
57. 柯華葳, H.-W.,陳明蕾, M.L.,李俊仁, J.R.,陳冠銘, G.M.(2019)。,新北市=New Taipei City:國家教育研究院=National Institute of Education。
58. 胡惟喻, W.-Y.,陳依婷, I.-T.,劉素真, S.-Z.(2016)。國民小學教師在職進修動機，專業知能成長與教學效能關係之研究。中華科技大學學報，66，103-120。
59. 張金蘭, C.-L.(2019)。體驗與反思學習在國小 [ 國音及說話 ] 師資培育課程的實踐成效。教學實踐與創新，2(1)，17-48。
60. 教育部=Ministry of Education(2012).第七次中華民國教育年鑒.
61. 陳汸妘, F.-Y.(2019)。國立暨南國際大學=National Chi Nan University。
62. 陳惠娟, H.-J.(2019)。淡江大學=Tamkang University。
63. 葉耘竹, Y.-Z.(2020)。淡江大學=Tamkang University。
64. 蔡銘津, M.J.,楊淑娟, Sh. J.(2012)。幼稚園教師不同在職進修參與、進修動機與教學效能關係之研究。人文社會電子學報，8(1)，129-156。
65. 鄭青青, C.-C.((2012)。研習表像 VS. 深層意涵──以系統支持觀點檢視幼兒教師在職進修研習動。兒童照顧與教育，1，81-86。
66. 蘇香諭, S.-Y.(2019)。國立臺灣師範大學=National Taiwan Normal University。
67. 鐘佳靜, C.-C.(2019)。學生幸福感之影響─以學生知覺教師正向領導，班級經營之探討。元培學報，24，52-65。