英文摘要
|
The United Nations reveals the core concept of high-quality education in Sustainable Development Goal 4, and hopes that governments of all countries will promote education without discrimination, fairness, and high-quality education, promote lifelong learning, and achieve the goal of sustainable education. The current cross-grade and interdisciplinary teaching model of elective courses, eighth after-school tutoring, and club activities in national middle schools is in line with the international trend of sustainable development goals and the spirit of whole-person education in the 108 curriculums, which is important for maintaining the quality of rural education. However, little research discusses how to carry out cross-grade and interdisciplinary teaching in rural middle schools from the perspective of sustainable development goals. Through literature review, this study explores the challenges of cross-grade and interdisciplinary teaching in rural middle schools from the perspective of sustainable development goals. The challenges include school administration, teacher professionalism, and student learning. This study proposes the following responses strategies. Inventory the software and hardware resources of rural schools to strengthen administrative support for teachers' teaching. Introduce various resources from public and private sectors to support the implementation of cross-grade and interdisciplinary courses. Develop professional learning communities to encourage teachers to cooperate across schools and domains. Develop curriculum meetings or parent-child meetings to build a community consensus on parent participation. Adopt learner-centered curriculum design to cultivate civic literacy and social participation. Establish a cross-domain culture and evaluation mechanism to provide reflection and feedback references. It is hoped to achieve the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 4 to eliminate the learning gap of rural students, so that disadvantaged students and aboriginal students can receive high-quality education on an equal footing.
|
参考文献
|
-
吳雅萍, Y.-P.(2020)。淺談偏鄉教育之現況與問題。教育研究與實踐學刊,67(2),41-50。
連結:
-
李佩臻, P.-C.,洪儷瑜, L.-Y.(2022)。偏鄉國小國語補救教學實施跨年級教學之行動研究。課程與教學,25(1),35-66。
連結:
-
林季怡, C,-I.,李育諭, Y.-Y.(2018)。跨領域永續課程提升大學生整體性思考及衝突問題解決能力:以海洋永續教育為例。科學教育學刊,26(1),1-27。
連結:
-
林欣毅, H.-Y.,鄭章華, C.-H.,廖素嫻, S.-H.(2016)。混齡教學于國中小階段之實施方式與支援措施──多重個案探究。教育實踐與研究,29(2),1-31。
連結:
-
梁榮仁, J.-J.,余屹安, Y.-A.,施裕明, Y.-M.(2020)。新北市偏遠地區小學教師混齡教學之信念與實踐反思。學校行政,125,239-258。
連結:
-
陳文正, W-C.(2019)。專書導讀──跨年級跨領域教學實務手冊。教育脈動,19,1-4。
連結:
-
陳延興, Y.-H.,朱秀麗, H.-L.(2018)。一所學校型態創新混齡實驗教育學校的成長與蛻變。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,11(3),109-135。
連結:
-
陳黎娟, L.-J.(2018)。非主科混齡教學實施現況之研究──以一所實驗小學為例。學校行政,113,119-138。
連結:
-
潘淑琦, S.-C.(2016)。跨越偏鄉教育紅海困境──從非主學科跨年級跨領域混齡教學開始。學校行政,106,9-26。
連結:
-
鄭以萱, I.-H.(2019)。聯合國永續發展目標下的優質學習生態系統建構:以社會創業型態之印度河濱學校為例。當代教育研究季刊,27(4),1-35。
連結:
-
Bandura, A.(1977).Social learning theory.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
-
Smit, R.,Engeli, E.(2015).An empirical model of mixed-age teaching.International Journal of Educational Research,74,136-145.
-
UNESCO(2013).Practical tips for teaching multigrade classes.Bangkok, Tailand:Asia and Pacific Regional Bureau of Education.
-
UNESCO (2016). Unpacking sustainable development goal 4: Education 2030. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000246300
-
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Retrieved from https://sdgs.un.org/sites/default/files/publications/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf
-
Vygotsky, L. S.(1978).Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
-
李建彥, C.-Y.(2018)。實施混齡素養導向課程教師教學觀點轉化之研究:以一所偏鄉國小教學團隊為例。雙溪教育論壇,7,135-171。
-
施月麗, Y.-L.(2018)。偏鄉小校「語文領域跨年級跨領域識字教學」的實踐經驗──以彰化縣永樂小學為例。庶民文化研究,17,37-64。
-
張臺隆, T.-L.(2017)。偏鄉學校推動跨年級跨領域教學的省思。臺灣教育評論月刊,6(1),177-182。
-
教育部(2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要。取自:https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/WebNews/details.aspx?sid=11&mid=50&nid=1618 [Ministry of Education (2014). Curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education. https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/WebNews/details.aspx?sid=11&mid=50&nid=1618]
-
教育部(2017)。偏遠地區學校教育發展條例。 https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=H0070073 [Ministry of Education (2017). Act for education development of schools in remote areas. https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=H0070073]
-
教育部(2019)。十二年國教課綱。取自:https://www.naer.edu.tw/PageSyllabus?fid=52 [Ministry of Education (2019). Curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education. https://www.naer.edu.tw/PageSyllabus?fid=52]
-
教育部統計處(2023)。各級學校基本統計資訊,取自:https://reurl.cc/klrOan [Highlights of Education Statistics (2023). Basic statistical information of schools at all levels. https://reurl.cc/klrOan]
-
陳佩英, P.-Y.(2017).跨領域素養導向課程設計初階工作坊實踐手冊.教育部=Ministry of Education.
-
陳彥廷, Y.-T.,卓冠維, G.-W.(2019)。「混」之有道:漫談小學階段數學混齡教學之實務。屏縣教育季刊,78,17-37。
-
陳聖謨, S.-M.(2016).混齡教學:偏鄉小校新風貌.臺北市=Taipei City:華騰文化=Far Terng Culture Co., Ltd..
-
陳榮政, J.-C.(2015)。實驗教育的實施與混齡教學的嘗試。教育研究月刊,270,54-67。
-
游淑靜, S.-C.,梁榮仁, J.-J.(2020)。國民小學實施混齡教學的困境及解決策略。臺灣教育評論月刊,9(4),154-159。
-
黃國將, K.-C.(2021)。偏鄉小學 COVID-19 疫情期間透過遠距教學實踐 SDG4 的挑戰與因應。臺灣教育評論月刊,10(9),153-158。
-
謝傳崇, C.-C.,林庭律, T.-L.(2021)。臺灣高等教育實踐永續發展指標(SDGs)的意涵與重要性。臺灣教育評論月刊,10(4),31-34。
|