自我效能、學校環境因素對國小教師參與專業發展活動影響之研究

Effects of Self-Efficacy and School Environmental Factors on Elementary School Teachers' Professional Development Activity

10.6423/HHHC.202305_(145).0006

蕭佳純(Chia Chun Hsiao)

自我效能 ； 參與專業發展活動 ； 資料庫分析 ； 學校環境因素 ； self-efficacy ； professional development activity ； database analyst ； school environmental factors

學校行政

145期（2023 / 05 / 16）

107 - 131

繁體中文;英文

教師專業的持續發展是確保教育品質的重要環節，本研究以跨層次理論，分別從教師個人因素及學校因素來討論影響教師參與專業發展活動的因素。且因為教師是巢套在同一學校領導之下，故運用階層線性模式進行研究分析，以了解彼此變項之間的脈絡效果與跨層級交互作用。本研究運用TALIS 2018國際資料庫探討臺灣國民小學教師自我效能、學校環境因素對參與專業發展活動的影響，其中學校環境因素包含共享權責、信任文化以及校長參與專業發展活動，並且以學校環境因素為跨層次調節變項。研究對象為臺灣國民小學共計200所學校，3,494名參與TALIS 2018調查研究之教師。研究結果發現：自我效能、共享權責、信任文化、校長參與專業發展活動對參與專業發展活動有正向的直接影響效果，而且校長參與專業發展活動可在學生投入、一般教學與參與專業發展活動關係間具有跨層次調節效果。

The continuous development of teachers' profession is an important part to ensure the quality of education. With multilevel theory, teachers' personal factors and school factors are used for discussing the effects on teachers' professional development activity in this study. Since teachers are nested under the same school leadership, hierarchical linear model is applied in the research analysis to understand the contextual effect and cross-level interaction effect among variables. The international database, TALIS 2018, is applied to discuss the effects of elementary school teachers' self-efficacy and school environmental factors on professional development activity, where school environmental factors contains shared rights & responsibilities, trust culture, and principals participate in professional development activities. School environmental factors is used as the cross-level moderator. Total 3,494 teachers from 200 elementary schools in Taiwan participate in the TALIS 2018 survey, as the research objects. The research findings show that self-efficacy, shared rights & responsibilities, trust culture, and principals participate in professional development activities present positive and direct effects on professional development activity, and principals participate in professional development activities shows cross-level moderating effects on the relations among student involvement, general teaching, and professional development activity.

1. 王鳳雄, F.-H.,洪子鑫, T.-H.(2010)。分散式領導在教師專業發展評鑑之運用。學校行政，70，154-173。
   連結：
2. 余忠潔, C.-C.,段曉林, H.-L.(2017)。以 MAIT 網站促進科學教師探究教學能力之專業成長。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，10(1)，105-134。
   連結：
3. 林孟郁, M.-Y.,鍾武龍, W.-L.,張月霞, Y.-H.,李哲迪, C.-D.,陳穎儀, Y.-Y.(2013)。高中教師在創新科學課程專業學習社群中的發展歷程。科學教育季刊，21(1)，75-96。
   連結：
4. 孫志麟, C.-L.(2003)。教師自我效能的概念與測量。教育心理學報，34(2)，139-156。
   連結：
5. 張芳全, F.-C.(2021)。國民小學男女教師的工作壓力源之研究──以臺灣參與 TALIS 為例。學校行政，133，121-151。
   連結：
6. 許育齡, Y.-L.(2006)。教師專業發展團體的團體動力分析──四種初始型態及其發展。新竹教育大學學報，23，75-102。
   連結：
7. 陳俊龍, J.-L.(2010)。教師專業發展評鑑下的教師專業成長之研究。學校行政，66，188-207。
   連結：
8. 陳建志, C.-C.,鐘巧如, C.-J.(2014)。當代分布式領導在教育領導之發展與應用。教育研究與發展期刊，10(3)，1-24。
   連結：
9. 陳棟樑, T.-L.,黃明一, M.-Y.,周瓊瑤, C.-Y.(2017)。臺中市教師專業學習社群與教師專業發展之研究。管理資訊計算，6(1)，34-43。
   連結：
10. 黃建翔, C.-H.,石淑旻, S.-M.,蔡明學, M.-H.(2018)。臺北市國小校長創新領導與教師專業學習社群關係之研究。教育行政與評鑑學刊，23，119-153。
    連結：
11. 黃富揚, F.-Y.(2010)。教師專業發展中之學校與教師角色。教育科學研究期刊，9(1)，87-104。
    連結：
12. 黃嘉莉, J.-L.,謝傳崇, C.-C.(2022)。為何教師專業發展活動不有效？ TALIS 2018 臺灣國中教師調查結果之羅吉斯驗證。教育科學研究期刊，67(1)，1-32。
    連結：
13. 溫褔星, F.-H.,邱皓政, H.-J.(2009)。多層次模型方法論，階層線性模式的關鍵議題與試解。臺大管理論叢，19，263-294。
    連結：
14. 潘慧玲, H.-L.,張素貞, S.-Z.,沈靜濤, J.-T.(2013)。專業學習社群在教師專業發展評鑑中介下的發展：一所國中個案研究。教育研究與發展期刊，9(2)，145-174。
    連結：
15. 薛雅文, Y.-W.,賴志峰, Z.-F.(2013)。國民小學分布式領導與學校組織文化之關係研究。學校行政，86，20-42。
    連結：
16. 謝紫菱, Z.-L.(2019)。組織支持、有效專業發展活動、專業發展正向影響與教師工作滿意度關係之研究。清華教育學報，36(2)，91-122。
    連結：
17. 謝傳崇, C.-C.,翁暄睿, X.-R.(2019)。TALIS 2018 年臺灣國小校長分布式領導調查結果之分析。學校行政，124，1-20。
    連結：
18. 簡杏娟, X.-J.,賴志峰, Z.-F.(2014)。國民小學教師領導促進專業學習社群建構之個案研究。學校行政，90，172-193。
    連結：
19. Avalos, B.(2011).Teacher professional development in Teaching and Teacher Education over ten years.Teaching and Teacher Education,27(1),10-20.
20. Bandura, A.(1986).Social Foundations of Thought and Action.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
21. Bellibas, M. S.,Liu, Y.(2018).The effects of principals’ perceived instructional and distributed leadership practices on their perceptions of school climate.International journal of leadership in education,21(2),226-244.
22. Bredeson, P. V.(2013).Distributed instructional leadership in urban high schools: Transforming the work of principals and department chairs through professional development.Journal of School Leadership,23(2),362-388.
23. Brinkmann, S.(2019).Teachers’ belief and educational reform in India: From "learner-centered’ to "learning-centered’ education.Comparative Education,55(1),9-29.
24. Camburn, E.,Rowan, B.,Taylor, J. E.(2003).Distributed leadership in schools: The case of elementary schools adopting comprehensive school reform models.Educational evaluation and policy analysis,25(4),347-373.
25. Creanor, L.(2014).Raising the profile: An institutional case study of embedding scholarship and innovation through distributive leadership.Innovations in Education and Teaching International,51(6),573-583.
26. DeFlaminis, J. A.,Abdul-Jabbar, M.,Yoak, E.(2016).Distributed leadership in schools: A practical guide for learning and improvement.Routledge.
27. Drago-Severson, E.(2004).Helping teachers learn: Principal leadership for adult growth and development.Corwin Press.
28. Gronn, P.(2002).Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis.The leadership quarterly,13(4),423-451.
29. Gümüş, S.,Bellibaş, M. Ş.(2020).The relationship between professional development and school principals’ leadership practices: the mediating role of self-efficacy.International Journal of Educational Management,34(7),1155-1170.
30. Guskey, T. R.(2000).Evaluating professional development.Corwin press.
31. Hipp, K. A.(1996).Teacher efficacy: influence of principal leadership behavior.The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association
32. Hwang, S.(2021).The mediating effects of self-efficacy and classroom stress on professional development and student-centered instruction.International Journal of Instruction,14(1),1-16.
33. Kao, C. P.,Wu, Y. T.,Chang, Y. Y.,Chien, H. M.,Mou, T. Y.(2020).Understanding web-based professional development in education: The role of attitudes and self-efficacy in predicting teachers’ technology-teaching integration.The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher,29(5),405-415.
34. Lieberman, A.,Saxl, E. R.,Miles, M. B.(2000).Teacher leadership: Ideology and practice.The Jossey-Bass reader on educational leadership
35. Liu, Y.,Bellibas, M. S.,Printy, S.(2018).How school context and educator characteristics predict distributed leadership: A hierarchical structural equation model with 2013 TALIS data.Educational Management Administration & Leadership,46(3),401-423.
36. McFarlan, E. S.(2014).Raleigh, North Carolina,North Carolina State University.
37. Neumayer DePiper, J.,Louie, J.,Nikula, J.,Buffington, P.,Tierney-Fife, P.,Driscoll, M.(2021).Promoting teacher self-efficacy for supporting English learners in mathematics: effects of the Visual Access to Mathematics professional development.ZDM–Mathematics Education,53(2),489-502.
38. OECD(2019).TALIS 2018 technical report.Paris:OECD.
39. Park, S.,Oliver, S.(2007).Revisiting the conceptualization of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teacher as professionals.Research in Science Education,38(3),261-284.
40. Pintrich, P. R.,Marx, R. W.,Boyle, R. A.(1993).Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change.Review of Educational research,63(2),167-199.
41. Pulkkinen, J.,Räikkönen, E.,Pirttimaa, R.,Jahnukainen, M.(2019).Principals’ views on changes in the provision of support for learning and schooling in Finland after educational reform.Journal of Educational Change,20(1),137-163.
42. Rabindarang, S.,Bing, K. W.,Yin, K. Y.(2014).The influence of distributed leadership on job stress in technical and vocational education.International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences,4(1),490-499.
43. Runhaar, P.,Sanders, K.,Yang, H.(2010).Stimulating teachers’ reflection and feedback asking: An interplay of self-efficacy, learning goal orientation, and transformational leadership.Teaching and Teacher Education,26(5),1154-1161.
44. Safari, I.,Davaribina, M.,Khoshnevis, I.(2020).The influence of EFL teachers’ self-efficacy, job satisfaction and reflective thinking on their professional development: A structural equation modeling.Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science,13(1),27-40.
45. Sales, A.,Moliner, L.,Francisco Amat, A.(2017).Collaborative professional development for distributed teacher leadership towards school change.School Leadership & Management,37(3),254-266.
46. Schunk, D. H.,Pajares, F.(2009).Self-efficacy theory.Handbook of motivation at school
47. Smylie, M. A.,Conley, S.,Marks, H. M.(2002).Exploring new approaches to teacher leadership for school improvement.Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education,101(1),162-188.
48. Spillane, J. P.(Ed.),Diamond, J. B.(Ed.)(2007).Distributed leadership in practice.New York, NY:Teachers College, Columbia University.
49. Tay, L. Y.,Ramachandran, K.,Ong, W. L. M.,Towndrow, P. A.(2021).Empowerment through distributed leadership in reconciliating tensions and dilemmas in teacher professional development.Teacher Development,25(5),647-668.
50. Thurm, D.,Barzel, B.(2020).Effects of a professional development program for teaching mathematics with technology on teachers’ beliefs, self-efficacy and practices.ZDM,52(7),1411-1422.
51. Tschannen-Moran, M.,Hoy, A. W.(2001).Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct.Teaching and teacher education,17(7),783-805.
52. Wei, R. C.,Darling-Hammond, L.,Adamson, F.(2010).Professional development in the United States: Trends and challenges.Dallas, TX:National Staff Development Council.
53. 丁一顧, Y.-K.,江姮姬, H.-C.,吳宜蓉, Y.-R.(2018)。校長同儕式領導與教師專業學習社群關係之研究。教育政策論壇，21(2)，97-129。
54. 吳和堂, H.-T.(2007).教師評鑑理論與實務.台北:高等教育=Higher education press.
55. 阮光勛, G.-X.(2015)。如何以學校專業發展活動提升教師學習動機：國小教師觀點的分析。桃園創新學報，35，357-382。
56. 林志成, C.-C.(2002)。授能導向的專業發展評鑑。教育政策論壇，5(2)，81-101。
57. 曾文鑑, W.-J.,郭碧玄, B.-S.,陳雯玲, W.-L.(2014)。新竹縣教師專業發展行政運作、教師實踐與成長介入之模式初探。新竹縣教育研究學刊，14，61-92。
58. 黃嘉莉, J.-L.,謝紫菱, T.-L.,丁一顧, Y.-K.(2019)。臺北市與亞洲三國 TALIS 教師專業發展之比較研究。中正教育研究，18，1-41。
59. 廖佩宸, P.-C.,曾怡華, Y.-H.,邱鈺淇, Y.-C.,黃小芬, H.-F.,張淑芬, S.-F.(2017)。教師專業學習社群運作對教師專業成長影響之研究──以大大國小閱讀課為例。新竹縣教育研究集刊，17，87-118。
60. 劉瓊文, Q.-W.,闕廷諭, T.-Y.,何俐安, L.-A.(2019)。透過分散性領導經營教師專業學習社群──以國小資訊科技教學社群為例。華人前瞻研究，15(1)，41-52。
61. 蔡明學, M.-X.(2021)。國民小學教師專業發展評鑑影響因素之研究──以教學發展支持、教學發展溝通對教學自我效能影響進行探討。教育與心理研究，37(2)，33-66。
62. 蕭佳純, C.-C.(2020).多層次分析理論與 HLM 操作實務──含縱貫性研究與創造力應用.台北:五南=Wu Nan.
63. 薛奕龍, Y.-L.,謝傳崇, C.-C.(2022)。教師自我效能感在學校分布式領導與教師創新的中介作用有效嗎？ TALIS 2018 臺灣國中教師的調查分析。教育政策論壇，25(2)，111-144。
64. 謝傳崇, C.-C.,賴協志, X.-Z.,徐合慶, H.-Q.(2016)。國民小學校長分布式領導，教師組織承諾與資訊通信科技運用關係之研究。教育行政論壇，8(2)，1-23。