瑞典「自主學校」之發展及其對臺灣實驗學校經營之啟示

The Development of "Free School" in Sweden and Its Implications on the Management of Experimental School in Taiwan

10.6423/HHHC.202307_(146).0007

謝糧蔚(Liang-Wei Hsieh)

教育選擇權 ； 實驗教育 ； 實驗學校 ； 自主學校 ； school choice ； experimental education ； experimental school ； free school

學校行政

146期（2023 / 07 / 16）

189 - 201

繁體中文;英文

本文透過文獻分析，首先梳理瑞典自主學校之發展背景，分從「入學方面，引進教育消費券提供家長學校選擇權」、「課程規劃方面，較不受國定課程規範」與「學校經營方面，多以大規模企業經營為主，且人員聘用較彈性」三方面探究瑞典自主學校之內涵；再者，本文評析瑞典自主學校可能遇到困境，從引進家長教育選擇權產生隔離現象，以及以營利導向公司經營，不利校長行政專業與教師專業發展等二個面向探討之；最後，闡述瑞典自主學校對於臺灣實驗學校經營的啟示。本文歸納結論如下：（1）提供弱勢家庭學雜費補助機制，達到入學機會均等；（2）多元管道引入學校經營人才，以實驗教育經營理念，豐富實驗學校經營多樣性；（3）彈性聘用師資，並注重教師在創新教學的專業發展。

This article was to review the background of the development of free school in Sweden, and investigate the meanings of free school in Sweden from the three aspects: introduction of educational voucher into school choice, free from obeying the national curriculum, and school management by non-governmental organizations, flexibility of hiring faculty and staff. Furthermore, this article was to criticize the emerging issues from two aspects: introduction of educational voucher, and the management for business in the practice of Swedish free school. Finally, this article was to demonstrate the meanings of Swedish free school and its implications on experimental school in Taiwan. Above all, there were three conclusions to sum up according to this study: (1) offering the tuition fee for disadvantaged family to reach the opportunity of fair access; (2) hiring the professional for experimental school management to enrich the diversity of experimental school; (3) employing teacher flexibly and focusing the professional development for creative teaching.

1. 秦夢群, M.-C.(2014)。實施教育券主要國家成效之研究。教育資料與研究，114，265-292。
   連結：
2. 陳榮政, R.-J.(2021)。我國實驗教育實研究之分析與展望。教育研究與發展期刊，17(4)，69-96。
   連結：
3. Anti-Academies Alliance (2011). Sweden’s ‘Free Schools’ schools like any other? http://antiacademies.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/swedish-free-schools-schools-like-any-other.pdf
4. Arnesen, A.-L.,Lundahl, L.(2006).Still social and democratic? Inclusive education policies in the Nordic welfare states.Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research,50(3),285-300.
5. Brandén, M.,Bygren, M.(2022).The opportunity structure of segregation: School choice and school segregation in Sweden.Acta Sociologica,65(4),420-438.
6. Erixon Arreman, I.,Holm, A.-S.(2011).Privatisation of public education? The emergence of independent upper secondary schools in Sweden.Journal of Education Policy,26(2),225-243.
7. Fredriksson, A.(2009).On the consequences of the marketisation of public education in Sweden: For-profit charter schools and the emergence of the ‘market-oriented teacher’.European Educational Research Journal,8(2),299-310.
8. Jarl, M.,Fredriksson, A.,Persson, S.(2012).New public management in public education: A catalyst for the professionalization of Swedish school principals.Public Administration,90(2),429-444.
9. Lundahl, L.,Erixon Arreman, I.,Holm, A. S.,Lundström, U.(2013).Educational marketization the Swedish way.Education Inquiry,4,497-517.
10. New Schools Network (2016). What are Free Schools? https://www.newschoolsnetwork.org/what-are-free-schools
11. Swedish National Agency for Education(2006).Schools like any other? Free schools as part of the system 1991-2004.Swedish National Agency for Education.
12. Wiborg, S.(2010).Swedish free schools: Do they work?.Lakes Research Paper,18
13. Wiborg, S.(2015).Privatizing education: Free school policy in Sweden and England.Comparative Education Review,59(3),473-497.
14. Yang Hansen, K.,Gustafsson, J. E.(2016).Causes of educational segregation in Sweden-school choice or residential segregation.Educational Research and Evaluation,22(1-2),23-44.
15. 吳清山, C. -S.(2015)。「實驗教育三法」的重要內涵與策進作為。教育研究月刊，258，42-58。
16. 沈姍姍, S.-S.(2013)。英國中等學校入學制度分析──兼論對臺灣十二年國教中學入學制度之啟示。教育資料集刊，58，43-70。
17. 陳榮政, R.-J.,李重毅, C. -Y.,俞玲琍, L.-L.(2022)。新管理主義下的公辦民營學校治理：美、英實施經驗。教育研究月刊，337，4-18。
18. 黃彥超, Y.-C.(2016)。《實驗教育三法》分析與影響之探究。臺灣教育評論月刊，5(4)，44-49。
19. 黃政傑, C.-C.(2018)。《實驗教育三法》修法宜審慎研議。臺灣教育評論月刊，7(1)，11-17。
20. 楊振昇, C. -S.(2015)。從實驗教育三法析論我國中小學教育之發展。教育研究月刊，258，15-27。
21. 溫明麗, M.-L.(2018)。實驗教育真能引領教育走出新篇章？。臺灣教育評論月刊，7(1)，18-24。
22. 監察院=The Control Yuan(2019)。,作者。