「老師，我不是真的要蹺課…」大學生蹺課問卷建構之研究－以北部一所私立大學為例

"Teacher, I don't actually want to skip classes..." A Study on University Students' Class Skipping Behavior Questionnaire Construction-A Case Study of a Private University in Northern Taiwan

10.6423/HHHC.202311_(148).0004

林佳琪(Lin, Chia-chi)；張志瑋(Chang, Chih-wei)

大學生蹺課 ； 蹺課成因 ； 問卷建構 ； 因素分析 ； 迴歸分析 ； College student class skipping ； reasons for class skipping ； questionnaire construction ； factor analysis ； regression analysis

學校行政

148期（2023 / 11 / 16）

69 - 101

繁體中文;英文

臺灣教改後大學擴充快速，在幾乎人人都可以進入大學就讀的情況下，卻發現大學生蹺課行為日益嚴重！但是什麼樣原因讓大學生們想蹺課？本研究在2022至2023年進行分析各種大學生可能蹺課成因，以北部某所頗負盛名的私立大學為例，透過問卷調查，以因素分析與迴歸分析來說明其意義，深究大學生蹺課的可能因素，以利於在高等教育現場的教師與學校管理階層作為未來課程規劃、教師排課、學生心態掌握與行政管理之參酌。由研究結果來看，高達75.5%的大學生有蹺課經驗，蹺課比例相當高，值得學校與授業教師重視。從研究結可發現：1.所建構大學生蹺課因素之研究問卷工具具有測量統計之信、效度；2.大學生個人藉口與叛逆態度是影響蹺課的主要因素；3.學校學習環境與課程規劃的專業和未來性，與學生蹺課具有高度顯著相關；以及4.教師的外貌在不同世代的大學生判斷觀念與價值中佔有影響因素。本研究所建構之問卷及其結果，可提供各大學院校參考運用，以降低或解決大學生蹺課問題，培育臺灣高等教育更優秀之人才。

After educational reforms in Taiwan, universities have expanded rapidly, allowing almost everyone to pursue higher education. However, a concerning increase in college students' class skipping behavior has been observed. This study aims to analyze the potential reasons behind college students' inclination to skip classes. Using a renowned private university in northern Taiwan as a case study, the research conducted questionnaire surveys and employed factor analysis and regression analysis to elucidate the significance of these reasons. The study delves into the potential factors contributing to class skipping behavior among college students, with the intention of providing insights for educators and higher education administrators. These insights can inform future curriculum planning, class scheduling, understanding student attitudes, and administrative management within higher education institutions. The research findings reveal that a significant 75.5% of college students have experienced class skipping, indicating a noteworthy prevalence of this behavior that warrants attention from educational institutions and instructors. The study results indicate the following key points: 1. The constructed research questionnaire tool possesses measurement reliability and validity for class skipping factors; 2. Personal excuses and rebellious attitudes are primary influencers of class skipping; 3. The school's learning environment and curriculum planning, in terms of professionalism and future relevance, exhibit substantial correlations with students' class skipping behavior; and 4. The appearance of instructors holds sway over students' perceptions and values across different generations. The questionnaire developed in this study and its outcomes offer valuable reference material for various university institutions to mitigate and address the issue of class skipping among college students, thereby cultivating a more exceptional talent pool in Taiwan's higher education.

1. 張芳全, F. C.(2019)。學生蹺課因素之多層次分析：以華得大學為例。臺中教育大學學報，33(2)，1-28。
   連結：
2. Astin, A. W.(1997).What matters in college? Four critical years revisited.Jossey Bass.
3. Bosworth, D.(1994).Truancy and pupil performance.Education Economics,2(3),243-264.
4. Clump, M. A.,Bauer, H.,Whiteleather, A.(2003).To attend or not to attend: Is that a good question?.Journal of Instructional Psychology,30(3),220-224.
5. Dawis, R.(2005).The Minnesota theory of work adjustment.Career development and counseling-putting theory and research to work
6. Delworth, U.(Ed.),Hanson, G. R.(Ed.)(1989).Student services: A handbook for the profession.Jessey-Bass.
7. Glynn, J. G.,Sauer, P. L.,Miller, T. E.(2003).Signaling student retention with Prematriculation data.Naspa Journal,41(1),41-67.
8. Kreps, R.(1999).,Nova Southeastern University.
9. Lin, N.(2001).Social capital-A theory of social structure and action.Cambridge University Press.
10. López-Bonilla, J. M.,López-Bonilla, L. M.(2015).The multidimensional structure of university absenteeism: An exploratory study.Innovations in Education and Teaching International,52(2),185-195.
11. Marburger, D. R.(2006).Does mandatory attendance improve student performance?.Journal of Economic Education,37(2),148-155.
12. Nemec, C. J.,Watson, R. A.(2007).Teacher initiatives to reduce truancy among high school students.Saint Xavier University.
13. Pollser 波仕特線上市調網（2016）。今天蹺課為哪樁，男性蹺課理由多？ Life 台灣生活網。https://life.tw/?app=view&no=372025[Pollser Online Polling Website (2016). Which matters are Taiwanese students skipping class for today, and what are the common reasons among males for skipping class? Life Taiwan. https://life.tw/?app=view&no=372025]
14. Sagy, S.(2000).Factors influencing early dropout.Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,36(3),362-375.
15. Umberson, D.,Chen, M. D.,House, J. S.,Hopkins, K.,Slaten, E.(1996).The effect of social relationships on psychological well-being: Are men and women really so different ?.American Sociological Review,61,837-857.
16. 中正 E 報（2008）。大學生，你蹺課了嗎？－大學生你為什麼要蹺課？中正 E 報。http://www.peopo.org/news/26700[E News (2008). College Students, Have You Played Hooky? - Why Do You Skip Classes, College Students? E News. http://www.peopo.org/news/26700]
17. 成功大學（2002）。成功大學學則。國立成功大學。https://reg-acad.ncku.edu.tw/var/file/41/1041/img/2539/a1.pdf[Cheng Kung University (2002). Regulations of Cheng Kung University. National Cheng Kung University. https://reg-acad.ncku.edu.tw/var/file/41/1041/img/2539/a1.pdf]
18. 李尚龍（2018）。「不蹺課的學生，不是好學生！」大學講師語出驚人，戳破中式教育「聽話」二字的虛偽。風傳媒。https://www.storm.mg/article/432634?kw=%E5%A4%A7%E5%AD%B8%E4%B8%8D%E8%BF%B7%E8%8C%AB&pi=0[Li, S. L. (2018). “ A Good Student Skips Classes! “ Startling Claim from a University Lecturer Breaks the Hypocrisy of Obedience in Chinese-style Education. Storm Media. https://www.storm.mg/article/432634?kw=%E5%A4%A7%E5%AD%B8%E4%B8%8D%E8%BF%B7%E8%8C%AB&pi=0]
19. 林俊瑩, C. Y.(2002)。大學生的價值觀、就學動機、社會網絡與生活滿意度關連性之研究：以台東師院為例。台灣教育社會學研究，2(2)，63-100。
20. 侯崇文, C. W.(2001)。家庭結構、家庭關係與青少年偏差行為探討。應用心理研究，11，25-43。
21. 馬傳鎮, C. Z.(2002)。中輟生現況分析輔導策略之研究。玄奘學報，5，1-37。
22. 國立臺灣大學（2016）。學生請假辦法。臺灣大學。https://advisory.ntu.edu.tw/CMS/GetFile/1540[National Taiwan University (2016). Student Leave Regulations. National Taiwan University. https://advisory.ntu.edu.tw/CMS/GetFile/1540]
23. 張芳全（編）, F. C.(Ed.)(2017).高等教育：理論與實證.高等教育出版社=Higher Education Press.
24. 張芳全, F. C.(2010)。影響大學生蹺課因素分析。2010 年臺灣教育學術研討會
25. 張春興, C. X.(1996).教育心理學——三化取向的理論與實踐.東華=Tung Hua Book.
26. 張美英, M. Y.(2006)。從美國「離校現象」思索大專學生曠課行為。學生專務，45(1)，113-129。
27. 張雪梅, S. M.(1996).學生發展─學生事務工作的理論與實踐.張教師=Teacher Chang.
28. 張裕豐, Y. F.(2011)。國立新竹教育大學=National Hsinchu University of Education。
29. 教育部（2021）。高級中等學校學生學習評量辦法。教育部。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=H0060060[Ministry of Education (2021). Regulations for the Assessment of Learning in Senior Secondary Education. Ministry of Education. https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=H0060060]
30. 黃佳玲, C. L.(2013)。國立臺北大學=National Taipei University。
31. 黃德祥, D. H.(1995)。學習輔導與學生發展。學生輔導通訊，38，22-31。
32. 黃毅志, Y. C.(2002).社會階層、社會網絡與主觀意識─台灣地區不公平的社會階層體系之延續.巨流=Chu Liu.
33. 劉川康, C. K.(2020)。,嘉南藥理大學=Chia Nan University of Pharmacy and Science。