以景觀生態學觀點探討棲地模擬模型－以台中市大坑地區為例

The Habitat Simulation Model through Landscape Ecological Approach-A Case Study on Takeng Scenic Area in Taichung City

10.6381/JD.200406.0047

王小璘(Hsiao-Lin Wang)；林沛毅(Pai-Yi Lin)

景觀生態 ； 模擬模型 ； 滲透率 ； 景觀元素 ； 生物棲地 ； Landscape ecology ； Simulation model ； Permeability ； Landscape Elements ； Biological habitats

設計學報

9卷2期（2004 / 06 / 01）

47 - 69

繁體中文

台中市擁有優於其他都市之公園綠地，並具有生物生存及棲息之潛力。本研究之主要目的，在於建構生物棲地模擬模型，進行生物棲地搜尋分析，並根據實證結果，探討景觀生態環境對生物造成之影響，進而求得台中市大坑地區適宜生物棲地之區域。本研究以赤腹松鼠(Callosciurus erythraeus)為實證研究生物，根據景觀生態學原理，應用AutoCad與GIS軟體建構生物棲地模擬模型。模擬包括領域圈模式模擬及生物棲地模式模擬，前者可推論模擬模型之可行性，後者可觀察實證生物與景觀生態環境之間的關連。由生物棲地適宜分佈區位選定之分析，可推論在大坑地區具有赤腹松鼠較佳生存優勢之區域，包括：1.東南部闊葉林區。2.山坡地中北部區域。3.山坡地西南部邊緣闊葉林環境。4.北部闊葉林區。5.中部零星闊葉林及各類型作物區。6.山坡地西部零星闊葉林及各類型作物區。

Taichung City, which provides habitats for livings, has better parks and grasslands than the other cities in Taiwan. The purposes of the study are establishing a simulation model for biological habitats to examine the influences of landscape environment on biology, and to look for the suitable distribution for biological habitats at Takeng scenic Area in Taichung City. The study species of the study is Callosciurus erythraeus. The simulation model, is established based on the landscape ecological principle by applying AutoCAD and GIS. The simulation comprises in two parts: model for territory simulation and model for biological habitats simulation. The first one can analogize the feasibility of the simulation model, and the other can examine the coloration between the species and landscape ecological environment. According to the analyses of the distribution suitability of biological habitats, we conclude that the better living areas for Callosciurus erythraeus in Takeng scenic Area are as follows: 1. broad-leaved tree areas in the south-east; 2. north-middle areas of hillsides; 3. broad-leaved tree areas in the south-west of hillsides; 4.broad-leaved tree areas in the north areas; 5. fragmentary broad-leaved tree areas and other crop fields in the middle of the area; 6. fragmentary broad-leaved tree areas in the west of hillsides.

1. Apeldoorn, R. C. V.(1998).Applying ecological knowledge in landscape planning: a simulation model as a tool to evaluate scenarios for the badger in the Netherlands.Landscape and Urban Planning,41,57-69.
2. Bellmann, K.(2000).Towards to a system analytical and modelling apporoach for integration of ecological,hydrological,economical and social components of disturbed regions.Landscape and Urban Planning,51,75-87.
3. Boone, R. B.,M. L. Hunter.(1996).Using diffusion models to simulate the effects of land use on grizzly bear dispersal in the Rocky Mountains.Landscape Ecology,11,51-64.
4. Dramstad, W. E.,D., Olson, J.,R. T. T. Forman(1996).Landscape ecology principles in landscape architecture and land-use planning.Harvard University Graduate School of Design.
5. Forman, R. T. T.,M. Godron(1986).Landscape Ecology.John Wiley & Sons Inc..
6. Gardner, R. H.,R. V. O'Neill.,M. G. T. a. R. H(editor.)(1990).Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology.Gardner:
7. Gordon, G.(1978).System simulation.Prentice-Hall.
8. Hopkins, L. D.(1977).Methods for Generating Land Suitability Maps: A Comparative Evaluation.American Institute of Planners,43,386-400.
9. Lewis, P. A. W.(1989).Simulation methodology for statisticians,operations analysts,and engineers.E.J.Orav.
10. Pirnat, J.(2000).Conservation and management of forest pathes and corridors in suburban landscapes.Landscape and Urban Planning,52,135-143.
11. Pritsker, A. A. B.(1979).Introduction to simulation and SLAM.Wiley:distributed by Halsted Press.
12. Saura, S.,J. M. Millan(2000).Landscape patterns simulation with a modified random clusters method.Landscape Ecology,15,661-678.
13. Stauffer, D.,A. Aharony(1992).Introduction to Percolation Theory.Taylor and Francis.
14. Swenson, J. J.,J. Franklin(2000).The effects of future urban development on habitat fragmentation in the Santa Monica Mountains.Landscape Ecology,15,713-730.
15. Tang, S. M.,J. F. Franklin,D. R. Montgomery.(1997).Forest harvest patterns and landscape disturbance processes.Landscape Ecology,12,349-363.
16. Tischendorf, L.(2001).Can landscape indices predict ecological processes.Landscape Ecology,16,235-254.
17. Turner, M. G.,R. H. Gardner,V. H. Dale,R. V. O'Neill(1989).Predicting the spread of disturbance across heterogeneous landscapes.Oikos,55,121-129.
18. Ziv, Y.(1998).The effect of habitat heterogeneity on species diversity patterns: a community-level approach using an object-oriented landscape simulation model(SHALOM).Ecological modeling,111,135-170.
19. 尤少彬(1981)。臺灣赤腹松鼠的生態與防治－兼論不平衡自然體系下之野生動物問題。科學月刊，12(6)，9-11。
20. 尤少彬、林曜松、霍華德(1992)。溪頭赤腹松鼠生活圈之動態。中央研究院動物研究所集刊，31(3)，199-211。
21. 王小璘、吳慧儀(2001)。都市廊道景觀生態功能評估架構之研究－以台中市東光園道爲例。造園學報，7(2)，99-119。
22. 王小璘、曾詠宜(2000)。由景觀生態觀點評估都市公園綠地區位之研究－以台中市東峰公園與豐樂公園爲例。第三屆造園景觀與環境規劃設計成果研討會論文集
23. 伍南彰編(2001)。臺中市政府建設局八十九年度建設實務。台中市政府建設局。
24. 俞孔堅(1993)。景觀生態學理論、方法與應用。地景出版社。
25. 張俊彥(1999)。以塊區形狀進行公園綠地評估之應用研究。造園學報，16(1/2)，117-131。
26. 郭林海(1993)。景觀生態學理論、方法與應用。地景出版社。
27. 郭寶章(2000)。松鼠研究在臺灣：回顧與影響。野生動物保育彙報及通訊。
28. 陳恩倫(1988)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立台灣大學森林學研究所。
29. 趙羿、李月輝(2001)。實用景觀生態學。科學出版社。
30. 鄭錫奇(1997)。臺中縣市的野生動物。台灣省特有生物研究保育中心。

1. (2010)。都會區空間發展樣貌之探討—發展密度與地景生態指數的整合評估途徑—。土地經濟年刊，21，97-124。