設計創造運思模式與變項間之互動關係研究

A Study on the Relation of Interaction between the Model of Design-Creating-Thinking and Variations

10.6381/JD.200406.0071

陳啟雄(Chi-Hsiung Chen)；程英斌(Ying-Ping Chen)

設計 ； 創造 ； 運思 ； 創作品 ； 設計參照 ； 創造運思模式 ； 設計哲學 ； Design ； Creating ； Thinking ； Creation ； Design Reference ； Model of Design-Creating-Thinking ； Design Philosophy

設計學報

9卷2期（2004 / 06 / 01）

71 - 86

繁體中文

設計師如何啟動靈感和產生創意思考的過程，是當今設計研究領域中最重要的議題之一。最近的文獻認為知識的重要性會影響到競爭力，研究設計運思不僅可以促進教育機構提升教學品質，更可以增進設計的訓練和實務的應用。這不但是設計理論和設計教育學的問題，也與設計哲學和設計方法學有關。因此，研究創造和設計的邏輯問題，以及藉由控制理論來探討設計創造運思過程的模式，是本研究最主要的目的。人類對於「創造、運思和創作品」的疑問和回答，已有二、三千年的光景。而此問題竟然貫穿了哲學、神學和科學，因而促使本研究意欲藉由歷代西方哲學家的見解，一探創造運思的奧秘。本研究遂採行動研究之實驗、創作品和實地觀察，以瞭解本研究架構和理論模式的適切性。研究結果顯示，本研究所假定之理論和模式，具有相當程度的適切性和可行性。

The thinking process of designers, how to inspire and to innovate, are one of the most important issues in design research now. Recent literatures have emphasized the importance of knowledge assets to competitive advantage. Not only can the design research improve the quality of education, but it can also add to the disciplines and practicalities of design. Not only are these issues for pedagogy and theory of design, but this is also concerned with the philosophy and methodology of design. Therefore, to research the issues about the creating and logicality of design, and to study the model of Design-Creating-Thinking by cybernetics, they are our principal purposes. Human beings had brought the ”Creating, thinking, and creation” into question, and answer, for two or three thousand years. Because of these questions, they include philosophy, theology, and science; they have caused us to research the mysteries of creating and thinking by ideas of western philosophers. Thus, this thesis uses action research to experiment, to observe the creations and practices of subjects, and to study our research framework and theory model for applicability. Finally, this outcome of our study shows that the theory and model of our assumptions have quite applicability and feasibility.

1. Gordon, J. L.(2000).Creating knowledge maps by exploiting dependent relationships.Knowledge-Based Systems,13,71-79.
2. Joseph, S.(1996).Design systems and paradigms.Design Studies,17,227-239.
3. Kryssanov, V. V.,Tamaki, H.,Kitamura, S.(2001).Understanding design fundamentals: how synthesis and analysis drive creativity, resulting in emergence.Artificial Intelligence in Engineering,15,329-342.
4. Lawson, B.(1997).How designers think: the design process demystified.Oxford:Architectural Press.
5. Mascitelli, R.(2000).From experience: harnessing tacit knowledge to achieve breakthrough innovation.J PROD INNOV MANAG,17,179-193.
6. McGuigan, F. J.(1994).Biological Psychology a Cybernetic science.New Jersey, USA:Prentice-Hall, Inc..
7. Noguchi, H.(1997).An idea generation support system for industrial designers.Knowledge-Based Systems,10,37-42.
8. Noh, J. B.,Lee, K. C.,Kim, J. K.,Lee, J. K.,Kim, S. H.(2000).A case-based reasoning approach to cognitive map-driven tacit knowledge management.Expert Systems with Applications,19,249-259.
9. Stempfle, J.,Badke-Schaub, P.(2002).Thinking in design teams: an analysis of team communication.Design Studies,23,473-496.
10. Stufflebeam, D. L.(1994).Introduction: recommendations for improving evaluations in U.S. public schools 1,2.Studies in Educational Evaluation,20,3-21.
11. Verma, S.(1997).Design theory education: how useful is previous design experience?.Design Studies,18,89-99.
12. Wang, Z.,He, W. P.,Zhang, D. H.,Cai, H. M.,Yu, S. H.(2002).Creative design research of product appearance based on human-machine interaction and interface.Journal of Materials Processing Technology,129,545-550.
13. Weber, A.,Perry, R. B.(1983).History of Philosophy.Taipei:
14. Xiong, M. C.(2003).Global manufacture by using conceptual design.Journal of Materials Processing Technology,139,453-456.
15. 王文科(1999)。教育研究法。五南:台北市。
16. 石延平(1994)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,未出版
17. 何明泉、姜禮誠(1997)。產品訊息解讀之設計考量。國立雲林技術學院學報，6(1)，27-34。
18. 李翠卿(2003)。產業大革命－科技從娛樂出發。遠見雜誌，205，214-219。
19. 林銘煌(2000)。產品造形中的符號與符碼。設計學報，5(2)，73-81。
20. 程英斌(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學工業教育研究所。
21. 鄧成連(1999)。產品設計評價模式研究－側重不同專業角度之設計評價決策。設計學報，4(2)，89-97。

1. 許育齡、梁朝雲(2011)。想像促發與運作的學習心理因素之初探研究—以設計學習領域為例。教學科技與媒體，95，2-16。
2. 劉育東、許育齡、梁朝雲、李元榮(2011)。促發想像之環境因素的評測工具—域設計教育為例的初探性研究。設計學報，16(1)，65-82。
3. 王志弘(2015)。藝術工人、專業服務者與美學企業家室內設計師的生產關係與自我認知。臺灣社會研究季刊，101，125-170。
4. 趙方麟(2006)。非設計科系通識課程產品創新教學案例分析。藝術學報，78，1-16。