專門知識對假記憶的影響：以設計專家為例

The Role of Domain Knowledge in Creating False Memory: Evidence from Industrial Design Experts

10.6381/JD.200412.0093

林漢裕(Han-Yu Lin)；李玉琇(Yuh-Shiow Lee)

假記憶 ； 專門知識 ； DRM典範 ； 設計專家 ； False Memory ； Domain Knowledge ； DRM Paradigm ； Industrial Design Experts

設計學報

9卷4期（2004 / 12 / 01）

93 - 105

繁體中文

本研究用DRM典範(Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm)，探討專門知識對假記憶產生的影響，藉以了解專門知識是增加或降低假記憶的產生。實驗操弄設計和非設計科系高、低年級的參與者，在設計列表詞和一般列表詞的自由回憶、再認正確率和關鍵詞的錯誤再認率（假記憶）的表現。結果發現，設計列表詞的自由回憶和再認率，受到設計知識的影響，也就是高設計知識的參與者表現優於低設計知識和不具備設計知識的參與者，一般列表詞的表現則不受設計知識的影響。同樣地，對於實驗中沒有出現的關鍵詞，其錯誤再認率也受到專門知識的影響。設計高年級在設計關鍵詞的假記憶，明顯高於設計低年級和非設計科系的參與者，而低設計知識和無具備設計知識的參與者，在設計關鍵詞的假記憶則沒有不同。另外，在一般關鍵詞的假記憶中，不論設計或非設計科系的高年級，其假記憶都較低年級的參與者高。最後，本研究分別從內隱連結反應假說及模糊痕跡理論，來探討這些結果的意涵。

Many studies have demonstrated the power of schema and knowledge in organizing incoming information. On the other hand, knowledge could also lead to various kinds of memory errors. The present study examined how participants' domain knowledge affects their memory, using the DRM paradigm to investigate false memory produced by a group of industrial design experts as compared to a group of novices. In particular, this study investigated whether domain specific knowledge would induce or reduce false memories. Two groups of old and young experts and novices were asked to study lists of semantically related words and then tested on both studied words and non-studied critical words. Two types of semantically related list items were used; one type of items was words selected from technical terms used in the domain of industrial design. The other type of items was common words. Results revealed that design knowledge increased veridical memory of design-related terms. More importantly, age had an effect on the false recognition of common words, while participants' design knowledge had an effect on false recognition of design-related terms. These results were discussed in terms of implicit associative response hypothesis and fuzzy-trace theory.

1. Anderson, J. R.,Pirolli, P. L.(1984).Spread of activation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition,10,791-798.
2. Bartlett, F. C.(1932).Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology.Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press.
3. Bransford, J. D.,Franks, J. J.(1971).The abstraction of linguistic ideas.Cognitive Psychology,2,331-350.
4. Brewer, W. F.(1977).Memory for the pragmatic implications of sentences.Memory & Cognition,5,673-678.
5. Chi, M. T. H.,Feltovich, P. J.,Glaser, R.(1981).Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices.Cognitive Science,5,121-152.
6. Chi, M.,Glaser, R.,Rees, E.,R. Sternberg, (Ed.)(1982).Advances in the psychology of human intelligence.Hillsdale, N.J.:Lawrence Erlbaum Associate Inc.
7. Collin, A. M.,Loftus, E. F.(1975).A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing.Psychological Review,82,407-428.
8. De Groot, A. D.(1946).Thinking processes in chess player.Den Haag, The Netherlands:Noord Holland.
9. Deese, J.(1959).On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall.Journal of experimental Psychology,58,17-22.
10. Ericsson, K. A.,Kintsch, W.(1995).Long-term memory.Psychological Review,102,211-245.
11. Graesser, A. C.,Clark, L. F.(1985).Structures and procedures of implicit knowledge.Norwood, NJ:Ablex.
12. Johnson, M. K.,Hashtroudi, S.,Lindsay, D. S.(1993).Source monitoring.Psychological Bulletin,114,3-28.
13. Koutstaal, W.,Schacter, D. L.(1997).Gist-based false recognition of pictures in older and younger adults.Journal of Memory & Language,37(4),555-583.
14. Landauer, T. K.,Dumais, S. T.(1997).A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and the representation of knowledge.Psychological Review,104,211-240.
15. Lenton, A. P.,Blair, I. V.,Hastie, R.(2001).Illusions of Gender: Stereotypes evoke false memories.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,37,3-14.
16. Loftus, E. F.,Palmer, J. C.(1974).Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,13,585-589.
17. McEvoy, C. L.,Nelson, D. L.,Komatsu, T.(1999).What is the connection between true and false memories? The differential roles of interitem associations in recall and recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition,25,1177-1194.
18. Neely, J. H.,D. Besner (Eds.),M. Humphreys (Eds.)(1991).Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition.Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
19. Norman, K. A.,Schacter, D. L.(1997).False recognition in younger and older adults: Exploring the characteristics of illusory memories.Memory & Cognition,25,838-848.
20. Reyna, V. F.,C. J. Brainerd.(1995).Fuzzy-trace theory: An interim synthesis.Learning and Individual Difference,7,1-75.
21. Robinson, K. J.,Roediger, H. L, Ⅲ(1997).Associative processes in false recall and false recognition.Psychological Science,8,231-237.
22. Roediger, H. L., Ⅲ,,McDermott, K. B.(1995).Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition,21,803-814.
23. Schmidt, H. G.,Boshuizen, H. P. A.,D. A. Evans (Eds.),V. L. Patel (Eds.)(1992).Advanced models of cognition for medical training and practice.New York:Springer-Verlag.
24. Smith, R. E.,Hunt, R. R.(1998).Presentation modality affects false memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5(4),710-715.
25. Splich, G. J.,Vesonder, G. T.,Chiesi, H. L.,Voss, J. F.(1979).Text processing of domain-related information for individuals with high and low domain knowledge.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18,275-290.
26. Sulin, R. A.,Dooling, D. J.(1974).Instruction of a thematic idea in retention of prose.Journal of experimental Psychology,103,240-245.
27. Underwood, B. J.(1965).False recognition produced by implicit verbal responses.Journal of experimental Psychology,70,122-129.
28. Voss, J. F.,Bisanz, G. L.,B. K. Britton (Eds.),J. B. Black (Eds.)(1985).Understand expository text.Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
29. 章韶純(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立中正大學心理學研究所。