造形形變於產品造形情感意象上的探討－以壺類產品為例

Affective Responses toward Morphing Product Shapes-Using Kettle as Examples

10.6381/JD.200509.0101

蕭坤安(Kun-An Hsiao)；陳玲鈴(Lin-Lin Chen)

造形形變 ； 多元向度評量 ； 造形情感意象 ； Shape morphing ； Multidimensional scaling ； Affective responses of shapes

設計學報

10卷3期（2005 / 09 / 01）

101 - 121

繁體中文

在造形產生的許多方法中，造形形變是一種相當整體而逼真的工具。本研究針對產品造形形變所產生的中間新造形，其所引發的情感意象認知進行探討。應用多元向度評量法所建構的偏好性認知空間，進一步探討產品造形形變與情感意象反應之關係。研究結果顯示：兩代表性造形所產生的中間形變造形，會具有比原代表性造形更複雜的意象。整體形變認知空間可以用“感性－理性”（X軸）與“簡潔－複雜”（Y軸）這兩個大軸向作區分，形變組的兩個原代表造形如果位於Y軸的兩端，形變造形在“簡潔－複雜”與“感性－理性”的情感意象上，大致隨著形變造形的改變而成線性改變：而形變組的兩個原代表造形如果位於X軸的兩端，形變造形在“感性－理性”的情感意象變化上，大致隨著造形的改變而成線性改變，但在“簡潔－複雜”的情感意象變化上，則呈非線性變化。

Shape morphing is an integral and realistic shape creation tool. This research investigates the affective responses toward products with gradual changing shapes. Using the perceptual map obtained by multidimensional scaling method, we probe into the relationship between morphing shapes and the affective responses they elicit. The results of this study show that the morphed shapes are perceived to be more complex than the original shapes. The whole perception space can be characterized by two main axes: emotional-rational (X-axis) and simple-complex (Y-axis). If the pair of original shapes are located toward the two extremes of the Y-axis, then the changes in affective simple-complex and emotional-rational responses exhibit a linear relationship with the transformation of morphing shapes. On the other hand, if the pair of original shapes are located toward the two extremes of the X-axis. then the changes in affective emotional-rational responses also show linear relationship, while changes in affective simple-complex responses will exhibit nonlinearity.

1. Busey, T.(1998).Physical and Psychological Representations of Faces: Evidence from Morphing.Psychological Science,9,476-482.
2. Chen K, H.(1997).Style Recognition and Description.設計學報,2(2),123-143.
3. Chen, S.E.,Parent, R.E.(1989).Shape Averaging and Its Applications to Industrial Design.IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications,47-54.
4. Crozier, R.(1994).Manufactured Pleasures-Psychological Responses to Design.Manchester University Press.
5. Desmet, P.(1999).Proceeding of The First International Conference on Design & Emotion.
6. Desmet, P.,Overbeek, K.(2001).Designing Products with Added Emotional Value: Development and Application of An Approach for Research Through Design.The Design Journal,4,32-46.
7. Gordon, I.E.(1997).Theories of Visual Perception, 2nd ed..John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
8. Hsiao, S.W.,Liu, M.C.(2002).A Morphing Method for Shape Generation and Image Prediction in Product Design.Design Studies,23(5),533-556.
9. Jindo, T.,Hirasago, K.,Nagamachi, M.(1995).Development of a Design Support System for Office Chairs using 3-D Graphics.International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics,15,49-62.
10. Jordan, P.W.(2000).Designing Pleasurable Products.Taylor & Francis.
11. Maslow, A.(1970).Motivation and Personality.New York:Harper & Row.
12. McDonagh, D.,Bruseberg, A.,Haslam, C.(2002).Visual Product Evaluation: Exploring Users` Emotional Relationship with Products.Applied Ergonomics,33,231-240.
13. Nagamachi, M.(1995).Kansei Engineering: A New Ergonomic Consumer-oriented Technology for Product Development.International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics,15,3-11.
14. Perrett, D.I.,Lee, K.J.,Penton-Voak, I.,Rowland, I.D.,Yoshikawa, S.,Burt, D.M.,Henzi, S.P.,Castles, D.L.,Akamatsu, S.(1998).Effects of Sexual Dimorphism on Facial Attractiveness.Nature,394(27)
15. Schiffman, S.S.、Reynolds M.L.、Young, F.W.、楊浩二譯(1996)。多元尺度法：理論、方法與應用
16. Shang, H.H.,Chuang, M.C.,Chang, C.C.(2000).A semantic differential study of designers` and users` product form perception.International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics,25,375-391.
17. Tiddeman, B.,Burt, D.,Perrett, D.(2001).Prototyping and Transforming Facial Textures for Perception Research.IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications,21,42-50.
18. Toshimasa, Y.,Toshiaki, U.,Emi, H.,Shigeo, H.(2002).Image Database System based on Readers Kansei Character.The 5th Asian Design Conference
19. Wang, H.S.(1995).An Approach to Computer-Aided Styling.Design Studies,16(1),50-61.
20. Yang, S.,Nagamachi, M.,Lee, S.(1999).Rule-based Inference Model for the Kansei Engineering System.International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics,24,459-471.
21. 王鉅富(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北，國立台灣科技大學設計研究所。
22. 王鉅富、蕭坤安、陳玲鈴。造形於形變過程中與情感意象之關係研究－以汽車造形爲例。中華民國設計學會第八屆設計學術研究成果研討會論文集光碟
23. 高清漢。從風格原型－看泳鏡造形特徵與意象的關係。設計學報，7(1)，33-46。
24. 梁德聰(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北，國立台灣科技大學工程技術研究所設計學程。
25. 莊明振、馬永川。以微電子產品為例探討產品意象與造形呈現對應關係。設計學報，6(1)，1-16。
26. 葉俊棋(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北，國立台灣科技大學設計研究所。

1. 鄭德輝,楊正翔,高洋,林榮泰(2021)。雕塑藝術品審美愉悅感之先期研究。藝術學報，109，49-73。
2. (2012)。應用類神經網路於產品感性設計之造形要素評比─以 PDA 智慧型手機為例。樹德科技大學學報，14(1)，243-262。