合作設計過程中個人的創造潛能與團隊的概念衍伸對設計成果之影響

Exploring the Relationship between Personal Creativity, Creative Process, Concept Evolution, and Design Performance in a Collaborative Design Process

10.6381/JD.200909.0051

唐玄輝(Hsien-Hui Tang)；林智文(Chih-Wen Lin)；陳文誌(Wen-Zhi Chen)

創造潛能 ； 合作式設計 ； 設計內容導向編碼系統DCOCS ； 探索階段的預設結構PSEP ； 概念衍伸度 ； Creative Potentials ； Collaborative Design ； DCOCS ； PSEP ； Rate of Concept Evolution

設計學報

14卷3期（2009 / 09 / 01）

51 - 71

繁體中文

本研究的主要目的，在於探討合作設計過程中，團隊成員的創造潛能、設計過程的認知變化、概念衍伸度等因素，對於設計成果與創意表現的交互關係。研究使用「新編創造思考測驗」量測受測者的創造潛能，並利用口語分析法對合作設計實驗的過程資料進行分析。設計過程資料使用設計內容導向編碼系統(DCOCS)加以編碼後，分別進行探索階段的預設結構(PSEP)比例以及概念衍伸度等分析。研究結果發現：1)創造潛能組合相似的設計團隊，其設計成果不一定相同；2)合作設計過程中，設計師的認知變化與創意展現和設計成果之間沒有顯著的關係；3)團隊概念衍伸度較高的團隊，能得到較佳的設計成果。綜合上述結果發現，在合作式設計過程中，要產生良好的設計成果，最重要的是團隊所提出的設計概念需要經由成員的相互合作、持續地發展與衍伸。

The high demand of creativity in industry results in the emphasis on the multidisciplinary collaborative design. Our research question is which of designers, or design processes, or collective concepts influence the design performance most during this process. The purpose is to explore the relationship between creative potentials of team members, cognitive change during the design process, evolution of the concepts, and design performance in a collaborative design process. This was a concurrent protocol study, utilizing Design Content Oriented Coding Scheme (DCOCS). The evaluative methods used in this study included a new version of the Torrance Test of Creativity, the rate of Preinventive Structure in the Explorative Phase (PSEP), and the rate of concept evolution. Results showed first, the teams that had similar combination of creative potentials of members produced different design performance; second, the cognitive change of the team members in the design process had no correlation to design performance; and finally, the design team having a higher rate of concept evolution had better design performance. To conclude, the most important thing to consider in a collaborative design process is whether the collaborative interactions between team members can consistently develop and evolve their concepts and consequently produce better design performance.

1. Bachelor, P. A.,Michael, W. B.,M. A. Runco(Ed.)(1997).The creativity research handbook.Cresskill, New Jersey:Hampton Press.
2. Brown, R. T.,J. A. Glover(Eds.),R. R. Ronning(Eds.),C. R. Reynolds(Eds.)(1989).Handbook of creativity.New York:Plenum.
3. Cross, N.,Cross, A. C.(1995).Observations of teamwork and social processes in design.Design Studies,16(2),143-170.
4. Csikszentmihalyi, M.(1997).Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention.New York:Harper Perennial.
5. Demhis, A. R.,Valacich, J. S.(1993).Computer brainstorms: More head are better than one.Journal of Applied Psychology,78(4),531-536.
6. Dorst, K.,Cross, N.(2001).Creativity in the design process: Co-evolution of problem.Design Studies,22(5),425-437.
7. Feldhusen, J. F.,Goh, B. E.(1995).Assessing and accessing creativity: An integrative review of theory, research, and development.Creativity Research Journal,8(3),231-247.
8. Finke, R. A.,Ward, T. B.,Smith, S. M.(1996).Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications.Bradford:The MIT Press.
9. Gabora, L.,T. Hewett(Eds.),T. Kavanagh(Eds.)(2002).Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Creativity and Cognition.New York:ACM.
10. Gardner, H.(1988).Creativity: An interdisciplinary perspective.Creativity Research Journal,1,106-114.
11. Goldschmidt, G.(1994).On visual design thinking: the vis kids of architecture.Design Studies,15(2),158-174.
12. Gruenfeld, D. H.,Mannix, E. A.,Williams, K. Y.,Neale, M. A.(1996).Group composition and decision making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,67(1),1-15.
13. Guilford, J.(1957).Creative abilities in the arts.Psychological Review,64(2),110-118.
14. Guilford, J. P.(1956).The structure of intellect.Psychological Bulletin,53(4),267-293.
15. Haymaker, J.,Keel, P.,Ackermann, E.,Porter, W.(2000).Filter-mediated design: Generating coherence in collaborative design.Design Studies,21(2),205-220.
16. Lawson, B.(2005).How designers think: The design process demystified.Oxford:Architectural.
17. Newell, A.,Simon, H. A.(1972).Human problem solving.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
18. Olson, G. M.,Olson, J. S.(2000).Distance matters.Human-Computer Interaction,15(2),139-178.
19. Paulus, P. B.(2000).Groups, teams, and creativity: The creative potential of idea-generating groups.Applied Psychology: An International Review,49(2),237-262.
20. Purcell, A. T.,Gero, J. S.(1998).Drawings and the design process: A review of protocol studies in design and other disciplines and related research in cognitive psychology.Design Studies,19(4),389-430.
21. Runco, M. A.,Chand, I.(1995).Cognition and creativity.Educational Psychology Review,7(3),243-267.
22. Simon, H. A.(1983).Search and reasoning in problem solving.Artificial Intelligence,21(1),7-29.
23. Simonton, D. K.,M. A. Runco(Eds.),R. S. Albert(Eds.)(1990).Theories of creativity.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
24. Suwa, M.,Gero, J. S.,Purcell, A. T.(2000).Unexpected discoveries and S-invention of design requirements: Important vehicles for a design process.Design Studies,21(6),539-567.
25. Tang, H.-H.(2003).The anatomy of the design process revealed by DCOCS.Proceeding of 2003 Pan-Pacific Vocational Design Conference,Yulin:
26. Tang, H.-H.,Gero, J. S.,C. Bento(Eds),A. Cardoso(Eds),G. Wiggins(Eds)(2002).Proceeding of ECAI.Lyon:IOS Press.
27. Tang, H.-H.,Lee, Y.-Y.(2009).Proceeding of CAADRIA.Yunlin:National Yunlin University of Science and Technology.
28. Taylor, D. W.,Berry, P. C.,Block C. H.(1958).Does group participation when using brainstorming facilitate or inhibit creative thinking?.Administrative Science Quarterly,3(1),23-47.
29. Torrance, E. P.(1974).The torrance tests of creative thinking-TTCT manual and scoring guide: Verbal test A, figural test.Lexington, KY:Ginn.
30. Torrance, E. P.(1979).The search for satori and creativity.Buffalo, NY:Creative Education Foundation.
31. Wang, L.,Shen, W.,Xie, H.,Neelamkavil, J.,Pardasani, A.(2002).Collaborative conceptual design - state of the art and future trends.Computer-Aided Design,34(13),981-996.
32. Warr, A.,O'Neill, E.(2005).Understanding design as a social creative process.Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Creativity & Cognition,London:
33. Warr, A.,O'Neill, E.(2006).The effect of group composition on divergent thinking in an interaction design activity.Proceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems,University Park, PA:
34. Warr, A.,O'Neill, E.,M. F. Costabile(Eds.),F. Paternò(Eds.)(2005).Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT.Berlin:Springer.
35. Woodman, R. W.,Sawyer, J. E.,Griffin, R. W.(1993).Toward a theory of organizational creativity.The Academy of Management Review,18(2),293-321.
36. 毛連塭、郭有遹、陳龍安、林幸台(2000)。創造力研究。台北:心理出版社。
37. 吳靜吉、陳嘉成、林偉文(1998)。創造力量表簡介，『技術創造力』研討活動（二）：研究方法探討。高雄:國立中山大學。
38. 林美玲(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。桃園，長庚大學工業設計研究所。
39. 唐玄輝(2006)。設計過程中創意產出的可能性－以PSEP比例為測量標準。工業設計，34(2)，155-162。
40. 唐玄輝、林智文、蕭貴霙(2009)。探討創造潛能與概念衍伸度對合作式設計之影響。第十四屆中華民國設計學會研討會論文集，台北市:
41. 郭有遹(2001)。創造心理學。台北:正中書局。
42. 詹鎔瑄(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。桃園縣，中原大學室內設計研究所。

1. 陸定邦、呂佳珍(2012)。以競合關係為導向的選才模式。Journal of Design，17(1)，1-24。
2. 王志弘(2015)。藝術工人、專業服務者與美學企業家室內設計師的生產關係與自我認知。臺灣社會研究季刊，101，125-170。
3. (2023)。設計思考之團隊形塑力研究：團隊人格謹慎性特質在恆毅力對設計思考流程表現之調節效應。設計學報，28(4)，49-72。