高涉入使用者設計知識搜尋模式探討

The Search Model for Design Knowledge at Highly-Involved Users

10.6381/JD.200912.0023

張嘉玲(Chia-Ling Chang)；陸定邦(Ding-Bang Luh)

使用者為創新者 ； 設計知識 ； 使用者設計 ； 資訊搜尋 ； User as Innovator ； Design Knowledge ； User Design ； Information Search

設計學報

14卷4期（2009 / 12 / 01）

23 - 47

繁體中文

Web2.0成功開啟網路世界「全民專家」時代，使用者由單純的知識接收者，轉變為知識提供者或知識開發者。在具體產品領域，使用者期待能自行設計產品，以展現個人創意。更多企業提供產品構件或工具，供使用者發揮他們對產品的創意，使用者可視為另一種形式的設計者。本研究基於「使用者即為創新者」與「Design by user-self」概念，以樂高積木為設計物件、高涉入程度玩家為研究對象，執行「高涉入使用者設計知識搜尋概念模式」之定性研究，提出可行之問卷工具、變動屬性判定原則、模式建構方法與程序等觀念工具，歸納出四種身分之高涉入使用者：初級專家、作品參展者、經營管理者、競賽獲獎者及其關鍵設計知識及搜尋途徑。應用所提概念模式，可針對使用者及企業提出未來發展之可行策略建議，當使用者逐步擁有設計知識，不僅能實踐個人創意，亦間接擴展企業創意版圖；企業方面，可規劃多種商業發展策略來提昇體驗經濟產值及專業形象。透過所提概念模式，高涉入使用者之設計知能，將由少數個人化嗜好提昇為「創意體驗產業」，開創產業設計新能量。

Web 2.0 has facilitated an ”all people expert” era in the internet world, and users have transformed from pure knowledge receptors to knowledge providers or knowledge developers. In the field of concrete products, users wish to design their own products to show personal creativity. More and more enterprises provide the components or tools of products for users to apply their creativity toward product design, and thus, users can be viewed as another form of designers. Based on the concepts, namely ”user is innovator” and ”design by user-self”, using LEGO bricks as the design element and LEGO players with high design capability as the research subjects, this study qualitatively implemented ”a concept model of highly-involved users' design knowledge and search approaches,' and proposed the conceptual tools, including: research questionnaire tools, judgment method for changed attributes, and model construction method and process. This article generalized the key design knowledge and search approaches needed by four types of highly-involved users (junior expert, exhibition participator, business manager, and award winner). With the proposed concept model, feasible suggestions and strategies were offered for users and industries for future development. The possession of design knowledge in users, it not only fulfills individual creativity but also indirectly expands the creativity domain of the enterprise. From the enterprise's perspective, various development strategies could be made to increase its experience economic value and upgrade its professional image. Through proposed model, the design knowledge and skills of highly-involved users will advance from a few individual hobbies to a creative experience industry and start new design power in the industry.

1. Allen, T. J.(1968).Organizational aspects of information flow and technology.Aslib Proceedings,20(11),433-454.
2. Berthon, P. R.,Pitt L. F.,McCarthy, I.,Kates, S. M.(2007).When customers get clever: Managerial approaches to dealing with creative consumers.Business Horizons,50(1),39-47.
3. Blackwell, R. D.,Miniard, P. W.,Engel, J. F.(2005).Consumer behavior.Cincinnati:South Western College Press.
4. 13th international conference on management of technology. Web site
5. Claudia, E.,Martin, S.(2000).Sources of inspiration: A language of design.Design Studies,21(5),523-538.
6. Cooper, R.,Press, M.(1995).The design agenda: A guide to successful design management.New Jersey:Wiley.
7. Cross, N.(1997).Descriptive models of creative design: Application to an example.Design Studies,18(4),427-440.
8. Cross, N.(2004).Expertise in design: An overview.Design Studies,25(5),427-441.
9. Franke, N.,Keinz, P.,Schreier, M.(2008).Complementing mass customization toolkits with user communities: How peer input improves customer self-design.Journal of Product Innovation Management,25(6),546-559.
10. Hansen, M. W.(2007).Keynote Speech for the IDC07, Interaction design and children.DK:Aalborg.
11. Hardy, A. P.(1982).The selection of channels when seeking information: Cost / benefit vs. least-effort.Information Processing & Management,18(6),289-290.
12. Hedlund, G.(1994).A model of knowledge management and the N-Form Corporation.Strategic Management Journal,15(5),73-90.
13. Houston, M. J.,Rothchild, M. L.,S. C. Jain(Ed.)(1978).Research frontiers in marketing: Dialogues and direction.Chicago, IL:Marketing Association.
14. Howells, J.(1996).Tacit knowledge.Technology Analysis & Strategic Management,8(2),91-106.
15. Laurent, G.,Kapferer, J.(1985).Consumer involvement profiles: A new practical approach to consumer involvement.Journal of Advertising Research,25(6),48-56.
16. An introduction to the LEGOR group
17. Luh, D. B.,Chang, C. L.(2008).Incorporating users' creativity in new product development via a user successive design strategy.International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology,32(4),312-321.
18. Luh, D. B.,Lin. T. Z.,S. Poggenpohl(Ed.)(2007).Proceeding of International Association of Societies of Design Research.Kowloon:School of Design, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
19. Mittal, B.,Lee, M. S.(1989).A casual model of consumer involvement.Journal of Economic Psychology,10(3),363-389.
20. Musser, J.,O'Reilly, T.(2006).Web 2.0: Principles and best practices.Sebastopol:O'Reilly Media Inc..
21. Narvaez, L. M. J.(2000).Design's own knowledge.Design Issues,16(1),36-51.
22. Nonaka, I.(2007).The knowledge-creating company.Harvard Business Review,85(7/8),162-171.
23. Nonaka, I.,Takeuchi, H.(1995).The knowledge-creating company.London:Oxford University.
24. What is Web 2.0
25. Polanyi, M.(1967).The tacit dimension.New York:M. E. Sharp Inc..
26. Popovic, V.(2004).Expertise development in product design: Strategic and domain-specific knowledge connections.Design Studies,25(5),527-545.
27. Prahalad, C. K.,Ramaswamy, V.(2002).Co-opting customer competence.Harvard Business Review,78(1),79-87.
28. Redström, J.(2006).Towards user design? On the shift from object to user as the subject of design.Design Studies,27(2),123-139.
29. Robertson, T. S.(1984).Consumer behavior. Scott Foresman and Company.New York:Addison Wesley.
30. Rosenberg, V.(1967).Factors affecting the preferences of industrial personnel for information gathering methods.Information Storage and Rretrieval Journal,3(3),199-129.
31. Sanoff, H.(2007).Special issue on participatory design.Design Studies,28(3),213-215.
32. Su, C. T.,Chen, Y. H.,Sha, D. Y.(2006).Linking innovative product development with customer knowledge: A data-mining approach.Technovation,26(7),784-796.
33. Sveiby, N. E.(1997).The new organization wealth: Managing & measuring knowledge-based assets.San Francisco:Betrett-koehler.
34. von Hippel E.,Katz, R.(2002).Shifting innovation to users via toolkits.Management Science,48(7),821-833.
35. von Hippel, E.(2007)。使用者是創新主導者。哈佛商業評論，6，9-10。
36. Westbrook, R. A.,Claes, F.(1979).Patterns of Information source usage among durable goods buyer.Journal of Marketing Research,16(3),303-312.
37. Wilson, T. D.(1999).Models in information behavior research.Journal of Documentation,55(3),249-270.
38. Zack, M. H.(1999).Managing codified knowledge.Sloan Management Review,40(4),45-57.
39. Zaichkowshy, J. L.(1985).Measuring the involvement construct.Journal of Consumer Research,12(3),341-352.
40. 田耐青(1999)。由「電腦樂高」談新世紀的學習：一個「科技支援之建構學習環境」實例。教學科技與媒體，44，24-35。
41. 伍忠賢、王建彬(2001)。知識管理：策略與實務。台北:聯經出版。
42. 林立軒(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。雲林，國立雲林科技大學工業設計研究所。
43. 許言、張文智(2000)。設計組織的知識管理研究。工業設計，28(2)，191-197。
44. 陳文龍(2000)。設計教育產學合作論文集。雲林:雲林科技大學。
45. 黃哲(2004)。質化研究的效度問題。教育趨勢導報，9，1-4。

1. 曾郭鈞,曾凡桂,陳殿禮(2022)。運用韋伯社會學理論建構設計程序：以獨居現象為例。設計學研究，25(2)，1-35。
2. 陳淳迪、陳姿琪(2010)。由設計視覺溝通探討工業設計實務教學的實施。設計學報，15(3)，69-86。
3. 鍾政偉,蔣宇婷(2020)。以計畫行為理論探討社群媒體搜尋行為之研究－兼論社群媒體之差異比較。Journal of Data Analysis，15(4)，69-101。