產品認知價值之情感向度指標萃取與評價模式研究

Extracting the Emotional Index and Developing the Evaluation Method for the Perceived Value of Products

10.6381/JD.201003.0025

朱柏穎(Po-Ying Chu)；陳立杰(Li-Chieh Chen)；俞維昇(Wei-Sheng Yu)

情感向度 ； 費思指標 ； 決策性格 ； 感受度差異分析 ； Emotional Dimensions ； FASE Index ； Perception Difference Analysis

設計學報

15卷1期（2010 / 03 / 01）

25 - 49

繁體中文

消費者通常會根據產品的效益，以價格和功能的評比作為決策的參考，這種訴求是理性的。但是另外有一些消費行為卻超越理性，而是以使用者主觀衡量得失之後的認知價值作為決策的關鍵。另一方面，以創意與美學等感性訴求的設計活動，則被視為能夠提昇產品認知價值的關鍵因素。因此，本研究期望能探討設計提昇產品認知價值之情感向度指標及其評價模式，作為改進產品開發與決策品質的重要依據。本研究分為三個階段：第一階段先透過文獻研究及訪談設計師與使用者的方式，找出建立情感向度的15個元素因子；第二階段則透過159份有效問卷，進行因素分析並萃取出情感向度的四個構面，並將之命名為費思指標(FASE Index)；第三階段則以三款經典設計商品，對21名決策性格不同的受測者進行實驗，結合模糊理論與成對比較矩陣，對受測者費思指標的權值進行評價。最後並藉由卡方分析、G2統計與四次的二因子變異數分析，檢定費思指標的區別能力與實用性。統計分析結果顯示，受測者面對不同設計款式的產品，在費思指標上具有顯著的感受差異；而某些產品的設計手法，也能使不同決策性格的受測者在費思指標上，呈現不同的感受評價。研究結果顯示，產業將可藉由費思指標作為規劃產品開發策略之依據，除可強化競爭優勢，提昇設計品質外，並可擴展成為生活、商業和公共政策等諸多領域的決策參考。

Often customers make their purchase decision based on price, quality and functionality of the product. However, sometimes, they make the decision based on perceived value. Though design can improve the perceived value of the product, it is not easy for designers to predict the user's preference and reaction toward their products. The gap between designers and users in the design process is always a challenge that academic and industrial professionals try to overcome. Therefore, an effective decision method is necessary and extremely important to evaluate the design at the early stage of product development. This study extracted the indexes from emotional dimensions and developed an evaluation method for the perceived value of products. Based on literature review and the interview of designers and users, the authors identified 15 emotional variables. Followed by conducting questionnaire survey on 159 participants and factor analysis, four indexes were extracted. They are Features, Association, Social-esteem, and Engagement, also named as FASE index. Then by combining the fuzzy theory and the pair-wise comparison method, an evaluation method for FASE index was developed. At the end, the analysis of perception differences for three classic design products was executed to test the sensitivity of FASE index. The findings of this study have demonstrated that FASE index and the decision method can be used to discriminate among design concepts and improve the design process and quality.

1. Desmet, P. M. A.,Hekkert, P.(2007).Framework of product experience.International Journal of Design,1(1),57-66.
   連結：
2. Desmet, P. M. A.,Hekkert, P.(2007).Framework of product experience.International Journal of Design,1(1),57-66.
   連結：
3. 陳文亮、陳姿樺(2008)。模糊決策模式在職校技藝競賽選手評選之研究－以服裝製作組為例。設計學報，13(3)，23-38。
   連結：
4. 單承剛、何明泉(2005)。設計政策指標建構之研究。設計學報，10(2)，13-28。
   連結：
5. 衛萬里、張文智(2005)。應用模糊德爾菲與分析網路程序法選擇最佳產品設計方案之研究。設計學報，10(3)，59-80。
   連結：
6. Akin, Ö.,N. Cross(Eds)(1984).Developments in design methodology.New York:John Wiley.
7. Ariely, D.(2008).Predictably irrational: The hidden forces that shape our decisions.New York:Harper Collins.
8. Baxter, M.(1995).Product design: A practical guide to systematic methods of new product development.London:CRC.
9. Buckley, J. J.(1985).Fuzzy hierarchical analysis.Fuzzy Sets and Systems,17(3),14.
10. Chen, M. F.,Tzeng, G. H.,Ding, C. G.(2008).Combining fuzzy AHP with MDS in identifying the preference similarity of alternatives.Applied Soft Computing,8(1),110-117.
11. Ertugrul, I.,Karakasoglu, N.(2009).Performance evaluation of Turkish cement firms with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS methods.Expert Systems with Applications,36(1),702-715.
12. Gaver, B.,Martin, H.(2000).Alternatives: Exploring information appliances through conceptual design proposals.Proceedings of CHI 2000,2(1),209-216.
13. Gobe, M.、藍美貞譯、高仁君譯(2004)。公民品牌，感性行銷(Citizen brand : 10 commandments for transforming brands in a consumer democracy)。台北市:天下雜誌。
14. Güngör, Z.,Serhadlıoğlu, G.,Kesen, S. E.(2008).A fuzzy AHP approach to personnel selection problem.Applied Soft Computing,9(2),641-646.
15. Hassenzahl, M.,M. A. Blythe,K. Overbeeke(Eds.),A. F. Monk(Eds.),P. C. Wright(Eds.)(2004).Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment.Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic.
16. Myers-Briggs type indicator
17. Jones, J. C.(1992).Design methods.New York:John Wiley.
18. Jordan, P. W.(2000).Designing pleasurable products: An introduction to the new human factors.New York:Taylor.
19. Jordan, P. W.,W. S. Green(Eds.),P. W. Jordan(Eds.)(1999).Human factors in product design: Current practice and future trends.London:Taylor.
20. Khalid, H. M.,Helander, M. G.(2004).A framework for affective customer needs in product design.Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science,5,27-42.
21. Kim, W. C.、Mauborgne, R.、黃秀媛譯(2005)。藍海策略。台北市:天下文化。
22. Leong, B. D.,Clark, H.(2003).Culture-based knowledge towards new design thinking and practice-A dialogue.Design Issues,19(3),48-58.
23. Lin, R. T.(2007).Transforming Taiwan aboriginal cultural features into modern product design: A case study of a cross-cultural product design model.International Journal of Design,1(2),45-33.
24. Ma, M. Y.,Chen, C. Y.,Wu, F. G.(2007).A design decision-making support model for customized product color combination.Computers in Industry,58(6),504-518.
25. Moalosi, R.,Popovic, V.,Hickling-Hudson, A.(2007).Product analysis based on Botswana's postcolonial socio-cultural perspective.International Journal of Design,1(2),25-43.
26. Myers, I. B.,McCaulley, M. H.(1998).MBTI manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs type indicator.Palo Alto:Consulting Psychologists.
27. Norman, D. A.(2004).Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things.New York:Basic.
28. Ortony, A.,Clore, G. L.,Collins, A.(1988).The cognitive structure of emotions.New York:Cambridge University.
29. Preece, J.、Rogers, Y.、Sharp, H.、陳建雄譯(2006)。互動設計。台北市:全華科技。
30. Saaty, T. L.(1980).The analytic hierarchy process.New York:McGraw-Hill.
31. Saaty, T. L.,Takizawa, M.(1986).Dependence and independence: From linear hierarchies to nonlinear networks.European Journal of Operational Research,26(2),229-237.
32. Teng, J. Y.,Tzeng, G. H.(1996).Fuzzy multicriteria ranking of urban transportation investment alternatives.Transportation Planning and Technology,20(1),15-31.
33. Tiger, L.(1992).The pursuit of pleasure.London:Little Brown.
34. van Laarhoven, P. J. M.,Pedrycz, W.(1983).A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory.Fuzzy Sets and Systems,11(1-3),199-227.
35. Wu, F. G.,Lee, Y. J.,Lin, M. C.(2004).Using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process on optimum spatial allocation.International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics,33(6),553-569.
36. Zadeh, L. A.(1999).Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility.Fuzzy Sets and Systems,100,9-34.
37. Zadeh, L. A.(1965).Fuzzy sets.Information and Control,8(3),338-353.
38. Zeithaml, V. A.(1988).Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence.Journal of Marketing,52(3),2-22.
39. Zimmermann, H. J.(1996).Fuzzy sets and its applications.Norwell:Kluwer Academic.
40. 王小璘、劉若瑜(2001)。由景觀生態學觀點探討都市基質環境之永續利用－以台中市東區及南屯區為例。設計學報，6(2)，1-21。
41. 邱皓政(2006)。量化研究與統計分析－SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。台北市:五南。
42. 翁振益、周瑛琪、張保隆(2006)。決策分析方法與應用。台北市:華泰文化。
43. 程炳林、陳正昌編著、程炳林編著、陳新豐編著、劉子鍵編著(2005)。多變量分析方法－統計軟體應用。台北市:五南。
44. 鄧成連(2001)。設計策略：產品設計之管理工具與競爭利器。台北市:亞太圖書。

1. Liu,Chung-Chu(2011)。馬斯洛需求理論在網路書局使用者之驗證。行銷評論，8(3)，405-422。
2. 陳璽敬、陳俊良、林志隆(2014)。策展理念傳達效果探討：以「原來臺灣」展覽為例。設計學報，19(3)，1-22。
3. 劉仲矩、廖子寧(2015)。Ubike APP 數位資本內涵與性別差異重要性之研究。管理資訊計算，4(2)，94-107。
4. 薛淞林(2013)。結合環保訴求之多屬性文化商品設計成效評估模型─以美濃客家為例。設計學研究，16(1)，81-105。
5. 顏惠芸(2017)。文化元素轉換時尚設計因素探討─以紐約大都會博物館「中國：鏡花水月」時裝展為例。設計學報，22(2)，1-24。
6. 顏惠芸(2018)。情感設計因素影響文創產品喜好之模式建構與分析。設計學報，23(4)，21-44。
7. 顏惠芸(2019)。經典產品設計的評價與喜好研究－以包浩斯餐廚產品為例。設計學報，24(4)，41-63。
8. 顏惠芸(2021)。宗教觀光紀念品之愉悅設計因素探討。設計學研究，24(2)，1-24。
9. 莊立文、邱淑萍、朱維政(2010)。美容SPA館氛圍之設計策略。美容科技學刊，7(4)，13-34。
10. (2014)。文創商品之感質特性探討。感性學報，2(1)，34-61。