商品意象設計指標權重之研究

A Study on the Weighting of Indicators for Image Design

10.6381/JD.201103.0041

李亞傑(Ya-Chieh Lee)；何明泉(Ming-Chyuan Ho)

意象設計 ； 指標 ； 權重 ； Image Design ； Indicator ； Weighting

設計學報

16卷1期（2011 / 03 / 01）

41 - 64

繁體中文

今日的消費者以商品意象之差異性符號價值來消費商品，透過意象消費獲得生活的愉悅與認同。正因如此，商品意象設計儼然成爲當代設計的重要核心課題。本研究透過專家決策方式，篩選出具專業和一致性看法之評估指標，並透過因素分析，建構商品意象設計指標之層級架構，找出影響意象設計之關鍵指標。再者，本研究更進一步透過專家運用層級程序分析法（AHP法）取得意象設計指標之相對權值，以及一致性檢定和分析，藉以建構商品意象設計指標權重體系。在研究結果部份，本研究歸納出6項影響意象設計評估構面和21條細項指標。在意象設計指標之相對權值研究結果，權重由高至低依序爲「使用者爲主的設計思考」、「企業目標和消費者期望的實現」、「品牌形象的建立」、「產品識別力」、「文化訊息的傳遞」、「設計計劃的整合」。最後，透過本研究所建構之商品意象設計指標實際對三件商品評判其意象設計之成效，以驗證指標操作之可行性。本研究相信藉由商品意象設計指標相對權重的建立，對過去籠統的意象設計概念能更進一步透過科學化程序對商品意象設計之評估方式加以釐清，作爲設計學術界、實務界之參考。

Nowadays, consumers judge different symbol values of products through images. People get pleasure and identity through product images as well. Therefore, image design has become a core issue of product design development. However, there are few related studies or systematic evaluation indicator on weighting of indicators for image design. Thus, this study uses expert decision making to establish the professional and consensual evaluation indicators. Then, factor analysis is used to construct the framework of the evaluation indicators. Further, this study also uses Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for the relative weights of the evaluation indicators, and examines consistency for the indicator weight system of the study. Finally, this study concludes 6 evaluation dimensions with 21 indicators. Besides, the meaning of the indicators system is discussed. In terms of the relative weights of these evaluation dimensions, the first is ”user-center design thinking”; the second is ”attaining corporate objectives and consumers' expectations”; the third are ”building brand image”, ”product identity”, ”cultural information communication”, and ”design plan and integration”. The construction of image design indicator system scientifically helps to clarify the concepts of image design.

1. 單承剛、何明泉(2005)。設計政策指標建構之研究。設計學報，10(2)，13-27。
   連結：
2. 周美惠（2009年3月13日）。周功鑫：Alessi幫故宮設計商品不及格。聯合報，A8，文化版。Jhou, M. H. (2003, March 13). Jhou Gong-Sin critiqued Alessi's design. United Daily News, A8, Culture ed. [in Chinese, semantic translation]
3. Akin, Ö.(1986).Psychology of architectural design.London:Pion Ltd..
4. Almquist, J.,Lupton, J.(2010).Affording meaning: Design-oriented research from the humanities and social sciences.Design Issues,26(1),3-14.
5. Baudrillard, J.,Glaser, S.(trans.)(1994).Simulacra and simulation.New York:University of Michigan Press.
6. Bhamra, T. A.,Lilley, D.,Tang, T.(2008).Changing the Change Conference- Design Visions, Proposals and Tools.Turin, Italy:
7. Bowen, K. H.,Clark, K. B.,Holloway, C. A.,Wheelwright, S. C.(1994).The perpetual enterprise machine.New York:Oxford University Press.
8. Brown, T.(2009).Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation.New York:HarperCollins.
9. Cagan, J.,Vogel, C. M.(2002).Creating breakthrough products: Innovation from product planning to program approval.New Jersey:Financial Times Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
10. Cross, N.(2002).Design as a discipline: Assist discussion at designing design.The Inter-disciplinary Design Quandary Conference,DeMontfort, UK:
11. Folkmann, M. N.(2010).Evaluating aesthetics in design: A phenomenological approach.Design Issues,26(1),40-53.
12. Jakobson, R.,Halle, M.(1971).Fundamentals of language.New York:de Gruyter, Hawthorne Mouton.
13. Junginger, S.(2008).Product development as a vehicle for organizational change.Design Issues,24(1),26-35.
14. Kellaghan, T.(ed.),Stufflebeam, D. L.(ed.),Wingate, L. A.(ed.)(2003).International handbook of educational evaluation: Part 2.MA:Practice Norwell, Kluwer Academic.
15. Kellaghan, T.(ed.),Stufflebeam, D. L.(ed.),Wingate, L. A.(ed.)(2003).International handbook of educational evaluation: Practice.Norwell:Kluwer Academic.
16. Kellaghan, T.(ed.),Stufflebeam, D. L.(ed.),Wingate, L. A.(ed.)(2003).International handbook of educational evaluation: Practice.MA:Norwell, Kluwer Academic.
17. Krippendorff, K.(2009).On communication: Otherness, meaning, and information.New York:Routledge.
18. Lilley, D.(2009).Design for sustainable behaviour: Strategies and perceptions.Design Studies,30(6),704-720.
19. Lindgreen, A.,Vanhamme, J.(2003).To surprise or not surprise your customers: The Use of surprise as a marketing tool.Journal of Customer Behavior,2(2),219-242.
20. Ludden, G. D. S.,Schifferstein, H. N. J.,Hekkert, P.(2008).Surprise as a design strategy.Design Issues,24(2),28-38.
21. Manzini, E.,Milano, P. D.(2009).New design knowledge.Design Studies,30(1),4-12.
22. Margolin, V.(ed.),Buchanan, B.(ed.)(1995).The idea of design.London:MIT.
23. Meltsner, A. J.(1976).Policy analysis in the Bureaucracy.Berkeley:University of California Press.
24. Nachmias, D.,Nachmias, C.(1979).Public policy evaluation: Approaches and methods.New York:St. Martin's.
25. Nightingale, P.,Ibbetson, A.,Pugh, R.(2003).An evaluation of the impact of a multidisciplinary educational event focusing on teamwork and leadership skills in primary care.Education for Primary Care,14,345-355.
26. Norman, D.(2003).Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things.New York:Basic Books.
27. Norman, D.(2002).Design of everyday things.New York:Basic Books.
28. Nunnally, J.(1978).Psychometric theory.New York:McGraw-Hill.
29. Oliver, R. L.,Winer, R. S.(1987).A framework for the formation and structure of consumer expectations-Review and propositions.Journal of Economic Psychology,8(4),469-499.
30. Petitdemange, J.,R. Rentschler(ed.)(1998).Shaping culture, art and entertainment management.Geelong:Deakin University Press.
31. Pink, D.(2008).A whole new mind: Why right-brainers will rule the future.New York:Riverhead Books.
32. Rousseau, D.(1995).Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements.CA:Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications.
33. Saaty, T. L.(1980).The analytic hierarchy process.New York:McGraw-Hill.
34. Saaty, T. L.(1994).Fundamentals of decision making with the analytic hierarchy process.PA:RWS.
35. Scruton, R.(1980).The aesthetics of architecture.New Jersey:Princeton University Press.
36. Tyler, R. W.(1950).Basic principles of curriculum and instruction.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
37. Ulrich, K. T.,Eppinger, S. D.(1995).Product design and development.New York:McGraw-Hill.
38. Weimer, D. L.,Vining, A. R.(1992).Policy analysis: Concepts and practice.New Jersey:Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
39. Wilson, A.,Pitman, L.(2001).Best practice handbook for Australian university libraries.Australia:Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
40. Wylant, B.(2008).Design thinking and the experience of innovation.Design Issues,24(2),3-14.
41. Ysseldyke, J.,Krentz, J.,Elliott, J.,Thurlow, M. L.,Erickson, R.,Moore, M. L.(1998).NCEO framework for educational accountability.Minneapolis:University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
42. 內田廣由紀(2009)。共感力：暢銷商品的秘密。台北=Taipei:城邦文化=Cite Books。
43. 王光明、吳和堂、吳明隆(2008)。高雄市立國民小學學校評鑑指標再建構之研究。教育行政與評鑑學刊，5，75-106。
44. 王郁閔(2009)。台北市= Taipei，國立台灣科技大學設計研究所=National Taiwan University of Science and Technology。
45. 王桂沰(2005)。企業、品牌、識別、形象—符號思維與設計方法。台北=Taipei:全華=Open Tech。
46. 佐口七朗(1990)。設計概論。台北=Taipei:藝風堂出版社=Yft.。
47. 李金泉(2007)。精通SPSS統計分析實務與應用。台北=Taipei:全華=ChWa Books。
48. 邱皓政(2010)。量化研究與統計。台北=Taipei:五南=WuNan Books。
49. 原田進、黃克煒譯(2007)。設計品牌Branding。台中=Taichung:辰星=Morning Star。
50. 孫志麟(1998)。台北市=Taipei，國立政治大學教育研究所=National Chengchi University。
51. 張光民(2010)。編輯的話。設計Design，152，6。
52. 張佳穎、邱垂昱(2008)。建立大學教師研究績效指標權重之研究。台北科技大學學報，41(1)，89-106。
53. 張國禎(2007)。台灣綠建築九大評估指標改進方向之研究—以學校類建築之規劃設計爲例。中華建築技術學刊，4(1)，47-54。
54. 張鈿富(1999)。教育政策與行政—指標發展與應用。台北=Taipei:師大書苑=Shta Book。
55. 黃雅雯(2006)。屏東縣=Miaoli County，育達商業技術學院企業管理研究所=Yu Da College of Business。
56. 楊文雄(1980)。教育評鑑之理論與實務。台中=Taichung:台灣省政府教育廳=Education department of Taiwan Provincial Government。
57. 經濟部、新聞局、文建會(2009)。創意台灣—文化創意產業發展方案行動計畫98-102年核定版。台北=Taipei:文建會=Council for Cultural Affairs。
58. 漢寶德(1988)。建築、社會與文化。台北=Taipei:境與象=Environment and Phenomenon。
59. 鄭進斛(2005)。高雄市=Kaohsiung，國立中山大學教育研究所=National Sun Yat-sen University。
60. 賴明茂(2008)。雲林縣=Yunlin，國立雲林科技大學設計學研究所=National Yunlin University of Science and Technology。
61. 謝文全(1989)。教育行政—理論與實務。台北=Taipei:文景出版社=WinJoin Book。

1. 馮文君(2019)。文創品牌之策展設計與形象塑造：以「有情門」品牌為例。修平學報，38，15-83。
2. 馮文君、陳殿禮(2017)。多廠商品牌聯展之策展設計。設計學報，22(3)，21-44。
3. 薛淞林(2013)。結合環保訴求之多屬性文化商品設計成效評估模型─以美濃客家為例。設計學研究，16(1)，81-105。
4. (2015)。探討影響校園自有商品購買意願之因素：大學品牌知名度、設計、價格為變數。傳播管理學刊，16(2)，1-36。