教學相長：學生社會網絡中介電腦繪圖學習動機與成效

Teaching and Learning Help Each Other: A Study on Students' Social Network Intermediated CAD Learning Motivation and Performance

10.6381/JD.201209.0023

黃教益(Chiao-I Huang)；陸定邦(Ding-Bang Luh)；孔憲法(Shin-Far Kung)

電腦繪圖 ； 成就動機理論 ； 社會網絡分析 ； 中介 ； 干擾 ； Amos ； NodeXL ； CAD ； Achievement Motivation Theory ； SNA ； Mediation ； Moderation ； Amos ； NodeXL

設計學報

17卷3期（2012 / 09 / 01）

23 - 44

繁體中文

本文探討學習過程中影響電腦繪圖學習成效的因素。於不同學制班級間，在相同授課老師、期間、軟體、教室等限制條件下進行問卷調查（N= 112，Cronbach α=0.62-0.81），依成就動機理論，驗證學習動機、學習行為與成效的因果關係。因前測發現練習頻率、安裝軟體早晚、求助管道等一般認真日之學習行為，與學習動機及成效無顯著關係，並且遭遇問題時大多求助同儕，因而改以學生社會網絡之互動行為做為學習行為，分析互動行為對學習的中介效用，並分析不同班級對此學習模型之干擾效用。分析結果顯示，在相同學習動機下，較高社會網絡行為，如協助他人及告訴相關訊息，就有較高學習成效，而組成差異很大的學制對模型的干擾效用不顯著。學生學習中還教導別人等的互動行為對學習具顯著中介效用，映證禮記學記『教學相長』之古諺。

To improve CAD learning performance, this paper studies the crucial factors of learning process. Based on Achievement Motivation Theory, a questionnaire was used to test the causality between motivation, behavior and performance with constraint conditions (N=112, Cronbach alpha=0.617～0.813), which were of the same period, course, and classroom in 3 different classes. Since no significant correlation was found in the pretest between practice and the other two factors, the authors adopted Social Network (SN) theory to approach the behavior issue. Social Network Analysis (SNA) was used to calculate six social metrics of four networks. Then factor analysis was used to select proper metrics for further study. After model fitness comparison in Amos, research goes on mediation from social network, and moderation from different programs. The result shows that under the same motivation level, higher social network behavior could result in higher learning performance and better scores. Furthermore, different programs have no moderation effect on such learning model. That students' social network has significant mediation effects on CAD learning is the evidence of a wise old saying in ”Li Ji Xue Ji”: ”Teaching and learning help each other”.

1. Ames, C.,Archer, J.(1988).Achievement goals in the classroom: Students' learning strategies and motivation processes.Journal of Educational Psychology,80(3),260-267.
2. Baron, R. M.,Kenny, D. A.(1986).The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,51(6),1173-1182.
3. Bentler, P.(1990).Comparative fit indexes in structural models.Psychological Bulletin,107(2),238-246.
4. Bian, Y.(1997).Bringing strong ties back in: Indirect ties, network bridges, and job searches in China.American Sociological Review,62(3),366-385.
5. Biddle, S. K.,Cury, F.,Goudas, M.,Sarrazin, P.,Famose, J.-P.,Durand, M.(1995).Development of scale to measure perceived physical education class climate: A cross-national project.British Journal of Educational Psychology,65(3),341-58.
6. Bollen, K. A.(1989).Structural equations with latent variables.New York, NY:Wiley.
7. Browne, M.,Cudeck, R.(1993).Alternative ways of assessing model fit.Testing structural equation models,Newbury Park, CA:
8. Bryman, A.,Cramer, D.(1997).Quantitative data analysis with SPSS for Windows.London, England:Routledge.
9. Divjak, B.,Peharda, P.(2010).Social network analysis of study environment.Journal of International Students,34(1),67-80.
10. Dziuban, C. D.,Shirkey, E. C.(1974).When is a correlation matrix appropriate for factor analysis? Some decision rules.Psychological Bulletin,81(6),358-361.
11. Evans, K. M.(1966).Sociometry and education.New York, NY:The Humanities Press.
12. Fornell, C.,Larcker, D.(1981).Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.Journal of Marketing Research,18(1),39-50.
13. Granovetter, M.(1985).Economic-action and social-structure- the problem of embeddedness.American Journal of Sociology,91(3),481-510.
14. Granovetter, M.(1973).Strength of weak ties.American Journal of Sociology,78(6),1360-1380.
15. Hamadea, R. F.,Artailb, H. A.,Jaberc, M. Y.(2006).Evaluating the learning process of mechanical CAD students.Computers & Education,49(3),640-661.
16. Karolchuck, P. A.,Worell, L.(1956).Achievement motivation and learning.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,53(2),255-257.
17. Kenny, D. A.(2008).Reflections on mediation.Organizational Research Methods,11(2),14-21.
18. Krackhardt, D.(1992).The strength of strong ties: The importance of Philos in organization.Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action,Boston, Mass:
19. Krackhardt, D.,Hanson, J. R.(1993).Informal networks: The company behind the chart.Harvard Business Review,71(4),191-196.
20. Kunz, W.,Pradhan, D. K.(1994).Recursive learning: A new implication technique for efficient solutions to CAD problems-test, verification, and optimization.Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, IEEE Transactions on,13(9),1143-1158.
21. McClelland, D. C.(1958).Methods of measuring human motivation.Motives in fantasy, action and society,Princeton, N. J.:
22. McClelland, D. C.(1965).Toward a theory of motive acquisition.American Psychologist,20(5),321-333.
23. McClelland, D. C.(1961).Methods of measuring human motivation.The achieving society,Princeton, N. J.:
24. McClelland, D. C.,Atkinson, J. W.,Clark, R. A.,Lowell, E. L.(1953).The achievement motive.New York, NY:Appleton-Century-Crofts.
25. Nicholls, J. G.(1984).Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance.Psychological Review,91(3),328-346.
26. Prensky, M.(2003).Digital game-based learning.Computers in Entertainment,1(1),21-21.
27. Puca, R. M.,Schmalt, H. D.(1999).Task enjoyment: A mediator between achievement motives and performance.Motivation and Emotion,23(1),15-29.
28. Russo, T. C.,Koesten, J.(2005).Prestige, centrality, and learning: A Social network analysis of an online class.Communication Education,54(3),254-261.
29. Schumacher, M.,Roßner, R.,Vach, W.(1996).Neural networks and logistic regression.Computational Statistics and Data Analysis,21(6),661-682.
30. Wahab, M. B. H. A.(2007).Study on the impact of motivation, self-efficacy and learning strategies of faculty of education undergraduates studying ICT courses.The Journal of Behavioral Science,2(1),151-185.
31. Wasserman, S.,Faust, K.(1994).Social network analysis: Methods and applications.Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press.
32. Weiner, B.(1979).A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences.Journal of Educational psychology,71(1),3-25.
33. Weiner, B.(1985).An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion.Psychological Review,92(4),548-573.
34. Yang, H.-L.,Tang, J.-H.(2003).Effects of social network on students' performance: A web-based forum study in Taiwan.Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks,7(3),93-107.
35. 吳秀玲(2008)。彰化市，台灣=Changhua City, Taiwan，國立彰化師範大學=National Changhua University of Education。
36. 李義平(2006)。新竹市，台灣=Hsinchu City, Taiwan，中華大學=Chunghwa University。
37. 林甘敏(2005)。雲林縣，台灣=Yunlin County, Taiwan，雲林科技大學=National Yunlin University of Science and Technology。
38. 袁和法、劉平、許懋琦(2004)。工業設計的發展需要製圖教學的創新。華東理大學學報：社會科學版，19(3)，117-120。
39. 莫春柳(2005)。工業設計專業的工程製圖教學模式探索。工程圖學報，26(2)，142-145。
40. 莊謙本(2001)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,台北市=Taipei, Taiwan:國立臺灣師範大學工業教育學系=Department of Industrial Education, National Taiwan Normal University。
41. 陳正和(2001)。影響青年學習行為的組織承諾、信念與一些社會特徵。應用心理研究，11，117-140。
42. 陳順宇(2007)。結構方程式模式Amos操作。台北市=Taipei:心理出版社=Psychological Publishing。
43. 黃教益(2007)。台南科大電腦繪圖課程教學之研究。中原大學室內設計系第六屆國際學術研討會論文集，桃園=Tao-Yuan:
44. 黃教益(2009)。科技．創新與室內設計。台南市=Tainan:漢家出版社=Han Gu Publisher。
45. 黃教益(1994)。由電腦應用談室內設計之電腦教學方向。台南家專學報，13，283-288。
46. 鄧成連(1997)。平面設計教育之電腦繪圖教學研究。設計學報，2(2)，21-36。
47. 鍾桂民(2008)。台北市，台灣=Taipei City, Taiwan，輔仁大學=Fu Jen Catholic University。
48. 羅家德(2005)。社會網分析講義。北京=Bejing:社會科學文獻出版社=Social Science Literature。
49. 關道文(2003)。停止教授CAAD的理由。CAAD TALK3數位設計教育，台北市=Taipei:

1. 戴偉勝(2015)。3D電腦繪圖學習效益影響因素之研究。台北海洋技術學院學報，6(2)，223-238。
2. 劉光夏、李翊駿(2013)。提昇非設計背景大學生之電腦繪圖能力：五位經驗教師的分享與探究。國教新知，60(3)，36-44。