涵蓄的變化：日常實踐中的詩意體驗設計

An Implicit Change: Designing Poetic Experience in Daily Practice

林逸筑(Yi-Chu Lin)；陳杏綺(Hsing-Chi Chen)；梁容輝(Rung-Huei Liang)

詩意互動設計 ； 詩意意象 ； 反思 ； 想像力 ； 內隱聯結測試 ； Poetic Interacation Design ； Poetic Image ； Reflection ； Implicit Associate Test

設計學報

18卷1期（2013 / 03 / 01）

25 - 39

繁體中文

本研究提出並探索日常實踐中新的設計類別－詩意互動設計（Poetic Interaction Design），以「藉由設計做研究」（Research through Design）為取徑，透過設計實作：「Scentonight」，企圖鼓勵使用者於生活脈絡中進行自我反思的互動體驗。然而，詩意是一種極為抽象的概念，為了驗證此詩意經驗的影響，本研究使用內隱聯結測試方法（Implicit Association Test），以測量與評估參與者內隱態度的改變狀態。研究結果可得知（1）透過詩意設計的互動體驗，確實能改變或提升使用者初期對於物件與詩意聯結的既定印象；（2）相較於初期的「功能性」連結，參與者普遍提升日常生活物件的「聯想性」連結。因此，本研究主張使用者經驗中的涵蓄變化將可被評估與證實，並倡導發展「實用詩意」範疇，透過互動設計的實踐，提升使用者日常生活體驗。

This study explores a novel direction of design in daily practice - Poetic Interaction Design. Following a ”Research through Design” approach to addressing such issues, this paper presents a design work, Scentonight, creating an interactive experience to encourage users in the context of usage to reflect on their everyday lives. The concept of Poetic Interaction however is too abstract to grasp and describe. In order to investigate the effect of poetic experience, we employ the Implicit Association Test to measure and analyze changes in a user's implicit self-concept. The result shows that, through a poetic experience, participants' attitudes significantly differ from their original impression. Furthermore, the participants tend to regard an everyday object in terms of its association to poetic images rather than its function. Therefore, this study demonstrates and evaluates an implicit change of an abstract concept of user's experience, advocating ”pragmatist poetics” which could contribute and enrich the experience of daily practice by interaction design.

1. Plurk. (2008). Retrieved February 02, 2011, from the World Wide Web: http://www.plurk.com.
2. Carroll, L.,Kincaid, E.(1993).Alice in wonderland.Newmarket, UK:Brimax Books.
3. Djajadiningrat, P. J.,Gaver, W. W.,Fres, W. J.(2000).Interaction relabeling and extreme characters: methods for exploring aesthetic interactions.Proceedings of the 3rd conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques,New York, NY:
4. Greenwald, A. G.,McGhee, D. E.,Schwartz, J. L. K.(1998).Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test.Personality and Social Psychology,74(6),1464-1480.
5. Hallnäs, L.,Redström, J.(2002).From use to presence: on the expressions and aesthetics of everyday computational things.ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction,9(2),106-124.
6. Hashim, W. N. W.,Noor, M. L. M.,Adnan, W. A. W.(2009).The design of aesthetic interaction: Towards a graceful interaction framework.Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Interaction Sciences: Information Technology, Culture and Human,New York, NY:
7. Hindus, D.,Mainwaring, S. D.,Leduc, N.,Hagström, E. A.,Bayley, O.(2001).Casablanca: Designing social communication devices for the home.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems,New York, NY:
8. Hummels, C.,Overbeeke, K.(2010).Special issue editorial: Aesthetics of interaction.International Journal of Design,4(2),1-2.
9. Kolko, J.(2007).Thoughts on Interaction Design.Savannah, GA:Brown Bear LLC.
10. Kooijmans, T.,Rauterberg, M.(2007).Cultural computing and the self concept: Towards unconscious metamorphosis.Entertainment Computing ICEC 2007,Berlin, Germany:
11. Lehar, S.(2003).,Boston, MA:Peli Lab, Schepens Eye Research Institute.
12. Lim, Y. K.,Stolterman, E.,Jung, H.,Donaldson, J.(2007).Interaction gestalt and the design of aesthetic interactions.Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Designing pleasurable products and interfaces,New York, NY:
13. Lin, Y.-C.,Chang, H.-M.,Liang, R.-H.(2011).Capturing notions from abstractions: The foundation of poetic interaction design.The 4th World Conference on Design Research, IASDR2011,Delft, Netherlands:
14. Lin, Y.-C.,Chang, H.-M.,Liang, R.-H.(2011).Designing poetic interaction in space.Human-Computer Interaction. Towards Mobile and Intelligent Interaction Environments
15. Löwgren, J.(2007).Fluency as an experiential quality in augmented spaces.International Journal of Design,1(3),1-10.
16. McConnell, A. R.,Leibold, J. M.(2000).Relations among the implicit association test, discriminatory behavior, and explicit measures of racial attitudes.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,37(5),435-442.
17. Norman, D.(2005).Emotional design: why we love (or hate) everyday things.New York, NY:Basic Books.
18. Norretranders, T.(1999).The user illusion: Cutting consciousness down to size.New York, NY:Penguin Books.
19. Petersen, M. G.,Hallnäs, L.,Jacob, R. J. K.(2008).Introduction to special issue on the aesthetics of interaction.ACM Transaction on Computer-Human Interaction,15(3)
20. Petersen, M. G.,Iversen, O.,Krogh, P.,Ludvigsen, M.(2004).Aesthetic interaction: A pragmatist's aesthetics of interactive systems.Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems,New York, NY:
21. Ross, P. R.,Wensveen, S. A. G.(2010).Designing aesthetics of behavior in interaction: Using aesthetic experience as a mechanism for design.International Journal of Design,4(2),3-13.
22. Scherini, T.,Melo, P.,Craenendonck, V. T.,Zou, W.,Kaptein, M.(2010).Enhancing the sleeping quality of partners living apart.Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems,New York, NY:
23. Shusterman, R.(2000).Pragmatist aesthetics: Living beauty, rethinking art.Oxford, UK:Blackwell.
24. Visser, T.,Vastenburg, M.,Keyson, D.(2010).SnowGlobe: the development of a prototype awareness system for longitudinal field studies.DIS'10 Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems,New York, NY:
25. Zimmerman, J.,Forlizzi, J.,Evenson, S.(2007).Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI.Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems,New York, NY: