题名

應用德爾菲層級程序法於可攜式學童舒壓背靠之設計

并列篇名

Applying Delphi Hierarchy Process in the Design of a Portable Pressure-relieving Back Supporter for Elementary School Children

作者

駱信昌(Hsin-Chang Lo)

关键词

德爾菲層級程序法 ; 保健器材 ; 學童 ; 舒壓背靠 ; Delphi Hierarchy Process ; Healthcare Device ; Elementary School Children ; Pressure-relieving Back Supporter

期刊名称

設計學報

卷期/出版年月

18卷3期(2013 / 09 / 01)

页次

1 - 21

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

國小階段為學童成長發育的關鍵時期,學童採用不良的方式背負過重書包時,脊椎將長時間維持不正常的曲線,容易造成骨骼肌肉傷害甚至導致脊椎變形。透過適當保健器材的介入可以修正不良的書包背負姿勢以減輕脊椎壓力。保健器材的設計考量多方面設計要素,需利用多準則決策方法獲得客觀的產品設計與評價共識。本研究與醫療器材製造廠商合作,以可攜式學童舒壓背靠產品開發案為實例,探討應用德爾菲層級程序法於保健器材設計與評估模式的可行性。首先採用德爾菲法獲得不同領域專家具共識性舒壓背靠產品之設計要素;透過分析層級程序法建立三個構面以及九項準則,並計算準則之相對權重;再依此準則評選構想方案的優先順序,決定最適當的構想方案。研究結果顯示德爾菲層級程序法從新產品開發之初便由相關領域專家參與訂定新產品的設計要素,建立設計準則之層級架構,接著提出設計構想方案並完成敏感度分析,最終產出之產品原型明顯符合最初設定之新產品開發目標。本研究透過實例說明德爾菲層級程序法在新產品開發流程的可行性,此法簡單、客觀、邏輯架構清楚,且易於操作,可廣泛應用於不同類型的產品開發流程。

英文摘要

Elementary school years are a crucial period to children's physical development. If school children carry their schoolbags in an inappropriate manner, it would bring their spine to an abnormal curve, which leads to musculoskeletal disorders or even spinal deformity. Healthcare devices can adjust inappropriate bag-carrying posture and reduce spinal pressure. The design of healthcare devices should take several design elements into consideration and apply multiple criteria decision making to acquire objective design principle and evaluation consensus. In this study we cooperated with medical equipment manufactures to explore the feasibility of applying Delphi Hierarchy Process in medical equipment design and evaluation mode through a case study in which a pressure-relieving back supporter was designed for school children. First, Delphi Hierarchy Process was adopted to obtain the consensual design concepts of the pressure-relieving back supporter from experts of different domains. Then through analytic hierarchy process, three design objectives and ten design criteria were introduced, and the relative importance ranking of the criteria was also calculated. The ranking was adopted to decide the priority of each solution and determine the best solution. The experimental result showed that Delphi Hierarchy Process allowed experts to determine the design criteria, establishing the hierarchical structure of the design standard, proposing design concept and completing sensitivity analysis of the new product from early development stage. Therefore, the final product prototype complied obviously with the initial product development goals. In this study, the feasibility of applying Delphi Hierarchy Process in new product development process is explained through a case study. Delphi Hierarchy Process proves to be a simple and objective method that is not only with clear logical structure but also easy to operate, which makes it possible to be widely applied in different types of product development.

主题分类 人文學 > 藝術
社會科學 > 傳播學
参考文献
  1. 王振琤、林銘泉、陳子昌(2005)。應用品質機能展開於戶外休閒服飾設計程序之發展。設計學報,10(2),29-41。
    連結:
  2. 陳文亮、陳姿樺(2007)。運動休閒服飾設計指標之建立與分析。設計學報,12(4),79-95。
    連結:
  3. 衛萬里、張文智(2005)。應用模糊德爾菲與分析網路程序法選擇最佳產品設計方案之研究。設計學報,10(3),59-77。
    連結:
  4. 何國平(2010)。旅行背包。中華民國新式樣專利證書號:D133357。Ho, G. P. (2010). Backpack. Taiwan Patent D133357. [in Chinese, semantic translation]。
  5. 蕭景隆(2004)。椅背靠墊之結構改良。中華民國新型專利證書號:M248330。Xiao, J. L. (2004). Improved structure of mat for backrest of chair. Taiwan Patent M248330. [in Chinese, semantic translation]。
  6. 余有文(2008)。背包。中華民國新型專利證書號:M336720。Yu, Y. W. (2008). Backpack. Taiwan Patent M336720. [in Chinese, semantic translation]。
  7. 楊甫元(2007)。3D 立體氣流式背包墊。中華民國新型專利證書號:M313451。Yang, F. Y. (2007). 3D air-current-type knapsack pad. Taiwan Patent M313451. [in Chinese, semantic translation]。
  8. 徐松德(2006)。背包之墊體結構改良。中華民國新型專利證書號:M288784。Shiu, S. D. (2006). Improvement of overall structure of backpack. Taiwan Patent M288784. [in Chinese, semantic translation]。
  9. 張啓源(2005)。充氣式護墊結構。中華民國新型專利證書號:M254938。Zhang, Q. Y. (2005). Structure of inflatable protective mat. Taiwan Patent M254938. [in Chinese, semantic translation]。
  10. Al-Harbi, K. M.(2001).Application of the AHP project management.International Journal of Project Management,19(1),19-27.
  11. Carolyn. K.,Colby, L. A.(2007).Therapeutic exercise foundations and techniques: Foundations and techniques.Philadelphia, PA:F. A. Davis.
  12. Chansirinukor, C.,Wilson, D.,Grimmer, K.,Dansie, B.(1996).Effects of backpacks on students: Measurement of cervical and shoulder posture.Australian Journal of Physiotherapy,4(2),110-116.
  13. Dalkey, N.,Helmer, O.(1963).An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts.Management Science,9(3),458-467.
  14. Handfield, R.,Walton, S.V.,Sroufe, R.,Melnyk, S. A.(2002).Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: A study in the application of the analytical hierarchy process.European Journal of Operational Research,141(1),70-87.
  15. Hong, Y.,Brueggemann, G. P.(2000).Changes in gait patterns in 10-year-old boys with increasing loads when walking on a treadmill.Gait & Posture,11(3),254-259.
  16. Hong, Y.,Cheung, C. K.(2003).Gait and posture responses to backpack load during level walking in children.Gait & Posture,17(1),28-33.
  17. Hunter, A. M.,St Clair Gibson, A.,Lambert. M.,Noakes, T. D.(2002).EMG normalization method for cycle fatigue protocols.Medical and Science in Sports and Exercise,34(5),857-861.
  18. Khorramshahgol, R.,Moustakis, V. S.(1988).Delphic hierarchy process (DHP): a methodology for priority setting derived from the Delphic method and analytical hierarchy process.European Journal of Operational Research,37(3),347-354.
  19. Li, J. X.,Hong, Y.(2004).Age difference in trunk kinematics during walking with different backpack weights in 6- to 12-year-old children.Research in Sports Medicine,12(2),135-142.
  20. Linstone, H. A.,Turoff, M.(1975).The delphi method: Techniques and application.London, England:Addison-Wesley.
  21. Liu, C. C.,Jheng, J. J.,Wang, T. Y.(2011).The application of quality function deployment and analytical hierarchy process in product design of digital lens single reflex camera.Journal for SME Development,22,25-44.
  22. Liu, P. H.,Wei, C. C.(2000).A group decision making technique for appraising the performance of organizations.International Journal of the Computer. Internet and Management,8(2),39-49.
  23. Mackie, H. W.,Legg, S. J.,Beadle, J.,Hedderley, D.(2003).Comparison of four different backpacks intended for school use.Applied Ergonomics,34(3),257-264.
  24. Narasimhan, C.,Neslin, S. A.,Sen, S. K.(1996).Promotional elasticities and category characteristics.Journal of Marketing,60(April),17-30.
  25. Negrini, S.,Carabalona, R.,Sibilla, P.(1999).Backpack as a daily load for schoolchildren.The Lancet,354,1974.
  26. Nydick, R. L.,Hill, R. P.(1992).Using the analytic hierarchy process to structure the supplier selection procedure.International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management,28(2),31-36.
  27. Olsen, T. D.,Andrews, R. L.,Dearwater, S. R.,Kriska, A. M.,Cauley, J. L.,Aaron, D. J.,LaPorte, R. E.(1992).The epidemiology of low back pain in an adolescent population.American Journal of Public Health,82(4),606-608.
  28. Pascoe, D. D.,Pascoe, D. E.,Wang, Y. T.,Shim, D. M.,Kim, C. K.(1997).Influence of carrying book bags on gait cycle and posture of youth.Ergonomics,40(6),631-641.
  29. Saaty, T. L.(1980).The analytic hierarchy process.New York, NY:McGraw-Hill.
  30. Salminen, J. J.,Pentti, J.,Terho, P.(1992).Low back pain and disability in 14 year old schoolchildren.Acta Paediatr,81(12),1035-1039.
  31. Troussier, B.,Davoine, P.,de Gaudemaris, R.,Fauconnier, J.,Phelip, X.(1994).Back pain in school children: A study among 1178 pupils.Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine,26(6),143-146.
  32. Whittfield, J.,Legg, S. J.,Hedderley, D. I.(2001).The weight and use of schoolbags in New Zealand secondary schools.Ergonomics,44(9),819-824.
  33. 杜瑞澤、陳苑菁(2006)。層級分析法(AHP)應用於永續產品開發策略之研究。高雄師大學報,21,139-153。
  34. 林奕瑋、駱信昌、衛萬里(2012)。新型國小學童專用可攜式舒壓背靠之設計。第19屆人因工程學會年會暨學術研討會,高雄市=Kaohsiung:
  35. 胡佑宗(1996)。工業設計:產品造形的歷史、理論及實務。台北=Taipei:亞太圖書=Asiapac。
  36. 張建成、吳俊杰(2004)。應用AHP與Delphi技術於新產品造形設計決策分析-以行動電話為例。華梵藝術與設計學報,1,81-98。
  37. 張曉亭(2003)。桃園=Taoyuan,國立體育學院教練研究所=National Taiwan Sport University。
  38. 黃佳麟(2005)。台南=Tainan,國立臺南大學自然科學教育學系=Department of Science Education, National University of Tainan。
  39. 楊東鎮、蔡文甲(2004)。台灣購物中心競爭力指標之建立與分析。中華管理學報,5(1),77-90。
  40. 簡禎富(2005)。決策分析與管理。台北=Taipei:雙葉書廊=Yeh Yeh Book Gallery。
被引用次数
  1. 駱信昌、林奕瑋(2014)。可攜式學童舒壓背靠產品開發之設計驗證。設計學報,19(4),21-36。