以互動塔羅建構設計發想的中介知識

The Construction of Intermediate-Level Knowledge in Ideation with Interaction Tarot

莊偉銘(David W. Chung)；梁容輝(Rung-Huei Liang)

互動設計 ； 研究方法 ； 創意發想 ； 腦力激盪 ； Interaction Design ； Research Method ； Ideation ； Brainstorming

設計學報

20卷3期（2015 / 09 / 01）

21 - 44

繁體中文

過去已有許多互動設計研究探討如何以牌卡作為發想刺激，協助設計師於設計初期做創意發想，然而，卻鮮少嚴格地探究其建構的理論依據，也沒有提出有效的方法來理解其易用程度。本研究基於過去西方世界用來理解生活世界的原型架構，塔羅，以及中介知識中用來建構強概念的要則，建構一套適合互動設計的創意發想工具，互動塔羅。再者，研究者認為用於建構強概念的要則即是確證互動塔羅效度的方法，故以水平式和垂直式紮根作為理解牌卡的向度，來交叉檢視與論述互動塔羅對互動設計實務的效益。本研究旨在提倡、推展一種建構式的互動設計學術文化，將中介知識在創意發想階段所扮演的角色清楚地描繪出來，以豐富人機互動社群的設計知識建構過程。

In the past, many design studies were focused on how to form a card-based inspiration tool to support designers in the early stage of their design process. However, there is little guidance, on how to construct an inspiration tool upon theoretical basis and on how to understand the usefulness of card-based tools. Using a set of deck, Interaction Tarot, designed via the archetype of Tarot and Contextual Grounding (CG) as an example, we propose a new analytical criteria based on Horizontal and Vertical Groundings (HG & VG), for understanding the quality of card-based tools. The questionnaire data, tool usage, and interview accounts are categorized, discoursed and triangulated with respect to HG & VG, to ascertain how a card-based tool helps designers facilitate the design ideation in practical use. This paper aims to advocate designerly-oriented culture in HCI and to demonstrate how design researchers use the set of two lenses (HG & VG) to have better understandings of a card-based tool in supporting the design inspiration.

1. Intùiti Creative Cards. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.intuiti.it/.
2. IDEO Method Cards. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.ideo.com/work/method-cards/.
3. Alvesson, M.,Sköldberg, K.(2009).Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research.London, England:Sage..
4. Banzhaf, H.(2000).Tarot and the journey of the hero.York Beach, Me:Samuel Weiser.
5. Bekker, T.,Antle, A. N.(2011).Developmentally situated design (DSD): Making theoretical knowledge accessible to designers of children's technology.Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems,New York, NY:
6. Belman, J.,Flanagan, M.,Nissenbaum, H.(2009).Instructional methods and curricula for "values conscious design".Loading: The Official Journal of the Canadian Games Studies Association,3(4)
7. Bowers, J.(2012).The logic of annotated portfolios: Communicating the value of 'research through design'.Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems,New York, NY:
8. Brandt, E.,Messeter, J.(2004).Facilitating collaboration through design games.Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Participatory Design,New York, NY:
9. Chung, W.-M.,Chiu, L.-Y.,Liang, R.-H.(2013).The Twins: Lighting design based on rich movements.Proceedings of the 5th IASDR Conference on Design Research,Tokyo, Japan:
10. Cross, N.(2007).Designerly ways of knowing.London, England:Springer.
11. Dalsgaard, P.,Dindler, C.(2004).Between theory and practice: Bridging concepts in HCI research.Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems,New York, NY:
12. Deng, Y.,Antle, A. N.,Neustaedter, C.(2014).Tango cards: A card-based design tool for informing the design of tangible learning games.Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems,New York, NY:
13. Diehl, M.,Stroebe, W.(1991).Productivity loss in idea-generating groups: Tracking down the blocking effect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,61(3),392-403.
14. Diehl, M.,Stroebe, W.(1987).Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,53(3),497-509.
15. Gaver, B.,Bowers, J.(2012).Annotated portfolios.Interactions,19(4),40-49.
16. Gaver, B.,Dunne, T.,Pacenti, E.(1999).Design: Cultural probes.Interactions,6(1),21-29.
17. Golembewski, M.,Selby, M.(2010).Ideation decks: A card-based design ideation tool.Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems,New York, NY:
18. Halskov, K.,Dalsgård, P.(2006).Inspiration card workshops.Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems,New York, NY:
19. Höök, K.,Löwgren, J.(2012).Strong concepts: Intermediate-level knowledge in interaction design research.ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction,19(3),1-18.
20. Hornecker, E.(2010).Creative idea exploration within the structure of a guiding framework: The card brainstorming game.Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction,New York, NY:
21. Hornecker, E.,Buur, J.(2006).Getting a grip on tangible interaction: A framework on physical space and social interaction.Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Design for Tangible Interactions,New York, NY:
22. Johansson, F.(2006).The medici effect: What elephants and epidemics can teach us about innovation.Boston, MA:Harvard Business School Press.
23. Kelley, T.,Littman, J.(2001).The art of innovation.London, England:Profile Books.
24. Liang, R.-H.,Chung, W.-M.,Kao, H.-L.,Lin, T.-Y.(2013).InTouch: Crossing social interaction with perception.Design, user experience, and usability. User experience in novel technological environments,Berlin:
25. Löwgren, J.(2013).Annotated portfolios and other forms of intermediate-level knowledge.Interactions,20(1),30-34.
26. Lucero, A.,Arrasvuori, J.(2010).PLEX Cards: A source of inspiration when designing for playfulness.Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Fun and Games,New York, NY:
27. Martin, B.,Hanington, B.(2012).Universal methods of design: 100 ways to research complex problems, develop innovative ideas, and design effective solutions.Beverly, MA:Rockport Publishers.
28. Moggridge, B.(2007).Designing interactions.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
29. Mueller, F.,Gibbs, M. R.,Vetere, F.,Edge, D.(2014).Supporting the creative game design process with exertion cards.Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems,New York, NY:
30. Osborn, A.(1953).Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative problem solving.New York, NY:Charles Scribner's Sons.
31. Pollack, R.(2002).The Haindl tarot, the major arcana.Franklin Lakes, NJ:New Page Books..
32. Semetsky, I.(2011).Re-symbolization of the self: Human development and tarot hermeneutic.Rotterdam:Springer.
33. Spencer, D.(2009).Card sorting: Designing usable categories.Brooklyn, NY:Rosenfeld Media.
34. Zimmerman, J.,Forlizzi, J.,Evenson, S.(2007).Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI.Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems,New York, NY: