题名

以符號學觀點探討現成物設計的思考邏輯

并列篇名

Investigating the Design Logic of the Ready-made Design from Semiotics Viewpoint

作者

林銘煌(Ming-Huang Lin);林宜鄉(Yi-Shiang Lin);王靜儀(Ching-Yi Wang)

关键词

現成物 ; 工業設計 ; 解構主義 ; 達達 ; 造形 ; Ready-made ; Industrial Design ; Deconstructionism ; Dada ; Form

期刊名称

設計學報

卷期/出版年月

24卷2期(2019 / 06 / 01)

页次

1 - 23

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

90年代現成物設計開始漸受注意,利用現有構件所進行的拼接式外觀,創作出令人感到熟悉卻又充滿新意的作品。本研究先從文獻探討開始,縱觀現成物在藝術和設計上的歷史發展脈絡以及相關的學術研究。進一歩導入符號學的觀點進行分析,因為相較於其他研究方法,符號學研究更加注重文本的剖析,有利於分析現成物設計看似嬉戲、失序的外表和物件間意想不到的替換。基於同樣強調創作的藝術表現,故循序藉由分析作家的文學體系(文字)和超現實主義繪畫體系(圖片),來推敲現成物設計體系(實體)在意義和構件之間變化的邏輯。過程中再應用焦點團體法,以單椅、燈具設計為例,探索設計專業人員判定現成物設計在構想上的各種優劣和強弱的原因,並整合成14項評估考量的因素,其中尤以涉及到「意義」和「構件」的項目與本研究最為相關。其中透過套用符號學中系譜軸和毗鄰軸的架構,剖析現成物因典型物件的選擇、安排和轉換,造就人們在意義上的新解讀,並解釋能指在新的脈絡中因物件的熟悉感反而帶來新奇感這個看似矛盾的現象。最後研究歸納了4點創作邏輯,輔助詮釋設計創作時,加強深度思考,包括:1.能指為核心:從現有物件出發;2.相似性的運作:善用或組成典型的外觀;3.新舊所指的拉扯:變化構件的身份和用途;4.可能的新所指:賦予連結的組件。

英文摘要

Because of its novelty and contradictory quality, ready-made designs, the combination of familiar found objects, continually develop and receive much attention since the 1990s. This study begins with the literature survey, and looks at its historical development in art and design, as well as the related academic research. By taking chair and lamp design as examples, it applies focus group method to explore how design professionals determine their preferences of the ready-made designs, and their strengths or weaknesses. We first integrate 14 assessment factors, and among them the items related to "meaning" and "components" are most relevant to this study. Compared with other research methods, semiotics approach pays much attention in content and context analysis, and it is useful for analyzing ready-made designs especially their disorder appearance and unexpected replacement. Thus, according to semiotics and structuralism viewpoint in literature, this study tries to analyze the writer's literary system (text) and surrealist painting system (picture) to infer common structure, skill of being artistic, and combination logic of the readymade design system (entity). Particularly the structure of the genealogical axes and adjacent axes in semiotics is applied to the analysis of the selection, arrangement, and conversion of existing objects for typical objects, which leads to a new interpretation of the meaning. It also explains the contradictory phenomenon that the novelty due to the familiarity. In the end, we sum up four creation logics, including: (1) the signifier is the core: starting from the found objects, (2) the operation of similarity: using or forming the typical appearance, (3) the swap of the old and new signified: changing the role and purpose of the component, (4) possible new indications: filling up components for the association.

主题分类 人文學 > 藝術
社會科學 > 傳播學
参考文献
  1. 方裕民, Y. M.,林銘煌, M. H.,廖軍豪, C. H.(2006)。「失諧-解困」理論與設計邏輯中的幽默理解歷程。設計學報,11(2),65-81。
    連結:
  2. 李佩玲, P. L.(2005)。現成物對現代設計觀念的衝擊與反思。師大學報,50(1),91-103。
    連結:
  3. 蔡秀枝, H. C.(2003)。巴特 S/Z 中的轉向與閱讀策略。中外文學,31(9),33-66。
    連結:
  4. (2004).MoMA highlights.New York, NY:The Museum of Modern Art.
  5. (1980).signs, symbols, and architecture.Chichester:John Wiley and Sobs.
  6. Anonymous (1964). The great war. Retrieved from https://www.ss.net.tw/list1.asp?PageTo=1&num=119
  7. Droog Design. (1993). 85 Lamp. Retrieved from https://www.droog.com/webshop/product/85-lamps
  8. Duchamp, M.,Sanouillet, M.,Peterson, E.(1989).The writings of Marcel Duchamp.New York, NY:Baker & Taylor.
  9. Eggink, W.(2010).The reinvention of the ready-made.Proceedings of the 7th Design and Emotion Conference 2010,Chicago, IL:
  10. Fernando, C.,Humberto, C.(2010).Campana brothers: Complete works (so far).New York, NY:Random House.
  11. Ferrari, P.(2012).Achille Castiglioni.London:Phaidon.
  12. Front Design. (n.d.). Hanger. Retrieved from http://www.frontdesign.se/office-collection-project
  13. Hanks, D. A.(2000).Design for living: Furniture and lighting 1950-2000.Paris:Flammarion.
  14. Heatherwick, T.,Rowe, M.(2012).Thomas Heatherwick: Making.New York, NY:Monacelli Press.
  15. Hekkert, P.,Snelders, D.,Wieringen, P. C.,Hekkert, P.,Snelders, H. M. J. J.,Wieringen, P. C. W. V.(2003)."Most advanced, yet acceptable": Typicality and novelty as joint predictors of aesthetic preference in industrial design.British Journal of Psychology,94(1),111-124.
  16. Israel Museum, Jerusalem. (1959). The castle in the Pyranees. Retrieved from https://www.ss.net.tw/list1.asp?PageTo=2&num=119
  17. Iversen, M.(2004).Readymade, found object, photograph.Art Journal,63(2),45-57.
  18. Joss & Main. (n.d.). Rowan 12-light shaded chandelier. Retrieved from https://www.jossandmain.com/lighting/pdp/rowan-12-light-shaded-chandelier-loon6466.html?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Pinterest
  19. Krippendorff, K.(1990).Product semantics: A triangulation and four design theories.Finland Helsinki:University of Industrial Arts.
  20. Leiss, W.,Kline, S.,Jhally, S.(1986).Social communication in advertising: Persons, products and images of well-being.New York, NY:Methuen.
  21. Lin, M. H.,Wang, C. Y.,Cheng, S. K.,Cheng, S. H.(2011).An event-related potential study of semantic style-match judgments of artistic furniture.International Journal of Psychophysiology,82(2),188-195.
  22. Max Kuwertz. (n.d.). Ready-made collection. Retrieved from https://www.maxkuwertz.com/index
  23. Meyer, J.(2000).Minimalism.London:Phaidon.
  24. MoMA. (1931). The persistence of memory. Retrieved from https://www.moma.org/collection/works/79018
  25. Olschewski Design. (n.d.a). Bathroom. Retrieved from https://www.olschewski-design.com/
  26. Olschewski Design. (n.d.b). Stiller Gefahrte. Retrieved from https://www.olschewski-design.com/
  27. Parson, T.(2009).Thinking objects: Contemporary approaches to product design.Lausanne:AVA Academia.
  28. Ramakers, P.(2002).Droog design in context less + more.Utrecht:010Publishers.
  29. Rose, G.(2001).Visual methodologies: An introduction to the interpretation of visual materials.London:Sage.
  30. Rume. (n.d.). Miss Sissi. Retrieved from https://www.rume.co.uk/flos-miss-sissi.html
  31. San Francisco Museum of Modern Art. (1952). Personal values. Retrieved from https://www.ss.net.tw/list1.asp?PageTo=2&num=119
  32. Scha, R. J. H.(2001).Readymades, artificial art, new media.Exploding Aesthetics,16,40-47.
  33. Vitra Design Museun. (n.d.) Seggiolina da Pranzo. Retrieved from https://sumally.com/p/484517
  34. Wang, C. Y.(2015).The development, technique and application of ready-made in the product design.Art and Design Review,3(2),49-67.
  35. Zonotta.it (n.d.). Mezzadro. Retrieved from https://www.zanotta.it/ContentsFiles/220%20Mezzadro.pdf
  36. 王秀雄(譯), X. X.(trans.),Johannes, I.(1978).造形藝術的基礎-包浩斯的造形原理及展開.台北=Taipei:大陸書店=Da Liu Shu Dian.
  37. 王詠剛, Y. G.,周虹, H.(2012).世界跟著他的想像走-賈伯斯傳奇.台北=Taipei:天下遠見=Tian Xia Yuan-Juan.
  38. 吳瑪悧(譯), M. L.(trans.),Rotzler, W.(1991).物體藝術.台北=Taipei:遠流=Yuan Liou.
  39. 李幼蒸, Y. J.(1998)。符號學和人文科學─關於符號學方法的認識論思考。哲學雜誌,23,208-222。
  40. 林銘煌, M. H.(2000)。產品造形中的符號與符碼。設計學報,5(2),73-82。
  41. 林銘煌, M. H.,方裕民, Y. M.,鄭仕弘, S. H.(2008)。論幽默設計中詼諧與滑稽的表現技巧。設計學報,13(3),61-80。
  42. 洪穎真, Y. J.(2007)。復古新潮流(上):古典元素的當代應用。設計雜誌,138,76-79。
  43. 洪穎真, Y. J.(2009)。打撈日常的漂浮物,化高價設計品:巴西兄弟檔 Fernando and Humberto Campana。設計雜誌,145,29-33。
  44. 洪顯勝(譯), S. S.(trans.),Barthes, R.(1988).符號學要義.台北=Taipei:南方=Nan Fang.
  45. 張光琪, K. C.(2003).馬格利特.台北=Taipei:藝術家=Yi Shu Jia.
  46. 敖軍(譯), J.(trans.),Barthes, R.(1998).流行體系(一):符號學與服飾符碼(Systeme de la mode).台北=Taipei:桂冠=Guei Guan.
  47. 陳永寬(譯), Y. K.(trans.),Hawkes, T.(1988).結構主義與符號學.台北=Taipei:南方=Nan Fang.
  48. 陳明珠, M. C.(2006)。符號的文化政治反思。傳播研究的傳承與創新,臺北=Taipei:
  49. 陸谷孫, G. S.(1996).英漢大辭典.台北=Taipei:東華=Dong Hua.
  50. 傅嘉琿(譯), J. H.(trans.),Eddie, W.(1992).拼貼藝術之歷史.台北=Taipei:遠流=Yuan Liou.
  51. 彭舜(譯), S.(trans.),楊韶剛(譯), S. G.(trans.),Freud, S.(2000).詼諧與潛意識的關係.台北=Taipei:知書房=Jhih Shu Fang.
  52. 曾長生, C. S.(2000).超現實主義藝術.台北=Taipei:藝術家=Yi Shu Jia.
  53. 黃庭超, T. C.(2003)。杜象的現成物,達達與前衛之外:兼論對台灣裝置藝術現象的觀察。2003 新異象論壇藝術暨二十世紀西洋繪畫主流之探討研討會論文集,台北市=Taipei:
  54. 黃海鳴, H. M.(2012).大破設計物件的現代生活:法國北加萊當代藝術基金會收藏展.台北=Taipei:台北市立美術館=Taipei Fine Art Museum.
  55. 葉韋利(譯), W. L.(trans.),蘇文淑(譯), W. S.(trans.),柳宗理, Sori(2015).柳宗理隨筆.台北=Taipei:大鴻藝術=Da Hong Yi Shu.
  56. 劉北成(譯), B. C.(trans.),陳銀科(譯), Y. K.(trans.),方海波(譯), H. P.(trans.),Derrida, J.(1998).言語與現象.台北=Taipei:桂冠=Guei Guan.
  57. 劉振源, J. Y.(1998).印象派繪畫.台北=Taipei:藝術家=Yi Shu Jia.
  58. 劉慧雯, H. W.(2002)。Saussure 符號學理論在廣告研究中的應用:文本意義研究的更弦易幟。新聞學研究,70,197-227。
  59. 觀止, J.(2011)。百變畢卡索。臺北畫刊,523,42-45。
被引用次数
  1. 邱順應(2021)。從索緒爾符號學角度探討房產建案命名的日月星雲符號與語法結構。嶺東學報,48,63-90。
  2. (2023)。再製手工藝品設計類型與知覺價值探討。設計學研究,26(2),83-105。