英文摘要
|
In pursuit of "rational" design thinking, Bauhaus (Bauhaus Universitaet Weimar) founded in 1919, guides a new direction for modern design and drives the world's modern design movement to create the modern style of design. However, due to the differences in ethnic background and regional culture, while inheriting the spirit of Bauhaus, the local culture all over the world was also blended and created their own styles. This article started from the perspective of group psychological cognition, took the cover design of the first ten issues of Industrial Design, as the research target to find out the recognition of the similarities and differences between the publications of Industrial Design and Bauhaus, to further explore the continuation and blending of Bauhaus visual design in the cultural context of Taiwan after half a century of communication and development. This study used a triangle check that collected literature, semi-structured interviews and questionnaires. The research results show that Industrial Design has continued Bauhaus's visual design language in the color application, graphics composition and layout design, while the font style is full of distinct characteristics of the times and region. Through the analysis, it is found that the subjects are more interested in visual design with strong color contrast, rich graphics composition, multiple design techniques and spatial representation. This study aims to explore the influence and spread of the Bauhaus movement in Taiwan's visual design, hoping to contribute to the construction of Taiwan's graphic design history and serve as a reference for the design field.
|
参考文献
|
-
林美婷, M. T.,林榮泰, R. T.(2013)。從工業設計雜誌封面分析台灣設計的轉變。藝術學報:表演類(革新版),93(10),153-184。
連結:
-
楊靜, C.(2010)。1960 年代外國專家來台指導「工業設計訓練班」的過程及其影響。設計學報,15(4),81-101。
連結:
-
(2006).Design studies-Theory and research in graphic design.New York, NY:Princeton Architectural Press.
-
Alavi, Y.(ed),Lick, D.R.(ed),White, A.T.(ed)(1972).Graph Theory and Applications.Berlin, Germany:Springer.
-
Bláha, J. D.,Štěrba, Z.(2014).Colour contrast in cartographic works using the principles of Johannes Itten.The Cartographic Journal,51(3),203-213.
-
Düchting, H.,Kandinsky, W.(2000).Wassily Kandinsky, 1866-1944: A revolution in painting.Cologne:Taschen.
-
Fiske, J.(1990).Ethnosemiotics: Some personal and theoretical reflections.Cultural Studies,4(1),85-99.
-
Grohmann, W.,Guterman, Norbert(Trans.)(1958).Wassily Kandinsky: Life and work.New York, NY:Harry N. Abrams.
-
Gropius, W.(1956).Scope of total architecture.London:G. Allen & Unwin.
-
Gropius, W.,Shand, P. Morton(Trans.)(1965).The new architecture and the Bauhaus.Massachusetts:MIT press.
-
Hollis, R.(2006).Swiss graphic design: The origins and growth of an international style, 1920-1965.North America:Yale University Press.
-
Hsiao, L.,White, M.(2015).The Bauhaus and China: Present, past, and future.West 86th: A Journal of Decorative Arts, Design History, and Material Culture,22(2),176-189.
-
Itten, J.(1975).Design and form: The basic course at the Bauhaus.New York, NY:Van Nostrand Reinhold.
-
Itten, J.(1973).The art of color: The subjective experience and objective rationale of color.New York, NY:Van Nostrand Reinhold.
-
Itten, J.,Birren, F.(1970).The elements of color: A treatise on the color system of Johannes Itten based on his book the art of color.New York, NY:Van Nostrand Reinhold.
-
Jakobson, R.(1987).Language in literature.Cambridge, England:The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
-
Kandinsky, W.,SADLER, M. T. H.(Trans.)(1977).Concerning the spiritual in art.New York, NY:Dover Publications, Inc..
-
Lin, H. L.(1991).Columbus, America,The Ohio State University.
-
Malevich, K.(1959).The non-objective world.Chicago, IL:Theobald.
-
Moholy-Nagy, L. (1947). Vision in motion. Chicago: Paul Theobald and Company.
-
Moholy-Nagy, L.(2012).The new vision: fundamentals of Bauhaus design, painting, sculpture, and architecture.North Chelmsford, MA:Courier Corporation.
-
Naylor, G.(1968).The Bauhaus.London:Studio Vista.
-
Oswalt, P.,Overmeyer, K.,Misselwitz, P.(2013).Urban catalyst: The power of temporary use.Berlin:DOM.
-
Roskill, M. W.(1992).Kandinsky, and the thought of their time: A critical perspective.Urbana, IL:University of Illinois Press.
-
Sausmarez, M. D.(1964).Basic design: The dynamics of visual form.New York, NY:Van Nostrand Reinhold.
-
Tashakkori, A.,Teddlie, C.(1998).Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches.London:Sage.
-
Wolfe, T.(1981).From Bauhaus to our house.London:Macmillan Publishers.
-
Yang, C.(2010).A study of the program for promoting handicraft export of America conducted by the Russel wright associates during 1955-60.Bulletin of Japanese Society for the Science of Design,57(3),97-106.
-
Yao, T. H.,Sun, C. Y.,Lin, P. C.(2013).Modern design in Taiwan: The Japanese period, 1895-1945.Design Issues,29(3),38-51.
-
王友江, Y. J.(2004).平面設計基礎.北京=Beijing:紡織=Textile.
-
王鋒, W.(2017)。圖形符號在現代平面設計中的運用。包裝工程,38(22),290-292。
-
余美槿, M. J.(2016)。現代主義設計的幾何精神探析。大眾文藝,14,68-69。
-
周憲, X.(2018)。作為現代主義另一面的包浩斯。學術研究,6,141-147。
-
杭間, J.,靳埭強, D. Q.,胡恩威, E.W.(2010).包豪斯道路:歷史、遺澤、世界和中國.濟南市=Jinan:山東美術出版社=Shan Dong Fine Arts Publishing House.
-
林登讚(編), D.T.(ed.)(2006).工藝水龍頭─顏水龍的故事.南投縣=Nantou:國立台灣工藝研究所=National Taiwan Crafts Research Institute.
-
馬方春, F. C.(2011)。試論色彩、圖形、文字在平面設計中的運用。藝術百家,8(123),176-178。
-
張廣智, G. Z.,周兵, B.(2001).心理史學.台北市=Taipei:揚智文化=Yang Chih Book.
-
陳藝雙, Y. S.(2013)。淺析平面設計中的字體設計的重要性。劍南文學,2,169。
-
陸敏, M.(2006)。約翰尼斯·伊頓的設計教育思想。裝飾,3,85。
-
馮永華, Y. H.,楊裕富, Y. F(2004)。“設計風格”形成因素之研究。設計學報,11(3),99-115。
-
楊靜, C.,蓮見孝, T.(2009)。台灣早期工業設計發展政策與培養人才方案的形成與分析。科技學刊,人文社會類,18(1),1-14。
-
詹姆斯.哈威.魯濱遜, J. H.,齊思和(譯), S. H.(trans.),林幼琪(譯), Y. Q.(trans.),陳芳芝(譯), F. Z.(trans.)(1989).新史學.北京=Beijing:商務印書館=The Commercial Press.
|