以「隨創」觀點解析包浩斯編織工坊傑出女性創意設計者的發展脈絡

Analyzing the Development Context of Talented Female Creative Designers of Bauhaus Weaving Workshop from a ＂Bricolage＂ Perspective

馬睿平(Jui-Ping Ma)

包浩斯 ； 女性編織創作者 ； 編織工坊 ； 隨創 ； Bauhaus ； Female Creative Designers ； Weaving Workshop ； Bricolage

設計學報

24卷4期（2019 / 12 / 01）

89 - 112

繁體中文

適逢紀念德國包浩斯誕生百年，過去研究觀點多聚焦在包浩斯知名的男性藝術設計教師、作品及具有特色且對世界現代設計發展影響極深的課程內容及教學方法，但對於獨具特色的專業分科工作坊卻欠缺深入的解析，特別是包浩斯短短14年中，女學生最多且具備現代化工業生產雛型的編織工坊，包浩斯女性編織創作者的成就與表現幾乎被埋沒在以男性父權觀點主導的包浩斯研究中而鮮為人知，究竟這些傑出的女性編織創作者如何在國家社會困窘動盪的年代中創新？她們在設計表徵、意義與發展上有何內涵？這些議題尚待系統化的探究。緣此，本研究即以包浩斯編織工坊為研究對象，搜羅歷史文獻、耙梳這段模糊未明的發展脈絡，並以「隨創」觀點來詮釋此時期動盪情境下的包浩斯傑出女性創作者及其創作的發展概況，透過質性方法，解析其創作內容、作品內涵，並論述她們對於後輩設計的影響。研究成果如下：（1）包浩斯女性編織創作者具備5 種「隨創」的象徵意義；（2）編織工坊的工具、材料、學習和工作方式，都充分利用了「隨創」原則；（3）工坊的發展成果是典型「劣勢創新」的典範－涉及大環境（國家、社會）、中環境（學校管理層）、小環境（師生、同儕）的三方制約。

In commemoration of the centenary of the birth of Bauhaus in Germany, it is found that the past views mostly focused on the works of famous male art and design teachers of Bauhaus, their course contents, teaching methods, and characteristics that had a pro-found impact on the development of modern design in the world, whereas it was in lack of in-depth analysis on these unique professional workshops. In the 14 years of Bauhaus history, the weaving workshop with its largest number of female students, the modern industrial foundation and the achievements of Bauhaus female knitters were almost buried in the male patriarchal perspective of Bauhaus research and little known. How on earth did these brilliant female knitters innovate in a time of national and social distress? What is the meaning and development of their design representation? These issues need to be systematically explored. Hence, this study adopted an analysis framework from a bricolage perspective with the existing literature of weaving workshop from Bauhaus. The findings are as follows: (1) the context of Bauhaus female weaving creators had included the five characteristics of bricolage; (2) the tools, materials, study, and work style of weaving workshop can be seen as examples of making the best use of bricolage principles; (3) the results of the workshop development is a typical example of ＂disadvantageous innovation＂, involving the hindrances from the macro-environment (national, social), medium environment (school management) and micro- environment (teachers and students, peers).

1. 蕭瑞麟, R. L.,歐素華, S. H.,吳彥寬, Y. K.(2017)。逆勢拼湊：化資源制約為創新來源。中山管理評論，25(1)，219-284。
   連結：
2. 100 years of Bauhaus. (2019, March 6). Weaving 1919-1933. [web blog message]. Retrieved from https://www.bauhaus100.com/the-bauhaus/training/workshops/weaving/
3. Albers, A.(2017).On weaving: New expanded edition.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
4. Ambos, T. C.,Andersson, U.,Birkinshaw, J.(2010).What are the consequences of initiative-taking in multinational subsidiaries?.Journal of International Business Studies,41(7),1099-1118.
5. Andersson, U.,Forsgren, M.,Holm, U.(2007).Balancing subsidiary influence in the federative MNC: A business network view.Journal of International Business Studies,38(5),802-818.
6. Ardichvili, A.,Cardozo, R.,Ray, S.(2003).A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development.Journal of Business Venturing,18(1),105-123.
7. Baker, T.,Miner, A. S.,Eesley, D. T.(2003).Improvising firms: Bricolage, account giving and improvisational competencies in the founding process.Research Policy,32(2),255-276.
8. Baker, T.,Nelson, R. E.(2005).Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage.Administrative Science Quarterly,50(3),329-366.
9. Balogun, J.,Jarzabkowski, P.,Vaara, E.(2011).Selling, resistance and reconciliation: A critical discursive approach to subsidiary role evolution in MNEs.Journal of International Business Studies,42(6),765-786.
10. Barba, M. M. F.,Mondragón, M. S.,Rivera, V. Z.(2019).Lena Bergner– From the Bauhaus to Mexico.bitácora arquitectura,34
11. Baum, J. A.,Korn, H. J.(1996).Competitive dynamics of interfirm rivalry.Academy of Management Journal,39(2),255-291.
12. Baumhoff, A.(2001).The gendered world of the Bauhaus: The politics of power at the Weimar Republic's premier art institute, 1919-1932.Frankfurt:Peter Lang.
13. Bechky, B. A.,Okhuysen, G. A.(2011).Expecting the unexpected? How SWAT officers and film crews handle surprises.Academy of Management Journal,54(2),239-261.
14. Boak, H.(2015).Women in the Weimar Republic.Manchester:Manchester University Press.
15. Bouquet, C.,Birkinshaw, J.(2008).Managing power in the multinational corporation: How low-power actors gain influence.Journal of Management,34(3),477-508.
16. Boxenbaum, E.,Rouleau, L.(2011).New knowledge products as bricolage: Metaphors and scripts in organizational theory.Academy of Management Review,36(2),272-296.
17. Bulhof, F.(1976).Nijhoff, Van Ostaijen, "De Stijl".Hague:Martinus Nijhoff.
18. Campbell, J. L.(2005).Where do we stand? Common mechanisms in organizations and social movement research.Social movements and organization theory,New York, NY:
19. Campbell, J. L.(2010).Institutional reproduction and change.Social movements and organization theory,New York, NY:
20. Campbell, J. L.(2004).Institutional change and globalization.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
21. Casciaro, T.,Piskorski, M. J.(2005).Power imbalance, mutual dependence, and constraint absorption: A closer look at resource dependence theory.Administrative Science Quarterly,50(2),167-199.
22. Ciborra, C. U.(1996).The platform organization: Recombining strategies, structures, and surprises.Organization Science,7(2),103-118.
23. Dearstyne, H.(2014).Inside the Bauhaus.London:Architectural Press.
24. Desa, G.,Basu, S.(2013).Optimization or bricolage? Overcoming resource constraints in global social entrepreneurship.Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal,7,26-49.
25. Di Domenico, M. L.,Haugh, H.,Tracey, P.(2010).Social bricolage: Theorizing social value creation in social enterprises.Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice,34(4),681-703.
26. Dörrenbächer, C.,Geppert, M.(2006).Micro-politics and conflicts in multinational corporations: Current debates, re-framing, and contributions of this special issue.Journal of International Management,12(3),251-265.
27. Dutton, J. E.,Worline, M. C.,Frost, P. J.,Lilius, J.(2006).Explaining compassion organizing.Administrative Science Quarterly,51(1),59-96.
28. Duymedjian, R.,Rüling, C. C.(2010).Towards a foundation of bricolage in organization and management theory.Organization Studies,31(2),133-151.
29. Eisenhardt, K. M.,Martin, J. A.(2000).Dynamic capabilities: What are they?.Strategic Management Journal,21(10-11),1105-1121.
30. Gabet, O.(Ed.),Monier, A.(Ed.)(2018).The spirit of the Bauhaus.London:Thames & Hudson.
31. García, M. (2019, January 6). The lost history of the women of the Bauhaus. [arch daily website]. Retrieved from https://www.archdaily.com/890807/the-lost-history-of-the-women-of-the-bauhaus
32. Gargiulo, M.(1993).Two-step leverage: Managing constraint in organizational politics.Administrative Science Quarterly,38(1),1-19.
33. Garud, R.,Karnøe, P.(2003).Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship.Research Policy,32(2),277-300.
34. Hacker, J.(2004).Privatizing risk without privatizing the welfare state: The hidden politics of social policy retrenchment in the United States.American Political Science Review,98,243-260.
35. Halme, M.,Lindeman, S.,Linna, P.(2012).Innovation for inclusive Business: Intrapreneurial bricolage in multinational corporations.Journal of Management Studies,49(4),743-784.
36. Lévi-Strauss, C.(1968).The savage mind.Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.
37. Lin, N.(Ed.),Cook, K.(Ed.),Burt, R. S.(Ed.)(2017).Social capital.New York, NY:Routledge.
38. Louridas, P.(1999).Design as bricolage: Anthropology meets design thinking.Design Studies,20(6),517-535.
39. MacCarthy, F.(2019).Walter Gropius: Visionary founder of the Bauhaus.London:Faber & Faber.
40. Meskimmon, M.(1999).We weren't modern enough: Women artists and the limits of German Modernism.New York, NY:I. B. Tauris.
41. Minniti, M.(2004).Entrepreneurial alertness and asymmetric information in a spin-glass model.Journal of Business Venturing,19(5),637-658.
42. Müller, U.(2009).Bauhaus women: Art, handicraft, design.Paris:Flammarion.
43. Nordic Needle. (2019, May 6). Huck (Swedish Weaving) [Web blog message]. Retrieved from http://www.nordicneedle.net/guides/stitching-techniques-guides/scandinavian-techniques/huck-swedish-weaving/#.XSkfxugzbD6
44. Otto, E.,Rössler, P.(2019).Bauhaus women: A global perspective.London:Herbert press.
45. Palier, B.,Martin, C.(2007).From a frozen landscape’ to structural reforms: The sequential transformation of Bismarckian welfare systems.Social Policy & Administration,41(6),535-554.
46. Pfeffer, J.(1992).Managing with power: Politics and influence in organizations.Boston, MA:Harvard Business School Press.
47. Philips, N.,Tracey, P.(2007).Opportunity recognition, entrepreneurial capabilities and bricolage: Connecting institutional theory and entrepreneurship in strategic organization.Strategic Organization,5(3),313-320.
48. Regnér, P.(2008).Strategy-as-practice and dynamic capabilities: Steps towards a dynamic view of strategy.Human Relations,61(4),565-588.
49. Rössler, P.,Blümm, A.(2019).Soft skills and hard facts: A systematic assessment of the inclusion of women at the Bauhaus.Bauhaus bodies: Gender, sexuality, and body culture in Modernism's legendary art school,London:
50. Rugman, A. M.,Verbeke, A.(2002).Edith penrose's contribution to the resource- Based view of strategic management.Strategic Management Journal,23(8),769-780.
51. Scheck, R.(2004).Mothers of the nation: Right-wing women in Weimar Germany.New York, NY:Berg.
52. Schmidt, V. A.(2002).The futures of European capitalism.Oxford, England:Oxford University Press.
53. Schwartz, F. J.(1996).The Werkbund: Design theory and mass culture before the First World War.New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.
54. Senyard, J.,Baker, T.,Steffens, P.,Davidsson, P.(2014).Bricolage as a path to innovativeness for resource-constrained new firms.Journal of Product Innovation Management,31(2),211-230.
55. Seražin, H.(2018).Women's education and training: National and international mappings.Women's creativity since the Modern Movement (1918-2018),Ljubljana, Slovenian:
56. Shane, S.(2000).Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities.Organization Science,11(4),448-469.
57. Siebenbrodt, M.,Schöbe, L.(2009).Bauhaus: 1919-1933 Weimar-Dessau-Berlin.New York, NY:Parkstone Press.
58. Simon, H. A.(1997).Administrative behavior.New York, NY:Free Press.
59. Skender, M. (2019, Jun 12). History of textile art: Gunta Stölzl (1897-1983) [Textile Artist.org]. Retrieved from https://www.textileartist.org/textile-artist-gunta-stolzl-1897-1983
60. Smith, T.(2014).Bauhaus weaving theory: From feminine craft to mode of design.Minneapolis, MN:University of Minnesota Press.
61. Sonenshein, S.(2014).How organization foster the creative use of resources.Academy of Management Journal,57(3),814-848.
62. Stadler, M.(2009).Gunta Stölzl: Bauhaus master.Ostfildern:Hatje Cantz.
63. Stölzl, G. (2019, March 20). In the textile workshop at the Bauhaus 1919 to 1931 [Web blog message]. Retrieved from https://www.bauhaus-bookshelf.org/gunta-stoelzl-textile-weaving-workshop-1919-1931.html
64. Streeck, W.,Thelen, K.(2005).Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
65. Teece, D. J.,Pisano, G.,Shuen, A.(1997).Dynamic capabilities and strategic management.Strategic Management Journal,18(7),509-533.
66. Vaghely, I. P.,Julien, P. A.(2010).Are opportunities recognized or constructed? An information perspective on entrepreneurial opportunity identification.Journal of Business Venturing,25(1),73-86.
67. Wang, X., & Bennett, T. (2019, May 6). The restriction of female artists in Bauhaus movement. [Web blog message]. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/20804986/The_Restrictionof_Female_Artists_in_Bauhaus_Movement
68. Weick, K. E.(2001).Making sense of the organization.Boston, MA:Blackwell.
69. Weick, K. E.(1993).The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster.Administrative Science Quarterly,38(4),628-652.
70. Westphal, U.(1991).The Bauhaus.London:Studio Editions.
71. Wright, B. D.(2005).10: Intimate strangers: Women in German expressionism.A companion to the literature of German expressionism,New York, NY: