連結內在深層意義的設計思考－整合U型理論視域的探究

The Design Thinking Deeply Related to Inner Meaning-from the Perspective of Theory U

吳靜宜(Ching-Yi WU)；李明芬(Ming-Fen Li)

設計思考 ； U型理論 ； 當下澄明覺知湧現 ； 參與式設計 ； 土溝農村美術館 ； Design Thinking ； Theory U ； Presencing ； Co-design ； Togo Rural Art Museum

設計學報

25卷1期（2020 / 03 / 01）

25 - 45

繁體中文

近年Tim Brown倡導的「設計思考」將設計師的思考特徵延伸運用到商管、教育等社會系統的設計。因應日趨嚴峻的農村高齡化與城鄉失衡挑戰，社區營造或地方創生的改造設計，因其牽涉因素的複雜度及需要整體關係人的協商共識，則需要長時間集體的協作。本研究探討土溝設計團隊在台南市後壁區土溝里農民協力的社區營造，以及此社造歷程如何發展演化至農村美術館推動的社會創新歷程，研究主旨為探討設計者在社區營造場域中的設計思考演化，以及促成土溝農村群體轉化的社會創新歷程。本研究以質性研究取向的個案研究法為主，從現場觀察、深度訪談和文件分析法蒐集統整多元的資料，並透過U型理論的視角詮釋之。本研究整合運用Brown的設計思考、Stanley King、Merinda Conley、Bill Latimer以及Drew Ferrari參與式設計與U型理論之關聯，研究發現以集體創新方式解決社會系統問題的設計思考歷程包括：1.傾聽內心召喚的發起，2.深入場境的感知與同理理解，3.放下自我的注意力轉向，4.在當下的澄明覺知湧現，與最高可能性連結，5.以行動結晶化新圖像，6.快速創造原型，7.在現實中修正與演化。特別是設計團隊與參與居民在不斷嘗試懸掛自我的當下澄明覺知的湧現，促使他們建立彼此更深的信任，而連結內在深層意義和對新可能性的覺察，則是促進創新設計思考的關鍵環節。

In recent years, Tim Brown has been advocating ＂design thinking＂ and endeavoring in integrating designerly ways of thinking into social system design, such as management and education. In order to actively respond to the increasingly rural aging and urban-rural imbalance challenges, the reconstruction and design of community-building or place making demands long-term collective collaboration due to the complexity of the factors involved and the need for consensus on the overall relationship. Through case study, the researchers explore how the design team's ＂design thinking＂ evolves, and how their collaborative efforts with the community transform the Togo Village and enhance the social innovation. By adopting this qualitative research approach, the researchers collect data from field observation, in-depth interviews and document analysis, and interpret from the perspective of Theory U. This study discusses Brown's ＂Design Thinking＂ and King's ＂Co-design＂ in terms of the Theory U and finds that the ＂design thinking＂ process leading to Togo Village's social innovation includes: (1) initiating based on inner calling, (2) sensing by deeply observing and empathizing in the field, (3) redirecting the attention by letting go the old ego, (4) presencing-exploring deep inner purposes and the highest possibility, (5) crystallizing the future vision with actions, (6) fast creating a prototype, and (7) evolving in the changing world. Particularly, suspending old self and judgement nurtures the emergence of their presencing, which deepens the mutual trust between the design team and the Togo Village Community. Furthermore, the connection of deep meaning and awareness of new possibilities is critical to innovative design thinking.

1. Arnstein, S. R.(1969).A ladder of citizen participation.Journal of the American Planning Association,35(4),216-224.
2. Banathy, B. H.(1996).Designing social systems in a changing world.New York, NY:Plenum Press.
3. Brown, T.(2008).Design thinking.Harvard Business Review,86(6),84-92.
4. Cross, N.(2006).Designerly ways of knowing.London:Springer-Verlag.
5. Cross, N.(1990).The nature and nurture of design ability.Design Studies,11(3),127-140.
6. Glen, R.,Suciu, C.,Baughn, C.(2012).The need for design thinking in business schools.Academy of Management Learning and Education,13(4),653-667.
7. Ho, L.-A.,Kuo, T.-H.(2009).Alternative organizational learning therapy: An empirical case study using behavior and U theory.The Australian Educational Researcher,36(3),105-125.
8. Ho, L.-A.,Lin, C.-Y.,Kuo, T.-H.,Kuo, Y.-K.,Kuo, Y.-L.(2008).Applying deeper learning and confucian values in enhancing school effectiveness: Empirical results and findings.Urban Education,43,561-586.
9. IDEO. (2013, January). Design thinking for educators. Retrieved from https://www.ideo.com/post/design-thinking-for-educators
10. Johansson-Sköldberg, U.,Woodilla, J.,Ç etinkaya, M.(2013).Design thinking: past, present and possible futures.Creativity and Innovation Management,22(2),121-146.
11. Li, M. F.(2002).Fostering design culture through cultivating the user-designers' design thinking and systems thinking.Systemic Practice and Action Research,15(5),385-410.
12. Liedtka, J.(2015).Perspective: Linking design thinking with innovation outcomes through cognitive bias reduction.Journal of Product Innovatino Production,32(6),925-938.
13. Papanek, V.(1985).Design for the real world: Human ecology and social change.London:Thames and Hudson.
14. Pepper, C.,Wildy, H.(2009).Using Narratives as a Research Strategy.Qualitative Research Journal,9(2),18-26.
15. Plattner, H.(ed.),Meinel, C.(ed.),Leifer, L.(ed.)(2011).Design thinking, understand-improve-apply.
16. Scharmer, C. O.(2009).Theory U: Leading from the futures as it emerges-the social technology of presencing.San Francisco, CA:Berrett-Koehler.
17. Simon, H. A.(1984).The Sciences of the Artificial.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
18. 王芸（譯）,Senge, P.,Scharmer, C. O.,Jaworski, J.,Flowers, B. S.(2006).修練的軌跡.臺北=Taipei:天下文化.
19. 吳莉君（譯）,Brown, T.(2010).設計思考改造世界.臺北:聯經.
20. 呂耀中, Y. C.(2006)。台南市=Tainan, Taiwan，國立臺南藝術大學=Tainan National University of the Arts。
21. 林文浹, W.C.(2008)。臺南市=Tainan, Taiwan，國立臺南藝術大學=Tainan National University of the Arts。
22. 林玲儀, L. Y.(2009)。南投縣=Nantou, Taiwan，國立暨南大學=National Chi Nan University。
23. 南秋原, C. Y.(2005)。高雄市=Kaoshiung, Taiwan，國立中山大學=National Sun Yat-sen University。
24. 後壁區公所（ 2016 ） 。 105 年臺南市後壁區統計年報 。 取自https://web.tainan.gov.tw/houbi/News_Content.aspx?n=7069&s=75286 Houpi Township Office. (2016). The statistical yearbook of Houpi township, Tainan County. Retrived from https://web.tainan.gov.tw/houbi/News_Content.aspx?n=7069&s=75286 [in Chinese, semantic translation]
25. 張世杰（2017 年 6 月 11 日）。「設計之都」回來了，北市五座鄰里公園導入藝術設計。聯合新聞網。取自 https://udn.com/news/story/7323/2517984 Chang, S. J. (2017). “Design City” returns, artistic design embedded in five neighborhood parks in Taipei City. UDN. Retrieved from https://udn.com/news/story/7323/2517984 [in Chinese, semantic translation]
26. 張正揚, C. Y.(2016)。美濃啟示：善待農地是一種文明選擇。綠主張，149，28-29。
27. 許佳琪, C. C.(2012)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國立臺灣師範大學=National Taiwan Normal University。
28. 陳佾芬, Y. F.,林芳穗, F. S.(2017)。運用參與式設計於展示空間改善之研究以臺灣工藝之家為例。設計學刊，2(2)，36-56。
29. 陳昱良（編）, Y. L.(ed.),黃鼎堯（編）, D. Y.(ed.)(2013).土溝農村美術館.臺南市=Tainan:土溝農村文化營造協會=Togo Rural Culture Association.
30. 陳昱良, Y. L.(2009)。臺南市=Tainan, Taiwan，國立臺南藝術大學=Tainan National University of the Arts。
31. 陳瑞成, J. C.(2008)。臺南市=Tainan, Taiwan，國立臺南大學=National Tainan University。
32. 楊沛儒（譯）,King, S.,Conley, M.,Latimer, B.,Ferrari, D.(1996).參與式設計 :一本合作、協力、社區營造的技術指南.臺北市:崇智國際文化.
33. 蔡嘉信, G. H.(2008)。臺南市=Tainan, Taiwan，國立臺南藝術大學=National Tainan University。