「事物中心」設計之推測潛能：透過物本體視野的互動研究

The Speculative Potentiality in Thing-Centered Design: An Interaction Research via Objected-Oriented Ontology View

李婉貞(Wan-Chen, Lee)；梁容輝(Rung-Huei Liang)

物聯網 ； 事物中心 ； 推測實在論 ； 物導向本體論 ； 撤出 ； 互物性 ； 中域 ； Internet of Things ； Thing-Centered ； Speculative Realism ； Object-Oriented Ontology ； Withdrawal ； Interobjectivity ； Milieu

設計學報

25卷1期（2020 / 03 / 01）

63 - 85

繁體中文

第三互動派典之後，興起物聯網（IOT）時代新一波推測趨勢。主流派典基於人類經驗，「事物中心」設計（thing-centered design）則提倡「與物一同」（＂with＂ things）的後人類思維。從「物視角」拓展現象學矩陣，可運用其推測潛能，感受事物的經驗與時空。本文以「推測實在論」（speculative realism）作為新派典之哲理基礎，透過「物導向本體論」（Object-Oriented Ontology）與「系統理論」（system theory）的融通，反思人與技術（物）關係。本研究目的在釐清事物的角色作用、比較智慧物設計的多元取向，藉分析既有設計派典之間差異，探索新派典趨勢。此有助於理解物之「撤出」（withdrawal）本質、「互物性」（interobjectivity），及「中域」（milieu）知識觀。為實踐「做」哲學精神，強調作為推測美感經驗的互動隱喻，本文綜述「事物中心」互動法則，以創造性思維促進設計問題的探索。

After the 3rd paradigm in HCI, a new wave of speculative tendency emerges in IOT age. While the mainstream paradigm builds on human experience, the ＂Thing-Centered Design＂ advocates the posthumanism thinking- ＂with things＂. To explore the phenomenological matrix via object's view, this research utilizes the speculative potentiality, to evocate the experience and universe from objects. With ＂Speculative Realism＂ as the basic theory, this paper rethinks the relationship between human and objects through ＂Object-Oriented Ontology＂ and ＂system theory＂. The purposes include analyzing differences of the known paradigms, exploring the trend of the new paradigm, by clarifying the roles of objects, comparing the various approaches of smart things, and then helping understand the objects' withdrawal essence, interobjectivity, and the milieu concept. Emphasizing ＂do＂ philosophy spirit, and the speculative aesthetic experience as interaction metaphor, this paper reviews the ＂thing-centered＂ interaction strategies, and explores the design questions by creative thinking.

1. Agre, P. E.(1997).Computation and human experience.Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press.
2. Bardzell, J.,Bardzell, S.(2016).Humanistic HCI.Interactions,23(2),20-29.
3. Bardzell, J.,Bardzell, S.(2015).Humanistic HCI(Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics).San Rafael, CA:Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
4. Barthel, R.,Hudson-Smith, A.,De Jode, M.,Blundell, B.(2010).Tales of things: the internet of ‘old’ things: collecting stories of objects, places and spaces.1st International Workshop the Urban Internet of Things, Internet of Things 2010,Tokyo, Japan:
5. Barthel, R.,Leder Mackley, K.,Hudson-Smith, A.,Karpovich, A.,De Jode, M.,Speed, C.(2013).An internet of old things as an augmented memory system.Personal and Ubiquitous Computing,17(2),321-333.
6. Bleecker, J., (2009). Design fiction: A short essay on design, science, fact and fiction. Near Future Laboratory. Retrieved from http://www.nearfuturelaboratory.com/2009/03/17/design-fiction-a-short-essay-on-design-science-fact-and-fiction/
7. Bødker, S.(2006).When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges.Proceedings of the 4th Nordic Conference on Human-computer Interaction Changing Roles-NordiCHI’06,New York, NY:
8. Bogost, I.(2006).Unit operations: An approach to videogame criticism.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
9. Bogost, I.(2012).Alien phenomenology: Or what it’s like to be a thing.Minneapolis, MN:University of Minnesota Press.
10. Bogost, I. (2012b, April 13). The new aesthetic needs to get weirder. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/04/the-new-aesthetic-needs-to-get-weirder/255838/
11. Brassier, R.,Grant, I. H.,Harman, G.,Meillassoux, Q.(2007).Speculative realism.Collapse: Volume 3,Falmouth:
12. Bryant, L. R.(2011).The democracy of objects.Ann Arbor, MI:Open Humanities Press.
13. Bryant, L. R. (2009, Oct 1). A brief note on OOO and politics. Retrieved from https://larvalsubjects.wordpress.com/2009/10/01/a-brief-note-on-ooo-and-politics/
14. Bryant, L. R. (2012, July 24). Borromean machine-oriented ontology, strange strangers, and alien phenomenology. Retrieved from https://larvalsubjects.wordpress.com/2012/07/24/borromean-machine-oriented-ontology-strange-strangers-and-alien-phenomenology/
15. Bryant, L. R.,Srnicek, N.,Harman, G.(2011).The speculative turn: Continental materialism and realism.Melbourne:Re-press.
16. Cila, N.,Smit, I.,Giaccardi, E.,Kröse, B.(2017).Products as agents: Metaphors for designing the products of the IoT age.Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’17,New York, NY:
17. Deckers, E. J. L.,Lévy, P. D.,Wensveen, S. A. G.,Ahn, R. M. C.,Overbeeke, C.(2012).Designing for perceptual crossing: Applying and evaluating design notions.International Journal of Design,6(3),41-55.
18. Deckers, E,Wensveen, S.,Ahn, R.,Overbeeke, K.(2011).Designing for perceptual crossing to improve user involvement.Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems,New York, NY:
19. Deleuze, G.,Guattari, F.(1987).A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia.Minneapolis, MN:University of Minnesota Press.
20. Dourish, P.(2004).Where the action is: The foundations of embodied interaction.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
21. Dunne, A.(2006).Hertzian tales: Electronic products, aesthetic experience, and critical design.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
22. Dunne, A.,Raby, F.(2001).Design noir: The secret life of electronic objects.Basel:Birkhäuser.
23. Dunne, A.,Raby, F.(2013).Speculative everything: Design fiction and social dreaming.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
24. Dunne, A., & Raby, F. (2007a). Critical Design FAQ. Retrieved from http://www.dunneandraby.co.uk/content/bydandr/13/0
25. Dunne, A., & Raby, F. (2007b). Technological dreams series: No.1, robots. Retrieved from http://www.dunneandraby.co.uk/content/projects/10/0
26. Filimowicz, M.,Tzankova, V.(2018).Introduction: New directions in third wave HCI.New directions in third wave human-computer interaction: Volume 1 -technologies,Switzerland:
27. Fox, T.(2018).Problematic milieus: Individuating speculative designs.New directions in third wave human-computer interaction: Volume 2 - methodologies,Switzerland:
28. Gaver, W. W.,Bowers, J.,Boucher, A.,Gellerson, H.,Pennington, S.,Schmidt, A.,Steed, A.,Villars, N.,Walker, B.(2004).The drift table: Designing for ludic engagement.CHI ’04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors and Computing Systems,New York, NY:
29. Giaccardi, E.,Speed, C.,Cila, N.,Caldwell, M. L.(2016).Things as co-ethnographers: Implications of a thing perspective for design and anthropology.Design anthropological futures,London:
30. Giaccardi, E.,Speed, C.,Rubens, N.(2014).Things making things: An ethnography of the impossible (draft).Ethnographies of the Possible,Moesgaard Alle:
31. Harman, G.(2011).The quadruple object.Winchester:Zero Books.
32. Harman, G.(2005).Guerrilla metaphysics: Phenomenology and the carpentry of things.Chicago, IL:Open Court of Carus Publishing Company.
33. Harman, G.(1999).Tool-being: Elements of theory of objects.Chicago, IL:DePaul University.
34. Harman, G.(2007).On vicarious causation.Collapse: Philosophical Research and Development,2,187-221.
35. Harman, G.(2013).Bells and whistles: More speculative realism.Hants:Zero Books.
36. Harman, G.(2009).Prince of networks: Bruno Latour and metaphysics.Melbourne:Re-press.
37. Harman, G.(2002).Tool-being: Heidegger and the metaphysics of objects.Chicago, IL:Open Court.
38. Harrison, S.,Sengers, P.,Tatar, D.(2011).Making epistemological trouble: Third-paradigm HCI as successor science.Interacting with Computers,23(5),385-392.
39. Harrison, S.,Tatar, D.,Sengers, P.(2007).,未出版
40. Heidegger, M.,Stambaugh, J.(Trans.)(2010).Being and time.Albany:Suny Press.
41. Husserl, E.,Findlay, J. N.(Trans.)(2001).Logical investigations.New York, NY:Routledge.
42. Husserl, E.,Findlay, J. N.(Trans.)(2001).Logical investigations.New York, NY:Routledge.
43. Ihde, D.(1990).Technology and the lifeworld: From garden to earth.Bloomington, IN:University of Indiana Press.
44. Ingold, T.(2011).Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description.London:Routledge.
45. Jenkins, T.(2014).Prototyping speculative objects for the internet of things.Proceedings of the 2014 Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems - DIS Companion ’14,Vancouver, BC:
46. Jenkins, T.(2018).Third-wave HCI perspectives on the internet of things.New directions in third wave human-computer interaction: Volume 1 -technologies,Switzerland:
47. Jenkins, T.(2015).Designing the “Things” of the IoT.Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction- TEI’15,Stanford, CA:
48. Knutsen, J.(2014).Uprooting products of the networked city.Interactional Journal of Design,8(1),127-142.
49. Koskinen, I.,Zimmerman, J.,Binder, T.,Redström, J.,Wensveen, S.(2011).Design research through practice: From the lab, field, and showroom.San Francisco, CA:Morgan Kaufmann.
50. Kuhn, T. S.(1962).The structure of scientific revolutions.Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.
51. Kuniavsky, M.(2010).Smart things: Ubiquitous computing user experience design.Burlington, MA:Morgan Kaufmann.
52. Latour, B.(1996).On interobjectivity in mind.Culture and Activity,3(4),228-245.
53. Laurel, B.(2008).Designed animism.(Re) searching the Digital Bauhaus,London:
54. Lindley, J.(2015).A pragmatics framework for design fiction.11th European Academy of Design Conference: Value of Design Research,Bologne-Billancourt, France:
55. Luhmann, N.,Jnr, J. Bednarz(Trans.),Baecker, D.(Trans.)(1996).Social systems.Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press.
56. Luhmann, N.,Rasch, W.(2002).Theories of distinction: Redescribing the descriptions of modernity.Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press.
57. Luhmann, N.,Ziegert, Klaus A.(Trans.)(2008).Law as a social system.Oxford, England:Oxford University Press.
58. Marenko, B.(2014).Neo-animism and design: A new paradigm in object theory.Design and Culture,17(2),219-242.
59. Marenko, B.,van Allen, P.(2016).Animistic design: How to reimagine digital interaction between the human and the nonhuman.Digital Creativity,27(1),52-70.
60. Maturana, H. R.,Varela, F. J.(1980).Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living.Dordrecht:D. Reidel Publishing Co.
61. Meillassoux, Q.,Brassier, R.(Trans.)(2008).After finitude: An essay on the necessity of contingency.London:Continuum.
62. Merleau-Ponty, M.,Smith, C.(Trans.)(1958).Phenomenology of perception.London:Routledge & Kegan Paul.
63. Morton, T.(2010).The ecological thought.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
64. Morton, T.(2013).Realist magic: Objects, ontology, causality.Ann Arbor, MI:Open Humanities Press, an imprint of MPublishing - University of Michigan Library.
65. Nagel, T.(1974).What is it like to be a bat?.The Philosophical Review,83(4),435-450.
66. Nansen, B.,van Ryn, L.,Vetere, F.,Robertson, T.,Brereton, M.,Douish, P.(2014).An internet of social things.Proceedings of the 26th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on Designing Futures: The Future of Design - OzCHI’14,New York, NY:
67. Rebaudengo, S. (2012). Addicted toasters: Real fictional service of self-sharing things. Retrieved from http://www.simonerebaudengo.com
68. Romero, M.,Pousman, Z.,Mateas, M.(2008).Alien presence in the home: The design of Tableau Machine.Personal and Ubiquitous Computing,12(5),373-382.
69. Rose, D.(2015).Enchanted objects: Innovation, design, and the future of technology.New York, NY:Scribner.
70. Rozin, D. (1999). Wooden mirror. Retrieved from http://www.smoothware.com/danny/woodenmirror.html
71. Rozin, D. (2015). Penguins mirror. Retrieved from https://bitforms.art/archives/rozin/penguins-mirror
72. Ryan, M.-L.(1991).Possible worlds, artificial intelligence and narrative theory.Bloomington, IN:University of Indiana Press.
73. Ryan, M.-L. (2013). Possible worlds. In The living handbook of narratology. In P. Hühn et al. (Eds.). Retrieved from http://www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de/article/possible-worlds.
74. Saffer, D.(2009).Designing for interaction: Creating innovative applications and devices.San Francisco, CA:New Riders.
75. Sparrow, T.(2014).The end of the phenomenology: Metaphysics and the new realism.Edinburgh:Edinburgh University Press.
76. Sterling, B. (2012). Sci-Fi writer Bruce Sterling explains the intriguing new concept of design fiction. (Interview by Torie Bosch). Slate. Retrieved from https://slate.com/technology/2012/03/bruce-sterling-on-design-fictions.html
77. Studio PSK. (n.d.). Quantum parallelograph. Retrieved from https://www.studiopsk.com/quantumparallelograph.html
78. Vallgårda, A.(2014).Giving form to computational things: Developing a practice of interaction design.Personal and Ubiquitous Computing,18(3),577-592.
79. Vallgårda, A.,Redström, J.(2007).Computational composites.Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’07,New York, NY:
80. van Allen, P.,McVeigh-Schultz, J.,Brown, B.,Kim, H. M.,Lara, D.(2013).AniThings: Animism and heterogeneous multiplicity.Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems on - CHI EA '13,New York, NY:
81. Verbeek, P.-P.(2011).Moralizing technology: Understanding and designing the morality of things.Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.
82. Verbeek, P.-P.(2005).What things do: Philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design.Philadelphia, PA:The Pennsylvania State University Press.
83. Verplank, W. (2009, December 1). Interaction design sketchbook by frameworks for designing interactive products and systems. [website document]. Retrieved from https://hci.rwth-aachen.de/tiki-download_wiki_attachment.php?attId=797
84. von Foerster, H.(ed.)(1981).Observing systems.Seaside, CA:Intersystems Publications.
85. Wakkary, R.,Odom, W.,Hauser, S.,Hertz, G.,Lin, H.(2015).Material speculation: Actual artifacts for critical inquiry.Proceedings of the fifth decennial Aarhus conference on critical alternatives,Aarhus, Denmark:
86. Wakkary, R.,Oogjes, D.,Hauser, S.,Lin, H.,Cao, C.,Ma, L.,Duel, T.(2017).Morse things: A design inquiry into the gap between things and us.Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems,New York, NY:
87. Wakkary, R.,Oogjes, D.,Lin, H. W. J.,Hauser, S.(2018).Philosophers living with the tilting bowl.Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems,New York, NY:
88. Weiser, M.(1991).The computer for the 21st century.Scientific American,265(3),94-104.
89. 黃芙蓉（譯）, F. R.(Trans.),格拉漢姆．哈曼, G.(2018).鈴與哨：更思辨的實在論.重慶=Chongqing:西南師範大學=Southwest University Press.
90. 韓連慶（譯）, L. Q.(Trans.),唐．伊德, D.(2012).技術與生活世界-從伊甸園到塵世.北京=Beijing:北京大學=Peking University Press.

1. 梁容輝,李婉貞(2022)。可感知的撤出：從植物性印表機探索事物中心取徑之設計策略。設計學報，27(2)，65-87。
2. 劉宇佳,張黎(2021)。論新興設計實踐的第四次轉向：思辨作為倫理。清華藝術學報，3，113-128。
3. 鄭宇婷,陳玲鈴,梁容輝(2022)。「事物星系」作為探索未來智慧群體互動設計。設計學報，27(4)，45-68。