题名

觀點革命:探討後設認知理論導入設計科系策展企劃教學之學習歷程與成效

并列篇名

View of View: Learning Process and Effectiveness of Applying Metacognitive Theory into the Curatorial Planning Teaching in Design Department

作者

林家華(Chia-Hua Lin)

关键词

後設認知 ; 策展企劃 ; 認知策略 ; 學習成效 ; 設計科系 ; Metacognition ; Curatorial Planning ; Cognitive Strategy ; Learning Effectiveness ; Design Department

期刊名称

設計學報

卷期/出版年月

26卷2期(2021 / 06 / 01)

页次

111 - 134

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

觀察臺灣近年興起許多設計主題的展覽,設計策展人(design-curator)儼然成為設計師的新角色。在設計教育的結構中,應思考強化培養學生對一個展覽的策劃能力。本研究係針對設計科系學生在策展企劃能力養成之需求,根據後設認知理論,建構以「觀點革命」為核心之策展,規劃漸進式教學模式,並透過教學的實施確認其教學成效。研究結果顯示:學生透過各階段的引導,在自我覺察與監控部分,對於橋接跨領知識運用在策展觀點上的策略方式,與策展出發點由社會環境之影響與教育啟發的回饋思維養成,及依照觀眾策略來鋪陳議題與展品規劃在故事鋪陳及傳達能力上,透過學生的反思回饋皆具有引導成效。在實務引導任務上,給予學生展覽範例後,鼓勵學生解構思維,透過重新策展的教學方式,對於學生在認知策劃的可行性、限制與優缺評估上具有明顯助益,且能觸發學生隨時機求新求變的設計應變能力。未來在對藝術家特質的理解、作品鑒賞、經費規劃以及團隊引導上需進一步強化,並透過同儕互評與企劃書互相觀摩的方式,增進同儕互學的興趣與信賴感,提升學習自信心。

英文摘要

According to design-based exhibitions that have been increasingly popular in Taiwan over the last few years, a design-curator has become a new role for designers. In response to the future requirements for designers and the trend of interdisciplinary design, the structure of design education must be focused on enhancing students' ability to curate exhibitions. Focusing on the needs of nurturing design students' capability of curation, this study constructed a curation teaching model centered on perspective revolution in accordance with the theory of metacognition and evaluated the teaching effectiveness after the teaching practice. The results revealed the following: The self-awareness and monitoring section in each stage guidance, the proposed teaching model facilitated significant learning effectiveness on students' strategies to bridge cross-collar knowledge to curatorial perspectives and development of feedback thinking as the curatorial starting points. In addition, according to the audience's strategy to present issues and the planning of stories in curating, shows the storytelling ability. On practical guidance tasks, after giving students an exhibition example, encouraging students to deconstruct their thinking and re-curate teaching methods will obviously help students in the evaluation of the feasibility, limitations and advantages of cognitive planning. This method also can trigger students` design ability and adaptability to changes. Future teaching methods may emphasize students' learning of artist qualities, ability to appreciate design work, funding plan and consider ways of peer review and inspect and learn from each other as well as enhance their confidence in teamwork learning.

主题分类 人文學 > 藝術
社會科學 > 傳播學
参考文献
  1. 林廷宜, T. Y.(2013)。專業策展人才養成:以美國藝術育才策略為例。設計學報,18(4),23-40。
    連結:
  2. 馬睿平, J. P.,陳維翰, W. H.(2013)。後設認知觀點的歷史人物主題策展設計:以張七郎紀念展為例。設計學報,18(4),41-64。
    連結:
  3. 黃巧慧, C. H.,莊明振, M.C.(2013)。以「粉樂町政大續展」為例探討 FTCC 做為策展決策參考模式之可行性。設計學報,18(4),1-21。
    連結:
  4. Betz, E.,Klingensmith, J.(1970).The measurement and analysis of college student satisfaction.Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance,3,110-118.
  5. Bloom, B. S.,Engelahar, M. D.,Frust, E. J.,Hill, W. H.,Krathwohl, D. R.(1956).Taxonomy of educational objective. Handbook1: Cognitive domain.New York, NY:David McKay.
  6. Burke, K.(1999).The mindful school: How to assess authentic learning.New York, NY:Sky Light Training and Publishing.
  7. Cross, D. R.,Paris, S. G.(1988).Development and instructional analyses of children’s metacognition and reading comprehension.Journal of Educational Psychology,80,131-142.
  8. Cull, W. L.,Zechmeister, E. B.(1994).The learning ability paradox in adult metamemory research: Where are the metamemory differences between good and poor learners?.Memory & Cognition,22,249-257.
  9. Field, H. S.,Giles, W. G.(1980).Student satisfaction with graduate education: Dimensionality and assessment is a school of business.Education Research Quarterly,5(2),66-73.
  10. Foster, N. L.,Was, C. A.,Dunlosky, J.,Isaacson, R. M.(2017).Even after thirteen class exams, students are still overconfident: The role of memory for past exam performance in student predictions.Metacognition and Learning,12,1-19.
  11. Hacker, D. J.(Ed.),Dunlosky, J.(Ed.),Graesser, A. C.(Ed.)(1998).Metacognition in educational theory and practice.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  12. Händel, M.,Dresel, M.(2018).Confidence in performance judgment accuracy: The unskilled and unaware effect revisited.Metacognition and Learning,13,265-285.
  13. Kleitman, S.,Narciss, S.(2019).Applied metacognition: Real-world applications beyond learning.Metacognition Learning,14,335-342.
  14. Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22(140), 55.
  15. Mangano, J. A.,Corrado, T. J.(1979).,New York, NY:State University of New York.
  16. McDougall, J.,Potter, J.(2015).Curating media learning: Towards a porous expertise.E-Learning and Digital Media,12(2),199-211.
  17. Nelson, T. O.,Dunlosky, J.,Graf, A.,Narens, L.(1994).Utilization of metacognitive judgments in the allocation of study during multitrial learning.Psychological Science,5,207-213.
  18. Piccoli, G.(2001).Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training.MIS Quarterly,25(4),401-427.
  19. Ryan, P.,Kristen, T.(2018).Course design, images, and the class curated exhibit.A Journal of Rare Books, Manuscript, and Culture Heritages,19(2),133-153.
  20. Sandell, R.(2006).Form+Theme+Context: Balancing considerations for meaningful art learning.Art Education,59(1),33-37.
  21. Sawyer, R. K.(Ed.)(2006).The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
  22. Tammaro, A. M.,Madrid, M.,Casarosa, V.(2013).Digital curators’ education: Professional identity vs. convergence of LAM (libraries, archives, museums).Digital libraries and archives,Berlin:
  23. Tregaskes, M. R.,Daines, D.(1989).Effects of metacognitive strategies on reading comprehension.Reading Research and Instruction,29(1),52-60.
  24. Weinert, F. E.(Ed.),Kluwe, R. H.(Ed.)(1987).Metacognition, motivation, and understanding.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
  25. Yore, L. D.,Treagust, D. F.(2006).Current realities and future possibilities: Language and science literacy empowering research and informing instruction.International Journal of Science Education,28(2),291-314.
  26. 佐佐木俊尚, T.,郭菀琪(譯), W. Q.(Trans.)(2012).CURATION 策展的時代:「串聯」的資訊革命已經開始心.台北市=Taipei:經濟新潮社=Eco Trend Publications.
  27. 吳采純, C. C.(2010)。新竹市=Hsinchu, Taiwan,國立新竹教育大學=National Hsinchu University of Education。
  28. 楊竣傑(2017 年 1 月)。必修能力 2:策展整合專案式時代,人人都是策展人。取自 http://topic.cheers.com.tw/issue/2017/work/article/9.aspxYoung, G. J. (2017, January). Required competencies 2:Curated and integrated project era, everyone is a curator [web blog message]. Retrieved from http://topic.cheers.com.tw/issue/2017/work/article/9.aspx [in Chinese, semantic translation]
  29. 漢寶德, P. T.(2004).展示規劃:理論與實務.台北=Taipei:田園城市文化事業=Garden City Publishers.
  30. 臺灣創意設計中心(無日期)。關於台創。取自 http://www.tdc.org.tw/about_tdcTaiwan Design Center. (n.d.). Introduction. Retrieved from http://www.tdc.org.tw/about_tdc [in Chinese, semantic translation]
  31. 潘淑滿, S. M.(2003).質性研究:理論與應用.台北市=Taipei:心=Psychological.