题名

擴增實境應用在基本設計教學之心流體驗探討

并列篇名

Exploring the Flow Experience of Augmented Reality Applied to Basic Design Teaching

作者

許言(Yen Hsu);陳江杰(Jiangjie Chen);顧超(Chao Gu);吳偉隆(Weilong Wu)

关键词

基本設計教學 ; 造形課程單元 ; 擴增實境 ; 心流體驗 ; PAT模型 ; Teaching of Basic Design ; Course of Styling ; Augmented Reality ; Flow Experience ; Person-Artefact-Task model

期刊名称

設計學報

卷期/出版年月

26卷2期(2021 / 06 / 01)

页次

43 - 66

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

「基本設計」是訓練設計系學生造形能力與美感經驗的重要課程,基本設計教學非常重視學生對於造形的體驗;而近年「擴增實境」(augmented reality, AR)逐漸成為輔助教學的一種技術,但少有在基本設計教學上的應用。因此本研究嘗試將AR技術應用於基本設計教學的「造形課程」單元,先開發AR造形課程教材,再分析AR教學對於學生「學習成效」,及學生學習過程中產生「心流體驗」對「學習態度」,以及「持續使用意圖」之影響。研究分二部分進行:1.首先分析基本設計教學之造形課程單元中,採用AR教學(實驗組)與紙本學習單教學(對照組)二組學生之學習成效差異;2.再以心流體驗之PAT模型(person-artefact-task model),分析學習者(學生因素)、AR教材(設備因素)和學習目的(任務因素)三方面的影響與交互的作用。本研究發現:1.將AR教材應用在基本設計教學之造形課程單元教學,可提高學生的專注度與學習興趣;2.在造形課程單元中,實驗組學生與對照組學生對於學習能力方面,存在顯著性差異,AR教材有助於提高學生之學習能力;3.學生因素的技能、控制力,與設備因素的互動性、臨場感,及任務因素的自我效能、挑戰性,對心流體驗產生正向影響;4.學生在學習AR教材時產生之心流體驗越強,學習態度與持續使用意圖會越明顯。整體而言,本研究對於AR教學的心流體驗提出了新觀點,可以提供教師在規劃AR教材以及在課程實施時之參考。

英文摘要

Basic Design is an important course for the building of the styling ability and aesthetic experience of students majoring in design. In recent years, Augmented Reality (AR) has gradually become a teaching aid; its application in the teaching of Basic Design, however, is been rare. This research tries to apply the AR technology into the course of Basic Design by developing the AR course materials first then followed by analyzing the learning outcomes among students receiving AR teaching, and the effect of the flow experience of students on their attitude towards learning and continuance intention. This study was carried out in two parts: (1) differences in learning outcomes of students from two groups, i.e. the AR teaching group (experiment group) and the traditional teaching group (control group) of Basic Design were analyzed; (2) the effect of learners (students), AR teaching materials (equipment) and purposes of learning (tasks) were studied with the Person-Artefact-Task (PAT) model of flow experience. The study found that: (1) the application of AR teaching materials to the teaching of Basic Design could enhance students' concentration and overall interest in learning. (2) students from the experiment group and from the control group showed significant differences in terms of learning ability, AR teaching contributed to the improvement of students' learning ability. (3) skills and control of the students, interactivity and telepresence of the equipment, self-efficacy and challenge of the tasks had a positive effect on the flow experience. (4) the stronger the flow experience of students during AR learning, the better their attitudes towards learning and continuance intention would be. This research put forward a new perspective of flow experience in AR teaching, and could serve as a reference to teachers' planning and practice of AR teaching materials.

主题分类 人文學 > 藝術
社會科學 > 傳播學
参考文献
  1. Chen, C.-M.,Tsai, Y.-N.(2012).Interactive augmented reality system for enhancing library instruction in elementary schools.Computers & Education,59(2),638-652.
    連結:
  2. 陳光大, G. D.,林品章, P. C.(2007)。動力學造形的理論基礎及其在造形教育中的地位。設計學報,12(2),37-52。
    連結:
  3. 陳俊智, C. C.,郭小菁, S. C.(2002)。應用概念構圖法於造形課程教學之研究。設計學報,7(1),1-13。
    連結:
  4. Ahmad, N.,Abdulkarim, H.(2019).The impact of flow experience and personality type on the intention to use virtual world.International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction,35(12),1074-1085.
  5. Ajzen, I.,Fishbein, M.(1980).Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
  6. Akçayır, M.,Akçayır, G.(2017).Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature.Educational Research Review,20,1-11.
  7. Aykac, V.(2015).An application regarding the availability of mind maps in visual art education based on active learning method.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,174,1859-1866.
  8. Azuma, R. T.(1997).A survey of augmented reality.Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments,6(4),355-385.
  9. Bandura, A.(1986).Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
  10. Billinghurst, M.(2002).Augmented reality in education.New Horizons for Learning,12(5),1-5.
  11. Biocca, F.(1997).The cyborg's dilemma: Progressive embodiment in virtual environments.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication,3(2),1-29.
  12. Bligh, D. A.(2000).What’s the use of lectures?.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
  13. Brookings, J. B.,Bolton, B.(1988).Confirmatory factor analysis of the interpersonal support evaluation list.American Journal of Community Psychology,16(1),137-147.
  14. Bujak, K. R.,Radu, I.,Catrambone, R.,Macintyre, B.,Zheng, R.,Golubski, G.(2013).A psychological perspective on augmented reality in the mathematics classroom.Computers & Education,68,536-544.
  15. Carroll, J. M.(2002).Human–computer interaction in the new millennium.New York, NY:ACM Press.
  16. Cauberghe, V.,Geuens, M.,De Pelsmacker, P.(2011).Context effects of TV programme-induced interactivity and telepresence on advertising responses.International Journal of Advertising,30(4),641-663.
  17. Chang, C.-C.(2013).Examining users’ intention to continue using social network games: A flow experience perspective.Telematics and Informatics,30(4),311-321.
  18. Chang, H. H.,Wang, I. C.(2008).An investigation of user communication behavior in computer mediated environments.Computers in Human Behavior,24(5),2336-2356.
  19. Costin, F.(1972).Lecturing versus other methods of teaching: A review of research.British Journal of Educational Technology,3(1),4-31.
  20. Coursaris, C. K.,Sung, J.(2012).Antecedents and consequents of a mobile website’s interactivity.New Media & Society,14(7),1128-1146.
  21. Csikszentmihalyi, M.(1990).Flow: The psychology of optimal experience.New York, NY:Harper & Row.
  22. Csikszentmihalyi, M.(1975).Beyond boredom and anxiety: Experiencing flow in work and play.San Francisco, CA:Jossey Press.
  23. Csikszentmihalyi, M.(Ed.),Csikszentmihalyi, I. S.(Ed.)(1988).Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
  24. Csikszentmihalyi, M.,Csikszentmihalyi, I. S.(1992).Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
  25. Csikszentmihalyi, M.,LeFevre, J.(1989).Optimal experience in work and leisure.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,56(5),815-822.
  26. Dağhan, G.,Akkoyunlu, B.(2016).Modeling the continuance usage intention of online learning environments.Computers in Human Behavior,60,198-211.
  27. Davis, R.,Wong, D.(2007).Conceptualizing and measuring the optimal experience of the eLearning environment.Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education,5(1),97-126.
  28. Di Serio, Á.,Ibáñez, M. B.,Kloos, C. D.(2013).Impact of an augmented reality system on students’ motivation for a visual art course.Computers & Education,68,586-596.
  29. DiCiccio, T. J.,Efron, B.(1996).Bootstrap confidence intervals.Statistical Science,11(3),189-228.
  30. Dunleavy, M.,Dede, C.,Mitchell, R.(2009).Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning.Journal of Science Education and Technology,18(1),7-22.
  31. Elfeky, A. I. M.,Elbyaly, M. Y. H.(2021).Developing skills of fashion design by augmented reality technology in higher education.Interactive Learning Environments,29(1),17-32.
  32. Esteban-Millat, I.,Martínez-López, F. J.,Huertas-García, R.,Meseguer, A.,Rodríguez-Ardura, I.(2014).Modelling students’ flow experiences in an online learning environment.Computers & Education,71,111-123.
  33. Faiola, A.,Newlon, C.,Pfaff, M.,Smyslova, O.(2013).Correlating the effects of flow and telepresence in virtual worlds: Enhancing our understanding of user behavior in game-based learning.Computers in Human Behavior,29(3),1113-1121.
  34. Finneran, C. M.,Zhang, P.(2003).A person–artefact–task (PAT) model of flow antecedents in computer-mediated environments.International Journal of Human-Computer Studies,59(4),475-496.
  35. Fonseca, D.,Martí, N.,Redondo, E.,Navarro, I.,Sánchez, A.(2014).Relationship between student profile, tool use, participation, and academic performance with the use of augmented reality technology for visualized architecture models.Computers in Human Behavior,31,434-445.
  36. Fornell, C.,Larcker, D. F.(1981).Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.Journal of Marketing Research,18,39-50.
  37. Gecu-Parmaksiz, Z.,Delialioğlu, Ö.(2020).The effect of augmented reality activities on improving preschool children’s spatial skills.Interactive Learning Environments,28(7),876-889.
  38. Ghani, J. A.,Deshpande, S. P.(1994).Task characteristics and the experience of optimal flow in Human-computer interaction.The Journal of Psychology,128(4),381-391.
  39. Goodyear, P.,Retalis, S.(2010).Technology-enhanced learning.Rotterdam:Sense Publishers.
  40. Gün, E. T.,Atasoy, B.(2017).The effects of augmented reality on elementary school students’ spatial ability and academic achievement.Egitim ve Bilim,42(191),31-51.
  41. Guo, Y. M.,Poole, M. S.(2009).Antecedents of flow in online shopping: A test of alternative models.Information Systems Journal,19(4),369-390.
  42. Guo, Z.,Xiao, L.,Van Toorn, C.,Lai, Y.,Seo, C.(2016).Promoting online learners’ continuance intention: An integrated flow framework.Information & Management,53(2),279-295.
  43. Hair, J. F.,Black, W. C.,Babin, B. J.,Anderson, R. E.,Tatham, R. L.(1998).Multivariate data analysis.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall.
  44. Hamari, J.,Shernoff, D. J.,Rowe, E.,Coller, B.,Asbell-Clarke, J.,Edwards, T.(2016).Challenging games help students learn: An empirical study on engagement, flow and immersion in game-based learning.Computers in Human Behavior,54,170-179.
  45. Harman, H. H.(1960).Modern factor analysis.Journal of the American Statistical Association,56(294),219-219.
  46. Hong, J.-C.,Hwang, M.-Y.,Tai, K.-H.,Lin, P.-H.(2017).Intrinsic motivation of Chinese learning in predicting online learning self-efficacy and flow experience relevant to students’ learning progress.Computer Assisted Language Learning,30(6),552-574.
  47. Hong, J.-C.,Pei-Yu, C.,Shih, H.-F.,Lin, P.-S.,Hong, J.-C.(2012).Computer self-efficacy, competitive anxiety and flow state: Escaping from firing online game.Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET,11(3),70-76.
  48. Hopkins, D. W. G.(2000).Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science.Sports Medicine,30(1),1.
  49. Hosseini, S. M.,Fattahi, R.(2014).Databases’ interface interactivity and user self-efficacy: Two mediators for flow experience and scientific behavior improvement.Computers in Human Behavior,36,316-322.
  50. Hsu, C.-L.,Lu, H.-P.(2004).Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience.Information & Management,41(7),853-868.
  51. Huang, E.(2012).Online experiences and virtual goods purchase intention.Internet Research,22(3),252-274.
  52. Hung, Y. H.,Chen, C. H.,Huang, S. W.(2017).Applying augmented reality to enhance learning: A study of different teaching materials.Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,33(3),252-266.
  53. Ibáñez, M. B.,Di Serio, Á.,Villarán, D.,Kloos, C. D.(2014).Experimenting with electromagnetism using augmented reality: Impact on flow student experience and educational effectiveness.Computers & Education,71,1-13.
  54. Joo, Y. J.,Oh, E.,Kim, S. M.(2015).Motivation, instructional design, flow, and academic achievement at a Korean online university: A structural equation modeling study.Journal of Computing in Higher Education,27(1),28-46.
  55. Kline, R. B.(2015).Principles and practice of structural equation modeling.New York, NY:Guilford Publications.
  56. Koufaris, M.(2002).Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior.Information Systems Research,13(2),205-223.
  57. Kye, B.,Kim, Y.(2008).Investigation of the relationships between media characteristics, presence, flow, and learning effects in augmented reality based learning augmented reality.International Journal for Education Media and Technology,2(1),4-14.
  58. Lee, C.-H.,Chiang, H.-S.,Hsiao, K.-L.(2018).What drives stickiness in location-based AR games? An examination of flow and satisfaction.Telematics and Informatics,35(7),1958-1970.
  59. Lee, M.-C.(2010).Explaining and predicting users’ continuance intention toward e-learning: An extension of the expectation–confirmation model.Computers & Education,54(2),506-516.
  60. Lee, M.-C.,Tsai, T.-R.(2010).What drives people to continue to play online games? An extension of technology model and theory of planned behavior.International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction,26(6),601-620.
  61. Liao, C.,Palvia, P.,Chen, J.-L.(2009).Information technology adoption behavior life cycle: Toward a technology continuance theory (TCT).International Journal of Information Management,29(4),309-320.
  62. Liao, L. F.(2006).A flow theory perspective on learner motivation and behavior in distance education.Distance Education,27(1),45-62.
  63. Lin, C.-P.,Joe, S.-W.(2012).To share or not to share: Assessing knowledge sharing, interemployee helping, and their antecedents among online knowledge workers.Journal of Business Ethics,108(4),439-449.
  64. Lin, K.-M.,Chen, N.-S.,Fang, K.(2011).Understanding e-learning continuance intention: A negative critical incidents perspective.Behaviour & Information Technology,30(1),77-89.
  65. Lu, S.-J.,Liu, Y.-C.,Chen, P.-J.,Hsieh, M.-R.(2020).Evaluation of AR embedded physical puzzle game on students’ learning achievement and motivation on elementary natural science.Interactive Learning Environments,28(4),451-463.
  66. Lupeon, E.,Miller, J. A.(1993).The Bauhaus and design theory.New York, NY:The Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art.
  67. Matute-Vallejo, J.,Melero-Polo, I.(2019).Understanding online business simulation games: The role of flow experience, perceived enjoyment and personal innovativeness.Australasian Journal of Educational Technology,35(3),71-85.
  68. Milgram, P.,Takemura, H.,Utsumi, A.,Kishino, F.(1995).Augmented reality: A class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum.Proceedings the SPIE: Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies,Boston, MA:
  69. Muñoz-Cristóbal, J. A.,Jorrín-Abellán, I. M.,Asensio-Perez, J. I.,Martinez-Mones, A.,Prieto, L. P.,Dimitriadis, Y.(2015).Supporting teacher orchestration in ubiquitous learning environments: A study in primary education.IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies,8(1),83-97.
  70. Norusis, M. J.(1992).SPSS for Windows: Professional statistics user's guide, release 5.0.Chicago, IL:SPSS Incorporated.
  71. Novak, T. P.,Hoffman, D. L.,Yung, Y.-F.(2000).Measuring the customer experience in online environments: A structural modeling approach.Marketing Science,19(1),22-42.
  72. Peifer, C.,Schulz, A.,Schächinger, H.,Baumann, N.,Antoni, C. H.(2014).The relation of flow-experience and physiological arousal under stress-can u shape it?.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,53,62-69.
  73. Pelet, J.-É.,Ettis, S.,Cowart, K.(2017).Optimal experience of flow enhanced by telepresence: Evidence from social media use.Information & Management,54(1),115-128.
  74. Radu, I.,Antle, A.(2017).Embodied learning mechanics and their relationship to usability of handheld augmented reality.2017 IEEE Virtual Reality Workshop on K-12 Embodied Learning through Virtual & Augmented Reality (KELVAR),Los Angeles, CA, USA:
  75. Rodríguez-Ardura, I.,Meseguer-Artola, A.(2016).E-learning continuance: The impact of interactivity and the mediating role of imagery, presence and flow.Information & Management,53(4),504-516.
  76. Rossin, D.,Ro, Y. K.,Klein, B. D.,Guo, Y. M.(2009).The effects of flow on learning outcomes in an online information management course.Journal of Information Systems Education,20(1),87-98.
  77. Shin, N.(2006).Online learner’s ‘flow’ experience: An empirical study.British Journal of Educational Technology,37(5),705-720.
  78. Snyder, C. R.(Ed.),Lopez, S. J.(Ed.)(2002).Handbook of positive psychology.New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
  79. Snyder, C. R.,Lopez, S. J.(2001).Handbook of positive psychology.New York, NY:Oxford University.
  80. Sobel, M. E.(1982).Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models.Sociological Methodology,13,290-312.
  81. Soomro, S.(Ed.)(2010).New achievements in technology education and development.Vukovar:InTech.
  82. Teng, C.-I.(2013).How do challenges increase customer loyalty to online games?.Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking,16(12),884-891.
  83. Van Noort, G.,Voorveld, H. A.,Van Reijmersdal, E. A.(2012).Interactivity in brand web sites: Cognitive, affective, and behavioral responses explained by consumers’ online flow experience.Journal of Interactive Marketing,26(4),223-234.
  84. Van Schaik, P.,Martin, S.,Vallance, M.(2011).Measuring flow experience in an immersive virtual environment for collaborative learning.Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,28(4),350-365.
  85. Wei, X.,Weng, D.,Liu, Y.,Wang, Y.(2015).Teaching based on augmented reality for a technical creative design course.Computers & Education,81,221-234.
  86. Wilks, J.,Cutcher, A.,Wilks, S.(2012).Digital technology in the visual arts classroom: An [un] easy partnership.Studies in Art Education,54(1),54-65.
  87. Wu, C. H.-J.,Liang, R.-D.(2011).The relationship between white-water rafting experience formation and customer reaction: A flow theory perspective.Tourism Management,32(2),317-325.
  88. Yip, J.,Wong, S.-H.,Yick, K.-L.,Chan, K.,Wong, K.-H.(2019).Improving quality of teaching and learning in classes by using augmented reality video.Computers & Education,128,88-101.
  89. 李麗雪, L. H.,徐慧民, H. M.,謝銘峰, M. F.,林孟立, M. L.(2006)。朝陽科技大學建築與景觀系不同入學背景學生基本計學習成果之比較分析研究。朝陽設計學報,7,1-14。
  90. 林品章, P. C.(1990).基礎設計教育.台北=Taipei:藝術家=Artist.
  91. 林書堯, S. Y.(1987).基本造形學.台北=Taipei:三民=Sanmin.
  92. 林崇宏, C. H.(1998).設計原理─基礎造形理念與創意思考的探索.台北=Taipei:全華=Quanhua.
  93. 林崇宏, C. H.(2007).設計基礎原理─造形與構成的創意思考.台北=Taipei:全華=Quanhua.
  94. 曾啟雄, C. S.,劉華傑, H. C.(2000)。高職課程之比較研究─以廣告設計科之設計基礎與造形為中心。設計學報,5(1),75-89。
被引用次数
  1. (2021)。兩岸廣告代理商擴增實境、虛擬實境行銷之採用因素研究。傳播管理學刊,22(2),33-62。