可感知的撤出：從植物性印表機探索事物中心取徑之設計策略

Perceived Withdrawal: Exploring the Design Strategies for Thing-Centered Approach with Botanical Printer

李婉貞(Wan-Chen Lee)；梁容輝(Rung-Huei Liang)

物導向哲學 ； 實用主義美學 ； 可感知的撤出 ； 事物中心取徑 ； 設計策略 ； Object-Oriented Philosophy ； Pragmatist Aesthetics ； Perceived Withdrawal ； Thing-Centered Approach ； Design Strategy

設計學報

27卷2期（2022 / 06 / 01）

65 - 87

繁體中文

互動領域興起事物中心設計趨勢，促使大眾再思考人本主義設計觀點，也豐富事物的多元表達。「物導向哲學」之「撤出」概念，有助於我們從事物的實在性理解互動美感。本研究梳理「撤出」理論脈絡，從實用主義美學（Pragmatist Aesthetics）角度，提出以「可感知的撤出」（perceived withdrawal）作為經驗品質。首先，依據人與物之間的溝通差異，分析當前互動設計案例，將「撤出」之互動表達，主要歸納為三項型態：脈絡撤出、形式撤出、訊息撤出；其次，評述《植物性印表機》作為「撤出」之設計實務研究；最後，綜論事物中心取徑之設計策略：（1）處境探索（situated exploration）；（2）矛盾時空（ambivalent space-time）；（3）共同推測（co-speculation）。透過設計實踐，期能培養欣賞事物之另類視野，更加增進人與物的日常互動體驗。

In the field of interaction, the trend of thing-centered design emerges, which not only prompts the public to rethink the human-centered design concept, but also enriches the diverse expression of things. The concept of ＂withdrawal＂ in object-oriented philosophy helps us to understand the interaction aesthetics from the reality of things. This study sorts out the theoretical context of ＂withdrawal＂, and from the perspective of pragmatist aesthetics, puts forward the concept of ＂perceived withdrawal＂ as an experiential quality. First of all, we analyze the current interactive design cases based on the communication differences between human and things, and summarize the interactive expressions of ＂withdrawal＂ into three types: withdrawal of context, withdrawal of form, and withdrawal of information. Secondly, we review Botanical Printer as a design practice research of ＂withdrawal＂. Finally, a comprehensive review of the design strategies for thing-centered design includes situated exploration, ambivalent space-time and co-speculation. Through the interactive practice of thing-centered design, we can cultivate an alternative perspective to appreciate things and enhance the daily interactive experience.

1. 李婉貞, W.-C.,梁容輝, R.-H.(2020)。「事物中心」設計之推測潛能：透過物本體視野的互動研究。設計學報，25(1)，63-85。
   連結：
2. Askin, R.(Ed.),Ennis, P. J.(Ed.),Hägler, A.(Ed.),Schweighauser, P.(Ed.)(2014).Speculation V: Aesthetics in the 21st century.New York, NY:Punctum Books.
3. Auger, J.(2013).Speculative design: Crafting the speculation.Digital Creativity,24(1),11-35.
4. Bardzell, J.(2011).Interaction criticism: An introduction to the practice.Interacting with Computers,23(6),604-621.
5. Bardzell, J.(2009).Interaction criticism and aesthetics.Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems,New York, NY:
6. Bardzell, J.,Bardzell, S.(2016).Humanistic HCI.Interactions,23(2),20-29.
7. Bogost, I.(2012).Alien phenomenology: Or what it’s like to be a thing.Minneapolis, MN:University of Minnesota Press.
8. Bogost, I. (2012b, April 13). The new aesthetic needs to get weirder. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/04/the-new-aesthetic-needs-to-getweirder/255838/
9. Bosch, T. (2012, March 2). Sci-fi writer Bruce sterling explains the intriguing new concept of design fiction. Slate. Retrieved from: https://slate.com/technology/2012/03/bruce-sterling-on-design-fictions.html
10. Bressa, N.,Wannamaker, K.,Korsgaard, H.,Willett, W.,Vermeulen, J.(2019).Sketching and ideation activities for situated visualization design.Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference,New York, NY:
11. Bryant, L. R. (2009, October 1). A brief note on OOO and politics. Retrieved from https://larvalsubjects.wordpress.com/2009/10/01/a-brief-note-on-ooo-and-politics/
12. Candy, S.(2010).Department of Political Science, University of Hawaii at Manoa.
13. Candy, S.,Dunagan, J.(2017).Designing an experiential scenario: The people who vanished.Futures,86,136-153.
14. Carroll, J. M.(Ed.)(2015).Synthesis Lectures on Humancentered Informatics.San Rafael, CA:Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
15. Chang, W.-W.,Giaccardi, E.,Chen, L.-L.,Liang, R.-H.(2017).Interview with things.Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems,New York, NY:
16. Coulton, P.,Lindley, J.(2019).More-than human centred design: Considering other things.The Design Journal,22(4),463-481.
17. Desjardins, A.,Key, C.,Biggs, H.,Aschenbeck, K.(2019).Bespoke booklets: A method for situated co-speculation.Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference,New York, NY:
18. Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York, NY: Minton, Balch & Company.
19. Dunne, A.(2006).Hertzian tales: Electronic products, aesthetic experience, and critical design.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
20. Dunne, A., & Raby, F. (2007). Technological dreams series: No.1, robots. Retrieved from http://www.dunneandraby.co.uk/content/projects/10/0
21. Dunne, A.,Raby, F.(2013).Speculative everything: Design fiction and social dreaming.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
22. Dunne, A.,Raby, F.(2001).Design noir: The secret life of electronic objects.Basel:Birkhäuser.
23. Frauenberger, C.(2019).Entanglement HCI - The next wave?.ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI),27(1),2:1-2:27.
24. Frayling, C.(1993).Research in art and design.Royal College of Art Research Papers,1(1),11-5.
25. Giaccardi, E.,Cila, N.,Speed, C.,Caldwell, M.,Cruz, S.(2016).Thing ethnography: Doing design research with non-humans.Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems,New York, NY:
26. Giaccardi, E.,Speed, C.,Cila, N.,Caldwell, M.(2016).Things as co-ethnographers: Implications of a thing perspective for design and anthropology.Design anthropological futures,London:
27. Giaccardi, E.,Speed, C.,Rubens, N.(2014).Things making things: An ethnography of the impossible (draft). Ethnographies of the Possible.Moesgaard Alle:Aarhus University.
28. Hallnäs, L.,Redström, J.(2001).Slow technology - designing for reflection.Personal and Ubiquitous Computing,5(3),201-212.
29. Haraway, D.(1988).Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective.Feminist Studies,14(3),575-599.
30. Harman, G.(2002).Tool-being: Heidegger and the metaphysics of objects.Chicago, IL:Open Court.
31. Harman, G.(2013).Bells and whistles: More speculative realism.Hants:Zero Books.
32. Harman, G.(2011).The quadruple object.Winchester:Zero Books.
33. Harman, G.(1999).Tool-being: Elements of theory of objects.Chicago, IL:DePaul University.
34. Harman, G.(2005).Guerrilla metaphysics: Phenomenology and the carpentry of things.Chicago, IL:Open Court.
35. Harrison, S.,Tatar, D.,Sengers, P.(2007).,未出版
36. Heidegger, M.,Macquarrie, J.(Trans.),Robinson, E.(Trans.)(1962).Being and time.New York, NY:Harper andRow.
37. Höök, K.,Löwgren, J.(2012).Strong concepts: Intermediate-level knowledge.ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction,19(3),23:1-23:18.
38. Hsu, Y.-Y.,Tsai, W.-C.,Lee, W.-C.,Liang, R.-H.(2018).Botanical printer: An exploration on interaction design with plantness.Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference,New York, NY:
39. Latour, B.(1992).Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts.Shaping technology / building society: Studies in sociotechnical change,Cambridge, MA:
40. Latour, B.,Catherine, P.(Trans.)(2004).Politics of nature: How to bring the sciences into democracy.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
41. Lindley, J.,Akmal, H.,Coulton, P.(2020).Design research and object-oriented ontology.Open Philosophy,3(1),11-41.
42. Löwgren, J.(2007).Fluency as an experiential quality in augmented spaces.International Journal of Design,1(3),1-10.
43. Löwgren, J.(2013).Annotated portfolios and other forms of intermediate-level knowledge.Interactions,20(1),30-34.
44. Löwgren, J.(2007).Pliability as an experiential quality: Exploring the aesthetics of interaction design.Artifact,1(2),85-95.
45. Mackay, R.(Ed.)(2007).Collapse: Philosophical research and development II.Falmouth:Urbanomic.
46. Mackay, R.(Ed.)(2007).Collapse: Volume 3.Falmouth:Urbanomic Press.
47. McCarthy, E. D.(1984).Towards a sociology of the physical world: George herbert mead on physical objects.Studies in Symbolic Interaction,5,105-121.
48. McCarthy, J.,Wright, P.(2004).Technology as experience.London:The MIT Press.
49. Morton, T.(2010).The ecological thought.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
50. Morton, T.(2013).Realist magic: Objects, ontology, causality.London:Open Humanities Press.
51. Nagel, T.(1974).What is it like to be a bat?.Philosophical Review,83(4),435-450.
52. Nansen, B.,Van Ryn, L.,Vetere, F.,Robertson, T.,Brereton, M.,Douish, P.(2014).An internet of social things.Proceedings of the 26th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on Designing Futures: The Future of Design,New York, NY:
53. Odom, W.,Selby, M.,Sellen, A.,Kirk, D.,Banks, R.,Regan, T.(2012).Photobox: On the design of a slow technology.Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference on,New York, NY:
54. Pérez de Miles, A.,Kalin, N. M.(2018).Speculative realism(s) objects/matter/entanglements of art and design education.International Journal of Education Through Art,14(1),3-12.
55. Pierce, J.(2009).Material awareness: Promoting reflection on everyday materiality. In CHI ’09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems.Boston, MA:ACM.
56. Pollan, M.(2002).The botany of desire: A plant’s eye view of the world.New York, NY:Random House.
57. Rebaudengo, S. (2012). Addicted toasters: Real fictional service of self-sharing things. Retrieved from http://www.simonerebaudengo.com.
58. Romero, M.,Pousman, Z.,Mateas, M.(2008).Alien presence in the home: The design of tableau machine.Personal and Ubiquitous Computing,12(5),373-382.
59. Ross, P. R.,Wensveen, S. A. G.(2010).Designing aesthetics of behavior in interaction: Using aesthetic experience as a mechanism for design.International Journal of Design,4(2),3-13.
60. Ryan, M. -L.(2013).Possible worlds.The living handbook of narratology,Hamburg:
61. Shusterman, R.(2000).Pragmatist aesthetics: Living beauty, rethinking art.Oxford:Blackwell.
62. Sturrock, J.(1986).Structuralism.London:Paladin.
63. Vallgårda, A.(2014).Giving form to computational things: Developing a practice of interaction design.Personal and Ubiquitous Computing,18(3),578-580.
64. Van Allen, P.,McVeigh-Schultz, J.,Brown, B.,Kim, H. M.,Lara, D.(2013).AniThings: Animism and heterogeneous multiplicity.Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems on - CHI EA,New York, NY:
65. Van der Tuin, I.,Dolphijn, R.(2012).New materialism: Interviews & cartographies.London:Open Humanities Press.
66. Wakkary, R.,Odom, W.,Hauser, S.,Hertz, G.,Lin, H.(2016).A short guide to material speculation.Interactions,23(2),44-48.
67. Wakkary, R.,Odom, W.,Hauser, S.,Hertz, G.,Lin, H.(2015).Material speculation: Actual artifacts for critical inquiry.Proceedings of the Fifth Decennial Aarhus Conference on Critical Alternatives,Aarhus:
68. Wakkary, R.,Oogjes, D.,Hauser, S.,Lin, H.,Cao, C.,Ma, L.,Duel, T.(2017).Morse things: A design inquiry into the gap between things and us.Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems,New York, NY:
69. Wakkary, R.,Oogjes, D.,Lin, H. W. J.,Hauser, S.(2018).Philosophers living with the tilting bowl.Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems,New York, NY:
70. Zimmerman, J.,Forlizzi, J.,Evenson, S.(2007).Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI.Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems,New York, NY:
71. 波倫．麥可, M.,潘勛（譯）, X.(Trans.),王毅（譯）, Y.(Trans.)(2002).植物慾望園.臺北=Taipei:時報文化=Times Culture.
72. 哈曼．格拉漢姆, G.,黃芙蓉（譯）, F. R.(Trans.)(2018).鈴與哨：更思辨的實在論.重慶=Chongqing:西南師範大學=Southwest Normal University.
73. 許元耀, Y.-Y.(2017)。台北市=Taipei，國立臺灣科技大學=National Taiwan University of Science and Technology。