新見明儒湛若水〈格物之說〉手蹟的文本問題與文獻價值

The Newly Discovered Manuscript of Zhan Ruoshui's Poem, ＂Explaining the Investigation of Things,＂: Its Textual Problems and Significance

10.3966/160759942021060036005

劉勇(Liu Yong)

湛若水 ； 王陽明 ； 格物 ； 《大學》 ； 理學 ； Zhan Ruoshui ； Wang Yang-ming ； the Investigation of Things ； the Great Learning ； Neo-Confucianism

明代研究

36期（2021 / 06 / 01）

145 - 166

繁體中文

在明代中葉的整體性社會劇變中，湛若水和王陽明是儒學思想領域引人矚目的明星組合，兩人既在反思和批判作為意識形態的朱子學說上密切合作，同時又在探索和引領儒學思想新方向上互為有力競爭對手。新見湛若水「書付君恪」〈格物之說〉手蹟，是其在正德末年書贈廣東西樵山講學門人鄧眕的一首五言古詩，主要概括了他對《大學》「格物」概念相異於王陽明的最新看法。通過對手蹟題識「與世傑格物之說」在湛、王有關「格物」論辯脈絡中所處位置的考察，可以確認該詩正是二人長期圍繞探索儒學思想新方向所產生的分歧與競爭的關鍵文本之一。作為物化形式出現和存在的五言古詩〈格物之說〉之手蹟，為在具體歷史情境中觀察湛、王學術互動提供了一個間接視角，這是從多種明代文獻收錄的該詩文字中難以解讀出來的信息，文獻編刊時的例行加工使得該詩脫離其初始產生和反覆使用的語境，僅僅作為泛泛解釋「格物」的論學之作而存在。

Amidst the dramatic shifts that took place across the social order in the middle of the Ming Dynasty, Zhan Ruoshui and Wang Yangming are leading lights that command our attention in the field of Confucian thought. The two cooperated closely in reflecting on and critiquing Zhu Xi's theories, which had become the dominant ideology. And they led the way as competitors in pursuing new avenues in Confucian thought. The newly discovered manuscript of Zhan's poem ＂(Written for [Deng] Junke,) Explaining the Investigation of Things＂ is a five-character ＂old-style＂ poem that he send to his disciple Deng Zhen. The poem generally summarizes Zhan's views on the ＂investigation of things＂ found in the text of the Great Learning, in contrast with Wang Yangming's newest positions on the subject. Written in response to Deng's piece, ＂Explaining the Investigation of Things with [Chen] Shijie,＂ and against the background of Zhan and Wang positioning themselves in the debates around the ＂investigation of things,＂ this poem is certainly one of the key documents in the ongoing exchanges between these two men on one of the most contentious and divisive issues that emerged in Confucian intellectual trends of the day. The survival of this five-character old-style poem, ＂Explaining the Investigation of Things,＂ provides us with an indirect perspective on the scholarly interactions between Zhan and Wang in a specific historical context. The precious message inherent in the material form of his calligraphy was lost because only the words were preserved in later publications. This article will bring the message to light by analyzing the calligraphy and its other material aspects.

1. 劉勇(2009)。中晚明時期的講學宗旨、《大學》文本與理學學說建構。中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊，80(3)，403-450。
   連結：
2. (1997).四庫全書存目叢書.濟南:齊魯書社.
3. (2000).故宮珍本叢刊.海口:海南出版社.
4. (1996).四庫全書存目叢書.濟南:齊魯書社.
5. (2009).儒藏.北京:北京大學出版社.
6. (1995).續修四庫全書.上海:上海古籍出版社.
7. (2015).廣州大典.廣州:廣州出版社.
8. (1990).天一閣藏明代方式選刊續編.上海:上海書店.
9. (1995).續修四庫全書.上海:上海古籍出版社.
10. （宋）程顥,（宋）程頤,王孝魚（點校）(2004).二程集.北京:中華書局.
11. （明）王守仁,吳光（編校）,錢明（編校）,董平（編校）,姚延福（編校）(2010).王陽明全集（新編本）.杭州:浙江古籍出版社.
12. （明）湛若水(2016).樵風.桂林:廣西師範大學出版社.
13. （明）湛若水,鍾彩鈞（點校）,游騰達（點校）(2017).泉翁大全集.臺北:中央研究院中國文哲研究所.
14. （明）費宏(1966).明武宗實錄.臺北:中央研究院歷史語言研究所.
15. Woo, Ann-ping Chin(1984).Columbia University.
16. 王文娟(2012).湛甘泉哲學思想研究.成都:巴蜀書社.
17. 束景南(2017).王陽明年譜長編.上海:上海古籍出版社.
18. 岡田武彥,吳光（譯）(2000).王陽明與明末儒學.上海:上海古籍出版社.
19. 胡吉勛(2005)。從陳洸案看明世宗對文官系統之滲透與操控。第十一屆明史國際學術討論會，甘肅蘭州:
20. 夏長樸(2014).儒家與儒學探究.臺北:大安出版社.
21. 崔建英（輯）,賈衛民（整理）,李曉亞（整理）(2006).明別集版本志.北京:中華書局.
22. 陳來(2003).中國近世思想史研究.北京:商務印書館.
23. 陳來(2006).有無之境：王陽明哲學的精神.北京:北京大學出版社.
24. 陳榮捷(2006).王陽明傳習錄詳註集評.臺北:臺灣學生書局.
25. 鄒建鋒(2017).陽明夫子親傳弟子考.北京:中國社會科學出版社.
26. 劉勇(2015)。王陽明《大學古本》的當代競爭者：湛若水與方獻夫之例。中國文化研究所學報，60，159-182。
27. 魯棣（編）,粵北山人（編）(2016).明清廣東書畫集.廣州:嶺南美術出版社.
28. 黎業明(2009).湛若水年譜.上海:上海古籍出版社.
29. 錢明(2009).王陽明及其學派論考.北京:人民出版社.