資訊管理研究主題的趨勢分析

Evolution of Information Systems Research

10.6382/JIM.200504.0001

梁定澎(Ting-Peng Liang)；陳燈能(Deng-Neng Chen)

資訊管理研究 ； 趨勢分析 ； 研究多樣性 ； 資管核心 ； IS Research ； Evolutionary Analysis ； Research Diversity ； IS Foundation

資訊管理學報

12卷2期（2005 / 04 / 01）

1 - 24

繁體中文

資訊管理學域的發展至今有三十餘年的歷史，伴隨著資訊科技的快速變化，資訊系統應用深入企業核心與個人生活，資訊管理研究方向與主題也快速變化。本文探討資管研究過去的歷程及未來發展的趨努，研究收集了1980年至2001年間八個主要國際資管學術期刊共3841篇，及國內資管學報的111篇論文進行分析，以瞭解這二十年來資訊管理研究主題與多樣性程度的變化趨勢，並與國內的資管學報論文比較。結果發現，在過去二十年來研究議題是不斷變動的，主要可以分為四個階段，不同階段各有不同的研究重點。藉由多元尺度分析，結果顯示過去資管研究有兩個明顯的演化趨勢，並發現「新資訊科技的引進」及「應用的需求」是兩個主要驅動力量，不斷的推動資管研究的演化過程。另外，我們也發現在研究主題和趨勢上，國內和國際趨勢相符的程度很高。

In the past thirty years, the information systems (IS) area has rapidly evolved into a mature discipline. Applications of information systems have embedded into business core and personal life. The research topic and directions have also changed dynamically. To help IS professionals understand and catch on the trend, it is important to understand how research issues have evolved in the past and the driving forces underlying the evolution. In this research, we surveyed 3841 papers published between 1980 and 2001 in eight major international IS journals and 111 domestic research published in Journal of Information Management. Each paper was categorized into our framework according to its research theme. The results indicate an increase in human-related research and a decline in systems-related research. Moreover, two major trends are identified: one driven by system design issues (1980-1991) and the other driven by human factors and system applications (1992-2001). Two underlying forces behind the trends have been identified: they were new technology development and organizational needs. No significant difference is found between Taiwanese and international research papers.

1. Alavi, M.,Carlson, P.(1992).A Review of MIS Research and Disciplinary Development.Journal of Management Information Systems,8(4),45-62.
2. Barki, H.,Rivard, S.(1988).An Information Systems Keyword Classification Scheme.MIS Quarterly,12(2),299-322.
3. Barki, H.,Rivard, S.,Talbot, J.(1993).A Keyword Classification Scheme for IS Research Literature: An Update.MIS Quarterly,17(4),209-226.
4. Baskerville, R. L.,Myers, M. D.(2002).Information Systems as a Reference Discipline.MIS Quarterly,26(1),1-14.
5. Benbasat, I.,Weber R.(1996).Research Commentary: Rethinking “Diversity” in Information Systems Research.Information Systems Research,7(4),389-399.
6. Benbasat, I.,Zmud, R. W.(2003).The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline`s Core Properties.MIS Quarterly,27(2),183-194.
7. Claver, E.,Gonzalez, R.,Llopis, J.(2000).An Analysis of Research in Information Systems (1981-1997).Information & Management,37(4),181-195.
8. Davis, G.(2000).Information Systems Conceptual Foundations: Looking Backward and Forward.Organizational and Social Perspectives on Information Technology.
9. Ein-Dor, P.,Segev, B.(1993).A Classification of Information Systems: Analysis and Interpretation.Information Systems Research,4(2),166-203.
10. Farhoomand, A. F.,Drury, D. H.(1999).A Historiographical Examination of Information Systems.Communications of AIS.
11. Gillenson, M. L.,Stutz, J. D.(1991).Academic Issues in MIS: Journal and Books.MIS Quarterly,15(4),447-452.
12. Koong, K. S.,Weistroffer, H. R.(1989).Faculty Usage of Management Information Systems Journals: A Survey.Journal of Computer Information Systems,30(1),1-4.
13. Krippendorff, K.(1980).Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology.
14. Kruskal, J. B.,Wish, M.(1978).Multidimensional Scaling.
15. Landis, J. R.,Koch, G. G.(1977).The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data.Biometrics,33(1),159-174.
16. Lee, Z.,Gosain, S.,Im, I.(1999).Topics of Interest in IS: Evolution of Themes and Differences Between Research and Practice.Information & Management,36(5),233-246.
17. Mylonopoulos, N. A.,Theoharakis, V.(2001).Global Perceptions of IS Journals.Communications of The ACM,44(9),29-33.
18. Robey, D.(1996).Research Commentary: Diversity in Information Systems Research: Threat, Promise, and Responsibility.Information Systems Research,7(4),400-408.
19. Simpson, E. H.(1949).Measurement of Diversity.Nature,163,688.
20. Swanson E. B.,Ramiller N. C.(1993).Information Systems Research Thematics: Submissions to a New Journal, 1987-1992.Information Systems Research,4(4),299-329.
21. Swanson, E. B.(1984).Information Systems: Necessary Foundations.Conference on the Intellectual Foundations for Information Professionals.
22. Vessy, I.,Ramesh, V.,Glass, R. L.(2002).Research in Information Systems: An Empirical Study of Diversity in the Discipline and Its Journals.Journal of Management Information Systems,19(2),129-174.
23. Weber, R. P.(1985).Basic Content Analysis.
24. 梁定澎(1997)。資訊管理研究方法總論。資訊管理學報，4(1)，1-6。

1. Wang, Jyun-Cheng,Chiu, Chui-Chen,Chang, Ching-Hui(2010).The Analysis of MIS Collaboration Research Networks and Research Issues Structure: The Example of MIS Quarterly Journal.資管評論,16(1),85-126.
2. 陳良駒、陳日鑫、張正宏(2010)。以特徵詞共現特性探討知識管理研究議題相關性—使用共詞與關聯法則分析。資訊管理學報，17(4)，31-60。
3. 黃郁婷、湯添進、陳昱文、李炳昭(2016)。運動社會學研究議題分類與指標建構。體育學報，49(3)，353-370。
4. 賴佳吟、陳灯能、梁定澎(2016)。臺灣資訊管理研究之回顧與展望。管理學報，33(1)，61-86。
5. 梁定澎(2016)。乘科技風潮，御管理智浪：一個管理學者的漂流。管理學報，33(2)，189-200。
6. 廖建翔、許建隆、張芳凱、李有仁(2017)。資訊管理研究在台灣：歷史回顧與未來展望。臺大管理論叢，27(4)，169-206。
7. 歐陽瑜、許瑋元(2017)。我國資訊科技採納與導入文獻回顧之趨勢分析（2000-2015）。臺大管理論叢，27(3)，215-252。
8. 謝清佳、謝定助、洪銘建(2007)。研究方法典範移轉？——國內資訊管理頓域論文之調查。資訊管理學報，14(4)，1-29。
9. 謝宗憲、唐震(2009)。以TSSCI為例探討學術共同著作現象。企業管理學報，81，43-83。
10. 鄭妃君,葉靜輝,林侑賢(2023)。運用文字探勘及問卷調查探討線上評論對消費者購買意願的影響。東吳經濟商學學報，106，41-63。