科技中介之組織溝通理論反思：研究典範與後設理論之重建

Philosophical Foundations within the Technological Mediation of Organizational Communication: Framing the Discipline's Research Paradigms and Meta Theories

10.6382/JIM.200607.0197

林千乃(Chien-Nai Lin)；謝清佳(Ching-Cha Hsieh)；謝定助(Ting-Chu Hsieh)；尤國任(Graham Yu)

組織溝通 ； 資訊科技 ； 研究典範 ； 後設理論 ； Organizational Communication ； Technological Mediation ； Research Paradigm ； Meta Theory

資訊管理學報

13卷3期（2006 / 07 / 01）

197 - 216

繁體中文

隨著資訊科技被廣泛應用於各類型的組織溝通活動，溝通現象愈趨複雜，相關之研究議題也更加豐富，組織溝通領域因立場差異而起的學術論戰也越趨激烈。科技中介之組織溝通領域的學術論戰，究其原因，皆是因後設理論觀點不同而起。本研究之目的，在於耙梳各類科技中介之組織溝通研究所稟持之後設理論，以及諸後設理論所本之研究典範，期能彰顯該領域理論建構之背景視域，並據以論證既存的科技中介之組織溝通理論。本研究籍由「研究典範→後設理論→理論建構」的概念架構，建構出整個科技中介之組織溝通研究領域的背景視域，並以此背景視域為 基礎，對領域內的主要理論作分析，探討其貢獻與侷限。

Technological mediation of organizational communication as a discipline grew tremendously over the latter part of the 20(superscript th) century. But accompanying that growth was the strident debate over various theoretical commitments. Scholars consider most of the theoretical conflicts are the incommensurability among philosophical foundations. Therefore, this essay is to frame the discipline's research paradigms and meta theories as its philosophical foundation, and to assess the well-known theories of the discipline based on this philosophical ground. The authors believe this approach bridges the competitive theories via research paradigms and metatheoretical perspectives, and provides a common basis for further studies.

1. Berger, P.,Luckmann, T.(1967).The Social Construction of Reality.London:Penguin.
2. Boland, R. J.,H. E. Nissen (eds.),H. K. Klein (eds.),R. Hirschheim (eds.)(1991).Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches & Emergent Traditions.New York:North-Holland.
3. Burrell, G.,Morgan, G.(1979).Sociological Paradigms and Organization Analysis.London:Heinemann.
4. Chua, W. F.(1986).Radical Developments in Accounting Thought.The Accounting Review,61(4),601-633.
5. Contractor, N. S.,Eisenberg, E. M.,J. Fulk (eds.),C. Steinfield (eds.)(1990).Organizations and Communication Technology.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
6. Corman, S. R. (eds.),M. S. Poole (eds.)(2000).Perspectives on Organizational Communication: Finding Common Ground.New York:The Guilford Press.
7. Daft, R. L.,Lengel, R. H.(1986).Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design.Management Science,32(5),554-571.
8. Daft, R. L.,Lengel, R. H.,Trevino, L. K.(1987).Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems.MIS Quarterly,11(3),355-366.
9. Deetz, Stanley,F. M. Jablin (eds.),L. L. Putnam (eds.)(2001).The New Handbook of Organizational Communication: Advances in Theory, Research, and Methods.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
10. DeSanctis, G.,Poole, M. S.(1994).Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory.Organization Science,5(2),121-147.
11. Fisher, B. A.(1978).Perspectives on Human Communication.New York:Macmillan.
12. Fulk, J (eds.),Schmitz, J.,Steinfield, C. W.,C. Steinfield (eds.)(1990).Organizations and Communication Technology.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
13. Fulk, J.,Collins-Jarvis, L.,F. M. Jablin (eds.),L. L. Putnam (eds.)(2001).The New Handbook of Organizational Communication: Advances in Theory, Research, and Methods.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
14. Fulk, Janet(1993).Social Construction of Communication Technology.Academy of Management Journal,36(5),921-950.
15. Geertz, C.(1991).The Saturated Self.New York:Basic Books.
16. Gephart, R.(1999).Research Method Forum (4).Academy of Management, Research Method Division.
17. Giddens, A.(1984).The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration.Berkely and Los Angeles, CA:University of California Press.
18. Giddnes(1991).Modernity and Self-Identify: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age.Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press.
19. Habermas, J.(1971).Knowledge and Human Interests.Boston, MA:Beacon Press.
20. Habermas, J.(1984).The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and Rationalization of Society (1).Boston, MA:Beacon Press.
21. Habermas, J.(1987).The Theory of Communicative Action: Lifeworld and Social System (2).Boston, MA:Beacon Press.
22. Howard, G. S.(1985).The Role of Values in the Science of Psychology.American Psychologist,40,255-265.
23. Klein, H.,Myers, M. D.(1999).A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems.MIS Quarterly,23(1),67-94.
24. Krone, K. J.,Jablin, F. M. (eds.),Putnam, L. L.(1987).Handbook of Orgnizational Communication.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
25. Lee, A. S.(1994).Electronic Mail as a Medium for Rich Communication: An Empirical Investigation Using Hermeneutic Interpretation.MIS Quarterly,18(2),143-157.
26. Lee, A. S.,M. D. Myers (eds.),D. Avison (eds.)(2002).Qualitative Research in Information Systems.London:Sage.
27. Leeds-Hurwitz, W.(1992).Forum Introduction: Social Approaches to Interpersonal Communication.Communication Theory,2,131-139.
28. Markus, M. Lynne(1994).Electronic Mail as the Medium of Managerial Choice.Organization Science,5(4),502-527.
29. Markus, M. Lynne,J. Fulk (eds.),C. Steinfield (eds.)(1990).Organizations and Communication Technology.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
30. Miller, Katherine(2003).Organizational Communication: Approaches and Processes.Belmont, CA:Wadsworth.
31. Miller, Katherine(1995).Organizational Communication: Approaches and Process.Belmont, CA:Wadsworth.
32. Miller, Katherine(2002).Communication Theories: Perspectives, Processes, and Context.McGraw-Hill.
33. Miller, Katherine,S. R. Corman (eds.),M. S. Poole (eds.)(2000).Perspectives on Organizational Communication: Finding Common Ground.New York:The Guilford Press.
34. Morgan, G.,Smirchich, L.(1980).The Case for Qualitative Research.Academy of Management Review,5(4),491-500.
35. Ngwenyama, O. K.,Lee, A. S.(1992).Communication Richness in Electronic Mail: Critical Social Theory and the Contextuality of meaning.MIS Quarterly,21(2),145-167.
36. Orlikowski, W. J.(1992).The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations.Organization Science,3(3),398-427.
37. Orlikowski, W. J.,Baroudi, J. J.(1991).Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approach and Assumptions.Information Systems Research,2(1),1-28.
38. Orlikowski, W. J.,Yates, J.(1994).Genre Repertoire: The Structuring of Communicative Practices in Organizations.Administrative Science Quarterly,39,541-574.
39. Poole, M. S.,DeSanctis, G.,J. Fulk (eds.),C. Steinfield (eds.)(1990).Organizations and Communication Technology.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
40. Putnam, L. L. (eds),Pacanowsky, M. E (eds)(1983).Communication and Organizations: An Interpretive Approach.Newbury Park:Sage.
41. Rosengren, K.,B. Dervin (eds.),L. Grossberg (eds.),B. O''Keefe (eds.),E. Wartella (eds.)(1989).Rethinking Communication, 2: Paradigm Exemplars.Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
42. Scherer, A. G.(1998).Pluralism and Incommensurability in Strategic Management and Organization Theory: A Problem in Search of a Solution.Organizations,5,147-168.
43. Short, J.,Williams, E.,Christie, B.(1976).The Social Psychology of Telecommunications.New York:John Wiley.
44. Sproll, L.,Kiesler, S.(1986).Reducing Social Context Cues: Electronic Mail in Organizational Communication.Management Science,32(1),1492-1512.
45. Trevino, L. K.,Daft, R. L.,Lengel, R. H.,J. Fulk (eds.),C. Steinfield (eds.)(1990).Organizations and Communication Technology.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
46. Weick, K. E.(1979).The Social Psychology of Organizing.Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley.
47. Yates, J.,Orlikowski, W. J.(1992).Genres of Organizational Communication: A Structurational Approach to Studying Communication Media.Academy of Management Review,17(2),299-326.
48. Yoo, Y.,Alavi, M.(2001).Media and Group Cohesion: Relative Influence on Social Presence, Task Participation, and Group Consensus.MIS Quarterly,25(3),371-390.
49. 黃光國著(2001)。社會科學的理路。台北市:心理。
50. 黃瑞棋著(2001)。批判社會學。台北市:三民。

1. 陳宇芬、許維素、張維中、徐啓氤(2009)。網路即時諮商系統之設計原則：以行動研究探索。應用心理研究，44，213-250。