電腦使用者界面的改良設計與科技接受模式之驗證

A Redesign of Computer Users Interface and a Verification of Technology Acceptance Model

10.6382/JIM.201010.0001

李國瑋(Kuo-Wei Lee)；李應註(Ying-Chu Lee)

使用者界面 ； 工具球 ； 滑鼠滾輪 ； 科技接受模式 ； programming language ； skill transfer ； positive transfer ； negative transfer

資訊管理學報

17卷4期（2010 / 10 / 01）

1 - 30

繁體中文

在電腦的圖形使用者界面上，以滑鼠按鍵點擊工具列，係最基本的電腦軟體操作架構。唯軟體功能未必須由按鍵動作來執行，「按鍵動作滾輪化」已是軟體操作的趨勢之一。如Windows Vista, Office 2007的諸多軟體功能，即以滾輪來取代按鍵的操作動作。因應此趨勢，本研究在軟體上，乃實作一以滾輪為操作基礎的改良式圖形使用界面－多重工具球；在硬體上，則實作一多重滾輪，以進一步拓展滾輪應用價值。同時，藉由「多重滾輪＋多重工具球」的結合，成為一創新的電腦軟體使用者界面。 最後，本研究針對此界面進行軟體操作效能的驗證以及使用者的使用意向進行評估。研究結果顯示「多重滾輪＋多重工具球」的軟體操作方式，在諸多軟體功能的執行上，較傳統「滑鼠按鍵＋工具列」有更佳之操作效能，同時使用者對此新科技亦有一定的接受與認同。

On the issue of graphical user interface (GUI), clicking toolbar with mouse click is an ordinary way to operate software functions. However, software functions are not necessary performed by ”mouse click”. Rolling mouse wheel instead of mouse click is a trend of software operation. In Windows Vista and Office 2007, we can find mouse click is replaced with mouse wheel to perform much software functions. Following the trend, in the aspect of software, this study tries to implement an improved GUI-multi-tool balls, which is operated by a mouse wheel. On the other hand, in the aspect of hardware, we redesigned multi-mouse wheels and increase the application of mouse wheel. Then, by combing ”multi-tool balls and multi-mouse wheels”, we develop an innovative framework to operate software. At last, this study examined the efficiency of the innovative user interface and assessed the intension of using the new technology. The empirical results reveal that the operation framework of「multi- tool balls + multi- mouse wheels」is more efficient than the one of 「toolbar + mouse click」in performing many software functions, and the users also accept and access the new technology.

1. 洪新原、梁定澎、張嘉銘(2005)。科技接受模式之彙總研究。資訊管理學報，12(4)，211-234。
   連結：
2. 微軟官方網站“微軟十年來最新最重要突破 2007 Microsoft Office System,＂微軟官方網站, 2006 (available online at http://www.microsoft.com/taiwan/press/2006/10/1012.mspx).
3. Adams, D. A.,Nelson, R. R.,Todd, P. A.(1992).Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication.MIS Quarterly,16(2),227-248.
4. Agarwal, R.,Karahanna, E.(2000).Time Flies When You're Having Fun: Cognitive Absorption and Beliefs about Information Technology Usage.MIS Quarterly,24(4),665-694.
5. Agarwal, R.,Prasad, J.(1999).Are Individual Differences Germane to the Acceptance of New Information Technologies?.Decision Sciences,30(2),361-391.
6. Akamatsu, M.,Mackenzie, I. S.(2002).Changes in Applied Force to a Touchpad During Pointing Tasks.International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics,29(3),171-182.
7. Bentler, P. M.,Chou, C. P.(1987).Practical Issues in Structural Modeling.Sociological Methods & Research,16(1),78-117.
8. Bohan, M.,Chaparro, A.,Scarlett, D.(1998).The Effects of Selection Technique on Target Acquisition Movements Made with a Mouse.Proceedings of the Forty-Second Annual Meeting on Human Factors and Ergonomics Society,California:
9. Chau, P. Y. K.,Hu, P. J. H.(2001).Information Technology Acceptance by Individual Professionals: A Model Comparison Approach.Decision Sciences,32(4),699-719.
10. Davis, F. D.(1989).Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology.MIS Quarterly,13(3),319-340.
11. Davis, F. D.(1986).Cambridge,Massachusetts Institute of Technology Sloan School of Management.
12. Davis, F. D.,Bagozzi, R. P.,Warshaw, P. R.(1989).User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models.Management Science,35(8),982-1003.
13. Fogleman, M.,Brogmus, G.(1995).Computer Mouse Use and Cumulative Trauma Disorders of the Upper Extremities.Ergonomics,38(12),2465-2475.
14. Gefen, D.,Straub, D. W.(1997).Gender Differences in the Perception and Use of E-Mail: An Extension to the Technology Acceptance Model.MIS Quarterly,21(4),389-400.
15. Horton, W. K.(1994).The Icon Book: Visual Symbols for Computer Systems and Documentation.New York:John Wiley & Sons.
16. Hunter, J. E.,Schmidt, F. L.,Jackson, G. B.(1982).Meta-Analysis: Cumulating Research Findings across Studies.California:Sage Publications.
17. Kaiser, H. F.(1958).The Varimax Criterion for Analytic Rotation in Factor Analysis.Psychometrika,23(3),187-200.
18. Kerlinger, F. N.(1986).Foundations of Behavioral Research.Chicago:Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
19. Kollar, L.(2003).GUIML, Creating Dynamic GUI Objects Using XML.Mathematical and Computer Modelling,38(7),893-901.
20. Moon, J. W.,Kim, Y. G.(2001).Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web Context.Information and Management,38(4),217-230.
21. Morgan, M. R. P.(1995).Crossing Disciplines: Usability as a Bridge between System, Software, and Documentation.Technical Communication,42(2),303-306.
22. Morris, M. G.,Dillon, A.(1997).How User Perceptions Influence Software Use.IEEE Software,14(4),58-65.
23. Nielson, J.(2000).Designing Web Usability: The Practice of Simplicity.Indiana:New Riders Publishing.
24. Nielson, J.(1999).User Interface Directions for the Web.Communications of the ACM,42(1),65-72.
25. Park, J.,Han, S. H.,Yang, H.(2006).Evaluation of Cursor Capturing Functions in a Target Positioning Task.International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics,36(8),721-730.
26. Preece, J.,Benyon, D.,Davies, G.(1993).A Guide to Usability: Human Factors in Computing.Addison Wesley.
27. Rauterberg, M.(1992).An Empirical Comparison of Menu-Selection (CUI) and Desktop (GUI) Computer Programs Carried Out by Beginners and Experts.Behaviour & Information Technology,11(4),227-236.
28. Sawyer, J. E.(1992).Goal and Process Clarity: Specification of Multiple Constructs of Role Ambiguity and a Structural Equation Model of Their Antecedents and Consequences.Journal of Applied Psychology,77(2),130-142.
29. Shneiderman, B.(1992).Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction.Addison Wesley.
30. Straub, D.,Keil, M.,Brenner, W.(1997).Testing the Technology Acceptance Model across Cultures: A Three Country Study.Information and Management,33(1),1-11.
31. Van der Heijden, H.(2003).Factors Influencing the Usage of Websites: The Case of a Generic Portal in the Netherlands.Information & Management,40(6),541-549.
32. 方裕民(2003)。人與物的對話—互動介面設計理論與實務。台北:田園城市。
33. 李國銘(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立雲林科技大學工業設計所。
34. 林麗娟(1996)。多媒體電腦圖像設計與視覺記憶的關係。教學科技與媒體，28(8)，3-12。

1. 吳郁香(2016)。以科技接受模型探討教育部數位學習服務平台的使用行為意圖之研究—以高雄市國中教師為例。義守大學資訊管理學系學位論文。2016。1-100。