题名

以推敲可能模式探討消費者創新與新產品採用之影響：以智慧型手機應用程式為例

并列篇名

Appling the Elaboration Likelihood Model for Consumer Innovativeness and New Product Adoption

作者

李家瑩(Chia-Ying Li)；李淑美(Shwn-Meei Lee)；黃偉珉(Wei-Min Huang)

关键词

特定領域創新 ； 推敲可能模式 ； 涉入程度 ； 先天創新 ； 新產品採用 ； argument quality ； source credibility ； involvement ； innate innovativeness ； domain-specific innovativeness

期刊名称

資訊管理學報

卷期/出版年月

22卷1期（2015 / 01 / 01）

页次

1 - 30

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

自從第一代iPhone的問世，宣告智慧型手機時代的來臨。智慧型手機當今已成為現代人不離手的產品，跟傳統手機相比，智慧型手機可透過應用程式（APP）的下載，讓手機不僅僅只是通訊，而是個人化的設備。伴隨著智慧型手機熱賣，APP程式需求也大幅的增加，要如何透過行銷策略吸引創新程度高的消費者，也就是早期使用者，達到一推出即可引領風潮，並且吸引大量後期使用者，成為APP程式廠商面臨的重要議題。過去已有學者指出特定領域創新對於新產品採用有正向顯著影響，然而過去研究往往著重於新產品採用者的特性，並未探討如何透過訊息的傳遞，來刺激特定領域創新的消費者。本研究以推敲可能模式及特定領域創新為理論基礎，探討不同路徑訊息對於特定領域創新與新產品採用的影響。有鑑於不同消費者會因為意願及能力的差異，而採用不同的訊息接收路徑，本研究將消費者的涉入程度（意願）及先天創新（能力）納入模式中進行考量。本研究以有使用APP程式的智慧型手機用戶為對象，透過問卷調查共回收有效樣本265份，並以結構方程模式進行資料分析。本研究結果顯示論點品質及來源可信度對消費者的特定領域創新有顯著影響，而特定領域創新會進一步影響新產品採用行為。此外，涉入程度對於論點品質與特定領域創新具有中介效果、先天創新對於來源可信度與特定領域創新有顯著干擾效果，期望研究結果能作為APP廠商推出新產品時之參考依據。
英文摘要

Purpose-To investigate consumers' new-product adoption behavior. Involvement and innate innovativeness were used as the moderating variables to explore the influences of persuasive messages on domain-specific innovativeness. Design/methodology/approach-In order to validate the proposed model, questionnaires were used to collect data from smartphone users who adopt APPs. Partial least squares analysis was employed to test the research model. Finding-Argument quality and source credibility have positive influences on domain-specific innovativeness. Domain-specific innovativeness further affects new-product adoption behavior. Besides, involvement mediates the influences of argument quality on domain-specific innovativeness, while innate innovativeness moderates the influences of source credibility on domain-specific innovativeness. Research limitations/implications-Except for involvement and innate innovativeness, some variables have been found relevant in the existing literature for consumer innovativeness, such as subjective norms, and product attributes. Future research could find more critical variables to explain consumers' new-product adoption behavior. Practical implications-The demand of APPs significantly accelerates, followed by the increasing selling of smart phones. APPs vendors have to consider how to implement marketing strategies to attract consumers to use, especially early adopters. Early adopters, such as opinion leaders, may create positive word-of-mouth, and persuade other consumers to purchase the product. The findings of this study provide suggestions and managerial implications for APPs vendors while launching a new product. Originality/value-Previous studies have pointed out domain-specific innovativeness having a significant and positive effect on new product adoption. However, these previous studies focus on the characteristics of innovative adopter, but do not explore how to stimulate domain-specific innovativeness through providing information. In addition, even though providing the same infonmation, not every consumer has the same degree of domain-specific innovativeness. The persuasiveness of information for domain-specific innovativeness may be affected by a consumer’s involvement (motivation) and innate innovativeness (ability). Therefore, this study integrated domain-specific innovativeness with Elaboration Likelihood Model.
主题分类 基礎與應用科學 > 資訊科學
社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. 資策會FIND 經濟部技術處（2012），「科技化服務價值鏈研究與推動計畫」，http://www.find.org.tw/find/home.aspx?page=many&id=331（存取日期2013/04/20）
  2. (1998).Advanced Social Psychology: The State of the Science.Oxford, UK.:Oxford University Press.
  3. (1999).Dual-process theories in social psychology.New York: US:Guilford Press.
  4. Angst, C.M.,Agarwal, R.(2009).Adoption of electronic health records in the presence of privacy concerns: The elaboration likelihood model and individual persuasion.MIS Quarterly,33(2),339-370.
  5. Bartels, J.,Reinders, M.J.(2011).Consumer innovativeness and its correlates: A propositional inventory for research.Journal of Business Research,64(6),601-609.
  6. Bhattacherjee, A.,Sanford, C.(2006).Influence processes for information technology acceptance: an elaboration likelihood model.MIS Quarterly,30(4),805-825.
  7. Blackwell, R.D.,Miniard, P.W.,Engel, J.F.(2001).Consumer Behavior.Texas, US.:Harcourt College Publishers.
  8. Blythe, J.(1999).Innovativeness and newness in high-tech consumer durables.Journal of Product & Brand Management,8(5),415-429.
  9. Breckler, S.J.(1984).Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,47(6),1191-1205.
  10. Briñol, P.,Petty, R.E.,Tormala, Z.L.(2004).The self-validation of cognitive responses to advertisements.Journal of Consumer Research,30(4),559-573.
  11. Calder, B.J.,Phillips, L.W.,Tybout, A.M.(1981).Designing research for application.Journal of Consumer Research,8(2),197-207.
  12. Chao, C.W.,Reid, M.,Mavondo, F.T.(2012).Consumer innovativeness influence on really new product adoption.Australasian Marketing Journal,20(3),211-217.
  13. Chin, W.W.(1998).Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling.MIS Quarterly,22(1),7-16.
  14. Chin, W.W.,Marcolin, B.L.,Newsted, P.R.(2003).A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study.Information Systems Research,14(2),189-217.
  15. Citrin, A.V.,Sprott, D.E.,Silverman, S.N.,Stem, J.D.E.(2000).Adoption of internet shopping: the role of consumer innovativeness.Industrial Management & Data Systems,100(7),294-300.
  16. Clark, R.A.,Goldsmith, R.E.(2006).Interpersonal influence and consumer innovativeness.International Journal of Consumer Studies,30(1),34-43.
  17. Cotte, J.,Wood, S.L.(2004).Families and innovative consumer behavior: A triadic analysis of sibling and parental influence.Journal of Consumer Research,31(1),78-86.
  18. Falk, R.F.,Miller, N.B.(1981).A primer for soft modeling.Akron, US:The University of Akron Press.
  19. Flynn, L.R.,Goldsmith, R.E.(1993).A validation of the Goldsmith and Hofacker innovativeness scales.Educational and Psychology Measurement,53(4),1005-1116.
  20. Fornell, C.,Larcker, D.F.(1981).Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.Journal of Marketing Research,18(1),39-50.
  21. Fowler, K.,Bridges, E.(2010).Consumer innovativeness: Impact on expectations perceptions and choice among retail formats.Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services,17(2),492-500.
  22. Goldsmith, R.E.,D'hauteville, F.,Flynn, L.R.(1998).Theory and measurement of consumer innovativeness: A transnational evaluation.European Journal of Marketing,32(3/4),340-353.
  23. Goldsmith, R.E.,Freiden, J.B.,Eastman, J.K.(1995).The generality/specificity issue in consumer innovativeness research.Technovation,15(10),601-612.
  24. Goldsmith, R.E.,Hofacker, C.E.(1991).Measuring consumer innovativeness.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,19(3),209-221.
  25. Grewal, R.,Mehta, R.,Kardes, F.R.(2000).The role of the social-identity function of attitudes in consumer innovativeness and opinion leadership.Journal of Economic Psychology,21(3),233-252.
  26. Gupta, S.(2013).For mobile devices, think apps, not Ads.Harvard Business Review,91(3),70-75.
  27. Hair, J.F.,Black, W.C.,Babin, B.J.,Anderson, R.E.,Tatham, R.L.(2006).Multivariate data analysis.New Jersey, US:Prentice-Hall.
  28. Hauser, J.,Tellis, G.J.,Griffin, A.(2006).Research on innovation: A review and agenda for marketing science.Marketing science,25(6),687-717.
  29. Hirschman, E.C.(1980).Innovativeness, novelty seeking, and consumer creativity.Journal of Consumer Research,7,283-295.
  30. Hoffmann, S.,Soyez, K.(2010).A cognitive model to predict domain-specific consumer innovativeness.Journal of Business Research,63(7),778-785.
  31. Holak, S.L.,Lehmann, D.L.(1990).Purchase intentions and the dimensions of innovation: An exploratory model.Journal of Product Innovation Management,7(1),59-73.
  32. Hovland, C.I.,Weiss, W.(1951).The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness.Public Opinion Quarterly,15(4),635-650.
  33. Huh, Y.E.,Kim, S.H.(2008).Do early adopters upgrade early? Role of post-adoption behavior in the purchase of next-generation products.Journal of Business Research,61(1),40-46.
  34. Im, S.,Bayus, B.L.,Mason, C.H.(2003).An empirical study of innate consumer innovativeness, personal characteristics, and new-product adoption behavior.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,31(1),61-73.
  35. Im, S.,Mason, C.H.,Houston, M.B.(2007).Does innate consumer innovativeness related to new product/service adoption behavior? The intervening role of social learning via vicarious innovativeness.Journal of Academy Marketing Science,35(1),63-75.
  36. Jacoby, J.,Troutman, T.,Kuss, A.,Mazursky, D.(1986).Experience and expertise in complex decision making.Advances in Consumer Research,13(1),469-475.
  37. Klink, R.R.,Athaide, G.A.(2010).Consumer innovativeness and use of new versus extended brand names for new products.Journal of Product Innovation Management,27(1),23-32.
  38. Krugman, H.E.(1965).The impact of television advertising: Learning without involvement.Public Opinion Quarterly,29(3),349-356.
  39. Midgley, D.F.,Dowling, G.R.(1993).A longitudinal study of product form innovation: The interaction between predisposition and social messages.Journal of Consumer Research,19(4),611-625.
  40. Midgley, D.F.,Dowling, G.R.(1978).Innovativeness: The concept and its measurement.Journal of Consumer Research,4(4),229-242.
  41. Pallister, J.G.,Wang, H.C.,Foxall, G.R.(2007).An application of the style/involvement model to financial services.Technovation,27(1),78-88.
  42. Petty, R.E.,Cacioppo, J.T.(1986).The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion.Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,19,123-205.
  43. Petty, R.E.,Cacioppo, J.T.,Goldman, R.(1981).Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,41(5),847-855.
  44. Robertson, T.S.,Myers, J.H.(1969).Personality correlates of opinion leadership and innovative buying behavior.Journal of Marketing Research,6(2),164-168.
  45. Roehrich, G.(2004).Consumer innovativeness: Concepts and measurements.Journal of Business Research,57(6),671-677.
  46. Rogers, E.M.(2003).Diffusion of innovations.New York, US.:The Free Press.
  47. Rogers, E.M.,Shoemaker, F.F.(1971).Communication of Innovations; A Cross-Cultural Approach.New York, US.:The Free Press.
  48. Rucker, D.D.,Petty, R.E.(2006).Increasing the effectiveness of communications to consumers: Recommendations based on elaboration likelihood and attitude certainty perspectives.Journal of Public Policy & Marketing,25(1),39-52.
  49. Salinas, E.M.,Pérez, J.M.P.(2009).Modeling the brand extensions' influence on brand image.Journal of Consumer Research,62(1),50-60.
  50. Schiffman, L.G.,Kanuk, L.L.(2000).Consumer behavior.New Jersey, US:Prentice Hall.
  51. Solomon, M.R.(2004).Consumer behavior: Buying, having, and being.New Jersey, US:Pearson Education International.
  52. Steenkamp, J.B.E.M.,Gielens, K.(2003).Consumer and market drivers of the trial probability of new consumer packaged goods.Journal of Consumer Research,30(3),368-384.
  53. Steenkamp, J-B.E.M.,Ter Hofstede, F.,Wedel, M.(1999).A Cross-national investigation into the individual and national cultural antecedents of consumer innovativeness.Journal of Marketing,63(2),55-69.
  54. Sussman, S.W.,Siegel, W.S.(2003).Informational influence in organizations: an integrated approach to knowledge adoption.Information Systems Research,14(1),47-65.
  55. Swasy, L.J.(1985).Examining the target of receiver elaborations: Theoretical question effects on source processing and persuasion.Journal of Consumer Research,11(4),877-886.
  56. Tellis, G.J.,Yin, E.,Bell, S.(2009).Global consumer innovativeness: cross-country differences and demographic commonalities.Journal of International Marketing,17(2),1-22.
  57. Tormala, Z.L.,Petty, R.E.(2004).Source credibility and attitude certainty: A meta cognitive analysis of resistance to persuasion.Journal of Consumer Psychology,14(4),427-422.
  58. Turner, B.A.,Pastore, D.L.(2008).Effective public service advertisements to attract volunteers for the special Olympics: An elaboration likelihood perspective.Sport Management Review,11(2),165-192.
  59. Wang, K.,Wang, E.T.G.,Farn, C.K.(2009).Influence of web advertising strategies, consumer goal-directedness, and consumer involvement on web advertising effectiveness.International Journal of Electronic Commerce,13(4),67-95.
  60. Zaichkowsky, J.L.(1986).Conceptualizing Involvement.Journal of Advertising,15(2),4-14.
  61. Zaichkowsky, J.L.(1985).Measuring the involvement construct.Journal of Consumer Research,12(3),341-352.
  62. Zhou, T.(2012).Understanding users' initial trust in mobile banking: an elaboration likelihood perspective.Computers in Human Behavior,28(4),1518-1525.
被引用次数
  1. 張清智(2016)。以行動應用程式行銷休閒農場之研究。國立臺灣大學農業經濟學系學位論文。2016。1-88。 
  2. 許淑芳(2017)。慎思可能模式觀點之綠色食品意象、滿意度與忠誠度研究：產品涉入之干擾效果。長榮大學經營管理研究所學位論文。2017。1-103。
print cancel