题名

「生活問題解決測驗」之發展

并列篇名

The Development of "Everyday Problem-Solving Test"

DOI

10.7108/PT.200506.0003

作者

詹雨臻(Yu-Chen Chan);葉玉珠(Yu-Chu Yeh)

关键词

生活問題解決 ; 多重問題解決 ; 情境測驗 ; 國小學童 ; 信效度 ; everyday problem-solving ; multiple problem solving ; situation-based test ; pupils ; reliability and validity

期刊名称

測驗學刊

卷期/出版年月

52卷1期(2005 / 06 / 01)

页次

1 - 30

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究旨在編製一份適合國小學童的「生活問題解決測驗」(EPST);此測驗是以圖畫和文字並陳的情境式問題解決測驗,包含三個情境、九個問題。本研究以高雄市國小五、六年級453人為研究參與者,除了考驗EPST的信度和效度外,也描述參與學童的整體生活問題解決能力表現,並依所提出之「多重問題導向」生活問題解決模式,說明學童在四個生活問題解決指標之表現情形。研究結果顯示EPST具有不錯的的鑑別度與效標關聯效度,同時也具有良好的穩定度、一致性與評分者信度。此外,本研究發現學童缺乏統整可用資源以進行創意問題解決之實用智能,而且他們的生活問題解決能力(尤其是在提出解決方法和決定最佳解決方法兩項指標)的表現不佳。

英文摘要

The purpose of this study was to construct the Everyday Problem-Solving Test (EPST) for pupils. The EPST was a narrative-style test with situation-based problems; it comprised 3 situations and each situation consisted of 3 problems. The participants included 453 fifth and sixth pupils sampled from Kaohsiung City. Besides testing the reliability and validity of the EPST, this study described the pupils' overall problem-solving ability as well as their performance on the four indices which were defined based on the multiple-oriented approach of everyday problem-solving. The results of this study suggest that the EPST can distinguish the high-ability group from the low-ability group in everyday problem-solving and it has good criterion-related validity; it also has decent stability, consistency, and inter-rater reliability. Moreover, the findings suggest that the pupils lack the practical intelligence in integrating available information to solve problems creatively and their problem-solving ability needs to be improved.

主题分类 社會科學 > 心理學
社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. Baumann, N.,Kuhl, J.(2002).Intuition, affect, and personality: Unconscious coherence judgments and self-regulation of negative affect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,83(5),1213-1223.
  2. Berardi-Coletta, B.,Buyer, L. S.,Dominowski, R. L.,Rellinger, E. R.(1995).Metacognition and problem solving: A process-oriented approach.Journal of Experimental Psychology,21(1),205-223.
  3. Berg, C. A.,Strough, J.,Calderone, K. S.,Sansone, C.,Weir, C.(1998).The role of problem definitions in understanding age and context effects on strategies for solving everyday problems.Psychology and Aging,13(1),29-44.
  4. Bielaczyc, K.,Pirolli, E L.,Brown, A. L.(1995).Training in self-explanation and self-regulation strategies: Investigating the effects of knowledge acquisition activities on problem solving.Cognition and instruction,13(2),221-252.
  5. Blanchard-Fields, F.,Chen, Y.,Norris, L.(1997).Everyday problem solving across the adult life span: Influence of domain specificity and cognitive appraisal.Psychology and Aging,12(4),684-693.
  6. Crabbe, A. B.(1991).Developing minds: Programs/or teaching thinking.Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  7. D''Zurilla, T. J.,Nezu, A.(1990).Development and preliminary evaluation of the social problem-solving inventory.Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,2(2),156-163.
  8. Gardner, H.(1983).Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences.New York:Basic Books.
  9. Halpern, D. F.(1997).Critical thinking across the curriculum: A brief edition of thought and knowledge.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  10. Heppner, E. E.,Baker, C. E.(1997).Applications of the problem solving inventory.Measurement & Evaluation in Counseling & Development,29(4),229-241.
  11. Heppner, E. P.,Pretorius, T. B.,Wei, M.,Lee, D.,Wang, Y.(2002).Examining the generalizability of problem-solving appraisal in Black South Africans.Journal of Counseling Psychology,49(4),484-498.
  12. Heppner, P. P.,Cook, S. W.(1995).Progress in resolving problems: A problem-focused style of coping.Journal of Counseling Psychology,42(3),279-293.
  13. Hunt, E.(1994).Thinking and problem solving.San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
  14. Isaksen, S. C.,Treffinger, D. J.(1991).Developing minds: Programs for teaching thinking.Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  15. Killen, M.,Pisacane, K.,Lee-Kim, J.,Ardila-Rey, A.(2001).Fairness or stereo- types? Young children's priorities when evaluating group exclusion and inclusion.Developmental Psychology,37(5),587-596.
  16. Lochhead, J.,Zietsman, A.(2001).Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking.Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  17. Mayer, R. E.(1992).Thinking, problem solving, cognition.NY:W. H. Freeman and Company.
  18. Mayer, R. E.,Wittrock, M. C.(1996).Handbook of education psychology.NY:Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
  19. Newell, A.,Simon, H. A.(1972).Human problem solving.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
  20. Nezu, A. M.,Ronan, G. F.(1988).Social problem solving as a moderator of stress- related depressive symptoms: A prospective Analysis.Journal of Counseling Psychology,35(2),134-138.
  21. Odom, R. D.(1967).Problem-solving strategies as a function of age and socioeconomic level.Child development,38(3),747-752.
  22. Parnes, S. J.(1991).Developing minds: Programs for teaching thinking.Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  23. Prescott, H. M.(2001).Helping students say how they know what they know.Clearing House,122(4),785-792.
  24. Rubinstein, M. F.,Firstenberg, I. R.(1995).Patterns of problem solving.NJ:Prentice-Hall.
  25. Stemberg, R. J.(2001).Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking.Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  26. Stemberg, R. J.,Lubart, T. L.(1995).Defying the crowd.New York, NY:Free Press.
  27. Strough, J. S.,Berg, C. A.,Sansone, C.(1996).Goals for solving everyday problem across the life span: Age and gender differences in the salience of interpersonal concerns.Developmental Psychology,32(6),1106-1115.
  28. Strough, J.,Cheng, S.,Swenson, L. M.(2002).Preferences for collaborative and individual everyday problem solving in later adulthood.International Journal of Behavioral Development,26(1),26-35.
  29. Treffinger, D. J.,Isaksen, S. C.(2001).Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking.Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  30. Vermeer, H. J.,Boekaerts, M.,Seegers, G.(2000).Motivational and gender differ ences: Sixth-grade students' mathematical problem-solving behavior.Journal of Educational Psychology,92(2),308-315.
  31. Vlietstra, A. G.(1980).Age changes in problem solving and attention: The effect of irrelevant stimulus variability.The Journal of Psychology,105,21-28.
  32. Wang, L.,Heppner, E. E.,Berry, T. R.(1997).Role of gender-related personality traits, problem-solving appraisal, and perceived social support in developing a mediational model of psychological adjustment.Journal of Counseling Psychology,44(2),245-255.
  33. Mathematical problem solving
  34. Woolfolk, A.(2001).Woolfolk, A..Needham Heights, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
  35. 洪蘭譯(1999)。不同凡想
  36. 教育部(2001)。國民中小學九年一貫課程暫行網要:自然與生活科技學習領域。台北市:教育部。
  37. 教育部(2001)。國民中小學九年一貫課程暫行網要:綜合活動學習領域。台北市:教育部。
  38. 湯偉君、邱美虹(1999)。創造性問題解決(CPS)模式的沿革與應用。科學教育月刊,223,2-20。
  39. 謝佳蓁(2000)。。
  40. 魏麗敏(1996)。。
  41. 羅芝芸(1999)。。
被引用次数
  1. 鍾素香、蔡維欣、葉玉珠、彭月茵、林志哲(2008)。「情境式科學創造力測驗」之發展暨科學創造力之性別與年級差異分析。測驗學刊,55(1),33-60。