“詞彙聯想策略擴散性思考測驗”之編製

The Development of Divergent Thinking Test of Word Associative Strategy (DTTWAS)

10.7108/PT.200906.0153

黃博聖(Po-Sheng Huang)；陳學志(Hsueh-Chin Chen)；黃鴻程(Hung-Chen Huang)；劉政宏(Cheng-Hong Liu)

創造力 ； 詞彙聯想 ； 聯想策略 ； 擴散性思考 ； Associative Strategy ； creativity ； divergent thinking ； Word Association

測驗學刊

56卷2期（2009 / 06 / 01）

153 - 177

繁體中文

擴散性思考測驗是最常為人所使用之創造歷程測量工具，然而現今之測驗多為概念流暢力取向之測量，缺乏聯想流暢力取向之工具發展。本研究之目的為編製一套「詞彙聯想策略擴散性思考測驗」(DTTWAS)，嘗試增加與修改流暢、變通與獨創性之計分規則。測驗共包含兩個作業，分別為「海洋」與「玫瑰」聯想作業，要求參與者分別根據兩目標詞進行直接聯想，並寫出其與所聯想詞彙之關係。透過參與者所填寫的關聯說明，可有效排除不適切的反應；其次，為了避免流暢性對獨創性分數之影響，以加權中位數來取代傳統常模分數作為獨創性之計分。另外，本研究亦建立聯想策略來作為變通性之評分依據。綜合信、效度之考驗結果可知，DTTWAS能有效測量擴散思考能力。

Divergent thinking test is the most commonly used measuring tool of creative process. However, the tests nowadays have problems of only measuring certain type of fluency, which called ideational fluency, without tests of associational fluency. Therefore the aim of this research is to develop a Divergent Thinking Test of Word Associative Strategy (DTTWAS), which revises different scoring principles of Fluency, Flexibility and Originality and builds a College Norm for scoring. DTTWAS is composed of two association subtests, ”the ocean” and ”the rose”. Participants were asked to associate ”the ocean” or ”the rose” with concepts that connected and describe their relations. Through the relations, scorers could exclude the inappropriate responses. Second, in order to avoiding the influence of fluency, researcher uses weighted median to represent originality index instead of the traditional norm score. Third, flexibility score is represented by the number of associative strategies which participants use. Totally speaking, the DTTWAS can effectively measure individuals' divergent thinking ability with fair reliability and validity.

1. Barron, F.,R. J. Sternberg (Ed.)(1988).The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives.New York:Cambridge University Press.
2. Cambell, D. T.,Fiske, D. W.(1959).Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.Psychological Bulletin,56,81-105.
3. Clark, P. M.,Mirels, H. L.(1970).Fluency as pervasive element in the measurement of creativity.Journal of Educational Measurement,7(2),83-86.
4. Collins, A. M.,Loftus, E. F.(1975).A spreading activation theory of semantic processing.Psychological Review,82,407-428.
5. Cox, C.,Brandt, J.(1990).Word-association responses and severity of dementia in Alzheimer Disease.Psychological Reports,66,1315-1322.
6. Guilford, J. P.(1967).The nature of human intelligence.New York:McGraw-Hill.
7. Guilford, J. P.(1956).The structure of intellect.Psychological Bulletin,53,267-293.
8. Guilford, J. P.,I. A. Taylor(Eds.),J. W. Getzels(Eds.)(1975).Perspectives in creativity.Chicago, IL:Aldine.
9. Heausler, N. L.,Thompson, B.(1988).Structure of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking.Educational and Psychological Measurement,48,463-468.
10. Hocevar, D.(1979).Ideational fluency as a confounding factor in the measurement of originality.Journal of Educational Psychology,71,191-196.
11. Hocevar, D.(1979).The unidimensional nature of creative thinking in fifth grade children.Child Study Journal,9(4),273-278.
12. Hocevar, D.,Michael, W.(1979).The effects of scoring formulas on the discriminant validity of tests of divergent thinking.Educational and Psychological Measurement,39,917-921.
13. Holley, C. D.,Dansereau, D. F.(1984).Spatial learning strategies.New York:Academic Press.
14. Jackson, P. W.,Messick, S.,J. Kagan (Ed.)(1967).Creativity and learning.Boston, MA:Houghton Mifflin.
15. Lubart, T. I.,R. J. Stemberg (Ed.)(1994).Thinking and problem solving.New York:Academic Press.
16. Mednick, M. T.,Mednick, S. A.,Jung, C. C.(1964).Continual association as a fUnction of level of creativity and type of verbal stimulus.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,69(5),511-515.
17. Mednick, S. A.(1962).The associative basis of the creative process.Psychological Review,44(2),220-232.
18. Michael, W. B.,Wright, C. R.,J. A. Glover(Eds.),R. R. Ronning(Eds.)(1989).Handbook of creativity: Perspectives on individual differences.New York:Plenum Press.
19. Moran, J. D.,Milgram, R. M.,Sawyers, J. K.,Fu, V. R.(1983).Original thinking in preschool children.Child Development,54,921-926.
20. Mouchiroud, C.,Lubart, T.(2001).Children's original thinking: An empirical examination of alternative measures derived from divergent thinking tasks.The Journal of Genetic Psychology,162(4),382-401.
21. Ochse, R.(1990).Before the gates of excellence.New York:Cambridge University Press.
22. Palermo, D.,Jenkins, J. J.(1964).Word association norms, grade school through college.Minneapolis, MN:University of Minnesota Press.
23. Plucker, J. A.,Renzulli, J. S.,R. J. Steinberg (Ed.)(1999).Handbook of creativity.New York:Cambridge University Press.
24. Rosen, W. G.(1980).Verbal fluency in aging and dementia.Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology,2,135-146.
25. Rothenberg, A.(1973).Word association and creativity.Psychological Reports.
26. Runco, M. A.(1986).Flexibility and originality in children's divergent thinking.Journal of Psychology,120,345-352.
27. Runco, M. A.(1986).Maximal performance on divergent thinking tests by gifted, talented, and nongifted children.Psychology in the Schools,23,308-315.
28. Runco, M. A.,Albert, R. S.(1985).The reliability and validity of ideational originality in the divergent thinking of academically gifted and nongifted children.Educational and Psychological Measurement,45,483-501.
29. Runco, M. A.,M. A. Runco(Eds.),S. R. Pritzker(Eds.)(1999).Encyclopedia of creativity.New York:Academic Press.
30. Runco, M. A.,Mraz, W.(1992).Scoring divergent thinking tests using total ideational output and a creativity index.Educational and Psychological Measurement,52,213-221.
31. Runco, M. A.,Okuda, S. M.(1988).Problem finding, divergent thinking, and the creative process.Journal of Youth and Adolescence,17,211-220.
32. Runco, M. A.,Okuda, S. M.,Thurston, B. J.(1987).The psychometric properties of four systems for scoring divergent thinking tests.Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment,5,149-156.
33. Steinberg, R. J.,Grigorenko, E. L.(2000).Guilford's structure of intellect model and model of creativity: Contributions and limitations.Creativity Research Journal,13(3&4),309-316.
34. Torrance, E, P.(1962).Guiding creative talent.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
35. Torrance, E. P.(1974).Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms-technical manual.Lexington, MA:Ginn.
36. Torrance, E. P.(1966).Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms-technical manual.Princeton, NJ:Personnel Press, Inc..
37. Williams, F. E.(1980).Creativity Assessment Packet.Buffalo, NY:DOK.
38. Yamamoto, K.(1964).Threshold of intelligence in academic achievement of highly creative students.The Journal of Experimental Education,32,401-405.
39. Yamarnoto, K.(1964).Role of creative thinking and intelligence in high school achievement.Psychological Reports.
40. Zarnegar, Z.,Hocevar, D.,Michael, W. B.(1988).Components of original thinking in gifted children.Educational and Psychological Measurement,48(1),5-16.
41. 丁興祥、邱皓政、蔡啟通、林逸媛(1992)。國中學生拖弄思創造思考測驗評分常模修訂。測驗年刊，39，105-116。
42. 余民寧(1999)。有意義的學習－概念構圖之研究。台北市:商鼎文化。
43. 吳靜吉(1981)。語文創造思考測驗評分手冊。台北市:遠流。
44. 吳靜吉(1981)。創造思考測驗評分手冊。台北市:遠流。
45. 吳靜吉(1998)。教育部輔導工作六年計畫研究報告教育部輔導工作六年計畫研究報告,未出版
46. 吳靜吉、高泉豐、丁興祥、葉玉珠(1993)。拖弄思圖形創造思考測驗（甲式）指導手冊及研究手冊評分手冊。
47. 吳靜吉、陳嘉成、林偉文(1999)。國科會研究結案報告國科會研究結案報告,未出版
48. 李乙明(2006)。陶倫斯創造思考測驗圖形版。台北市:心理。
49. 李乙明(2006)。陶倫斯創造思考測驗語文版。台北市:心理。
50. 李秀瓊(1999)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市，國立台灣大學心理學研究所。
51. 林幸台、王木榮(1987)。威廉斯創造力測驗。台北市:心理。
52. 林清山譯、R. E. Mayer著(1997)。教育心理學－認知取向。台北市:遠流。
53. 邱發忠(2005)。博士論文(博士論文)。台北市，國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系。
54. 郭有遹(2001)。創造心理學。台北市:正中。
55. 陳昭儀(1995)。增強創造力的方法。資優教育季刊，54，18-20。
56. 陳學志(1999)。國科會專題研究計畫成果報告國科會專題研究計畫成果報告,未出版

1. Li, Yu-Chin,Hu, Tsung-Chih,Chang, Kuo-En(2018).Identifying Food-related Word Association and Topic Model Processing using LDA.圖書資訊學刊,16(1),23-43.
2. 曹筱玥、林小慧(2012)。想像力量表之編製。教育科學研究期刊，57(4)，1-37。
3. 陳學志、陳彥丞、張雨霖、胡中凡、卓淑玲、宋曜廷(2017)。1200 個中文雙字詞的聯想常模與其被聯想反應參照表。教育心理學報，49(1)，137-160。
4. 邱發忠(2010)。「詞彙概念聯結測驗」—創造潛能測量工具的發展。測驗學刊，57(2)，295-324。
5. (2024)。以親子桌遊培養兒童創造力發展之實作。國際數位媒體設計學刊，16(1)，65-83。