「國民小學教師學術樂觀量表」之發展與衡量

Development of the Teacher Academic Optimism Inventory and Validation Study in Elementary Schools

10.7108/PT.201104.0116

張奕華(I-Hua Chang)；許正妹(Cheng-Mei Hsu)；顏弘欽(Hung-Chin Yen)

國民小學 ； 教師學術樂觀 ； elementary school ； teacher academic optimism

測驗學刊

58卷S（2011 / 04 / 01）

261 - 289

繁體中文

本研究旨在發展適合用以衡量國民小學教師學術樂觀之測量工具。首先，經文獻探討後確立學術強調、效能感與信任關係為本研究之概念架構，據以發展測量題項，並透過探索性因素分析確立教師學術樂觀之因素結構。其次，以873位台灣地區公立國民小學教師為研究樣本，進行資料蒐集與分析。為進一步確認測量模式之適切性，本研究透過模型競爭之策略，比較多因素直交模型、多因素斜交模型與二階因素模型後，選定多因素斜交模型做為國民小學教師學術樂觀之驗證模型；並透過個別項目信度、組成信度、平均變異數抽取量、幅合效度、區別效度與複核效化等方法，檢證模型之信效度。最後，根據所發展之量表，針對教師之學術樂觀知覺程度進行衡量。本研究結果顯示，「國民小學教師學術樂觀量表」包含學術強調、信任學生與家長、信任同儕教師、信任領導者與效能感等五個潛在因素，共計18題，且具良好之信效度。此外，國民小學教師在學術樂觀各層面的現況良好，而不同性別、年齡及職務別之教師，在知覺程度上有所差異。

The purpose of this research is to develop an inventory for measuring the academic optimism of the teachers in elementary schools. Firstly, the establishment of academic emphasis, perceived efficacy and mutual trust after the literature review is the conceptual framework for this research, which can be the basic for developing the measurement items, and through the exploratory factor analysis, the factor structure of teacher academic optimism can be decided. And secondly, 873 teachers from public elementary schools in Taiwan are sampled for data collection and analysis. For the further validation of the appropriateness on measurement model, through comparing the strategy of competing models, after comparing the uncorrelated factors model, correlated factors model and hierarchical model, correlated factors model has been chosen as the measurement model for academic optimism in elementary schools. Then through the verifying methods of the individual item reliability, composite reliability, average variance extracted, convergent validity, discriminant validity and cross-validation, the reliability and validity of the model can be measured. Furthermore, according to the inventory that has been developed, teachers' perceptions on academic optimism can be measured. This result shows that the inventory of teacher academic optimism contains 5 latent factors (academic emphasis, trust on students and parents, trust on the peer teachers, trust on the leader, and teacher efficacy), and the 18 measurement items all together, which has the excellent reliability and validity. In addition, all dimensions of academic optimism had the highly score, and the characteristics of teachers was perceived significantly different from gender, age and position.

1. 朱苑瑜、葉玉珠(2003)。實習教師信念改變的影響因素之探討。師大學報─教育類，48(1)，41-66。
   連結：
2. 何宗岳(2009)。國小教師之教師信念、領導行為、班級經營策略與班級經營效能之結構關係研究。台中教育大學學報─教育類，23(1)，99-127。
   連結：
3. 吳壁如(2004)。幼稚園職前教師的教師效能感與任教承諾之關係。教育學刊，23，207-229。
   連結：
4. 林啟超(2007)。父母親成就教養取向、教師期望對高職學生之成就目標與學業成就之關係研究。人文暨社會科學期刊，3(2)，37-53。
   連結：
5. 秦夢群、吳勁甫(2010)。國中校長轉型領導、學校組織健康與組織效能關係之研究─中介效果模式之檢證。當代教育研究，17(3)，83-124。
   連結：
6. 陳俊瑋(2009)。台灣地區教師自我效能感研究之統合分析。彰化師大教育學報，15，41-64。
   連結：
7. Lee, V. E., Smith, J. B., Perry, T. E., & Smylie, M. A. (1999). Social support, academic press, and student achievement: A view from the middle grades in Chicago. Retrieved August 10, 2010, from http://ccsr.uchicago.edu/publications/p0e01.pdf
8. Anderson, J. C.,Gerbing, D. W.(1988).Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach.Psychological Bulletin,103(3),411-423.
9. Bagozzi, R. P.,Yi, Y.(1988).On the evaluation of structural equations models.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,16(1),74-94.
10. Bandura, A.(1997).Self-efficacy: The exercise of control.New York:W. H. Freeman.
11. Bandura, A.(1993).Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning.Educational Psychologist,28(2),117-148.
12. Beard, K. S.(2008).OH,The Ohio State University.
13. Beard, K. S.,Hoy, W. K.,Woolfolk-Hoy, A.(2010).Academic optimism of individual teachers: Confirming a new construct.Teaching and Teacher Education,26(5),1136-1144.
14. Bryk, A. S.,Schneider, B.(2002).Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement.New York:Russell Sage Foundation.
15. Dellinger, A. B.,Bobbert, J. J.,Olivier, D. F.,Ellett, C. D.(2008).Measuring teachers' self-efficacy beliefs: Development and use of the TEBS-Self.Teaching and Teacher Education,24(3),751-766.
16. Duffy-Friedman, M.(2007).OH,Cleveland State University.
17. Flutter, J(2006).This place could help you learn: Student participation in creating better school environments.Educational Review,58(2),183-193.
18. Goddard, R. D.,Goddard, Y. L.(2001).A multilevel analysis of the relationship between teacher and collective efficacy in urban schools.Teaching and Teacher Education,17(7),807-818.
19. Goddard, R. D.,Hoy,W. K.,Woolfolk-Hoy, A.(2004).Collective teacher efficacy: Theoretical developments, empirical evidence, and future directions.Educational Researcher,33(3),3-13.
20. Goddard, R. D.,Sweetland, S. R.,Hoy, W. K.(2000).Academic emphasis of urban elementary schools and student achievement in reading and mathematics: A multilevel analysis.Educational Administration Quarterly,36(5),683-702.
21. Goddard, R. D.,Tschannen-Moran, M.,Hoy,W. K.(2001).A multilevel examination of the distribution and effects of teacher trust in students and parents in urban elementary schools.Elementary School Journal,102(1),3-17.
22. Hair, J. F.,Anderson, R. E.,Tatham, R. L.,Black,W. C.(1998).Multivariate data analysis.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
23. Hoy, A. Woolfolk,Hoy, W. K.,Kurz, N. M.(2008).Teacher's academic optimism: The development and test of a new construct.Teaching and Teacher Education,24(4),821-835.
24. Hoy, W. K.(2002).Faculty trust: A key to student achievement.Journal of School Public Relations,23(2),88-103.
25. Hoy, W. K.(ed.),Miskel, C. G.(ed.)(2006).Contemporary issues in educational policy and school outcomes.Greenwich, CT:Information Age.
26. Hoy, W. K.(ed.),Miskel, C.(ed.)(2005).Educational leadership and reform.Greenwich, CT:Information Age.
27. Hoy, W. K.,Miskel, C. G.(2001).Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice.New York:McGraw-Hill.
28. Hoy, W. K.,Sweetland, S. R.,Smith, P. A.(2002).Toward an organizational model of achievement in high schools: The significance of collective efficacy.Educational Administration Quarterly,38(1),77-93.
29. Hoy, W. K.,Tarter, C. J.,Bliss, J. R.(1990).Organizational climate, school health, and effectiveness: A comparative study.Educational Administration Quarterly,26(3),260-279.
30. Hoy, W. K.,Tarter, C. J.,Woolfolk-Hoy, A.(2006).Academic optimism of school: A force for student achievement.American Educational Research Journal,43(3),425-446.
31. Hoy,W. K.,Tschannen-Moran, M.(1999).Five faces of trust: An empirical confirmation in urban elementary schools.Journal of School Leadership,9(3),184-208.
32. Hu, L.,Bentler, P. M.(1998).Fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Sensitivity to under parameterized model misspecification.Psychological Methods,3(4),424-453.
33. Hu, L.,Bentler, P. M.(1999).Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.Structural Equation Modeling,6(1),1-55.
34. Jaccard, J.,Wan, C. K.(1996).LISREL approaches to interaction effects in multiple regression.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
35. Judson, E.(2006).How teachers integrate technology and their beliefs about learning: Is there a connection?.Journal of Technology and Teacher Education,14(3),581-597.
36. Kline, R. B.(1998).Principles and practice of structural equation modeling.New York:The Guilford Press.
37. Lee, V. E.,Smith, J. B.(1999).Social support and achievement for young adolescents in Chicago: The role of school academic press.American Educational Research Journal,36(4),907-945.
38. Lewicki, R. J.,McAllister, D. J.,Bies, R. J.(1998).Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities.Academy of Management Review,23(3),438-458.
39. Marsh, H.W.,Hocevar, D.(1985).Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First- and higher order factor models and their invariance across group.Psychological Bulletin,97,562-582.
40. Mascall, B.,Leithwood, K.,Straus, T.,Sacks, R.(2008).The relationship between distributed leadership and teachers' academic optimism.Journal of Educational Administration,46(2),214-228.
41. McGuigan, L.(2005).OH,The Ohio State University.
42. McGuigan, L.,Hoy, W. K.(2006).Principal leadership: Creating a culture of academic optimism to improve achievement for all students.Leadership and Policy in Schools,5(3),203-229.
43. Noar, S. M.(2003).The role of structural equation modeling in scale development.Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal,10(4),622-647.
44. Pajares, M. F.(1992).Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct.Review of Educational Research,62(3),307-332.
45. Phillips, M.(1997).What makes schools effective: A comparison of the relationships of communal climate and academic climate to mathematics achievement and attendance during middle school.American Educational Research Journal,34(4),633-662.
46. Ross, J. A.,Gray, P.(2006).School leadership and student achievement: The mediating effects of teacher beliefs.Canadian Journal of Education,29(3),798-822.
47. Shouse, R. C.(1996).ERIC Document Reproduction ServiceERIC Document Reproduction Service,未出版
48. Skaalvik, E. M.,Skaalvik, M.(2007).Dimensions of teacher self-efficacy and relations with strain factors, perceived collective teacher efficacy, and teacher burnout.Journal of Educational Psychology,99(3),611-625.
49. Smith, P. A.,Hoy, W. K.(2007).Academic optimism and student achievement in urban elementary schools.Journal of Education Administration,45(5),556-568.
50. 方正吉(1998)。教師信念研究之回顧與整合─六種研究取向。教育資料與研究，20，36-44。
51. 余民寧(1994)。試題反應理論的介紹（15）─IRT 的其他應用課題。研習資訊，11(2)，7-10。
52. 吳政達、湯家偉、羅清水(2007)。心理契約、組織公平、組織信任與組織公民行為結構關係之驗證─以台北地區國民中學學校組織為例。教育政策論壇，10(1)，133-159。
53. 吳壁如(2005)。教師效能感的縱貫性研究─以幼教職前教師為例。教育與心理研究，28(3)，383-408。
54. 吳璧如(2002)。教師集體效能感初探。教育資料與研究，49，72-78。
55. 李介麟(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。高雄市，國立高雄師範大學教育學系。
56. 邱皓政(2003)。結構方程模式─LISREL 的理論、技術與應用。台北市:雙葉。
57. 邱皓政、林碧芳(2009)。結構方程模型的原理與應用。北京市:中國輕工業。
58. 秦夢群、吳勁甫(2009)。國民中學教師彰權益能、學校組織健康與學校效能關係之研究。教育與心理研究，32(1)，1-28。
59. 秦夢群、吳勁甫、鄧鈞文(2007)。國民中學學校組織健康層面之建構與衡量。教育政策論壇，10(3)，75-102。
60. 張俊紳(1996)。博士論文(博士論文)。高雄市，國立高雄師範大學教育研究所。
61. 許永熹(2002)。教師效能感的機制及其強化策略。初等教育學刊，12，273-287。
62. 郭維哲、方聰安(2006)。學校組織公平對教師組織公民行為影響之研究─以信任及承諾為中介變項。教育經營與管理研究集刊，2，145-179。
63. 陳俊瑋、吳璧如(2010)。國中教師自我效能感與集體效能感的關係。教育政策論壇，13(3)，127-154。
64. 黃芳銘(2002)。結構方程模式─理論與應用。台北市:五南。
65. 歐玉萍(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。高雄市，國立高雄師範大學教育學系。
66. 潘如珮(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市，國立政治大學教育學系。

1. 曾若玫,范熾文(2019)。國民小學校長正向領導與學校效能關係之研究：以教師學術樂觀為中介。學校行政，121，33-52。
2. 曾若玫、范熾文(2017)。班級領導之新議題─教師學術樂觀及其啟示。學校行政，107，152-164。
3. 韓長澤、戴建耘、陳宛非、高曼婷、袁宇熙(2014)。企業工作者行動化知識分享行為評量工具之建構。測驗學刊，61(4)，557-585。
4. 黃志灯、洪福源、林惠芳(2018)。國小教師時間觀點、教師學業樂觀與教師工作投入之關係研究。運動與遊憩研究，13(2)，93-115。
5. 廖梅君(2022)。校長凝聚力領導與教師學術樂觀關係之研究。學校行政，137，74-91。
6. 林和春,李逸萱(2023)。桃園市國民小學教師知覺校長科技領導與教師學術樂觀關係之研究。學校行政，144，126-146。
7. 謝傳崇(2014)。國民小學校長正向領導對教師學術樂觀影響之研究―以學校創新文化為中介變項。學校行政，91，33-56。
8. 謝傳崇、陳愛玲(2015)。國民小學校長學術樂觀與學校效能關係之研究。學校行政，98，1-22。
9. (2013)。高中校長轉型領導、學校學業樂觀、教師學業樂觀與學生成績關係之研究。教育研究學報，47(2)，47-72。
10. (2016)。高級中等學校校長正向領導量表之發展與運用。教育與心理研究，39(4)，29-59。
11. (2017)。班級領導之新議題―教師學術樂觀及其啟示。學校行政，107，152-164。
12. (2019)。國民小學校長專業學習社群指標系統之建構。教育與心理研究，42(4)，1-32。
13. (2020)。臺中市白領階級工作者之幸福指數分析探討。市北教育學刊，66，105-135。