「台灣青少年幽默測量工具」之發展與編製

Development and Compilation of Taiwan Adolescent Humor Instruments (TAHI)

10.7108/PT.201104.0034

江宜珍(Yi-Chen Chiang)；李蘭(Lee-Lan Yen)；吳文琪(Wen-Chi Wu)；邱玉蟬(Yu-Chan Chiu)；鄭其嘉(Chi-Chia Cheng)；盛慧珊(Hui-Shan Sheng)

青少年 ； 幽默 ； 測量工具 ； 信度 ； 效度 ； adolescent ； humor ； measurement instrument ； reliability ； validity

測驗學刊

58卷S（2011 / 04 / 01）

179 - 205

繁體中文

本研究旨在發展一套適用於台灣青少年的幽默測量工具，並檢驗其信度及效度。利用「台灣地區國中生有關幽默之概念及型態：幽默對個人健康的影響研究」，於2007年蒐集之全國性資料進行分析。研究樣本係選自台灣的北、中、南、東四個地區；各地區隨機抽取5所國民中學；被抽中之國中的一至三年級各隨機抽出一個班級；被抽中之班級的全體學生均接受問卷調查。以團體施測及學生自填問卷的方式蒐集資料，共有1,639人完成調查。針對量表的信度，採用內部一致性係數評估；針對量表的效度，則以專家效度、探索性因素分析、驗證性因素分析，以及區辨效度等四種方法評估。結果發現，各個向度之量表的內部一致性係數介於.75～.93，顯示信度良好。探索性因素分析結果顯示，各個向度之量表的因素結構與初擬時所預設之因素結構類似。進一步綜合信度、專家效度及探索性因素分析的結果，經驗證性因素分析發現，所有量表均通過適合度檢定，尤其是GFI與AGFI值均達.94以上，並具區辨效度，顯示效度良好。本研究發展之幽默測量工具，以全國樣本進行分析證實具有良好的信度與效度，可作為評估台灣青少年之幽默感、幽默表現和接收經驗的測量工具。

The purpose of this study was to develop humor instruments for use in Taiwan adolescents. We analyzed nationally representative data from the Humor project (The concept and style of humor among junior high school students in Taiwan: A study on the effect of humor on personal health) in 2007. The study sample was selected from northern, central, southern and eastern Taiwan. Five public schools were randomly selected from each of the four regions and one class was randomly selected from each of the three grades in each school. All students in the selected classes were given the questionnaire and filled them out as a class group. A total of 1,639 students completed the questionnaire. The reliability of the scale was assessed by the internal consistency coefficient. The validity of the scale was assessed by the experts, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and discriminant validity. The internal consistency coefficients for each dimension of the scale ranged from .75 to .93 which indicates good reliability. Exploratory factor analysis showed that the factor structure of each dimension of the scale was similar to the factor structure developed in our preliminary draft. Results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that all dimensions of the scale fitted the data well. Particularly, the value of GFI and AGFI were greater than .94 indicated good validity. We developed a multidimensional humor scales and confirmed that they had good reliability and validity in a nationally representative sample. These scales can be used to measure the sense of humor, the experience of humor expression, and the experience of receiving humor messages in Taiwanese adolescents.

1. 吳靜宜、陳學志、邱發忠、徐芝君(2007)。國中小學版幽默理解與幽默創造能力測驗之編製。應用心理研究，35，185-210。
   連結：
2. 李蘭、江宜珍、邱玉蟬、鄭其嘉、吳文琪、楊蕙如(2008)。國中生的幽默概念及表現類型─焦點團體討論結果。台灣衛誌，27(6)，519-529。
   連結：
3. 邱發忠、陳學志、卓淑玲(2003)。幽默創造訓練之課程設計暨實徵效果評估。教育心理學報，34(2)，179-198。
   連結：
4. 陳淑蓉、陳學志(2005)。幽默感的定義與測量─多向度幽默感量表之編製。應用心理研究，26，167-187。
   連結：
5. Bollen, K. A.(1989).Structural equations with latent variables.NewYork:JohnWiley & Sons.
6. Freud, S.(1960).Jokes and their relation to the unconscious.New York:W. W. Norton.
7. Hallett, R. D.,Derks, P.(1998).Humor theory and Rabelais.Humor: International Journal of Humor Research,11(2),135-160.
8. Kazdin, A. E.(Ed.)(2000).Encyclopedia of psychology.Washington, DC:American Psychological Association.
9. Martin, R. A.(2001).Humor, laughter, physical health: Methodological issues and research findings.Psychological Bulletin,127,504-519.
10. Martin, R. A.,Lefcourt, H. M.(1983).Sense of humor as a moderator of the relation between stressors and moods.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,45(6),1313-1324.
11. Martin, R. A.,Lefcourt, H. M.(1984).Situational Humor Response Questionnaire: Quantitative measure of sense of humor.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,47(1),145-155.
12. Martin, R. A.,Puhlik-Doris, P.,Larsen, G.,Gray, J.,Weir, K.(2003).Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the Humor Styles Questionnaire.Journal of Research in Personality,37,48-75.
13. Mueller, R. O.(1996).Basic principles of structural equation modeling: An introduction to LISREL and EQS.New York:Springer-Verlag.
14. Ruch, W.(Ed.)(1998).The sense of humor: Explorations of a personality characteristic.New York:Mouton de Gruyter.
15. Schumacker, R. E.,Lomax, R. G.(1996).A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Seligman, M. E.、洪蘭譯(2003)。Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment。台北市:遠流。
17. Snyder, C. R.(ed.),Lopez, S. J.(ed.)(2002).Handbook of positive psychology.New York:Oxford University Press.
18. Thorson, J. A.,Powell, F. C.(1993).Development and validity of a multidimensional sense of humor scale.Journal of Clinical Psychology,49(1),13-23.
19. 郭美君(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。新北市，私立輔仁大學心理學系。
20. 黃芳銘(2007)。結構方程模式─理論與應用。台北市:五南。

1. Yu-Jung Lin(林妤容);Xian Li(李賢);Chun-Yang Lee(李均揚);Wen-Chi Wu(吳文琪);Hao-Jan Yang(楊浩然);Yi-Chen Chiang(江宜珍)(2022)。Interaction Effects between Social Network Indicators (In/Out-Degree Centrality) and Humor Expression in the Adolescent Experience of Being Bullied。中華心理衛生學刊。35(4)。347-379。