學系精博特徵與學職契連特徵：從類型論到特徵論

Program Breadth-Depth Characteristic & School-Work Correspondence Characteristic: Moving from Typological Theory to Characteristical Theory

10.7108/PT.201206.0277

王思峰(Sy-Feng Wang)；黃思聞(Szu-Wen Huang)

生涯 ； 社會參與 ； 特徵模式 ； 高等教育 ； career ； characteristic model ； community engagement ； higher education

測驗學刊

59卷2期（2012 / 06 / 01）

277 - 301

繁體中文

高等教育向來有兩種原型：文理、專業。2000～2005年間，「文理－專業」亦成為卡內基高等教育機構分類之重要類別，以反映社會對高等教育的不滿。然而，「文理－專業別」是一種相對粗略的說法，不僅混雜了多重面向，也將複雜現實過於簡化為「類別」。本研究以O*NET知識量尺為工具，採用O*NET資料庫與大考中心全國學系調查之次級資料，建構出學系「精博特徵」與「學職契連特徵」之測量指標。研究結果顯示，此二學系特徵在信度、聚斂效度、區別效度與效標關聯效度皆有良好表現，而且，相較於文理－專業別，學系特徵對進修與求職兩類效標，有更高、更穩定與更細緻之預測力。最後，本文亦討論了實徵結果對教育政策之意涵，以及文理基礎學科的因應策略。

In histories, there are two archetypes in higher education: Liberal Art & Science school (LA&S) and Professional school (PROF). In 2000-2005, in order to reflect the public un-satisfaction to higher education, Carnegie Foundation began to add the LA& S-PROF dimension into her classification of institutions of higher education. However, LA&S-PROF type is a rough concept. It not only mixes multiple meaning, but also simplifies the continuous scale into nominal scale. Using the survey data of College Entrance Examination Center (CEEC), the knowledge scale and the database of O*NET, this paper try to propose two department characteristics and their measurement index: ”Program Breadth-Depth Characteristic & School-Work Correspondence Characteristic”. Empirical results show that these two department characteristics have good performance in stability reliability test, convergent validity test, discriminant validity test and criterion-related validity test. Moreover, these two department characteristics have better, stable and meticulous predictive power than LA&S-PROF type at the two kind of criterion variables: job seeking behavior and acceptance rate of graduate program. Implementations for higher education policy and for LA&S school are discussed.

1. 王思峰、劉兆明(2012)。學涯與職涯分類系統之串接：建立大學學系學類之關係描述子。輔導與諮商學報，34(1)，1-29。
   連結：
2. 王思峰、劉兆明(2010)。開放式興趣量表之修訂研究：學系描述子區別分析。測驗學刊，57(4)，515-540。
   連結：
3. 游秋怡、林大森（2008）。影響職場新鮮人職業地位、薪資取得因素之初探。臺灣高等教育研究電子報，26。2010年12月11日，取自https://www.cher.ntnu.edu.tw/epaperi/topics/nindex2.php?no=51
4. 田弘華（2008）。高等教育擴張與大學畢業生薪資的影響因素。台灣高等教育研究電子報，24。2010 年12 月11 日，取自http://www.cher.ntnu.edu.tw/epaperi/topics/nindex2.php?no=48
5. Stevens, S. S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science,103, 667-680.
6. 林瑞雅（2010）。主修領域與未來工作發展關係。臺灣高等教育研究電子報，48。2010年12月11日，取自https://www.cher.ntnu.edu.tw/?p=465
7. Berggren, C.(2008).Horizontal and vertical differentiation within higher education: Gender and class perspectives.Higher Education Quarterly,62(1-2),20-39.
8. Blau, G.(1993).Further exploring the relationship between job search and voluntary individual turnover.Personnel Psychology,46,213-330.
9. Blau, G.(1994).Testing a two-dimensionalmeasure of job search behavior.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,59,288-312.
10. Brint, S.,Riddle, M.,Turk-Bicakci, L.,Levy, C. S.(2005).From the liberal to the practical arts in American colleges and universities: Organizational analysis and curricular change.The Journal of Higher Education,76(2),151-180.
11. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching=CFAT(2001).The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education: 2000 edition.USA:Carnegie Publications.
12. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching=CFAT(2005).The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education: 2005 edition.USA:Carnegie Publications.
13. Driscoll, A.(2009).Carnegie' s new community engagement classification: Affirming higher education' s role in community.New Directions for Higher Education,14,5-12.
14. Driscoll, A.(2008).Carnegie' s community engagement classification: Intentions and insights.The Magazine of Higher Learning,40(1),38-41.
15. Graham, J. W.,Smith, S. A.(2005).Gender differences in employment and earnings in science and engineering in the US.Economics of Education Review,24(3),341-354.
16. Mitchell, K. E.,Levin, A. S.,Krumboltz, J. D.(1999).Planned happenstance: Constructing unexpected career opportunities.Journal of Counseling and Development,77,115-124.
17. Peterson, N. G.(ed.),Mumford, M. D.(ed.),Borman, W. C.(ed.),Jeanneret, P. R.(ed.),Fleishman, E. A.(ed.)(1999).An occupational information system for the 21st century: The development of O*NET.Washington, DC:American Psychological Association.
18. Peterson, N. G.,Mumford, M. D.,Borman,W. C.,Jeanneret, P. R.,Fleishman, E. A.,Levin, K.Y.,Campion, M. A.,Mayfield, M. S.,Morgeson, F. P.,Pearlman, K.,Gowing, M. K.,Lancaster, A. R.,Silver, M. B.,Dye, D. M.(2001).Understanding work using the Occupational Information Network (O*NET): Implications for practice and research.Personnel Psychology,54,451-492.
19. Robst, J.(2007).Education and job match: The relatedness of college major and work.Economics of Education Review,26(4),397-407.
20. Roksa, J.(2005).Double disadvantage or blessing in disguise? Understanding the relationship between college major and employment sector.Sociology of Education,78,207-232.
21. Rumberger, R. W.(1984).The changing economic benefits of college graduates.Economics of Education Review,3(1),3-11.
22. Rumberger, R.W.,Thomas, S. L.(1993).The economic returns to college major, quality and performance: A multilevel analysis of recent graduates.Economics of Education Review,12(1),1-19.
23. Saks, A. M.,Ashforth, B. E.(1999).Effects of individual differences and job search behaviors on the employment status of recent university graduates.Journal of Vocational Behavior,54,335-349.
24. Savickas, M. L.(1997).Career adaptability: An integrative construct for life-span, life-space theory.Career Development Quarterly,45,247-259.
25. Torpey, E. M.(2008).The class of 1993: Earnings and occupations by college major, 1 and 10 years after graduation.Occupational Outlook Quarterly,2008(Summer),15-25.
26. Wade, A.,Demb, A.(2009).A conceptual model to explore faculty community engagement.Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning,15(2),5-16.
27. Weerts, D. J.,Sandmann, L. R.(2010).Community engagement and boundary-spanning roles at research universities.The Journal of Higher Education,81(6),632-657.
28. 王思峰、劉兆明、陳禹(2010)。私立輔仁大學研發處整合型計畫子計畫四結案報告私立輔仁大學研發處整合型計畫子計畫四結案報告,未出版
29. 何潤娥(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。新北市，私立輔仁大學心理學系。
30. 姚開屏(1996)。從心理計量的觀點看測量工具的發展。職能治療學會雜誌，14(1)，v-xxi。
31. 教育部統計處(2007)。中華民國教育程度及學科標準分類（第4 次修正）（POD）。臺北市:作者。
32. 彭森明(2010)。大學生學習成果評量：理論、實務與應用。臺北市:財團法人高等教育評鑑中心基金會。
33. 黃思聞(2010)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。新北市，私立輔仁大學心理學系。
34. 劉兆明、簡茂發、洪冬桂、林幸台、陳清平、王思峰、劉澄桂、蔡佳燕、侯陳美、區雅倫(2010)。,臺北市:大學入學考試中心。

1. 蔡秦倫、王思峯(2015)。職涯妥協的滿意度後效：以學系特徵為調節變項。中華輔導與諮商學報，43，1-34。
2. 黃素菲(2014)。以「生涯興趣小六碼」建置多元生涯發展路徑。教育實踐與研究，27(2)，133-166。