教師創意教學衡量中共同方法變異問題之探討

Common Method Variance in the Measurement of Teachers' Creative Teaching

10.7108/PT.201212.0609

蕭佳純(Chia-Chun Hsiao)；涂志賢(Chih-Hsien Tu)

共同方法變異 ； 創意教學 ； 構念效度 ； common method variance (CMV) ； construct validity ； creative teaching

測驗學刊

59卷4期（2012 / 12 / 01）

609 - 639

繁體中文

雖然近年來有許多研究強調調查研究中的共同方法變異問題，但教育領域對此一議題的討論卻相當缺乏。有感於近年國內外對於教師創意教學的重視，但有關的衡量量表卻從未討論共同方法變異可能造成的嚴重性，所以本文以MTMM、CFA-MTMM方法，探討「教師創意教學衡量量表」的共同方法變異問題。本研究藉由不同的資料蒐集方式，進而討論共同方法變異發生的程度，並採用教師自評、學生評量及同事評量等三種資料蒐集方式，採MTMM、CFA-MTMM的統計分析方法，結果顯示，本研究所使用量表的方法變異為8.3%，特質變異為0.7%，測量誤差為91%，雖不如過去研究所認為的嚴重，但希冀能由此引起國內教育學者對此問題的重視。最後，針對上述結果，本研究將提出相關的討論與建議。

Despite recurring concerns about common method variance (CMV) in survey research, the educational research community remains largely uncertainties of the extent of such potential bias. To address this uncertainty, this research attempts to systematically examine the impact of CMV on the inferences drawn from survey research in the education area. The purpose of this study is to inquire the creative teaching performances of elementary school teachers. Besides, if only one type of survey questionnaire is administered to a single sources of respondents and the questionnaire contains both the antecedents and outcome variables, then it is very likely that this research suffers a methodological problem termed common method variance (CMV). CMV will inadequately inflate the relationship between variables, resulting in an increase of statistical significance. Thus this paper tests the problem by the different resources of questionnaire. We use MTMM and CFA-MTMM analysis. The results indicate that the average amount of trait, method and error variance is 0.7%, 8.3%, and 91% for creative teaching performances. The purpose of this study is to appeal for readers' attention to the CMV problem and to handle it more effectively in future research program. There is room for improvement for our education community to do research without CMV and, eventually, to accumulate our knowledge more accurately. Based on the results, the study also provide some discussions and suggestions.

1. 吳采蓉、楊淑晴(2009)。影響國小教師資訊融入教學創新行為結構模式之建構暨結構模式性別恆等性之檢定。教育心理學報，40(3)，385-418。
   連結：
2. 林偉文(2006)。學校創意守門人對創意教學與創造力培育態度與教師創意教學之關係。教育學刊，27，69-92。
   連結：
3. 林鉦棽(2005)。組織公民行為之跨層次分析：層級線性模式的應用。管理學報，22(4)，503-524。
   連結：
4. 洪久賢、洪榮昭、林麗娟、蔡長艷(2007)。影響教師創意教學因素之研究：以綜合活動領域為例。師大學報教育類，52(2)，49-71。
   連結：
5. 洪素蘋、黃宏宇、林珊如(2008)。重要他人回饋影響創意生活經驗？以模式競爭方式檢驗創意自我效能與創意動機的中介效果。教育心理學報，40(2)，303-322。
   連結：
6. 洪榮昭、林雅玲、林展立(2004)。國中小創意教師教學策略之研究：四位創意教學特優教師的個案分析。教育心理學報，35(4)，375-392。
   連結：
7. 陳玉樹、胡夢鯨(2008)。任務動機與組織創新氣候對成人教師創意教學表現之影響：階層線性模式分析。教育心理學報，40(2)，179-198。
   連結：
8. 彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽(2006)。管理研究中的共同方法變異：問題本質、影響、測試和補救。管理學報，23(1)，77-98。
   連結：
9. 葉玉珠(2000)。創造力發展的生態系統模式及其應用於科技與資訊領域之內涵分析。教育心理學報，32(1)，95-122。
   連結：
10. 蕭佳純、胡夢鯨(2007)。影響成人教育工作者知識管理能力因素之跨層次分析。教育學刊，29，1-36。
    連結：
11. Aljughaiman, A.,Mowrer-Reynolds, E.(2005).Teachers' conceptions of creativity and creative students.Journal of Creative Behavior,39(1),17-34.
12. Amabile, T. M.(1995).Attributions of creativity: What are the consequences.Creativity Research Journal,8(4),423-436.
13. Anderson, D. R.(2002).Creative teachers: Risk, responsibility, and love.Journal of Education,183(1),33-48.
14. Avolio, B. J.,Yammarino, F. J.,Bass, B. M.(1991).Identifying common method variance with data collected from a single source: An unresolved sticky issue.Journal of Management,17(3),571-587.
15. Bagozzi, R. P.,Yi, Y.(1988).On the evaluation of structural equation models.Academic of Marketing Science,16,74-94.
16. Baltes, B. B.,Bauer, C. C.,Bajdo, L. M.,Parker, C. P.(2002).The use of multitrait-multimethod data for detecting nonlinear relationships: The cause of psychological climate and job satisfaction.Journal of Business and Psychology,17(1),3-17.
17. Buckley, M. R.,Cote, J. A.,Comstock, S. M.(1990).Measurement errors in behavior sciences: The case of personality/attitude research.Educational Psychology Measurement,50(3),447-474.
18. Campbell, D.,Fiske, W.(1959).Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.Psychological Bulletin,56,81-105.
19. Cheng, M. Y. V.(2001).Hong Kong, China,Hong Kong Baptist University.
20. Cote, J. A.,Buckley, M. R.(1987).Estimating trait, method, and error variance: Generalizing across 70 construct validation studies.Journal of Marketing Research,24,315-318.
21. Cote, J. A.,Buckley, M. R.(1988).Measurement error and theory testing in consumer research: An illustration of the importance of construct validation.Journal of Consumer Research,14,579-582.
22. Crampton, S. M.,Wagner, J. A., III.(1994).Percept-percept inflation in micro organizational research: An investigation of prevalence and effect.Journal of Applied Psychology,79(1),67-76.
23. Cropley, A. J.(1997).Fostering creativity in the classroom: General principles.Creativity research handbook,Cresskill, NJ:
24. Csikszentmihalyi, M.(1996).Creativity.NY:Harper Collins.
25. Dansereau, F.,Alutto, J. A.,Yammarino, F. J.(1984).Theory testing in organizational behavior: The variant approach.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
26. Doty, D. H.,Glick, W. H.(1998).Common method bias: Does common methods variance really bias results?.Organizational Research Methods,1(4),374-406.
27. Feldhuse, J. F.(1995).Creativity: A knowledge base, metacognitive skill, and personality factors.Journal of Creative Behavior,29(4),255-268.
28. Feldman, J. M.,Lynch, J. G.(1988).Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior.Journal Applied Psychology,73(3),421-435.
29. Fleith, D. S.(2000).Teacher and student perceptions of creativity in the classroom environment.Report Review,22(3),148-153.
30. Ganster, D. C.,Hennessey, H. W.,Luthans, F.(1983).Social desirability responses effects: Three alternative models.Academy Management Journal,26(2),321-331.
31. Hair, J. F.,Anderson, R. E.,Tatham, R. L.,Black, W. C.(1998).Multivariate data analysis.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
32. Harrison, D. A.,McLanghlin, M. E.,Coalter, T. M.(1996).Context, cognition, and common method variance.Organizational Behavior Human Decision Processes,68(3),246-261.
33. Huang, J. C.(2002).Organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior: The mediating effect of cognition and affect-based trust.NTU Management Review,12(2),107-141.
34. Hufnagel, E. M.,Conca, C.(1994).User response data: The potential for errors and bias.Information System Research,5(1),48-73.
35. James, P. T. F.(2000).Fostering creativity education.Education,120(1),744-757.
36. Kemery, E. R.,Dunlap, W. P.(1986).Partialling factor scores does not control method variance: A reply to Podsakoff and Todor.Journal of Management,12(4),525-544.
37. Kline, T. J. B.,Sulsky, L. M.,Rever-Moriyama, S. D.(2000).Common method variance and specification errors: A practical approach to detection.The Journal of Psychology,134(4),401-421.
38. Lindell, M. K.,Whitney, D. J.(2001).Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs.Journal Applied Psychology,86(1),114-121.
39. Malhotra, N. K.,Kim, S. S.,Patil, A.(2006).Common method variance in IS research: A comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research.Management Science,52(12),1865-1883.
40. Marsh, H. W.(1989).Confirmatory factor analyses of multitrait-multimethod data: Many problems and a few solutions.Applied Psychological Measurement,13,335-361.
41. Paglis, L. L.,Williams, L. J.(1996).Common methods variance: When does it bias OB research results?.the meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology,San Diego, CA:
42. Parker, C. P.(1999).A test of alternative hierarchical models of psychological climate: PCg, satisfaction, or common method variances?.Organizational Research Methods,2(3),257-274.
43. Peterson, R. E.(2002).Establishing the creative environment in technology education.Technology Teacher,61(4),7-10.
44. Podsakoff, P. M.,MacKenzie, S. B.,Lee, J. Y.,Podsakfoff, N. P.(2003).Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.Journal of Applied Psychology,88(5),879-903.
45. Podsakoff, P. M.,Organ, D. W.(1986).Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects.Journal of Management,12(4),531-544.
46. Raudenbush, S. W.,Bryk, A. S.(2002).Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
47. Rejskind, G.(2000).TAG teacher: Only the creative need apply.Report Review,22,153-157.
48. Rubio, D. M.,Berg-Weger, M.,Tebb, S. S.(2001).Using structural equation modeling to test for multidimensionality.Structural Equation Modeling,8(4),613-626.
49. Sackett, P. R.,Larson, J. R.(1991).Research strategies and tactics in industrial and organizational psychology.Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology,Palo Alto, CA:
50. Snijders, T.,Bosker, R.(1999).Multilevel analysis.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
51. Soh, K. C.(2000).Indexing creativity fostering teacher behavior: A preliminart validation study.Journal of Creative Behavior,34(2),118-134.
52. Spector, P. E.(2006).Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend?.Organizational Research Methods,9(2),221-232.
53. Spector, P. E.(1994).Using self-report questionnaires in OB research: A common on the use of a controversial method.Journal of Organizational Behavior,15,385-392.
54. Spector, P. E.(1987).Method variance as an artifact in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Myth or significant problem?.Journal of Applied Psychology,72,438-443.
55. Spector, P. E.,Brannick, M. T.(1995).The nature and effects of method variance in organizational research.International review of industrial and organizational psychology,West Sussex, UK:
56. Spector, P. E.,Jex, S. M.,Chen, P. Y.(1995).Personality traits as predictors of objective job characteristics.Journal of Organizational Behavior,16,59-65.
57. Spector, P. E.,Zapf, D.,Chen, P. Y.,Frese, M.(2000).Why negative affectivity should not be controlled in job stress research: Don't throw out the baby with the bath water.Journal of Organizational Behavior,21,79-95.
58. Sternberg, R. J.(2000).Identifying and development creative giftedness.Report Review,23(2),60-64.
59. Sternberg, R. J.,Lubart, T. I.(1999).The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms.Handbook of creativity,Cambridge, MA:
60. Timberlake, P.(1982).Fifteen ways to cultivate creativity in your classroom.Childhood Education,9,19-21.
61. Tourangeau, R.,Rips, L. J.,Rasinski, K.(2000).The psychology of survey response.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
62. Williams, L. J.,Brown, B. K.(1994).Method variance in organizational behavior and human resources research: Effects on correlations, path coefficients, and hypothesis Testing.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,57,185-209.
63. 余民寧(2006)。潛在變項模式。臺北市:高等教育。
64. 吳忠吉(2001)。知識經濟下的人力資源政策。台灣經濟月刊，278，49-54。
65. 吳思華(2001)。知識經濟社會總體指標。臺北市:行政院經濟建設委員會。
66. 吳靜吉、陳淑惠、林慧賢、郭俊賢、王文中、劉鶴龍(1996)。創意生活經驗量表。臺北市:教育部。
67. 林珈夙(1997)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立政治大學教育研究所。
68. 林鉦棽、葉紹琪(1998)。自尊感、求職行為、與社會化關係之研究：資訊真實性中介效果的探討。管理評論，17(1)，61-82。
69. 林碧芳、邱皓政(2008)。創意教學自我效能感量表之編製與相關研究。教育研究與發展期刊，4(1)，141-169。
70. 邱皓政(2003)。結構方程模式：LISREL的理論、技術與應用。臺北市:雙葉書廊。
71. 邱皓政、溫福星(2007)。脈絡效果的階層線性模型分析：以學校組織創新氣氛與教師創意表現為例。教育心理研究，30(1)，1-35。
72. 洪榮昭(2005)。遊戲的教育意義。國民教育，45(3)，9-16。
73. 張火燦、李安悌、劉淑寧(2007)。團隊認定和領導型態對團隊創新行為之影響：自我管理行為的角色。商管科技季刊，8(4)，457-479。
74. 張玉山、許雅婷(2008)。以問題解決為基礎的科技教學活動設計：以創意機器人研習為例。研習資訊，25(3)，61-69。
75. 教育部(2002)。創造力教育白皮書。臺北市:作者。
76. 許育彰(2005)。網路創意教學社群之研究：開放社群。教學科技與媒體，73，4-17。
77. 許玫琇、張富鈞、鄭秀貴(2008)。高中體育教師創造人格特質、創意教學自我效能、內在動機及教學行為之相關研究。美和技術學院學報，27(2)，113-124。
78. 陳霞鄢、王振德(2004)。國小資優班教師創造力教學行為之研究。資優教育研究，4(1)，29-50。
79. 黃惠君、葉玉珠(2008)。國中教師教學玩興、教學動機、教學快樂感受與創意教學之關係。教育與心理研究，31(2)，85-118。
80. 黃靖媛(2007)。博士論文(博士論文)。嘉義縣，國立中正大學企業管理研究所。
81. 葉玉珠(2006)。創造力教學：過去、現在與未來。臺北市:心理。
82. 詹志禹(2002)。台灣地區中小學創造力教育的實況條件與政策推展。創造能力課程開發國際學術研討會，臺北市:
83. 路婉林、陳兆敏(2008)。創意教學法教學設計在綜合活動領域教學上的應用。教師之友，49(5)，16-29。
84. 蔡宜貞(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。新竹市，國立交通大學教育研究所。
85. 鄭彩鳳(2009)。校長競值領導效能研究。臺北市:高等教育。
86. 蕭佳純(2007)。教師內在動機以及知識分享合作對創意教學行為關聯性之階層線性分析。當代教育研究，15(4)，57-92。
87. 羅綸新(2003)。創造力與創意教學活動之探討與實務。創新教學理論與實務，臺北市: