「CEEC興趣量表」簡版之編製

Construction of a Short Form of the CEEC Interest Inventory in Taiwan

區雅倫(Ya-Lun Ou)；翁儷禎(Li-Jen Weng)；李庚霖(Keng-Lin Lee)

Holland環狀結構 ； 興趣量表 ； 簡版 ； Holland's circumplex model ； interest inventory ； short form

測驗學刊

60卷1期（2013 / 03 / 01）

67 - 96

繁體中文

「大學入學考試中心興趣量表」（簡稱「CEEC興趣量表」）建構於Holland的類型論，題數198題，需時30分鐘，本研究編製此量表之簡版以提高受測者的作答意願。簡版之編製考量題目結構、題型比例、題間相關、因素負荷量等，以2007年受測原版興趣量表的3,362位臺灣高一學生之資料進行分析後，選取126題，並以測驗分數的信度、效度、適合度與環狀結構假設檢視簡版的特性。結果發現簡版分數信度良好，因素結構符合理論預期，其分布與原版相近並有高相關，兩版六型間相關矩陣相似，且二者測出之興趣第一碼相似度高達98%，多向度量尺法（Multidimensional Scaling）、隨機化檢驗（randomization test）支持簡版之環狀結構假設。研究結果顯示，「CEEC興趣量表」簡版分數具有良好的信度與建構效度，與原版特性相似，未來宜探究此簡版在實務應用上之效能。

CEEC Interest Inventory is based on Holland's RIASEC model and consists of 198 items. It takes approximately 30 minutes to complete the inventory. The purpose of this study is to construct a short form of the CEEC Interest Inventory in order to facilitate the respondent's willingness to complete the test. The construction of this short form considered item structure, item type, inter-item correlation, and factor loading. A sample of 3,362 high school students in Taiwan completed the CEEC Interest Inventory in 2007. Out of the original 198 items, 126 items were selected to form a short form. The psychometric properties of this short form including reliability and construct validity of test scores and the fitting of Holland’s circular hypothesis were examined using the randomization test of hypothesized order relations. Several results were found. First, the short form maintained the original content structure. Second, it shared similar psychometric properties with the original inventory. Third, its scores highly correlated with those of the original form. Fourth, Holland’s model fitted the short form data well and no structural differences were found between the two forms. Finally, The short form of the CEEC Interest Inventory can be considered as a reliable and valid measure of interest among high school students in Taiwan.

1. ACT(2001).Career Planning Survey: Technical manual.Iowa City, IA:Author.
2. ACT(2009).ACT Interest Inventory: Technical manual.Iowa City, IA:Author.
3. ACT(1995).Technical manual: Revised Unisex Edition of the ACT Interest Inventory (UNIACT).Iowa City, IA:Author.
4. American Educational Research Association,American Psychological Association,National Council on Measurement in Education(1999).Standards for educational and psychological testing.Washington, DC:Author.
5. Anastasi, A.,Urbina, S.(1997).Psychological testing (7th ed.).Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
6. Anderson, M. Z.,Tracey, T. R.,Rounds, J.(1997).Examining the invariance of Holland's vocational interest model across gender.Journal of Vocational Behavior,50,349-364.
7. Andresen, E. M.,Malmgren, J. A.,Carter,W. B.,Patrick, D. L.(1994).Screening for depression in well older adults: Evaluation of a short form of the CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale).American Journal of Preventive Medicine,10,77-84.
8. Andrews, P.,Meyer, R. G.(2003).Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale and short form C: Forensic norms.Journal of Clinical Psychology,59,483-492.
9. Armstrong, P. I.,Allison, W.,Rounds, J.(2008).Development and initial validation of brief public domain RIASEC marker scales.Journal of Vocational Behavior,73,287-299.
10. Beck, A. T.,Rial, W. Y.,Rickels, K.(1974).Short form of depression inventory: Crossvalidation.Psychological Reports,34,1184-1186.
11. Beck, A. T.,Steer, R. A.(1993).Beck Depression Inventory: Manual.San Antonio, TX:The Psychological Corporation.
12. Bollen, K. A.(1989).Structural equations with latent variables.NewYork, NY:JohnWiley & Sons.
13. Brown, S. D.,Gore, P. A., Jr.(1994).An evaluation of interest congruence indices: Distribution characteristics and measurement properties.Journal of Vocational Behavior,41,162-182.
14. Cronbach, L. J.,Gleser, G. C.(1953).Assessing similarities between profiles.Psychological Bulletin,50,456-473.
15. Darcy, M. U.,Tracey, T. J.(2007).Circumplex structure of Holland's RIASEC interests across gender and time.Journal of Counseling Psychology,54,17-31.
16. Edwards, P.,Roberts, I.,Sandercock, P.,Frots, C.(2004).Follow-up by mail in clinical trials: Does questionnaire length matter?.Controlled Clinical Trials,25,31-52.
17. Fouad, N. A.,Dancer, L. S.(1992).Cross-cultural structure of interests: Mexico and the United States.Journal of Vocational Behavior,40,129-143.
18. Hansen, Jo-Ida C.,Sarma, Z. M.,Collins, R. C.(1990).An evaluation of Holland'smodel of vocational interests for Chicana (o) and Latina (o) college students.Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development,32,2-13.
19. Harmon, L. W.,Hansen J. C.,Borgen, F. H.,Hammer, A. L.(1994).Applications and technical guide for the Strong Interest Inventory.Palo Alto, CA:Consulting Psychologists Press.
20. Hogan, R.(1983).A socioanalytic theory of personality.Nebraska symposium on motivation 1982. Personality: Current theory and research,Lincoln, NE:
21. Holland, J. L.(1973).Making vocational choices: A theory of careers.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
22. Holland, J. L.(1966).The psychology of vocational choice: A theory of personality types and environmental.New York, NY:Ginn.
23. Holland, J. L.(1997).Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3rd ed.).Palo Alto, CA:Consulting Psychologists Press.
24. Holland, J. L.(1985).Making vocational choice: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (2nd ed.).Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
25. Holland, J. L.,Fritzsche, B.,Powell, A.(1994).Technical manual for the Self-Directed Search.Lutz, FL:Psychological Assessment Resources.
26. Holland, J. L.,Gottfredson, G. D.(1992).Studies of the hexagonal model: An evaluation (or the perils of stalking the perfect hexagon).Journal of Vocational Behavior,40,158-170.
27. Holland, J. L.,Whitney, D. R.,Cole, N. S.,Richards, J. M.(1969).An empirical occupational classification derived from a theory of personality and intended for practice and research.Iowa City, IA:ACT.
28. Hu, L.,Bentler, P. M.(1999).Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.Structural Equation Modeling,6,1-55.
29. Hubert, L.,Arabie, P.(1987).Evaluating order hypotheses within proximity matrices.Psychological Bulletin,102,172-178.
30. Jackson, D. N.(1986).Career Directions Inventory: Manual.Port Huron, MI:Research Psychologists Press.
31. Johansson, C. B.(1986).The Career Assessment Inventory.Minneapolis, MN:NCS Assessments.
32. Kaufman, A. S.,Kaufman, N. L.(1990).Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test: Manual.Circle Pines, MN:American Guidance Service.
33. Kohout, F. J.,Berkman, L. F.,Evans, D. A.,Cornoni-Huntley, J.(1993).Two shorter forms of the CES-D depression symptoms index..Journal of Aging and Health,5,179-193.
34. Kosinski, M.,Bayliss, M. S.,Bjorner, J. B.,Ware, J. E., Jr.,Garber, W. H.,Batenhorst, A.,Cady, R.,Dahlof, C. G. H.,Dowson, A.,Tepper, S.(2003).A six-item short-form survey for measuring headache impact: The HIT-6TM.Quality of Life Research,12,963-974.
35. Kruskal, J. B.(1964).Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonnumeric hypothesis.Psychometrika,29,1-27.
36. Kruskal, J. B.,Wish, M.(1978).Multidimensional scaling.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
37. Lewis, P.,Rivkin, D.(1999).Development of the O*NET interest profiler.Raleigh, NC:National Center for O*NET Development.
38. Liu, C. J.,Rounds, J.(2003).Evaluating the structure of vocational interest in China.Acta Psychologica Sinica,35,411-418.
39. Lubinski, D.(Ed.),Dawis, R. V.(Ed.)(1995).Assessing individual differences in human behavior: New concepts, methods, and findings.Palo Alto, CA:Consulting Psychologists Press.
40. Mount, M. K.,Muchinsky, P. M.(1978).Concurrent validation of Holland's hexagonal model with occupational workers.Journal of Vocational Behavior,13,348-354.
41. O''Neil, J. M.,Magoon, T. M.(1977).The predictive power of Holland's investigative personality type and consistency levels using the Self-Directed Search.Journal of Vocational Behavior,10,39-46.
42. Orlofsky, J. L.,O''Heron, C. A.(1987).Development of a short-form Sex Role Behavior Scale.Journal of Personality Assessment,51,267-277.
43. Resnick, R. J.,Entin, A. D.(1971).Is an abbreviated form of the WISC valid for Afro-American children?.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,36,97-99.
44. Roberts, B. W.,Robins, R. W.(2004).Person-environment fit and its implications for personality development: A longitudinal study.Journal of Personality,72,89-110.
45. Silverstein, A. B.(1990).Short forms of individual intelligence tests.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,2,3-11.
46. Spielberger, C. D.(1980).Test Anxiety Inventory: Preliminary professional manual.Palo Alto, CA:Consulting Psychologists Press.
47. Taylor, J.,Deane, F. P.(2002).Development of a short form of the Test Anxiety Inventory (TAI).Journal of General Psychology,129,127-136.
48. Tellegen, A.,Briggs, P. E.(1967).Old wine in new skins: Grouping Wechsler subtests into new scales.Journal of Consulting Psychology,31,499-506.
49. Tracey, T. J.(1997).RANDALL: A Microsoft FORTRAN program for a randomization test of hypothesized order relations.Educational and Psychological Measurement,57,164-168.
50. Watkins, C. E.(1986).Validity and usefulness ofWAIS-R,WlSC-R, andWPPSI short forms.Professional Psychology: Research and Practice,17,36-43.
51. Yang,W.,Stokes, G. S.,Hui, C. H.(2005).Cross-cultural validation of Holland's interest structure in Chinese population.Journal of Vocational Behavior,67,379-396.
52. 田秀蘭(1996)。我國高中學生職業興趣結構之比較研究。中華輔導學報，4，69-93。
53. 李秉書(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學物理研究所。
54. 林一真(2007)。生活彩虹探索：指導手冊。臺北市:心理。
55. 林秀盆(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立臺北大學統計研究所。
56. 林佳瑩(2008)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學工業教育研究所。
57. 林幸台、金樹人、張小鳳、陳清平(1996)。生涯興趣量表：指導手冊。臺北市:測驗出版社。
58. 林幸台、簡茂發、洪冬桂、陳清平、劉澄桂、區雅倫、蔡家燕(2007)。,臺北市:大學入學考試中心。
59. 林清山(1986)。多向度量尺法（MDS）的理論及統計方法。測驗年刊，33，109-124。
60. 金樹人、田秀蘭、林世華(2000)。國中生涯興趣量表：指導手冊。臺北市:心理。
61. 金樹人、林幸台、陳清平、區雅倫(1994)。,臺北市:大學入學考試中心。
62. 區雅倫、陳清平(2001)。大學入學考試中心興趣量表：使用手冊。臺北市:大學入學考試中心。
63. 陳清平(1999)。博士論文(博士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所。
64. 陳惠玉(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。彰化縣，私立大葉大學教育專業發展研究所。
65. 簡茂發、林一真、陳清平、劉澄桂、區雅倫、舒琮慧(2007)。大學入學考試中心興趣量表修訂版信度及效度檢驗與常模的建立。考試學刊，2，87-107。

1. 林曉芳(2016)。國中生數學科課業任務價值量表之建構。臺中教育大學學報：教育類，30(1)，53-80。
2. 謝曼盈(2020)。簡版社交技巧提升系統青少年評量表的信度與效度研究。教育心理學報，51(4)，505-529。