結合學習迷思學生區與迷思次序演算法的提案

Combined Misconceptions' Domain for Students with Misconceptions' Order Algorithm Proposal

蔡清斌(Ching-Pin Tsai)；許天維(Tian-Wei Sheu)；曾建維(Jian-Wei Tzeng)；永井正武(Nagai Masatake)

GSP表 ； S-P表 ； 迷思序 ； 學習迷思 ； GRA ； GSP chart ； learning misconceptions ； misconception order ； S-P chart

測驗學刊

61卷2期（2014 / 06 / 01）

183 - 211

繁體中文

近年來，學習迷思廣泛地在學術界上運用，且已獲得相當好的成果，本研究擬對學生迷思區結合迷思次序演算法做出提案。本研究以GRA（灰關聯分析法）結合S-P表（Student-Problem Chart）所建立之GSP表（grey student-problem chart），選取GSP表之學生Gamma值為0.5附近的學生，定義為學習迷思學生區（misconceptions' domain for students），並對迷思學生的答題狀況進行分析，選取迷思學生不同時答對與不同時答錯的題目，表示為其易產生迷思之問題，並將之定義為學習迷思問題區（misconceptions' domain for problems），透過教師所建立之問題概念表（problem-concept chart），可對照出迷思概念表（misconception chart），即可定義出迷思率與迷思序，此種方法加上有效迷思半徑的選取，可預測學生概念迷思之所在，並可將之應用於排除學習迷思上。

In recent years, the learning misconceptions are widely applied in academic community, and it have obtained good results. This paper makes a proposal to the misconception's domain for students district binding misconceptions' order algorithm. This study proposes GSP Chart (grey student-problem chart) which combines misconceptions' domain for students with misconceptions' order. This study proposes GSP Chart which combines S-P Chart (Student-Problem Chart) with GRA (Grey Relational Analysis). This paper selects the students whose gamma value is near 0.5 from the GSP chart. Those students are defined as the learning misconceptions' domain for students. Then the study analyze those students' answers and select the right and wrong answers created by those Misconceptions' Students at the different time. It is said that the misconceptions' questions are defined as the learning misconceptions' domain for problems. Through the problem-concept chart conducted by teachers, the study can define the misconceptions' rate and the misconceptions' order by comparing the misconception chart. Combined the effective misconceptions' radius of selection, this method can not only predict where students' misconception is, but also apply to the remedial instruction.

1. 劉子鍵、林怡均(2011)。發展二階段診斷工具探討學生之統計迷思概念：以「相關」為例。教育心理學報，42(3)，379-400。
   連結：
2. Cohen, S.,Smith, G. A.,Chechile, R.,Burns, G.,Tasi, F.(1996).Identifying impediments to learning probability and statistics from an assessment of instructional software.Journal Educational and Behavioral Statistics,21(1),35-54.
3. Driver, R.(1981).Pupils' alternative frameworks in science.European Journal of Science Education,3(1),93-101.
4. Driver, R.,Easley, J.(1978).Pupils and paradigms: A review of literature related to concept development in adolescent science students.Studies in Science Education,5,61-84.
5. Lin, Y. H.,Chen, S. M.(2006).The integrated analysis of S-P chart and ordering theory on equality axiom concepts test for sixth graders.Wseas Transactions on Mathematics,5(12),1303-1308.
6. Liu, T. C.,Lin, Y. C.,Tsai, C. C.(2009).Identifying misconceptions about statistical correlation and their possible causes among high school students: An exploratory study using concept mapping with interviews.International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,7(4),791-820.
7. Nicoll, G.(2001).A report of undergraduates' bonding misconceptions.International Journal of Science Education,23(7),707-730.
8. Sato, T.(1969).A method of analyzing data gathered by the response analyzer for diagnosis of student performance and the quality of instructional sequence.Proc. of the meeting of IECE of Japan Annual Conference,Japanese:
9. Sato, T.(1985).Introduction to student-problem curve theory analysis and evaluation.Tokyo, Japan:Meiji Tosho.
10. Sato, T.(1980).The S-P chart and the caution index.NEC Educational Information Bulletin,80(1)
11. Sato, T.,Kurata, M.(1977).Basic S-P score table characteristics.NEC Research and Development,47,64-71.
12. Sheu, T. W.,Tzeng, J. W.,Liang, J. C.,Wang, B. T.,Nagai, M.(2011).A proposal of three parameters logistic model based on Rasch Model GSP.Proc. of the meeting of Technology and Mathematices Education of the Third Conference
13. Sheu, T. W.,Tzeng, J. W.,Tsai, C. P.,Chen, T. L.(2012).Applying problem-concept chart combined with structural analysis to investigate the learning misconcept-simple equation with one variable for example.Journal of Grey System,15(1),56-67.
14. Sheu, T.W.,Tsai, C. P.,Tzeng, J.W.,Chen, T. L.,Nagai, M.(2012).An algorithm of the misconception order.Applied Mechanics and Materials,284-287,3010-3014.
15. Tzeng, J. W.,Sheu, T. W.,Liang, J. C.,Wang, B. T.,Nagai, M.(2012).A new proposal based on Rasch Model GSP chart and grey structural model with analysis and discussion.International Journal of Advancements in Computing Technology,4(9),111-121.
16. Wang, N.(2003).Use of the Rasch IRT model in standard setting: An item-mapping method.Journal of Educational Measurement,40,231-253.
17. Yamaguchi, D.,Li, G. D.,Nagai, M.(2005).New grey relational analysis for finding the invariable structure and its applications.Journal of Grey System,8(2),167-178.
18. Yamaguchi, D.,Li, G. D.,Nagai, M.(2007).Verification of effectiveness for grey relational analysis models.Journal of Grey System,10(3),169-181.
19. 何英奇(1989)。精熟學習策略配合微電腦化S-P 表分析診斷對學生學習效果的實驗研究。教育心理學報，22，191-214。
20. 許天維、曾建維、梁榮進、王柏婷、永井正武(2012)。Rasch Model GSP 表與灰色結構模型之分析探究。臺中教育大學學報，26(1)，1-26。
21. 許天維、曾建維、蔡清斌、陳姿良、永井正武(2012)。以GSP表與ISM鑑別國中數學一元一次方程式單元學習困難點之研究。「2012 資訊科技國際研討會暨第二屆網路智能與應用研討會」論文集，臺中市:
22. 陳鎰斌(2004)。訊息處理論在技職教育教學策略的應用。內湖高工學報，15，97-109。
23. 游森期、余民寧(2006)。知識結構診斷評量與S-P表之關聯性研究。教育與心理研究，29(1)，183-208。
24. 溫坤禮、趙忠賢、張宏志、陳曉瑩、溫惠筑(2009)。灰色理論與應用。臺北市:五南。

1. 戴建耘,葉國良,張明文,高曼婷,袁宇熙(2021)。應用Petri-Net建構知識構圖強化適性學習診斷與學習推薦之研究。教育科學研究期刊，66(3)，61-105。