小學生「未來時間觀量表」之中文化及信、效度評估

Development and Validation of the Chinese-Version ＂Future Time Perspective Scale＂ for Elementary School Students in Taiwan

林秀玲(Hsiu-Ling Lin)；吳相儀(Hsiang-Yi Wu)；吳清麟(Ching-Lin Wu)；邱發忠(Fa-Chung Chiu)；陳學志(Hsueh-Chih Chen)；陳慧娟(Huey-Jiuan Chen)

未來時間觀 ； 量表編製 ； 學習動機 ； future time perspective ； student motivation

測驗學刊

62卷2期（2015 / 06 / 01）

153 - 179

繁體中文

本研究旨在採用Husman與Shell（2008）的理論內涵來發展適用於臺灣小學生的「未來時間觀量表」。該量表分成四個分量表，包括：倉促性、延伸性、價值性及連結性。預試以分層便利抽樣抽取239人，經過項目分析、探索性因素分析及信度分析後，形成正式量表27題。正式樣本涵蓋全臺灣北、中、南、東四區域的小學四至六年級，依照各地區小學生在全國的比例，共抽樣十一間小學，人數計1,136位學生。結果發現，本量表重測信度為.77~.95，而Cronbach's α係數為.74~.85，顯示本量表的穩定性佳、內部一致性良好。建構效度部分，各項整體適配度指標均達到標準，顯示本量表整體模式適配情形頗為理想。再以「國中小學習動機量表」為效標，發現具良好之同時效度。並從文獻回顧後，針對年級、社經地位、管教方式、課後才藝來進行考驗，以提供效度關聯的支持證據。研究結果發現，年級愈高、社經地位中上、父親民主管教、從事體育、藝能等才藝學習之背景變項的小學生，其未來時間觀表現狀況較佳。此外，本量表採直譯及回譯比對的嚴謹程序，具有價值性和應用性，未來可提供跨文化的比較，並提供家庭、學校以及教育研究上的具體建議，以做為後續教育及未來研究的參考。

The purpose of the study was to examine the reliability and validity of the Chineseversion ＂Future time perspective scale＂. Four factors were derived from the final 27-items through item analysis and exploratory factor analysis, and reliability analysis via 239 participants by using purposive sampling in the pretest. Then, the researchers used another 1,136 participants by using stratified convenience sampling method to conduct confirmatory factor analysis and criterion-related validity. Reliability results for the future time perspective subscales were impressive, with the Cronbach's α coefficients ranging from .74 to .85, and the test-retest reliabilities from .77 to .95. The four factors showed good composite reliability and average variance extracted. The study also employed learning motivation scale for primary and junior high school students, which were criterions. Regarding the analysis of background variables, it was shown that the students who have higher grade, middle and upper socioeconomic status, democratic discipline of parents, engage in sports learning, outperformed the ones who don't. The semantic equivalence between the original English version and the translated Chinese version was examined by using forward and backward translation. The findings will provide cross-cultural comparison and concrete suggestions on education of school and family were also provided for future researches.

1. 劉政宏(2010)。「國中小學習動機量表」之編製及其信、效度研究。測驗學刊，57(3)，371-402。
   連結：
2. Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (2001). LISREL (Version 8.51) [computer software]. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
3. Bagozzi, R. P.,Yi, Y.(1988).On the evaluation of structural equation models.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,16,74-94.
4. Bamdt, R. J.,Johnson, D. M.(1955).Time orientation in delinquents.Journal of Abnor-mal and Social Psychology,51,343-345.
5. Bembenutty, H.,Karabenick, S. A.(2004).Inherent association between academic delay of gratification, future time perspective, and self-regulated learning.Educational Psychology Review,16,35-57.
6. Daltrey, M. H.,Langer, P.(1984).Development and evaluation of a measure of futuretime perspective.Perceptual and Motor Skill,58,719-725.
7. de Bilde, J.,Vansteenkiste, M.,Lens, W.(2011).Understanding the association between future time perspective and self-regulated learning through the lens of self-determination theory.Learning and Instruction,21(3),332-344.
8. de Volder, M. L.,Lens, J.(1982).Academic achievement and future time perspective as a cognitive-motivational concept.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,42,566-571.
9. Gjesme, T.(1983).On the concept of future time orientation: Considerations of some func-tions' and measurements' implications.International Journal of Psychology,18,443-461.
10. Gorsuch, R. L.(1983).Factor analysis.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Greene, B. A.,DeBacker, T. K.(2004).Gender and orientations toward the future: Links to motivation.Educational Psychology Review,16,91-120.
12. Hair, J. F. Jr.,Anderson, R. E.,Tatham, R. L.,Black, W. C.(1998).Multivariate dataanalysis.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
13. Husman, J.,Shell, D. F.(2008).Beliefs and perceptions about the future: A measurement of future time perspective.Learning & Individual Differences,18(2),166-175.
14. Kastenbaum, R.(1961).The dimensions of future time perspective: An experimental analysis.The Journal of General Psychology,65(2),203-218.
15. Kauffman, D.,Husman, J.(2004).Effects of time perspective on student motivation: In-troduction to a special issue.Educational Psychology Review,16,1-7.
16. Knapp, R. H.,Garbutt, J. T.(1958).Time imagery and the achievement motive.Journal of Personality,26,426-434.
17. Lens, W.(1986).Future time perspective: A cognitive-motivational concept.Frontiers of motivational psychology,New York, NY:
18. Lessing, E. E.(1968).Demographic, developmental, and personality correlates of length of future time perspective.Journal of Personality,36,183-201.
19. Lomranz, J.,Shmotkin, D.,Katznelson, D. B.(1983).Coherence as a measure of futuretime perspective in children and its relationship to delay of gratification and social class.International Journal of Psychology,18,407-413.
20. Mello, Z. R.,Worrell, F. C.(2006).The relationship of time perspective to age, gender, and academic achievement among academically talented adolescents.Journal for the Education of the Gifted,29,271-289.
21. Moreas, A. M.,Lens, W.(1991).The motivational meaning of the individual future time perspective.Learning and Instruction,2,135-149.
22. Nowack, K.,Milfont, T. L.,van der Meer, E.(2013).Future versus present: Time per-spective and pupillary response in a relatedness judgment task investigating temporal event knowledge.International Journal of Psychophysiology,87(2),173-182.
23. Nuttin, J.,Lens, J.(1985).Future time perspective and motivation: Theory and research method.LeuvenHillsdale, NJ:Leuven University Press.
24. Padawer, E. A.,Jacobs-Lawson, J. M.,Hershey, D. A.,Thomas, D. G.(2007).Demographic indicators as predictors of future time perspective.Current Psychology,26,102-108.
25. Peetsma, T. T. D.(2000).Future time perspective as a predictor of school investment: Scandinavian.Journal of Educational Research,44(2),177-192.
26. Seijts, G. H.(1998).The importance of future time perspective in theories of work motivation.The Journal of Psychology,132(2),154-168.
27. Shell, D. F.,Husman, J.(2001).The multivariate dimensionally of personal control and future time perspective beliefs in achievement and self-regulation.Contemporary Educational Psychology,26(4),481-506.
28. Strathman, A.,Gleicher, F.,Boninger, D. S.,Edwards, C. S.(1994).The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,66(4),742-752.
29. Zimbardo, P. G.,Boyd, J. N.(1999).Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,77,1271-1288.
30. 何嘉欣(2011)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學。
31. 周淑楓(2007)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺南市，國立成功大學。
32. 林麗芳(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。彰化市，國立彰化師範大學。
33. 邱英豪(2007)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。彰化市，國立彰化師範大學。
34. 張新仁(1982)。國中學生學習行為問卷。臺北市:中國行為科學社。
35. 劉潔玲(2002)。從中國傳統文化思想及價值觀論目標取向理論在華人社會的應用。教育研究資訊，10(3)，183-203。
36. 蘇秀枝(2005)。國小學童課後托育、補習才藝與學業成就、行為適應之關係：以台中縣大里市為例。朝陽人文社會學刊，3(1)，173-223。

1. 陳嘉成,洪兆祥(2023)。A Man Who Knows What He Wants－專業認同對師資生生涯決策效能、結果期待、學習倦怠與生涯希望感的調節效果。教育科學研究期刊，68(1)，1-33。
2. 陳偉仁,陳美芳,張衿綾(2022)。資優學生未來觀之個案研究。特殊教育研究學刊，47(3)，67-96。
3. 黃志灯、洪福源、林惠芳(2018)。國小教師時間觀點、教師學業樂觀與教師工作投入之關係研究。運動與遊憩研究，13(2)，93-115。
4. 謝子陽,劉玉玲(2021)。整合未來時間觀與數學學習投入：國中生數學學習模式之研究。課程與教學，24(1)，235-263。
5. 張芳全,洪筱仙(2019)。澎湖縣國中生未來時間觀、自律學習與學習成就之研究。臺北市立大學學報.教育類，50(2)，1-32。
6. (2020)。人無遠慮，必有近憂：藝術大學師培生與非師培生之生涯發展模式差異分析。教育與心理研究，43(4)，1-32。