「中文部件組字遠距聯想測驗」之發展與其信效度研究

The Development of Chinese Radical Remote Associates Test

張雨霖(Yu-Lin Chang)；吳哲源(Jhe-Yuan Wu)；陳學志(Hsueh-Chih Chen)；吳清麟(Ching-Lin Wu)

中文部件 ； 頓悟性問題 ； 遠距聯想 ； Chinese radicals ； insight problems ； remote association

測驗學刊

63卷1期（2016 / 03 / 01）

59 - 81

繁體中文

本研究擬發展「中文部件組字遠距聯想測驗」（Chinese Radical Remote Associates Test，以下簡稱CRRAT），期能形成華人遠距聯想創造力的完整測量系統。測驗編製者首先挑選出60組具有同樣部件之三個衍生字組，編成CRRAT預試題本，計60題。接著以196名大學生進行預試，依項目分析結果挑選出30題做為正式試題，並區分為難度、鑑別度相近的甲、乙兩式題本（各15題）。其次，甲式以173名、乙式以187名大學生進行正式施測及信效度研究。結果發現，在信度方面，甲、乙兩版本之內部一致性係數分別為.706與.685；在效度方面，兩版本皆與「中文遠距聯想測驗」（Chinese Remote Associates Test, CRAT）（任純慧、陳學志、練竑初、卓淑玲，2004）有顯著相關（r 值分別為.317與.375），與「中文詞彙遠距聯想測驗」（Chinese Word Remote Associates Test, CWRAT）（黃博聖、陳學志、劉政宏，2012）有顯著相關（r值分別為.585與.350），與「頓悟性問題測驗」（邱發忠、陳學志、徐芝君、吳相儀、卓淑玲，2008）亦有顯著相關（r值分別為.417與.448）。另外，本測驗與「新編創造思考測驗」（吳靜吉，1998）各指標皆無相關存在（r介於-.103～.151之間），顯示本測驗具有良好的聚斂效度與區辨效度。此外，不同性別大學生在甲、乙式均無顯著差異，中文相關系所與非中文相關系所大學生在乙式亦無顯著差異。本研究最終針對測驗的信效度與未來可能發展提出討論與建議。

The purpose of this study was to develop ＂Chinese Radical Remote Associates Test＂ (CRRAT), which is a comprehensive system to measure the cognitive ability of Chinese remote associates test for Chinese people. To develop CRRAT, firstly, we choose 60 sets of derivative characters; every set contained three characters that derived from a same radical. These 60 sets was the pretest of CRRAT, and 196 undergraduates participated. Then 30 items of them were selected into CRRAT according to the result of item analysis; in particular, two alternative forms, version A and version B, were edited based on their item difficulty and discrimination, each version was composed of 15 items. With respect to the reliability and validity of CRRAT, we recruited 173 undergraduates for version A and 187 ones for version B to join the formal test. As for the reliability, the coefficients of internal consistency for version A and version B of CRRAT were .706 and .685 respectively. With regard to the validity of CRRAT, it is significantly correlated (r = .317, r = .375) to the ＂Chinese Remote Associates Test＂ (CRAT) (Chun-Hui Jen, Hsueh-Chih Chen, Hung-Chu Lien, & Shu-Ling Cho, 2004), and to the ＂Chinese Word Remote Associates Test＂ (CWRAT) (Po-Sheng Huang, Hsueh-Chih Chen, & Cheng-Hong Liu, 2012) (r = .585, r = .350), and to the ＂Insight Problems＂ (r = .417, r = .448). However, it wasn’t correlated to all the index of ＂New Creativity Test＂ (r = -.103 to .151), it shows that CRRAT has the convergent validity and discrimination validity. Besides, there was no gender difference between the responses of two versions of CRRAT, and the response of version B was not different between the Chinese literature major and other majors undergraduates. We have the discussion and suggestion for the reliability, the validity, and the future potential development of the CRRAT.

1. 任純慧、陳學志、練竑初、卓淑玲(2004)。創造力測量的輔助工具：中文遠距聯想量表的編製。應用心理研究，21，195-218。
   連結：
2. 邱發忠、陳學志、徐芝君、吳相儀、卓淑玲(2008)。內隱與外顯因素對創造作業表現的影響。中華心理學刊，50(2)，125-145。
   連結：
3. 陳奕全、葉素玲(2009)。漢字辨識理論模型中的部件表徵。應用心理研究，43，177-205。
   連結：
4. 陳學志、彭淑玲、曾千芝、邱皓政(2008)。藉由眼動追蹤儀器探討平均掃視幅度大小與創造力之關係。教育心理學報，9，127-149。
   連結：
5. 黃博聖、陳學志、劉政宏(2012)。「中文詞彙遠距聯想測驗」之編製及其信效度報告。測驗學刊，59(4)，581-607。
   連結：
6. Akbari Chermahini, S.,Hickendorff, M.,Hommel, B.(2012).Development and validity of a Dutch version of the Remote Associates Task: An item-response theory approach.Thinking Skills and Creativity,7,177-186.
7. Alexander, J. K.,Hillier, A.,Smith, R. M.,Tivarus, M. E.,Beversdorf, D. Q.(2007).Beta-adrenergic modulation of cognitive flexibility during stress.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,19(3),468-478.
8. Ansburg, P. I.(2000).Individual differences in problem solving via insight.Current Psychology,19(2),143-146.
9. Ashcraft, M. H.(2002).Cognition.NJ:Prentice-Hall.
10. Baba, Y.(1982).An analysis of creativity by means of the remote associates test for adults revised in Japanese (Jarat Form-A).Japanese Journal of Psychology,52,330-336.
11. Belcher, T. L.,Davis, G. A.(1971).Interrelationships among three standardized creativity tests and IQ.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association,New York, NY:
12. Ben-Zur, H.(1989).Automatic and directed search processes in solving simple semanticmemory problems.Memory and Cognition,17,617-626.
13. Bowden, E. M.,Jung-Beeman, M.(2003).Aha! Insight experience correlates with solution activation in the right hemisphere.Psychonomic Bulletin&Review,10,730-737.
14. Bowden, E. M.,Jung-Beeman, M.(2003).Normative data for 144 compound remote associate problems.Behavioral Research, Methods, Instruments, and Computers,35,634-639.
15. Chang, H.-W.(Ed.),Huang, J.-T.(Ed.),Hue, C.-W.(Ed.),Tzeng, O. J. L.(Ed.)(1994).Advances in the study of Chinese language processing.Taipei, Taiwan:Department of Psychology, National Taiwan University.
16. Chusmir, L. H.,Koberg, C. S.(1986).Creativity differences among managers.Journal of Vocational Behavior,29,240-253.
17. Cunningham, J. B.,MacGregor, J. N.,Gibb, J.,Haar, J.(2009).Categories of insight and their correlates: An exploration of relationships among classic-type insight problems, rebus puzzles, remote associates and esoteric analogies.The Journal of Creative Behavior,43(4),262-280.
18. Datta, L. E.(1964).Remote associates test as a predictor of creativity in engineers.Journal of Applied Psychology,48,183.
19. Guilford, J. P.(1956).The structure of intellect.Psychological Bulletin,53,267-293.
20. Hamilton, M. A.(1982).Jamaicanizing the Mednick Remote Associates Test of creativity.Perceptual & Motor Skills,55,321-322.
21. Harris, J. A.(2004).Measured intelligence, achievement, openness to experience, and creativity.Personality and Individual Differences,36,913-929.
22. Hood, R. W., Jr.,Ginsburg, G. P.(1969).Cultural availability: An associative characteristic of remote associates test items.Psychological Reports,25,441-446.
23. Hood, R. W., Jr.,Ginsburg, G. P.(1970).Connotative similarity of remote associates test items as a function of their cultural availability.Psychological Reports,27,127-130.
24. Hsu, K.,Lin, W.,Chen, H.(2011).Personality correlates of different creative processes: Perceptual sensitivity and effortful control as major constructs.12th annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology,San Antonio, TX:
25. Knoblich, G.,Ohlsson, S.,Haider, H.,Rhenius, D.(1999).Constraint relaxation and chunk decomposition in insight.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition,25,1534-1555.
26. Mednick, M. T.(1963).Research creativity in psychology graduate students.Journal of Consulting Psychology,27(3),265-266.
27. Mednick, S. A.(1968).The Remote Associates Test.The Journal of Creative Behavior,2,213-214.
28. Mednick, S. A.(1962).The associative basis of the creative process.Psychological Review,44(2),220-232.
29. Mednick, S. A.,Mednick, M. T.(1967).Examiner's manual, Remote Associates Test: College and adult forms 1 and 2.Boston, MA:Houghton Mifflin.
30. Metcalfe, J.(1986).Feeling of knowing in memory and problem solving.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,12,288-294.
31. Nevo, B.,Levin, I.(1978).Remote Associates Test: Assessment of creativity in Hebrew.Megamot,24,87-98.
32. Ohlsson, S.(1984).Restructuring revisited: II. An information processing theory of restructuring and insight.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,25,117-129.
33. Perkins, D.(2000).The art and logic of breakthrough thinking.NewYork, NY:W. W. Norton.
34. Richardson, A. G.(1985).Sex differences in creativity among a sample of Jamaican adolescents.Perceptual and Motor Skills,60,424-426.
35. Smith, S. M.(Ed.),Ward, B. T.(Ed.),Finke, R. A.(Ed.)(1995).The creative cognition approach.Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press.
36. Sternberg, R. J.(Ed.)(1999).Handbook of creativity.Cambridge, MA:Cambridge University Press.
37. Storm, B. C.,Angello, G.,Bjork, E. L.(2011).Thinking can cause forgetting: memory dynamics in creative problem solving.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,37,1287.
38. Taylor, I. A.(Ed.),Getzels, J.W.(Ed.)(1975).Perspectives in creativity.Chicago, IL:Aldine.
39. Wakefield, J. F.(1992).Creative thinking: Problem-solving skills and the art orientation.Norwood, NJ:
40. Ward, J.,Thompson-Lake, D.,Ely, R.,Kaminski, F.(2008).Synaesthesia, creativity and art: What is the link?.British Journal of Psychology,99,127-141.
41. Yeh, S. L.,Li, J. L.(2002).Role of structure and component in judgments of visual similarity of Chinese characters.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,28,933-947.
42. 任純慧、陳學志、練竑初(2001)。行政院國家科學委員會大專生研究計畫行政院國家科學委員會大專生研究計畫,行政院國家科學委員會。
43. 吳靜吉(1998)。教育部輔導工作六年計畫研究報告教育部輔導工作六年計畫研究報告,教育部。
44. 林幸台、王木榮(1994)。威廉斯創造力測驗：指導手冊。臺北市:心理。
45. 陳怡潔、陳學志、劉浩敏(2002)。行政院國家科學委員會大專生研究計畫行政院國家科學委員會大專生研究計畫,行政院國家科學委員會。
46. 陳學志(2007)。行政院國家科學委員會研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學委員會研究計畫成果報告,行政院國家科學委員會。
47. 陳學志(1999)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,行政院國家科學委員會。
48. 陳學志、張瓅勻、邱郁秀、宋曜廷、張國恩(2011)。中文部件組字與形構資料庫之建立及其在識字教學的應用。教育心理學報，43，66-86。
49. 陳學志、彭淑玲、吳清麟(2011)。純頓悟與假頓悟中文遠距聯想測驗之創造力解題歷程。創造學刊，2，25-51。
50. 陳學志、曾千芝、邱思潔、顏喬翊(2013)。正簡字體在筆劃與部件的差異分析。國際中國語言學學會第21 屆年會，臺北市:
51. 黃博聖、陳學志(2003)。行政院國家科學委員會大專生研究計畫行政院國家科學委員會大專生研究計畫,未出版

1. 黃博聖,陳學志,陳姵臻,張雨霖,林緯倫,吳清麟(2021)。中文版遠距聯想測驗在創造力研究之應用：回顧與展望。教育實踐與研究，34(1)，1-44。