中文版「情境－特質焦慮量表」之多元因素效度探討

An Investigation of Multidimensional Factorial Validity of the Chinese Version of State-Trait Anxiety Inventory

王國川(Kuo-Chang Wang)；鍾鳳嬌(Feng-Chiao Chung)

「情境─特質焦慮量表」 ； 多元因素效度 ； 等級反應模型 ； graded response model ； multidimensional factorial validity ； the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory

測驗學刊

63卷4期（2016 / 12 / 01）

287 - 313

繁體中文

本研究之目的在於探討中文版「情境─特質焦慮量表」之多元因素效度，以作為衡鑑情境與特質焦慮的測量理論基礎。本研究以792 位高屏兩縣市的高中職二年級學生為研究對象，結果顯示在一階層級的因素結構下，不論從傳統或現代測驗理論，兩個量表都屬於一個多向度的因素結構，分別由情境、特質焦慮─正、反面措詞等二個因素所組成，這二個因素彼此間具良好的區辨效度，且各題項間具有很好的聚合效度；而在二階層級的因素結構下，兩個量表又都屬於一個單向度的高階因素結構，分別代表情境、特質焦慮因素。另外，在一階層級的因素結構下，「情境焦慮量表」或「特質焦慮量表」二個因素隸屬的各題項，都有三組題項因措詞相似，而造成題項測量誤差彼此有關聯；「特質焦慮量表」有一個題項因措詞模稜兩可，而有一個題項因測量不同概念導致橫跨兩個因素。等級反應模型顯示，兩個量表各題項均具有很好鑑別力。因此，除「特質焦慮量表」的二個題項外，兩個量表都具有很好的多元因素效度，由這些題項加總形成的分數，可以有效的反映這兩種焦慮抽象概念，並且背後有良好的心理計量實證支持。

The purpose of this study was to examine the multidimensional factorial validity for the Chinese version of State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (C-STAI). Seven hundred and ninety two high school students from Kaohsiung and Pingtung Counties of southern Taiwan were invited to fill out the consent and this inventory. The findings show that each of those two scales belongs to a multidimensional factor structure which consists of two factors, state or trait anxiety - positive and negative wording in terms of the first-order level of factor structure, and there are good discriminant and convergent validity for each of those two scales. Each of those two scales is a one-dimensional second-order factor structure which represents the state or trait anxiety in terms of the second-order level of factor structure. Furthermore, there are moderate or high correlations between three pairs of the measurement errors since the wordings of those items may be very similar for those two scales. In addition, two items had cross factor loadings since one may be ambiguous wording and the other may measure different constructs for the Trait Anxiety Scale. Ignoring the controversial items above, the graded response model indicates that the remaining items have a good discrimination for each of those two scales. Therefore, the C-STAI had good multidimensional factorial validity except two items of A-Trait.

1. Anderson, J. C.,Gerbing, D. W.(1988).Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach.Psychological Bulletin,103,411-423.
2. Balsamo, M.,Romanelli, R.,Innamorati, M.,Clccarese, G.,Carlucci, L.,Saggino, A.(2013).The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory: Shadows and lights on its construct validity.Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment,35,475-486.
3. Barlow, D. H.(2002).Anxiety and its disorders: The nature and treatment of anxiety and panic.New York, NY:Guilford Press.
4. Bentler, P. M.(2006).EQS 6 Structural Equations Program Manual.Encino, CA:Multivariate Software.
5. Bollen, K. A.(1989).Structural equations with latent variables.NewYork, NY:JohnWiley & Sons.
6. Bollen, K. A.(Ed.),Long, J. S.(Ed.)(1993).Testing structural equation models.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
7. Bond, T. G.,Fox, C. M.(2007).Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences.New York, NY:Routledge Academic.
8. Cohen, J.(1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. Comrey, A. L.,Lee, H. B.(1992).A first course in factor analysis.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Court, H.,Greenland, K.,Margrain, T. H.(2010).Measuring patient anxiety in primary care: Rasch analysis of the 6-item Spielberger State Anxiety Scale.Value in Health,13(6),813-819.
11. Davey, C. J.,Harley, C.,Elliott, D. A.(2013).Levels of state and trait anxiety in patients referred to ophthalmology by primary care clinicians: A cross sectional study.PLoS ONE,8(6),1-6.
12. Davey, H. M.,Barratt, A. L.,Butow, P. N.,Deeks, J. J.(2007).A one-item question with a Likert or visual analog scale adequately measured current anxiety.Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,60,356-360.
13. de Ayala, R. J.(2009).The theory and practice of item response theory.New York, NY:Guilford Press.
14. du Toit, M.(2003).IRT from SSI: BILOG-MG, MULTILOG, PARSCALE, TESTFACT.Lincolnwood, IL:Scientific Software International.
15. Fernandez-Blazquez, M. A.,Avila-Villanueva, M.,Lopez-Pina, J. A.,Zea-Sevilla, M. A.,Frades-Payo, B.(2015).Psychometric properties of a new short version of the State-Trait Anxiety (STAI) for the assessment of anxiety in the elderly.Neurologia,30(6),352-358.
16. Hishinuma, E. S.,Miyamoto, R. H.,Nishimura, S. T.,Nahulu, L. B.,Andrade, N. N.,Makini, G. K.,Yuen, N. Y. C.,Johnson, R. C.,Kim, S. P.,Goebert, D. A.,Guerrero, A. P. S.(2000).Psychometric properties of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Asian/ Pacific-islander adolescents.Assessment,7(1),17-36.
17. Hu, L.,Bentler, P. M.(1999).Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.Structural Equation Modeling,6(1),1-55.
18. Joreskog, K. G.(1971).Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests.Psychometrika,36,109-133.
19. Kaipper, M. B.,Chachamovich, E.,Hidalgo, M. P. L.,da Silva Torres, I. L.,Caumo, W.(2010).Evaluation of the structure of Brazilian State-Trait Anxiety Inventory using a Rasch psychometric approach.Journal of Psychosomatic Research,68,223-233.
20. Kendall, P. C.,Finch, A. J.,Auerbach, S.M.,Hooke, J. F.,Mikulka, P. J.(1976).The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory: A systematic evaluation.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,44(3),406-412.
21. Kline, R. B.(2011).Principles and practice of structural equation modeling.New York, NY:Guilford Press.
22. Linacre, J. M.(2012).A user's guide to WINSTEPS.Chicago, IL:Winsteps.com.
23. Nunnally, J. C.,Bernstein, I. H.(1994).Psychometric theory.New York, NY:McGraw-Hill.
24. Raykov, T.(2004).Behavioral scale reliability and measurement invariance evaluation using latent variable modeling.Behavior Therapy,35,299-331.
25. Sarason, I. G.(Ed.),Spielberger, C. D.(Ed.)(1980).Stress and anxiety.Washington, DC:Hemisphere.
26. Satorra, A.,Bentler, P. M.(1988).Scaling corrections for statistics in covariance structure analysis.Los Angeles, CA:Department of Psychology, University of California at Los Angeles.
27. Shek, D. T. L.(1991).The factorial structure of the Chinese version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory: A confirmatory factor analysis.Educational and Psychological Measurement,51,985-997.
28. Spielberger, C. D.(Ed.)(1966).Anxiety and behavior.New York, NY:Academic Press.
29. Spielberger, C. D.,Gorsuch, R. L.,Lushene, R. E.(1970).Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory.Palo Alto, CA:Consulting Psychologists Press.
30. Suzuki, T.,Tsukamoto, K.,Abe, K.(2000).Characteristic factor structures of the Japanese version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory: Coexistence of positive-negative and state-trait factor structures.Journal of Personality Assessment,74(3),447-458.
31. Tenenbaum, G.,Furst, D.,Weingarten, G.(1985).A statistical reevaluation of the STAI anxiety questionnaire.Journal of Clinical Psychology,41,239-244.
32. Vigneau, F.,Cormier, S.(2008).The factor structure of the state-trait anxiety inventory: An alternative view.Journal of Personality Assessment,90(3),280-285.
33. Virella, B.,Arbona, C.,Novy, D. M.(1994).Psychometric properties and factor structure of the Spanish version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory.Journal of Personality Assessment,63(3),401-412.
34. Viswanathan, M.(2005).Measurement error and research design.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
35. 鍾思嘉(1982)。修訂情境─特質焦慮量表簡介。測驗與輔導，10(6)，789-790。
36. 鍾思嘉、龍長風(1984)。修訂情境─特質焦慮量表之研究。測驗年刊，31，27-36。

1. 蔡玉梅,陳寶珍,陳冠蓁,莊峰玲(2020)。以賦權式術前衛教提昇膝關節置換術病人之自我照顧效能。榮總護理，37(1)，14-24。
2. 鄧閔鴻,陳慈幸,陳庭香,陳欣語(2023)。以情緒注意力網絡作業探討憂鬱情緒狀態操弄對高兒童性偏好者注意力網絡系統之影響。中華心理衛生學刊，36(2)，185-222。
3. 郭信智,許麗玉,施美玲(2020)。初診斷乳癌病人術前焦慮之多媒體衛教效果初探。醫務管理期刊，21(1)，13-26。
4. 劉淑言,陳美碧,林信偵,李榮芬,吳佳芸(2022)。正念減壓課程對護理臨床教師焦慮與復原力之成效探討。源遠護理，16(2)，75-84。
5. 涂儷燕,施妙芳,李秀蘭(2022)。住院安胎婦女焦慮及其預測因子。長庚護理，33(1)，1-14。
6. (2024)。從自主神經彈性觀點探討類廣泛性焦慮疾患和高特質焦慮的自主神經反應、注意控制、與情緒調節。中華心理衛生學刊，37(3)，179-227。
7. (2024)。足浴改善女大學生情緒焦慮與生理參數之作用：隨機對照試驗。運動與遊憩研究，19(3)，39-56。